Measurement of clinical wear of two packable composites after 6 months in service

Physical Properties and Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin-based Composite in Posterior Dentition: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the physical properties and clinical performance of short fiber reinforced composites (SFRC) to those of particulate-filled resin-based composites (PFRC) for class I and II direct restorations in permanent dentition.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCO) databases. The outcomes evaluated were physical properties including flexural strength, flexural modulus, elastic modulus, microhardness, shrinkage, fracture toughness, degree of conversion, and depth of cure. Clinical performance was evaluated with a systematic review.

RESULTS

The meta-analyses favored SFRC for flexural strength and fracture toughness compared to every PFRC subgroup, with a high quality of evidence. For all other properties, the meta-analyses favored SFRC to overall PFRC, with some non-significant differences with certain PFRC subgroups. The most recent clinical trial showed SFRC performed similarly to PFRC, however older studies suggest inferior surface texture and discoloration of SFRC compared to PFRC.

CONCLUSION

This study can aid dental professionals in clinical decision making, supporting that SFRC offers improved physical properties, especially fracture resistance and flexural strength, compared to PFRC.

Clinical wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns. One-year results from a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical wear behavior of posterior, metal-free polymer crowns, with and without a glass-fiber framework, and to compare it with that of metal-ceramic crowns.

METHODS

Eighty single crowns manufactured from a newly designed polymer composite were set in posterior teeth. Half of these received a glass-fiber framework (group 1) whereas half were prepared without framework stabilization (group 2). All polymer crowns were adhesively luted with resin cement. As the control group, 40 conventional metal-ceramic crowns were inserted with hybrid cement. Wear was measured, by use of gypsum replicas, at baseline and after 12 months, by use of a 3D laser scanner. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed-effects regression model analyses.

RESULTS

The mean total wear of posterior single crowns was -8.1 microm (+/-9.7 microm) in group 1, -7.0 microm (+/-9.1 microm) in group 2, and -3.4 microm (+/-6.3 microm) in the control group. Statistical analysis revealed wear behavior was significantly different from the control group for group 1 (p=0.014) and group 2 (p<0.01). No significant difference was detected between groups 1 and 2. Age, gender, and opposing teeth had no significant effect on wear behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a 12-month observation period mean total wear of posterior polymer crowns with and without a glass-fiber framework was significantly greater than for metal-ceramic crowns. The selection of restorative materials should be based on knowledge of clinical wear in order to preserve occlusal stability.

Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up

The clinical performance of two packable posterior composites, Alert (A)-Jeneric/Pentron and SureFil (S)-Dentsply, was evaluated in 33 patients. Each patient received one A and one S restoration, resulting in a total of 66 restorations. The restorations were placed by one operator according to the manufacturer's specifications and were finished and polished after 1 week. Photographs were taken at baseline and after 2 years. Two independent evaluators conducted the clinical evaluation by using modified United States Public Health Service criteria. After 2 years, 60 restorations (30 A and 30 S), 27 class I (16 A and 11 S) and 33 class II (14 A and 19 S) were evaluated in 30 patients. Criterion A for recurrent caries, vitality, and retention was applicable to all 60 restorations. Criterion B was distributed among 40 restorations as follows: surface texture (15 A; 2 S), color (5 A; 6 S), postoperative sensitivity (1 S), marginal discoloration (8 A), marginal adaptation (3 A), and wear resistance (2 A). Data were analyzed using the Exact Fisher and McNemar tests. After 2 years, S showed a significantly better performance than A with respect to surface texture and marginal discoloration. The clinical performance of both materials was considered acceptable over the 2-year period. Further evaluations are necessary for a more in-depth analysis.