The compatibility of psychosocial interventions (PSI) and assertive outreach: a survey of managers and PSI-trained staff working in UK assertive outreach teams

"Stuck between a Rock and a Hard Place": How Mental Health Nurses' Experience Psychosocial interventions in Irish Mental Health Care Settings

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Psychosocial interventions (PSI) are recognized and recommended internationally as they primarily focus on improving a client's mental health and preventing relapse. Limited qualitative studies focus on the similarities and differences on offering PSI in practice across many countries. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This manuscript provides readers with qualitative findings of mental health nurses' (MHNs) experiences of using PSI in practice and the need for regular clinical supervision to increase MHNs confidence and enhance the offering of PSI. MHNs want PSI guidelines for the offering of these skills to their client groups across practice settings. MHNs require work release from practice to attend supplementary training on PSI so that they can do their job adequately. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: This study sheds light on the similarities and differences on PSI in Irish mental health services. It also highlights what MHNs recognize as important for PSI to be implemented. Clinical supervision and the development of PSI guidelines are necessary so that MHNs feel confident delivering these skills. They also need ongoing work release from practice to attend supplementary PSI training to provide best evidence to enhancing client experiences and positive PSI recovery outcomes. ABSTRACT: Description The paper will report on the interview data of trained MHNs' experiences of using PSI within the Irish context. This observational data will be reported elsewhere (Smyth et al. 2020-under review). Introduction This research is conducted when the current reform of Irish mental health governance demands clarification of key psychosocial skills (PSI) required for mental health nurses (MHNs) to embrace recovery-orientated ways of working. There is limited evidence about this important topic in Ireland and across countries. Aim To explore PSI-trained MHNs' experiences of using PSI within Ireland. Method A multiple case study methodology was used and situated within an interpretive paradigm. Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews with 40 PSI-trained MHNs. Findings Three overarching themes developed from the analysis. These included (a) PSI-trained MHNs' understanding and use of PSI; (b) facilitating factors supporting the use of PSI by PSI-trained MHNs; and (c) obstacles limiting the use of PSI by PSI-trained MHNs. Discussion MHNs recognize that regular clinical supervision is required to increase their confidence, along with PSI guidelines for the offering of these skills across practice settings. MHNs also need work release to attend supplementary training on PSI so that they can do their job adequately. Implications for practice This study suggests that MHNs are often stuck between a rock and a hard place when delivering PSI in practice. MHNs need to be aware that this can affect client outcomes. Relevance statement This research identified a gap in knowledge within the Irish context but also across the world on this important topic. MHNs need access to regular clinical supervision, PSI guidelines and ongoing PSI training to feel confident in order to keep abreast of the changes happening in mental health practice and research.

A qualitative study of mental health nurse identities: many roles, one profession

The aim of the study was to clarify and build upon current understandings of mental health nurse (MHN) identity. The study adopted a framework of social constructionism and qualitative methodology. Semistructured interviews were conducted, which were thematically analyzed using Nvivo software. Twenty-five MHN were recruited across three geographical sites in the UK. Participants constructed a cluster of seven MHN identity characteristics that constituted a unique contribution to talk-based therapies. These themes of characteristics are: (i) the MHN as generic specialist; (ii) the MHN as adopting a service-user focus; (iii) the MHN as positioning and utilizing the personal self; (iv) the MHN as spending time with the service user; (v) the MHN as delivering talk-based therapies in versatile ways; (vi) the MHN as having an everyday attitude; and (vii) the MHN as having transferable skills. The distinctiveness, and thus, professional identity of mental health nursing, must be understood as a cluster of capabilities rather than a search for a singular point of difference. The breadth of capabilities employed by MHN highlights the value and worth of their contribution to service-user care.

Cognitive behaviour therapy within assertive outreach teams: barriers to implementation: a qualitative peer audit

Assertive outreach is an evidence-based intervention, with over 30 well-designed randomized studies demonstrating its effectiveness, predominately in the USA. Assertive outreach teams have recently been implemented in the UK, and it has been recommended that teams should offer cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) to service users; however, it has been reported that barriers exist in the routine delivery of CBT for psychosis (CBTp). The aim of the peer audit was to gauge current opinion from clinicians whether their experiences of barriers to implementation of CBTp reflected that outlined in the literature. A qualitative peer audit was undertaken at the National Forum for Assertive Outreach Annual Conference in 2006. The team representatives were invited to outline the barriers to the implementation of psychosocial interventions within their local areas. Teams identified organizational, managerial, supervision and local specific barriers to implementation. Specific comments included a lack of organizational investment, the structured nature of CBT, caseload issues, medication issues, application to people with sensory impairments, staff apathy and staff burnout. The analysis was limited by the metholodology employed; however, further recommendations are explored. It was evident from this peer audit that teams are experiencing barriers relating to the implementation of evidence-based therapy interventions and further research is required on the outreach model and the use of CBTp.