Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine following the application of 5% lidocaine patches to cats

Local Anesthetics: Pharmacology and Special Preparations

Local anesthetics are the only class of drugs that can block transduction and transmission of nociception. Physical properties, mechanism of action, and pharmacokinetics of this class of drugs are reviewed in this article. The clinical use, such intravenous administration of lidocaine, and local and systemic toxic effects are covered. A review of current studies published in the human and veterinary literature on lidocaine patches (Lidoderm) and liposomal bupivacaine (Experal and Nocita) are discussed.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous, subcutaneous, and topical administration of lidocaine hydrochloride and metabolites 3-hydroxylidocaine, monoethylglycinexylidide, and 4-hydroxylidocaine in horse

Intravenous (iv), subcutaneous (sq), and topical (tp) lidocaine was administered to six horses in a cross-over, randomized design study. Samples were collected for up to 72 hr. Compartmental models were used to investigate the pharmacokinetics of (LD) and its metabolites 3-hydroxylidocaine (3-OH), 4-hydroxylidocaine (4-OH), and monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX). Metabolites 3-OH and 4-OH were present in conjugated forms, whereas LD and metabolite MEXG were present primarily in the un-conjugated form. Plasma concentrations of LD after iv administration (100 mg) were described by three-compartment model with an additional three compartments to describe the elimination of metabolites. Median (range) elimination micro-constants (K_e ) for LD, 3-OH, 4-OH, and MEXG were 4.12 (2.62-6.23), 1.25 (1.10-2.15), 1.79 (1.22-2.39), and 1.69 (1.03-1.99)/hr, respectively. Median (range) values of alpha (t_½α ), beta (t_½β ), and gamma (t_½γ ) half-lives were 0.08 (0.07-0.13), 0.57 (0.15-1.25), and 4.11 (0.52-7.36) hr. Plasma concentrations of LD after sq (200 mg) administration were described by absorption and two-compartment elimination model. The median (range) of the LD absorption half-life (t_½ab ) was 0.47 (0.29-0.61) hr. The K_e for LD, 3-OH, 4-OH, and MEXG was 3.91 (1.48-9.25), 1.00 (0.78-1.08), 1.76 (0.96-2.11), and 1.13 (0.69-1.33)/hr. The median (range) of t_½α and t_½β was 0.15 (0.06-0.27) and 3.04 (2.53-6.39) hr. Plasma concentrations of LD after tp (400 mg) application were described by one-compartment model with a t_½ab of 8.49 (5.16-11.80) hr. The K_e for LD, 3-OH, and MEXG was 0.24 (0.10-0.81), 0.41 (0.08-0.93), and 0.38 (0.26-1.14)/hr.

Measurement of lidocaine and 2,6-dimethylaniline in minipig plasma, skin, and dermal tapes using UHPLC with electrospray MS/MS

Sensitive LC-MS/MS methods were developed to measure lidocaine and its metabolite 2,6-dimethylaniline (2,6-DMA) with application to transdermal studies. The methods for lidocaine in minipig plasma, tissue biopsies, and dermal tapes utilized mixed mode/SCX solid phase extraction, with lower quantitation limits of 25 pg/mL in plasma, 15 ng/g tissue, and 5 ng/tape. 2,6-DMA was measured in plasma and skin tissue homogenates by ultrafiltration and (for tissue) by further derivatization with 4-methoxybenzoyl chloride to form the corresponding benzamide derivative, which extended the lower limit of quantitation to 200 pg/mL. The methods allowed local measurement of lidocaine in stratum corneum, punch biopsies, and plasma and of 2,6-DMA in plasma and biopsies obtained from minipigs dosed with experimental transdermal formulations. Quantitation limits were approximately 7-fold lower than previously reported for lidocaine and 3-fold lower for 2,6-DMA.

Transdermal Bioavailability in Rats of Lidocaine in the Forms of Ionic Liquids, Salts, and Deep Eutectic

Tuning the bioavailability of lidocaine was explored by its incorporation into the ionic liquid lidocainium docusate ([Lid][Doc]) and the deep eutectic Lidocaine·Ibuprofen (Lid·Ibu) and comparing the transdermal absorption of these with the crystalline salt lidocainium chloride ([Lid]Cl). Each form of lidocaine was dissolved in a vehicle cream and topically applied to Sprague-Dawley rats. The concentrations of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in blood plasma were monitored over time as an indication of systemic absorption. The concentration of lidocaine in plasma varied between applied API-based creams, with faster and higher systemic absorption of the hydrogen bonded deep eutectic Lid·Ibu than the absorption of the salts [Lid]Cl or [Lid][Doc]. Interestingly, a differential transdermal absorption was observed between lidocaine and ibuprofen when Lid·Ibu was applied, possibly indicating different interactions with the tissue components.

Pretreatmet with 5% lidocaine patch reduces cannula-induced and propofol-induced pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of 5% lidocaine patch in reducing propofol-induced pain and cannula-induced pain.

Methods

In a randomized, double-blind study, 126 patients were divided into one of three groups: pretreatment with a 5% lidocaine patch (Lidotop®) and premixed 2 ml of normal saline with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group A); pretreatment with a placebo patch and premixed 2 ml of normal saline with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group B); or pretreatment with a placebo patch and premixed 2 ml of 2% lidocaine (40 mg) with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group C) for induction of anesthesia. Pain severity was evaluated on a four-point verbal rating scale during intravenous cannulation, propofol injection, and 24 h after the operation (recall).

Results

Eighteen patients (47.4%) in Group A complained of cannula-induced pain compared with 35 (94.6%) in Group B and 36 (94.7%) in Group C (P < 0.001). Group A patients showed significantly lower incidence of propofol-induced pain and recall of propofol-induced pain compared with Group B (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01), whereas there was no difference compared with Group C.

Conclusions

Preoperative transdermal administration of 5% lidocaine patch is an effective and simple method in reducing propofol-induced pain as well as cannula-induced pain.

The effects of chemical and physical penetration enhancers on the percutaneous permeation of lidocaine through equine skin

Background

The effect of physical and chemical permeation enhancers on in vitro transdermal permeation of lidocaine was investigated in the horse.

Therefore, the effect of six vehicles (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 50% ethanol, 50% propylene glycol, 50% isopropylalcohol, 50% isopropylalcohol/isopropylmyristate and 50% dimethylsulfoxide) was examined as well as the effect of microneedle pretreatment with different needle lengths on transdermal drug delivery of lidocaine.

The skin was obtained from the thorax of six Warmblood horses and was stored up to two weeks at - 20°C. Franz-type diffusion cells were used to study the transdermal permeation through split skin (600 μm thickness). The amount of lidocaine in the receptor fluid was determined by UV–VIS high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results

All investigated vehicle supplementations diminished the transdermal flux of lidocaine through equine skin in comparison to pure PBS except dimethylsulfoxide, which resulted in comparable permeation rates to PBS. The maximum flux (J_max) was 1.6-1.8 fold lower for lidocaine applied in 50% ethanol, propylene glycol, isopropylalcohol and isopropylalcohol/isopropylmyristate. A significant higher J_max of lidocaine was observed when lidocaine was applied in PBS onto microneedle pretreated skin with similar permeation rates in both needle lengths. After 6 hours, 1.7 fold higher recovery rates were observed in the microneedle pretreated skin samples than in the untreated control samples. The lagtimes were reduced to 20–50% in the microneedle pretreated skin samples.

Conclusion

Microneedles represent a promising tool for transdermal lidocaine application in the horse with a rapid systemic bioavailability.

Lidocaine patch (5%) is no more potent than placebo in treating chronic back pain when tested in a randomised double blind placebo controlled brain imaging study

Background

The 5% Lidocaine patch is used for treating chronic neuropathic pain conditions such as chronic back pain (CBP), diabetic neuropathy and complex regional pain syndrome, but is effective in a variable proportion of patients. Our lab has reported that this treatment reduces CBP intensity and associated brain activations when tested in an open labelled preliminary study. Notably, effectiveness of the 5% Lidocaine patch has not been tested against placebo for treating CBP. In this study, effectiveness of the 5% Lidocaine patch was compared with placebo in 30 CBP patients in a randomised double-blind study where 15 patients received 5% Lidocaine patches and the remaining patients received placebo patches. Functional MRI was used to identify brain activity for fluctuations of spontaneous pain, at baseline and at two time points after start of treatment (6 hours and 2 weeks).

Results

There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in either pain intensity, sensory and affective qualities of pain or in pain related brain activation at any time point. However, 50% patients in both the Lidocaine and placebo arms reported a greater than 50% decrease in pain suggesting a marked placebo effect. When tested against an untreated CBP group at similar time points, the patch treated subjects showed significantly greater decrease in pain compared to the untreated group (n = 15).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that although the 5% Lidocaine is not better than placebo in its effectiveness for treating pain, the patch itself induces a potent placebo effect in a significant proportion of CBP patients.

Intravesical application of lidocaine and sodium bicarbonate in the treatment of obstructive idiopathic lower urinary tract disease in cats

BACKGROUND

In human patients with interstitial cystitis, intravesical instillation of alkalinized lidocaine sometimes is associated with sustained amelioration of symptoms beyond the acute treatment phase. Interstitial cystitis shares many features in common with feline idiopathic cystitis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether intravesical instillation of alkalinized lidocaine decreases recurrence of urethral obstruction and severity of clinical signs in cats with obstructive idiopathic LUTD.

ANIMALS

Twenty-six cats with obstructive idiopathic LUTD. Twelve cats in case group (treatment with alkalinized lidocaine) and 14 control cats (treatment with placebo or standard treatment).

METHODS

Cats were randomly assigned to treatment (2 or 4 mg/kg lidocaine and sodium bicarbonate) or placebo groups (0.2 mL/kg saline solution and sodium bicarbonate). The intravesical instillation was done once a day for 3 days. Some cats underwent standard treatment only (indwelling urinary catheter for 3 days without intravesical instillations). A 2-week, 1-month, and 2-month follow-up after treatment was made using a questionnaire. The recurrence rate and amelioration scores of clinical signs were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

Recurrence of urethral obstruction was 58% (7/12) in the case group and 57% (8/14) in the control group. Amelioration scores were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Intravesical administration of lidocaine for up to 3 consecutive days had no apparent beneficial effect on decreasing recurrence rate and severity of clinical signs in cats with obstructive idiopathic LUTD.

Long-term pain in cats: how much do we know about this important welfare issue?

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE

Long-term pain in cats is an important welfare issue but is often overlooked and undertreated.

AUDIENCE

All practitioners are faced with cats that require analgesic intervention to improve their quality of life.

PATIENT GROUP

Any cat may potentially experience long-term pain and discomfort. Degenerative joint disease and diabetic-related pain is more common in middle-aged or older individuals, whereas persistent postsurgical pain can occur at any age and is seen in young cats following onychectomy.

EVIDENCE BASE

Robust evidence on long-term pain issues in cats - specifically, relating to prevalence, etiology, and treatment protocols and outcomes - is missing from the veterinary literature. The aim of this review is to summarise the current state of knowledge. In doing so, it takes a practical approach, highlighting the obvious, and some not so obvious, causes of long-term pain in cats; some aspects that warrant closer attention; our ability to recognize pain and monitor how this impacts on quality of life; and today's treatment options.

Drug delivery systems in domestic animal species

Delivery of biologically active agents to animals is often perceived to be the poor relation of human drug delivery. Yet this field has a long and successful history of species-specific device and formulation development, ranging from simple approaches and devices used in production animals to more sophisticated formulations and approaches for a wide range of species. While several technologies using biodegradable polymers have been successfully marketed in a range of veterinary and human products, the transfer of delivery technologies has not been similarly applied across species. This may be due to a combination of specific technical requirements for use of devices in different species, inter-species pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and physiological differences, and distinct market drivers for drug classes used in companion and food-producing animals. This chapter reviews selected commercialised and research-based parenteral and non-parenteral veterinary drug delivery technologies in selected domestic species. Emphasis is also placed on the impact of endogenous drug transporters on drug distribution characteristics in different species. In vitro models used to investigate carrier-dependent transport are reviewed. Species-specific expression of transporters in several tissues can account for inter-animal or inter-species pharmacokinetic variability, lack of predictability of drug efficacy, and potential drug-drug interactions.