Clinical and virological characteristics of chronic hepatitis B with concurrent hepatitis B E antigen and antibody detection

Controversies in Treating Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Discordant Serologic Results

Despite effective vaccines and approved therapeutic agents, hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a prevalent global health problem. Current guidelines rely on a combination of serologic, virological, and biochemical markers to identify the phase in the natural history of chronic HBV infection. Discordant serologic results can occur, which may lead to misclassification. Commonly encountered results that differ from the typical profiles seen in chronic HBV infection are described. For each scenario, the frequency of occurrence, possible explanations, and recommendations for clinical management are discussed. Recognition of discordant serologic findings is crucial for optimal clinical decision.

Prevalence of Dual-Positivity for Both Hepatitis B e Antigen and Hepatitis B e Antibody Among Hospitalized Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Objective

The detection of dual-positivity for both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B e antibody (anti-HBe) is not typically performed for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV). This cross-sectional study was designed to figure out the prevalence of dual-positivity for both HBeAg and anti-HBe (DEP) among hospitalized patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection (C-HBVI).

Patients and Methods

Data from 2820 cases with C-HBVI from two centers in China were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to identify the risk factors for liver fibrosis (LF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

Results

There were 165 (5.9%), 688, and 1903 patients in DEP, HBeAg+/anti-HBe-, and HBeAg-/anti-HBe+ groups, respectively. The DEP patients’ median age was 43.6 years old and 71.5% of them were male. They had higher levels of alanine transaminase, total bilirubin, and international normalized ratio. Furthermore, DEP cases had a higher proportion of liver cirrhosis, and it was associated with non-invasive testing of LF, including aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) >1.5 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–3.03, P = 0.002) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score >1.45 (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.28–3.34, P = 0.003). DEP also contributed to the elevated risk of ACLF (OR = 4.80, 95% CI: 2.02–11.39, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

DEP cases are at higher risks of LF and ACLF than other patients with HBV infection. A fast diagnosis and an active monitoring of liver diseases for DEP patients are extremely vital.

HCV and Oxidative Stress: Implications for HCV Life Cycle and HCV-Associated Pathogenesis

HCV (hepatitis C virus) is a member of the Flaviviridae family that contains a single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome of approximately 9600 bases. HCV is a major causative agent for chronic liver diseases such as steatosis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma which are caused by multifactorial processes. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are considered as a major factor contributing to HCV-associated pathogenesis. This review summarizes the mechanisms involved in formation of ROS in HCV replicating cells and describes the interference of HCV with ROS detoxifying systems. The relevance of ROS for HCV-associated pathogenesis is reviewed with a focus on the interference of elevated ROS levels with processes controlling liver regeneration. The overview about the impact of ROS for the viral life cycle is focused on the relevance of autophagy for the HCV life cycle and the crosstalk between HCV, elevated ROS levels, and the induction of autophagy.

Performance of Liaison XL automated immunoassay platform for blood-borne infection screening on hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV 1/2, HTLV 1/2 and Treponema pallidum serological markers

OBJECTIVES

Aim of the study was to evaluate performance of a new fully automated platform, DiaSorin-LIAISON® XL (DiaSorin S.p.A, Vercelli, Italy), in blood donor screening, specifically for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBc), hepatitis C antibodies (anti-HCV), HIV p24 antigen, HIV antibodies, human T-lymphotropic virus types 1 and 2 (HTLV-1/2) and Treponema pallidum antibodies.

BACKGROUND

In screening for such viral and bacteriological blood-borne infections, sensitivity and specificity are of utmost importance.

METHODS

Sensitivity was evaluated using selected panels of samples previously analysed on the Abbott Architect immunoanalyser (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA)--the gold standard for this evaluation. These samples were confirmed positive for HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HCV, HIV Ag/Ab, anti-HTLV-1/2 and antibodies to T. pallidum, respectively. Specificity analysis was assessed by analysing blood donor samples previously run on the Architect platform and found non-reactive for each marker. A total of 1·100 donor samples (both new and regular donors) were tested. Previously, non-specific reactive samples were also run for every tested marker, as well as samples with autoimmune antibodies and antibodies to other infections.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-eight samples positive for the tested markers (HBsAg n = 51, anti-HBc n = 52, anti-HCV n = 75, anti-Treponema n = 55, anti-HIV-1 n = 79, anti-HIV-2 n = 25, anti-HIV 1/2 n = 3, anti-HTLV-1 n = 28 anti-HTLV-2 n = 10) were tested and found positive, suggesting a high sensitivity. A number of 342-1100 negative blood donors (depending on marker) have been tested, with very good specificity for the markers tested, ranging between 99·5 and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The LIAISON® XL platform demonstrated very high sensitivity for the markers tested and the specificity necessary to fulfil the stringent requirements for blood donor screening.

Long-term monitoring drug resistance by ultra-deep pyrosequencing in a chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patient exposed to several unsuccessful therapy schemes

The aim of this study was to analyze the spectrum and dynamics of low-prevalent HBV mutations in the reverse transcriptase (rt) and S antigen by ultra-deep pyrosequencing (UDPS). Samples were obtained from a chronically infected patient who was followed throughout a thirteen-year period. This technology enabled simultaneous analysis of 4084 clonally amplified fragments from the patient allowing detecting low prevalent (<1%) mutations during the follow-up. At baseline, HBV sequences were predominately wild-type. Under sequential HBV monotherapies including lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir, a high frequency of rtM204I mutation was detected initially as unique and then coexisting with rtM204V. Both mutations were statistically associated with rtA200V and rtV207I, respectively. Once the entecavir and tenofovir combined therapy was started, polymerase and consequently envelope gene mutations appeared at several positions at a higher frequency than before, including the entecavir resistance-associated mutation rtT184L.

Unsuccessful therapy with adefovir and entecavir-tenofovir in a patient with chronic hepatitis B infection with previous resistance to lamivudine: a fourteen-year evolution of hepatitis B virus mutations

Background

Complex mutants can be selected under sequential selective pressure by HBV therapy. To determine hepatitis B virus genomic evolution during antiviral therapy we characterized the HBV quasi-species in a patient who did no respond to therapy following lamivudine breakthrough for a period of 14 years.

Case Presentation

The polymerase and precore/core genes were amplified and sequenced at determined intervals in a period of 14 years. HBV viral load and HBeAg/Anti-HBe serological profiles as well as amino transferase levels were also measured. A mixture of lamivudine-resistant genotype A2 HBV strains harboring the rtM204V mutation coexisted in the patient following viral breakthrough to lamivudine. The L180M+M204V dominant mutant displayed strong lamivudine-resistance. As therapy was changed to adefovir, then to entecavir, and finally to entecavir-tenofovir the viral load showed fluctuations but lamivudine-resistant strains continued to be selected, with minor contributions to the HBV quasi-species composition of additional resistance-associated mutations. At the end of the 14-year follow up period, high viral loads were predominant, with viral strains harboring the lamivudine-resistance signature rtL180M+M204V. The precore/core frame A1762T and G1764A double mutation was detected before treatment and remaining in this condition during the entire follow-up. Specific entecavir and tenofovir primary resistance-associated mutations were not detected at any time. Plasma concentrations of tenofovir indicated adequate metabolism of the drug.

Conclusions

We report the selection of HBV mutants carrying well-defined primary resistance mutations that escaped lamivudine in a fourteen-year follow-up period. With the exception of tenofovir resistance mutations, subsequent unselected primary resistance mutations were detected as minor populations into the HBV quasispecies composition during adefovir or entecavir monotherapies. Although tenofovir is considered an appropriate therapeutic alternative for the treatment of entecavir-unresponsive patients, its use was not effective in the case reported here.