An early decrease in serum HBeAg titre is a strong predictor of virological response to entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients

Association of HBeAg decline rate from mid-pregnancy to delivery with HBeAg seroconversion after delivery in hepatitis B virus-infected mothers

There is still controversy about whether to continue antiviral therapy (AVT) after delivery, especially for pregnant women in the immune tolerance (IT) phase. In this study, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to explore the relationship between hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) decline rate (%) from mid-pregnancy to delivery and HBeAg seroconversion postpartum among patients using nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), with the goal of identifying the ideal candidates for postpartum AVT continuation. This retrospective cohort study included 151 postpartum women. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between the HBeAg decline rate (%) from mid-pregnancy to delivery and HBeAg seroconversion postpartum. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was utilized to evaluate the predictive capacity of the HBeAg decline rate (%) and determine the optimal cut-off point. The univariate analysis revealed a significant association between the HBeAg decline rate (%) and HBeAg seroconversion postpartum (OR 1.068, 95% CI: 1.034-1.103, p < .001). In the multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for age, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) titre (log10 IU/mL) at mid-pregnancy, HBeAg titre (log10 S/CO) at mid-pregnancy, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA load decline rate (%) from mid-pregnancy to delivery, the HBeAg decline rate(%) remained significantly associated with HBeAg seroconversion postpartum (OR 1.050, 95% CI: 1.015-1.093, p = .009). Then HBeAg decline rate (%) was treated as a categorical variable (tertiles) for sensitivity analysis. In the three distinct models, taking Tertile1 as a reference, women in Tertile3 still had a 4.201-fold (OR 4.201, 95% CI: 1.382-12.773, p = .011) higher risk of developing HBeAg seroconversion (p for trend <.05) after adjusting above covariates. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.723 (95% CI: 0.627-0.819). The optimal cut-off value was 5.43%, with a sensitivity of 0.561, specificity of 0.791, and Youden's index of 0.352.A higher HBeAg decline rate (%) from mid-pregnancy to delivery independently correlated with an increased risk of HBeAg seroconversion postpartum. This decline rate can serve as a valuable clinical indicator for predicting HBeAg seroconversion.

Plasma miR-146a predicts serological conversion of hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleotide analogs

Background

To investigate the association of plasma miR-146a with serological conversion of hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated with nucleotide analogs (NAs).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 115 HBeAg-positive patients with CHB treated at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China, between September 2009 and March 2014. Patients were grouped according to whether they had achieved seroconversion of HBeAg by 104 weeks of NAs treatment. We assessed plasma miR-146a using miScript polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Serum alanine transaminase (ALT), hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) load, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) titer, HBeAg titer, and plasma miR-146a were measured at 0, 24, 48, and 104 weeks of treatment. Finally, we also determined ΔmiR-146a_24w and ΔmiR-146a_48w.

Results

ΔmiR-146a_48w was independently associated with seroconversion of HBeAg at 104 weeks [odds ratio (OR) =1.302; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.159-1.962; P=0.029]. We obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of ΔmiR-146_48w of 0.757 for seroconversion of HBeAg (P=0.013). At the optimal cutoff value equivalent to a Youden index of 67.9%, the specificity and sensitivity of ΔmiR-146_48w were 63.7% and 88.3%, respectively. Positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were 70.87% and 84.48%, respectively.

Conclusions

ΔmiR-146a_48w was independently associated with seroconversion of HBeAg in CHB patients treated with NAs.

Viral Biomarkers in Chronic HBeAg Negative HBV Infection

Viral biomarkers are important tools for monitoring chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg) negative infection, both in its natural course as well as during and after treatment. The biomarkers consist of antibodies against viral epitopes, viral proteins, and molecular surrogate markers of the quantity and transcriptional activity of the stable episomal HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) which is located in the nuclei of the infected hepatocytes. HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or else viral load measurement in plasma or serum is a marker of HBV replication of major clinical importance. HBV DNA is used for staging and treatment monitoring as described in international scientific guidelines. Quantification of HBV antigens, mainly hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as well as Hepatitis B core related antigen (HBcrAg), play an important yet secondary role, especially in cases of low or undetectable HBV DNA and has been evaluated for the classification of the inactive carrier state, as a predictor of subsequent HBsAg clearance, treatment outcome, and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The measurement of the replicative intermediate HBV RNA in serum is currently evaluated and may also prove to be a significant biomarker particularly in patients treated with nucleot(s)ide analogs. This review focuses on the viral biomarkers mentioned above and their role in HBV, HBeAg negative, infection.

Baseline serum miR-125b levels predict virologic response to nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of baseline serum microRNA (miRNA)-125b for nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). A total of 66 patients with Be antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB received NAs therapy for 144 weeks. Serum miRNA-125b levels were measured at the baseline, while hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were measured throughout treatment. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of treatment response. The results indicated that baseline serum miR-125b (OR=4.377; P=0.006), HBsAg (OR=0.120; P=0.010), ALT >5× upper limit of normal (ULN; OR=11.726; P=0.018) and undetectable HBV DNA at week 24 (OR=7.828; P=0.021) were independent predictors of complete response (CR) at 144 weeks (CR is defined as HBV DNA <500 IU/ml and HBeAg seroconversion). The baseline serum miRNA-125b combined with baseline HBsAg level yielded an area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.852 in discriminating CR and non-CR at 144 week. The combination of baseline miRNA-125b ≥1.7 and ALT >5× ULN had a positive predictive value 80% for CR at 144 weeks. The combination of baseline miRNA-125b ≥1.7 and HbsAg ≤4.4 (log₁₀ IU/ml) had a negative predictive value of CR at 144 weeks of 100%. Together, these results suggest that baseline miRNA-125b is a reliable predictor of HBeAg seroconversion following NAs treatment. The present study may be used as a basis for the use of baseline miRNA-125b to optimize treatment prior to NAs therapy.

Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B: Current Updates and Perspectives

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) and interferon have been used for several decades to treat chronic hepatitis B; however, the therapeutic response remains unsatisfactory. Although NUC therapy exhibits potent on-treatment viral suppression, frequent off-therapy virological relapses suggest an indefinite treatment course. Interferon modulates the innate and adaptive antiviral immune responses and thus increases the chance of viral eradication. Interferon therapy has the advantage of a finite duration, absence of drug resistance, and durable posttreatment responses. Therefore, the combination of NUCs and interferon can theoretically facilitate a synergistic therapeutic effect. This paper summarizes the current strategies of various combination therapies into three categories: the simultaneous “dual” strategy, sequential combination “add-on” strategy, and “switch” strategy. Generally, dual therapy exhibits greater on-treatment and off-therapy viral suppression and lower drug resistance compared with NUC monotherapy. Compared with interferon monotherapy, dual therapy has greater on-treatment viral suppression but shows no difference in off-therapy sustained virological responses. Specific add-on or switch strategies provide promising on-treatment efficacy in select patients. Pretreatment or on-treatment quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen and e antigen are predictive for the treatment efficacy of combination therapy. The optimal schedule of combination regimens and individualized therapy remain to be comprehensively evaluated.

Serum M2BPGi level is a novel predictive biomarker for the responses to pegylated interferon-α treatment in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients

Serum Mac‐2‐binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) level was found to be a useful prognostic marker for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients treated with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NUCs) therapy, and the aim of our study is to evaluate the clinical implementation of M2BPGi level in the prediction of antiviral responses to pegylated‐interferon‐α (PEG‐IFN‐α) treatment in HBeAg‐positive CHB patients. Ninety‐six CHB patients who received PEG‐IFN‐α treatment for at least 48 weeks were recruited. The serum M2BPGi, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBeAg, and HBV DNA levels at baseline, weeks 4, 12, and 24 after PEG‐IFN‐α treatment were determined and their associations with antiviral responses were evaluated and the virological response (VR) rate and serological response (SR) rate after 48 weeks of treatment were 65.6% and 35.4%, respectively. Baseline serum M2BPGi level was significantly different between VR and non‐VR (P = 0.002) or SR and non‐SR groups (P = 0.012). Multivariate analyses suggested that baseline serum M2BPGi level was independently associated with VR and SR of PEG‐IFN‐α treatment at week 48. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of baseline M2BPGi was 0.682 in predicting VR, which was superior to HBsAg (AUC = 0.566) or HBV DNA (AUC = 0.567). The AUC of baseline M2BPGi in predicting SR was 0.655, which was also higher than that of HBsAg (AUC = 0.548) or HBV DNA (AUC = 0.583). These results suggested that baseline serum M2BPGi level was a novel predictor of VR and SR for PEG‐IFN‐α treatment in HBeAg‐positive CHB patients.

On-treatment quantitative hepatitis B e antigen predicted response to nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B

AIM

To investigate potential predictors for treatment response to nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS

Seventy-six HBeAg-positive CHB patients received 96-wk NAs optimized therapy (lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil) were studied retrospectively. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen, HBeAg, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and alanine aminotransferase levels were quantitatively measured before and during the treatment at 12 and 24 wk. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for treatment response, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of the independent predictors were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-three CHB patients (56.6%) achieved virological response (VR: HBV DNA ≤ 300 copies/mL) and 15 patients (19.7%) developed HBeAg seroconversion (SC) after the 96-wk NAs treatment. The HBeAg level (OR = 0.45, P = 0.003) as well as its declined value (OR = 2.03, P = 0.024) at 24-wk independently predicted VR, with the AUROC of 0.788 and 0.736, respectively. The combination of HBeAg titer < 1.3 lg PEIU/mL and its decreased value > 1.6 lg PEIU/mL at 24-wk predicted VR with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of 85%, 100%, 100% and 83%, respectively, and the AUROC increased to 0.923. The HBeAg level (OR = 0.37, P = 0.013) as well as its declined value (OR = 2.02, P = 0.012) at 24-wk also independently predicted HBeAg SC, with the AUROC of 0.828 and 0.814, respectively. The HBeAg titer < -0.5 lg PEIU/mL combined with its declined value > 2.2 lg PEIU/mL at 24-wk predicted HBeAg SC with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of 88%, 98%, 88% and 98%, respectively, and the AUROC reached 0.928.

CONCLUSION

The combination of HBeAg level and its declined value at 24-wk may be used as a reference parameter to optimize NAs therapy.

Slow reduction of IP-10 Levels predicts HBeAg seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B patients with 5 years of entecavir treatment

The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between dynamic changes in serum cytokine/chemokine expression levels in response to entecavir (ETV) treatment and HBV e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Four cytokines (interleukin [IL]-4, IL-6, IL-8, and interferon-γ) and five chemokines (macro-phage inflammatory protein [MIP]-1α, MIP-1β, platelet derived growth factor-BB, and interferon-inducible protein 10 [IP-10]) before ETV therapy and at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months during therapy in 105 CHB patients were analyzed. The results showed that the low decrease rate of IP-10 levels after 1 year of ETV treatment was an independent predictor of HBeAg seroconversion at year 5 (Hazard ratio = 0.972). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the decrease rate of IP-10 levels after 1 year of treatment to discriminate a year-5 HBeAg seroconversion was 0.752 (p = 0.005). The results indicate that higher IP-10 level at year one of ETV treatment is associated with an increased probability of HBeAg seroconversion. Quantification of IP-10 during ETV treatment may help to predict long-term HBeAg seroconversion in patients with CHB.

The predictive value of early indicators for HBeAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with Telbivudine treatment for 104 weeks

PURPOSE

Through an observation on HBeAg-positive chronic hepatits B (CHB) patients in Telbivudine (LDT) treatment for 104 weeks, we tried to explore valuable early predictors for HBeAg seroconversion during the treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study lasting for 104 weeks was conducted, and the patients enrolled were administered with LDT 600 mg daily. The medical evaluation went every 12 weeks, then the age distribution, baseline ALT level, early HBVDNA, HBsAg and HBeAg levels at baseline, week 12 and 24 as well as the decrease of the three indicators at week 12 and 24 were analyzed for their predictive values for HBeAg seroconversion at week 104.

RESULT

Thirty-three patients finished the observation. All patients got ALT normalisation and 28 patients (84.84%) got complete virological response (HBV DNA<291 copies/ml) at week 104. Poor virological response and virologic breakthrough was observed in two (6.06%) and three patients (9.09%), respectively. Nine patients (27.27%) got HBeAg seroconversion. HBeAg levels and its decrease levels at week 12 and 24 showed significant differences between patients with and without HBeAg seroconversion. And the HBsAg levels at week 12 and 24 showed tendencies of significant differences in two groups. HBeAg level at week 24 was confirmed related to its longer term seroconversion in regression analysis. The patients with HBeAg level<2.1 S/CO at week 24 would be more possible to get HBeAg seroconversion at week 104, with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 95.83%, 88.89%, 95.8% and 88.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Good efficacy of long-term LDT treatment in biological and virological response and its advantage in serological response was confirmed again in our study. The HBeAg level at week 24 showed significant value in prediction for HBeAg seroconversion at week 104 compared to other serological markers in the early period.

Association of serum gamma-glutamyl transferase with treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM: To investigate the association of serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels with chronic hepatitis B infection and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion.

METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on clinical data collected from patients who had been positive for hepatitis B surface antigen for > 6 mo and who were antiviral-treatment naïve (n = 215) attending the Hepatitis Clinic at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between August 2010 and December 2013. Healthy individuals without liver disease (n = 83) were included as controls. Patients were categorized into four groups based on disease status as recommended by the European Association for the Study of the Liver: immune tolerance (IT; n = 47), HBeAg-positive hepatitis (EPH; n = 93), HBeAg-negative hepatitis (ENH; n = 20), and inactive carrier (IC; n = 55). Prediction of complete response (CR) based on serum GGT was also examined in EPH patients (n = 33) treated for 48 wk with nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy, including lamivudine plus adefovir combination therapy (n = 20) or entecavir monotherapy (n = 13). CR was defined as a serum hepatitis B virus DNA level < 500 copies/mL and HBeAg seroconversion by 48 wk of treatment.

RESULTS: Serum GGT levels were significantly increased in EPH and ENH patients relative to the IT, IC, and healthy control groups (P < 0.01 for all). However, no significant difference in serum GGT levels was found between the EPH and ENH groups. Baseline serum GGT levels were significantly higher in patients who achieved CR (7/33; 21.2%) compared to patients in the non-CR group (26/33; 78.8%; P = 0.011). In addition, the decline in serum GGT was greater in CR patients compared to non-CR patients after 24 wk and 48 wk of treatment (P = 0.012 and P = 0.008, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve yielded a sensitivity of 85.71% and a specificity of 61.54% at a threshold value of 0.89 times the upper limit of normal for baseline serum GGT in the prediction of CR following NA therapy.

CONCLUSION: Serum GGT is significantly elevated in EPH and ENH patients and is a potential biomarker for the prediction of HBeAg seroconversion following NA therapy.

Use of hepatitis B surface and "e" antigen quantification during extensive treatment with tenofovir in patients co-infected with HIV-HBV

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV, hepatitis B 'e' antigen (qHBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen quantification (qHBsAg) may be used to predict short-term HBeAg and HBsAg loss, respectively. To determine if these quantifiable markers also provide accurate prediction of antigen loss during long-term, extensive tenofovir (TDF) treatment and to further establish qHBsAg profiles associated with HBsAg seroconversion.

METHODS

Prospective study of 111 co-infected, antiretroviral-experienced patients undergoing a TDF-containing regimen for >12 months. HBV-DNA viral load, qHBeAg [Paul Ehrlich Institute Units (PEIU)/ml] and qHBsAg were quantified at baseline and every 6-12 months. Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of qHBeAg criteria were calculated using a time-dependent receiver operator characteristic curve, and qHBsAg profiles were developed using a group-based trajectory model.

RESULTS

After a median 74.2 months (IQR: 33.1-94.7) of TDF treatment, four patients had HBsAg seroconversion. Among the 78 (70.3%) HBeAg-positive patients, cumulative proportion with HBeAg loss was 42.0% (n = 23) at month 96. Baseline qHBeAg ≤100 PEIU/ml was the only significant factor for HBeAg loss (adjusted-HR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.02-5.46) in multivariable analysis. In terms of predicting HBeAg-loss until month 96, qHBeAg ≤10 PEIU/ml was more accurate when evaluated at month 24 (Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.80) than month 12 (Se = 0.48, Sp = 0.90). All four patients with HBsAg seroconversion had profiles with large decreases in qHBsAg (>2 log10 IU/ml), not necessarily occurring during the first 12 months, which was infrequent in patients without seroconversion (8.4%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantifying hepatitis 'e' antigen during the first 2 years of TDF treatment is a practical tool in predicting long-term HBeAg loss. Non time-specific declines in qHBsAg may be a useful indicator of HBsAg seroconversion.

Quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen and E antigen: correlation between Elecsys and architect assays

Quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and their change model during treatment are emerging as a useful tool for assessing the outcome of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and predicting the efficacy of antiviral therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the Elecsys and Architect assays for HBsAg and HBeAg quantification. Quantification of HBsAg and HBeAg, determined by these two assays, were assessed in 1292 sera from patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB). HBeAg quantification in serum was performed by calibrating the results through HBeAg Paul-Ehrlich international (PEI) reference standard. The HBV genotype was determined by direct sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Of 1292 samples, the distribution of genotype was 514 (39.78%) genotype B, 776 (60.06%) genotype C, 2 (0.16%) genotype D. The results of HBsAg and HBeAg quantification between the Architect and Elecsys assays were significantly correlated (HBsAg: r = 0.939; HBeAg: r = 0.987), independent of HBV genotype and treatment phase. The mean differences between the two methods (the log10 [Elecsys] - the log10 [Architect]) were 0.075 log10  IU/mL and -0.149 log10 PE IU/mL in quantifying HBsAg and HBeAg, respectively. This study demonstrates a high correlation between the Elecsys and the Architect assays in quantifying HBsAg and HBeAg, regardless of HBV genotype. Both the two assays can be used to monitor the HBsAg and HBeAg levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Efficacy and Safety of Telbivudine Compared to Entecavir Among HBeAg+ Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: a Meta-Analysis Study

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious global health problem that is associated with huge social and economic costs. Early antiviral drugs, such as interferon-α2b, peginterferon-α2a, lamivudine, and adefovir, all have their limitations (such as low responses or safety concerns) in clinical application. Telbivudine and entecavir are two of the latest nucleotide drugs and both have been shown to have potent viral suppression. However, in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB), inconsistent results have been generated for efficacy between telbivudine and entecavir. Therefore, evidence-based medical data are required to compare the efficacies, in terms of virological and biochemical responses, and safety between telbivudine and entecavir.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the early antiviral efficacy and safety of telbivudine and entecavir in the treatment of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A search for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on HBeAg-positive CHB patients treated with telbivudine and entecavir for 24 or 52 weeks, published before December 2011, was performed. Primary efficacy endpoint was the cumulative rate of undetectable HBV DNA, and secondary efficacy endpoints included rates of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, HBeAg disappearance, HBeAg seroconversion and adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager v5.1.4 software package. We assessed the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the fixed-or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 555 patients were included. Telbivudine was associated with significantly higher rates of HBeAg disappearance (RR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11 - 1.91) and HBeAg seroconversion (RR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.25-2.48) than entecavir, but had higher adverse events (RR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.23 - 3.60), compared with entecavir. There was no difference between telbivudine and entecavir in the rate of cumulative undetectable HBV DNA (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90 - 1.10) and ALT normalization (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.85 - 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Telbivudine is associated with significantly higher rates of HBeAg disappearance and HBeAg seroconversion than entecavir, whereas entecavir is superior to telbivudine in safety. Both drugs have similar efficacy on rates of cumulative undetectable HBV DNA and ALT normalization.

A comparison of efficacy and safety of 2-year telbivudine and entecavir treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a match-control study

There are limited data comparing the clinical outcomes between telbivudine and entecavir. We consecutively enrolled 115 telbivudine-naive and 115 entecavir-naive chronic hepatitis B patients, who were matched for age, sex, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status and cirrhosis, and treated for at least 2 years or less than 2 years but had developed resistance. Except for the rate of HBeAg seroconversion, which was similar, patients in the entecavir group had better clinical outcomes than those in the telbivudine group for alanine aminotransferase normalization (85.2% vs 78.4%, p <0.048), undetectable HBV DNA (96.5% vs 74.8%, p <0.001), and viral resistance (0.9% vs 21.7%, p <0.001) after 2 years of treatment, After applying roadmap or super-responders concepts, entecavir still had better outcomes than telbivudine in undetectable HBV DNA and viral resistance. The cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma development was similar between telbivudine-naive and entecavir-naive patients (p 0.565). In renal function analysis, there were significantly more patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) category improvement in both the telbivudine and entecavir groups at year 1 (p 0.006 and p 0.047, respectively). The rate of virological improvement was significantly higher with entecavir than with telbivudine after 2 years of treatment, whether applying the concepts of roadmap or super-responders. The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma was similar between telbivudine and entecavir. Both telbivudine and entecavir were associated with eGFR improvement, especially in patients with renal insufficiency.

Undetectable HBV DNA at month 12 of entecavir treatment predicts maintained viral suppression and HBeAg-seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B patients at 3 years

BACKGROUND

On-treatment monitoring of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to guide treatment strategy for patients on entecavir has received little attention.

AIM

To investigate the predictive value of on-treatment HBV DNA levels for responses to entecavir.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study among nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve HBV-infected patients on entecavir with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Maintained virological suppression was defined as undetectable HBV DNA (<20 IU/mL) until the last visit. Genotypic drug resistance was screened by using the INNO-LiPA DR assay.

RESULTS

A total of 440 chronic hepatitis B patients (160 HBeAg-positive) followed for 34 ± 9 months were included. The cumulative probability of maintained virological suppression at year 1, 2 and 3 were 76.5%, 83.0% and 88.3% respectively. On multivariate analysis, lower baseline HBV DNA, undetectable HBV DNA at month 12 and negative HBeAg were the independent predictors of maintained virological suppression. M12 responders (who had undetectable HBV DNA at month 12) had higher probability of maintained virological suppression at 3 years (99.1%) as compared to non responders (57.5%; P < 0.001). The cumulative probability of HBeAg-seroconversion at year 1, 2 and 3 were 19.0%, 27.2% and 33.5% respectively. M12 responders had higher probability of HBeAg-seroconversion at 3 years (43.2%) than the non responders (19.0%; P = 0.003). M12 responders had lower probability of drug resistance at 3 years (0%) than the non responders (2.6%; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Month 12 HBV DNA responses could predict the probability of maintained virological suppression, HBeAg-seroconversion and risk of drug resistance among patients on entecavir treatment at 3 years.