Viral level is an indicator of long-term outcome of hepatitis B virus e antigen-negative carriers with persistently normal serum alanine aminotransferase levels

Clinical and histological features of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the grey zone

Chronic HBV infection patients who do not conform to any of the usual immune states are regarded as 'grey zone' patients. We aimed to investigate the proportion of chronic HBV infection patients in the grey zone, and evaluate the clinical characteristics and liver pathological changes in grey zone patients. Clinical data of 1391 treatment-naive chronic HBV infection patients with liver biopsy were collected. Natural history of HBV infection was determined based on European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) 2017, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) 2018 and Chinese 2019 guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic HBV infection. Significant liver histological changes and associated risk factors of normal ALT grey zone patients were analysed. According to EASL, AASLD and Chinese criteria, there were 50.0%, 28% and 37.4% chronic HBV infection patients in the grey zone. Among the 353 grey zone patients with normal ALT, 72.4% had significant liver histological changes. ALT (optimal cut-off value 25 IU/L) and HBV DNA (optimal cut-off value 18,000 IU/mL) were independent risk factors of significant liver histological abnormalities. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of grey zone patients with normal ALT have significant liver histological changes that can be predicted by levels of serum ALT and HBV DNA. These results provide guidance of antiviral treatment in grey zone patients.

A long-term study of liver-related events in Caucasian hepatitis B patients with normal ALT values and high viremia

Background and study aims

There is ongoing debate whether antiviral therapy should be initiated in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels but high HBV DNA levels >2,000 IU/mL. Since the need for antiviral therapy might be different between Asian and Caucasian patients, we studied the long-term disease outcome in Caucasian patients living in Western Europe.

Patients and methods

One hundred sixteen patients with high HBV DNA levels (>2,000 IU/mL) at diagnosis were included in the high viremia group, while those with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL were used as controls (n = 327). All patients were Caucasian, HBeAg negative, had normal ALT levels and had no significant liver disease at diagnosis.

Results

Median follow-up was 7 + 9.8 years in the high viremia group and this was 10 + 12.5 years in controls. The cumulative probability of a liver-related event over 10 years was 4.8% vs 0.0% in the control group (p=.008). In multivariable analysis, high viremia group was associated with the occurrence of a liver-related event (hazards ratio (HR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-11.98, p=.023). In this subgroup, older age at diagnosis (HR 95% CI: 1.01-1.16, p=.023) predicted a higher risk of liver-related event. In the high viremia group, liver-related mortality was 0.9% and none of the patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma.

Conclusions

HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL influences the long-term disease outcome in Caucasian HBeAg-negative patients living in Western Europe. Nevertheless, the risk of liver-related events is low.

Association of anti-HBc and liver inflammation in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients with normal ALT and detectable HBV DNA

Serum hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) is associated with liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis B patients. This study aimed to investigate whether anti-HBc could serve as a predictor of significant liver inflammation in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and detectable HBV DNA. Treatment-naïve HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infected patients with normal ALT and detectable HBV DNA who underwent liver biopsy were retrospectively included from two medical centers. Liver inflammation grade was evaluated using the Scheuer scoring system and significant liver inflammation was defined as ≥G2. Serum anti-HBc levels were measured by commercial immunoassays (Abbott GmbH & Co. KG). A total of 117 patients were included and 50 (42.7%) patients showed significant liver inflammation. Serum anti-HBc levels in patients with significant liver inflammation were significantly higher than patients with no or mild liver inflammation (<G2) (p < 0.001). High serum anti-HBc (odds ratio 1.562, 95% confidential interval 1.157-2.110, p = 0.004) was an independent risk factor of significant liver inflammation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of serum anti-HBc in predicting significant liver inflammation was 0.769 and the optimal cut-off value was 10.87 S/CO, with a sensitivity of 59.2% and a specificity of 87.9%. Our data revealed that a substantial of HBeAg-negative chronic infection patients with normal ALT and detectable HBV DNA showed significant liver inflammation. Serum anti-HBc can predict significant liver inflammation in these patients.

High risk of clinical events in untreated HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with high viral load and no significant ALT elevation

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown whether antiviral treatment for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients having high viral loads without significant elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels would reduce the risks of clinical events.

AIM

To compare clinical outcomes of high viral load CHB patients untreated for normal or mildly elevated ALT vs those treated for ALT ≥ 2 upper limit of normal (ULN).

METHODS

This historical cohort study included 5414 HBeAg-negative CHB patients without cirrhosis at a tertiary hospital in Korea from 2000 to 2013. Inactive phase was defined as serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA < 2000 IU/mL and persistently normal ALT (n = 3572). High viral load (HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/mL) patients were classified into three phases by ALT levels: Replicative (persistently normal ALT, n = 900); Mildly active (ALT 1-2ULN, n = 396); and Active (ALT ≥ 2ULN, n = 546) phases. All Active phase patients were treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 47 years without a significant difference among the groups. Compared with the treated Active phase group, the untreated Replicative phase group showed a significantly higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.00 - 3.10, P = 0.05) and death/transplantation (HR 2.14; 5% CI 1.09 - 4.21, P = 0.03) by propensity score-matched analysis. The untreated mildly active phase patients had further increase in risk of HCC and death/transplantation compared with the treated Active phase group by unadjusted, PS-matched, competing risks, and multivariable-adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Untreated high viral load HBeAg-negative CHB patients without significant ALT elevation had higher risks of clinical events than treated Active phase patients with elevated ALT.

Liver steatosis is a strong predictor of mortality and cancer in chronic hepatitis B regardless of viral load

Liver steatosis may occur concomitantly in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) and is implicated in increased morbidity and mortality. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load is a marker for disease progression and long-term outcomes in CHB. We investigated the association between liver steatosis and HBV viral load and their individual effects on all-cause mortality and the development of cancer in patients with CHB and liver steatosis.

Methods

This retrospective study included 524 treatment-naïve patients with CHB, with a mean follow-up of 6 years. Liver biopsy was available for 170 patients and liver steatosis was validated by at least 3 ultrasonographic examinations.

Results

A total of 241/524 (46%) patients with CHB had liver steatosis, with a strong correlation between the degree of liver steatosis as assessed by ultrasonography or by liver biopsy (r = 0.9, p < 0.001). Although liver steatosis was not significantly associated with advanced fibrosis, a multivariate analysis showed that liver steatosis was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality and cancer (hazard ratio 4.35; 95% CI 1.69–8.99; p < 0.001), irrespective of other major metabolic factors. However, baseline HBV viral load was not significantly associated with this composite outcome (hazard ratio 1.65; p = 0.29). In addition, liver steatosis was inversely associated with HBV viral load.

Conclusion

Patients with CHB and liver steatosis have an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cancer development compared to patients with CHB without liver steatosis, regardless of their baseline HBV viral load. Although tending to have a lower baseline viral load, patients with CHB and liver steatosis should be closely monitored irrespective of viral load.

Lay summary

Patients with chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) may have liver steatosis at the same time. Here we show that in patients with CHB, liver steatosis is significantly associated with all-cause mortality and cancer, irrespective of other major metabolic factors, and the effect of liver steatosis on mortality and cancer is stronger than the effect of hepatitis B viral load on these outcomes. Thus, patients with CHB and liver steatosis should be closely monitored, irrespective of their viral load.

•

HBV viral load is an important predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with chronic HBV (CHB).

•

Liver steatosis may co-occur with CHB but its effect on all-cause mortality and cancer has not been determined.

•

Liver steatosis is significantly associated with all-cause mortality and cancer in patients with CHB.

•

The effect of liver steatosis on mortality and cancer is stronger than the effect of HBV viral load.

•

Patients with CHB and liver steatosis should be closely monitored, irrespective of their viral load.

Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in untreated subjects with chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In the natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) chronic infection, the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk is unclear. We assessed incidence and predictors of HCC by a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We included longitudinal studies and randomized controlled trials assessing HCC incidence in untreated patients with HBV chronic infection. Incidence rates and their 95% confidence intervals were extracted by each study and pooled together in random effects models.

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies were included with a total of 347 859 patients. According to liver disease status, the summary incidence rates were in Europe, North America and East Asia, respectively: (a) asymptomatic carriers: 0.07 (95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.09), 0.19 (0.07-0.31) and 0.42 (0.21-0.63) per 100 person-years, respectively; (b) inactive carriers: 0.03 (0.0-0.10), 0.17 (0.02-0.62) and 0.06 (0.02-0.10), respectively; (c) chronic hepatitis: 0.12 (0.0-0.27), 0.48 (0.22-0.91) and 0.49 (0.32-0.66), respectively; (d) compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A): 2.03 (1.30-2.77), 2.89 (1.23-4.55) and 3.37 (2.48-4.26) respectively. Multivariate meta-regression showed a significant increase in incidence rates for age, and for status of a symptomatic carrier, chronic hepatitis and compensated cirrhosis compared to inactive carrier, but not for geographical area after adjusting for age. An increase in the incidence rates was also observed for alcohol intake ≥60 g/dl, HBV genotype C with respect to B and HBV-DNA serum levels >2000 IU/ml, in Asian studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in untreated subjects with HBV chronic infection is strongly related with age and liver disease status.

Clinical applications, limitations and future role of transient elastography in the management of liver disease

Transient elastography (TE) is a reliable tool for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in routine clinical practice. TE is currently approved for use in Europe, Asia and the United States. The widespread adoption of this technology is certain to increase the use of TE worldwide. Although TE has been well validated in chronic viral hepatitis, its clinical role in other liver diseases remains less clear. The advent of new treatment for chronic hepatitis C and emerging prevalence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis raises new questions on the role of TE in current clinical practice. This review aims to examine the clinical applications, limitations and future role of TE in current clinical practice in light of the changing epidemiology of liver diseases and new clinical management paradigms. In current clinical practice, TE is the most accurate non-invasive method for diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. TE is useful to rule out fibrosis and cirrhosis but does not have sufficient accuracy to discern between various stages of fibrosis. The clinical role of TE has evolved from cross-sectional point-in-time assessment of fibrosis and cirrhosis to the more relevant role of prediction of vital clinical end-points. This provides clinicians with the ability to modify treatment strategies based on the information provided by TE. TE has evolved over the past decade to become an essential tool to assist the clinician in the management of chronic liver disease.

Characteristics and prediction of hepatitis B e-antigen negative hepatitis following seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

We analyzed the characteristics of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) abnormality after achieving hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion (SC) and other factors associated with the occurrence of HBeAg negative hepatitis.

METHODS

We followed 36 patients with chronic hepatitis B from 3 years prior to at least 3 years after SC (mean, 11.6 years) and examined ALT, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, HB surface antigen, HB core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels and mutations related to HBeAg SC.

RESULTS

ALT normalization (<31 IU/L for at least 1 year) was primarily observed until 2 years following SC, after which it became more infrequent. We next divided patients into abnormal (≥31 IU/L, n = 20) and normal (<31 IU/L, n = 16) groups based on integrated ALT level after the time point of 2 years from SC, and considered the former group as having HBeAg negative hepatitis in the present study. Although changes in median levels of ALT and HBcrAg differed significantly between the groups, multivariate analysis showed ALT normalization within 2 years after SC to be the only significant determining factor for this disease (P = 0.001). We then assessed the 19 patients whose ALT was normal at 2 years following SC, four of whom developed HBeAg negative hepatitis. Increased levels of HBV DNA (P = 0.037) and HBcrAg (P = 0.033) were significant factors of potential relevance.

CONCLUSION

ALT abnormality after 2 years of SC may be evaluated as HBeAg-negative hepatitis. ALT, HBV DNA and HBcrAg levels may be useful in predicting the outcome of patients who achieve HBeAg SC.

Large variations in risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in treatment naïve hepatitis B patients: systematic review with meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

The complications to chronic hepatitis B (HBV) include incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and mortality. The risk of these complications may vary in different patient groups.

AIM

To estimate the incidence and predictors of HCC and in untreated HBV patients.

METHODS

Systematic review with random effects meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Results are expressed as annual incidence (events per 100 person-years) with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses of patient and study characteristics were performed to identify common risk factors.

RESULTS

We included 68 trials and studies with a total of 27,584 patients (264,919 person-years). In total, 1,285 of 26,687 (5%) patients developed HCC and 730 of 12,511 (6%) patients died. The annual incidence was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.76-0.99) for HCC and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.01-1.51) for mortality. Patients with cirrhosis had a higher risk of HCC (incidence 3.16; 95% CI, 2.58-3.74) than patients without cirrhosis (0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.18). The risk of dying was also higher for patients with than patients without cirrhosis (4.89; 95% CI, 3.16-6.63; and 0.11; 95% CI, 0.09-0.14). The risk of developing HCC increased with HCV coinfection, older age and inflammatory activity. The country of origin did not clearly predict HCC or mortality estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Cirrhosis was the strongest predictor of HCC incidence and mortality. Patients with HBV cirrhosis have a 31-fold increased risk of HCC and a 44-fold increased mortality compared to non-cirrhotic patients. The low incidence rates should be taken into account when considering HCC screening in non-cirrhotic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospero CRD42013004764.

Comprehensive analysis of common serum liver enzymes as prospective predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in HBV patients

BACKGROUND

Serum liver enzymes are frequently tested in clinics to aid disease diagnosis. Large observational studies indicated that these enzymes might predict cancer risk and mortality. However, no prospective study has reported on their relationships with the risk of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We evaluated the predictive values of four routinely tested liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], and gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT]) in HCC risk in a prospectively enrolled clinical cohort of 588 Korean American HBV patients. For all four enzymes, the baseline level as well as the average and maximum levels during the first 1 or 2 years of follow-up were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Patients were categorized into a normal or an elevated group based on the clinical cut-off of each enzyme. During a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 52 patients (incidence rate, 8.8%) developed HCC. The incidence rates were higher in the elevated groups for all four enzymes. The most significant finding was for GGT, with the highest incidence rate of 16.4% in the elevated group compared to 4.6% in the normal group (P<0.001). Compared to patients with normal baseline GGT, those with elevated GGT exhibited a significantly increased HCC risk with a hazards ratio (HR) of 2.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-4.77, P = 0.002). Further analyses revealed a cumulative effect between baseline GGT and ALP (HR = 3.41, 95% CI 1.54-7.56, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS SIGNIFICANCE

Serum GGT might predict HCC risk in HBV patients individually or jointly with other enzymes.

HBV-carriers: When is monitoring and surveillance sufficient? (point of view)

Medications currently available for the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are highly effective but not curative. The current paradigm is to recognize patients who require long-term treatment (with its inconveniences) among the majority of healthy carriers who do not need treatment. International guidelines have been established to identify patients requiring treatment but differences concerning the cut-off levels for viral load and transaminases, or need for liver biopsy, compromise their interpretation. IMMUNE TOLERANCE PHASE: Patients with strictly defined typical forms (HBeAg-positive, normal transaminases level, very high viral load HBV-DNA more than 2 × 10(6) IU) have very limited liver injury and do not require treatment. Patients with atypical forms (low viral load HBV-DNA less than 2 × 10(6) IU) have a potential risk of more severe histological lesions, but the need for liver biopsy and treatment remains a matter of debate. Immune tolerant patients aged over 40 years should be treated because of the higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, even without cirrhosis. ACTIVE PHASE HBEAG-POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE: Typical forms with elevated viral load and transaminases level should be treated. Mild hepatitis with moderately elevated transaminases levels (1-2 times upper limit of normal) can cause variable degrees of liver damage, and liver biopsy is necessary. HBeAg-positive hepatitis with very high transaminases levels have a very high rate of spontaneous HBe seroconversion. Hepatitis with high transaminases levels but low viral (HBV-DNA less than 2000 UI) is possible in HBe-negative patients but unusual in HBe-positive patients. Another cause of liver disease could be involved (hepatitis D, steatosis, alcohol). INACTIVE PHASE: In the typical form, patients have a normal transaminases level and HBV-DNA less than 2000 IU; histological lesions are in general minimal. Treatment is not indicated. Atypical forms with normal transaminases levels but elevated HBV-DNA more than 2000 IU remain problematic. Forms with high-normal transaminases levels have a higher risk of complications. In the event of inactive cirrhosis, treatment is indicated if replication persists, even at a low level.