Broadening our perceptions of diversity in medical education: using multifocal lenses

Knowledge gains in a professional development workshop on diversity, equity, inclusion, and implicit bias in academia

As literature indicates, historic racism and implicit bias throughout academia have been profound metrics leading to a lack of diversity, as related to people from underrepresented groups according to race and ethnicity, among biomedical sciences graduate students in U.S. universities. Recognizing such challenges, a team of biomedical scientists and inclusivity educators developed and implemented a pilot training program within an academic health sciences center as an initial step to educate faculty and staff regarding their roles in the promotion of an inclusive academic environment, receptive to all students, including underrepresented students. The 3-h workshop included didactic modules, videos, teaching modules, and active attendee participation. Faculty and staff were presented common terminology and ways to promote the development of an inclusive and diverse academic workforce. Compared with pre-workshop, post-workshop survey results indicated a statistically significant improvement in attendee knowledge of correctly identifying definitions of "implicit bias," "status leveling," "color-blind racial attitudes," "tokenism," and "failure to differentiate." Additionally, by the end of the workshop, participants had a statistically significant increase in self-perceptions regarding the importance of improving diversity and recognizing biases and stereotypes in graduate education, knowing what to say when interacting with people from different cultures, and the ability to acknowledge bias when mentoring students from groups underrepresented in the biomedical field. This preliminary initiative was successful in the introduction of faculty and staff to the importance of fostering an inclusive academic environment and thereby developing a diverse workforce.

The 'exotic other' in medical curricula: Rethinking cultural diversity in course manuals

Introduction: Implementation of cultural diversity training in medical education faces challenges, including ambiguity about the interpretation of 'cultural diversity'. This is worrisome as research has demonstrated that the interpretation employed matters greatly to practices and people concerned. This study therefore explored the construction of cultural diversity in medical curricula.Methods: Using a constructivist approach we performed a content analysis of course materials of three purposefully selected undergraduate curricula in the Netherlands. Via open coding we looked for text references that identified differences labelled in terms of culture. Iteratively, we developed themes from the text fragments.Results: We identified four mechanisms, showing together that culture is unconsciously constructed as something or someone exotic, deviant from the standard Dutch or Western patient or disease, and therefore problematic.Conclusions: We complemented earlier identified mechanisms of othering and stereotyping by showing how these mechanisms are embedded in educational materials themselves and reinforce each other. We argue that the embedded notion of 'problematic stranger' can lead to a lack of tools for taking appropriate medical action and to insecurity among doctors. This study suggests that integrating more attention to biological and contextual differences in the entire medical curriculum and leaving out static references such as ethnicity and nationality, can enhance quality of medical training and care.

Association between cultural distance and migrant self-rated health

We study whether migrant health in Europe is associated with the cultural distance between their host country and country of origin. To this end, we run multilevel regression models on data merging self-rated health and social background of ≥3800 migrants from the European Social Survey with an index of cultural distance based on country differences in values, norms and attitudes measured in the World Values Survey. We find that higher levels of cultural distance are associated with worse migrant health. This association is comparable in size with the negative association between health and female (compared with male) gender but less important than the association between health and education level. In addition, this association is less significant among second-generation than first-generation migrants.