Sense and antisense transcripts of traM, a conjugal transfer gene of the antibiotic resistance plasmid R100

Social behavior and decision making in bacterial conjugation

Bacteria frequently acquire novel genes by horizontal gene transfer (HGT). HGT through the process of bacterial conjugation is highly efficient and depends on the presence of conjugative plasmids (CPs) or integrated conjugative elements (ICEs) that provide the necessary genes for DNA transmission. This review focuses on recent advancements in our understanding of ssDNA transfer systems and regulatory networks ensuring timely and spatially controlled DNA transfer (tra) gene expression. As will become obvious by comparing different systems, by default, tra genes are shut off in cells in which conjugative elements are present. Only when conditions are optimal, donor cells—through epigenetic alleviation of negatively acting roadblocks and direct stimulation of DNA transfer genes—become transfer competent. These transfer competent cells have developmentally transformed into specialized cells capable of secreting ssDNA via a T4S (type IV secretion) complex directly into recipient cells. Intriguingly, even under optimal conditions, only a fraction of the population undergoes this transition, a finding that indicates specialization and cooperative, social behavior. Thereby, at the population level, the metabolic burden and other negative consequences of tra gene expression are greatly reduced without compromising the ability to horizontally transfer genes to novel bacterial hosts. This undoubtedly intelligent strategy may explain why conjugative elements—CPs and ICEs—have been successfully kept in and evolved with bacteria to constitute a major driving force of bacterial evolution.

Regulation of bacterial conjugation: balancing opportunity with adversity

Conjugative plasmids are involved in the dissemination of important traits such as antibiotic resistance, virulence determinants and metabolic pathways involved in adapting to environmental niches, a process termed horizontal or lateral gene transfer. Conjugation is the process of transferring DNA from a donor to a recipient cell with the establishment of the incoming DNA and its cargo of genetic traits within the transconjugant. Conjugation is mediated by self-transmissible plasmids as well as phage-like sequences that have been integrated into the bacterial chromosome, such as integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) that now include conjugative transposons. Both conjugative plasmids and ICEs can mediate the transfer of mobilizable elements by sharing their conjugative machinery. Conjugation can either be induced, usually by small molecules or peptides or by excision of the ICE from the host chromosome, or it can be tightly regulated by plasmid- and host-encoded factors. The transfer potential of these transfer regions depends on the integration of many signals in response to environmental and physiological cues. This review will focus on the mechanisms that influence transfer potential in these systems, particularly those of the IncF incompatibility group.

Transcription of the transfer genes traY and traM of the antibiotic resistance plasmid R100-1 is linked

Three separate traY deletion mutants of R100-1 were prepared by allele replacement. These mutants retained the ability to transfer at a level 100 times greater than R100 and 1/50 that of the parental R100-1. The mutants were complemented to normal R100-1 transfer levels by pDSP06, a multicopy traY clone. Comparison of transcripts initiated at the traY promoter, P(Y), by primer extension experiments showed that there was no detectable P(Y) activity in R100 and that the level of P(Y) activity in the traY deletion mutants was lower than that in R100-1. Similar measurements performed on RNA from a set of previously described traM deletion mutants showed that those traM deletion mutants that produced more traM and finM (M) transcripts than the parental R100-1 also produced more traY transcripts than R100-1 and that those traM mutants that produced fewer M transcripts than R100-1 also produced fewer traY transcripts than R100-1. We conclude that in R100, TraY regulates P(Y) activity and that transcripts originating in traM affect P(Y) activity.

Control of genes for conjugative transfer of plasmids and other mobile elements

Conjugative transfer is a primary means of spread of mobile genetic elements (plasmids and transposons) between bacteria.It leads to the dissemination and evolution of the genes (such as those conferring resistance to antibiotics) which are carried by the plasmid. Expression of the plasmid genes needed for conjugative transfer is tightly regulated so as to minimise the burden on the host. For plasmids such as those belonging to the IncP group this results in downregulation of the transfer genes once all bacteria have a functional conjugative apparatus. For F-like plasmids (apart from F itself which is a derepressed mutant) tight control results in very few bacteria having a conjugative apparatus. Chance encounters between the rare transfer-proficient bacteria and a potential recipient initiate a cascade of transfer which can continue until all potential recipients have acquired the plasmid. Other systems express their transfer genes in response to specific stimuli. For the pheromone-responsive plasmids of Enterococcus it is small peptide signals from potential recipients which trigger the conjugative transfer genes. For the Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium it is the presence of wounded plants which are susceptible to infection which stimulates T-DNA transfer to plants. Transfer and integration of T-DNA induces production of opines which the plasmid-positive bacteria can utilise. They multiply and when they reach an appropriate density their plasmid transfer system is switched on to allow transfer of the Ti plasmid to other bacteria. Finally some conjugative transfer systems are induced by the antibiotics to which the elements confer resistance. Understanding these control circuits may help to modify management of microbial communities where plasmid transfer is either desirable or undesirable. z 1998 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Regulation of R100 conjugation requires traM in cis to traJ

Deletion mutants of R100-1 were constructed by classical methods to remove various segments of the traM open reading frame, pTraM-binding sites and the traM promoters. Complementation tests showed that traM was efficiently complemented only when the trans-acting fragment contained both the complete traM gene and the adjacent traJ promoter and leader sequences. The conclusion is that traM and traJ constitute a complex operon. A deletion mutant lacking all of the traJ gene, and one containing a frameshifting traM deletion, retained the ability to transfer at a low level, thereby showing that neither pTraM nor pTraJ is absolutely essential for transfer.

traJ sense RNA initiates at two different promoters in R100-1 and forms two stable hybrids with antisense finP RNA

RNase protection experiments show that the sizes of the two R100 finP molecules are 74 and 135 nucleotides. In an RNase III mutant, finP transcripts form stable double-stranded hybrids of 108 bp and 68 bp with traJ transcripts. RNase protection experiments also show that most R100-1 transcripts originating in traM cross the traM-traJ intergenic region and end inside the untranslated leader region of traJ. Some extend into the traJ open reading frame. These findings mean that the antisense finP RNA, thought to regulate traJ translation, must regulate traJ transcripts from both J and M promoters.

Analysis of the sequence and gene products of the transfer region of the F sex factor

Bacterial conjugation results in the transfer of DNA of either plasmid or chromosomal origin between microorganisms. Transfer begins at a defined point in the DNA sequence, usually called the origin of transfer (oriT). The capacity of conjugative DNA transfer is a property of self-transmissible plasmids and conjugative transposons, which will mobilize other plasmids and DNA sequences that include a compatible oriT locus. This review will concentrate on the genes required for bacterial conjugation that are encoded within the transfer region (or regions) of conjugative plasmids. One of the best-defined conjugation systems is that of the F plasmid, which has been the paradigm for conjugation systems since it was discovered nearly 50 years ago. The F transfer region (over 33 kb) contains about 40 genes, arranged contiguously. These are involved in the synthesis of pili, extracellular filaments which establish contact between donor and recipient cells; mating-pair stabilization; prevention of mating between similar donor cells in a process termed surface exclusions; DNA nicking and transfer during conjugation; and the regulation of expression of these functions. This review is a compendium of the products and other features found in the F transfer region as well as a discussion of their role in conjugation. While the genetics of F transfer have been described extensively, the mechanism of conjugation has proved elusive, in large part because of the low levels of expression of the pilus and the numerous envelope components essential for F plasmid transfer. The advent of molecular genetic techniques has, however, resulted in considerable recent progress. This summary of the known properties of the F transfer region is provided in the hope that it will form a useful basis for future comparison with other conjugation systems.

Repression of the traM gene of plasmid R100 by its own product and integration host factor at one of the two promoters

Plasmid R100 codes for the traM gene, which is required for DNA transfer and whose product has been shown to bind to the four sites, called sbmA to sbmD, upstream of traM. To determine whether the TraM protein regulates the expression of traM, we constructed the plasmids carrying various portions of the region upstream of the initiation codon ATG for traM, which was fused with lacZ in frame, and introduced them into the cells, which did or did not harbor another compatible plasmid carrying traM. We then assayed the beta-galactosidase (LacZ) activity to monitor the expression of the fusion genes and analyzed the traM-specific transcripts made in the cells. Two promoters for traM were identified and designated pM1 and pM2. Promoter pM2 lies upstream of pM1 and overlaps the sbmC-sbmD region. Promoter pM1 is constitutively expressed, while pM2 is much stronger but is repressed almost completely by the TraM protein and partially by integration host factor, whose binding site is near pM2. The traM gene is likely to be expressed from pM2 when the TraM protein is at low levels after dilution in the donor cell during cell growth or before its expression in the recipient cell which has just received R100 by conjugation. The expression from pM2 could maintain the amount of the TraM protein at a constant level needed to initiate DNA transfer at any time. Integration host factor, which can partially repress the traM gene, may play a role in forming an active complex with the TraM protein at the sbm region to facilitate DNA transfer.

FinOP repression of the F plasmid involves extension of the half-life of FinP antisense RNA by FinO

The transfer operon of the F plasmid is positively regulated by the traJ gene product, expression of which, in turn, is regulated by both an antisense RNA, FinP, and the FinO protein (the FinOP system). A finP- F plasmid, pSFL20, was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis and was found to produce wild-type levels of pili encoded by the transfer operon. Transcription of the traJ gene was decreased by a factor of 3-5 fold in the presence of FinOP with no accumulation of a stable RNA duplex between the FinP RNA and the portion of the traJ mRNA which is complementary to finP. Stabilization of FinP RNA by FinO occurs in the absence of traJ transcripts, suggesting that FinO may interact directly with FinP to prevent its degradation.

Specific DNA binding of the TraM protein to the oriT region of plasmid R100

The product of the traM gene of plasmid R100 was purified as the TraM-collagen-beta-galactosidase fusion protein (TraM*) by using a beta-galactosidase-specific affinity column, and the TraM portion of TraM* (TraM') was separated by collagenolysis. Both the TraM* and TraM' proteins were found to bind specifically to a broad region preceding the traM gene. This region (designated sbm) was located within the nonconserved region in oriT among conjugative plasmids related to R100. The region seems to contain four core binding sites (designated sbmA, sbmB, sbmC, and sbmD), each consisting of a similar number of nucleotides and including a homologous 15-bp sequence. This result, together with the observation that the TraM* protein was located in the membrane fraction, indicates the possibility that the TraM protein has a function in anchoring the oriT region of R100 at the sbm sites to the membrane pore, through which the single-stranded DNA is transferred to the recipient. sbmC and sbmD, each of which contained a characteristic inverted repeat sequence, overlapped with the promoter region for the traM gene. This suggests that the expression of the traM gene may be regulated by its own product.

Repression and derepression of conjugation of plasmid R1 by wild-type and mutated finP antisense RNA

The finP gene of plasmid R1 is located between the genes traM and traJ, partially overlapping the first few nucleotides of the latter. It codes for a repressor of the conjugation system. The product of this gene is a small RNA of 72 nucleotides and, because it is transcribed from the opposite DNA strand, it is complementary to the 5' non-translated sequences, the ribosome-binding site, and the first two codons of traJ mRNA. The finP transcript is present in much higher concentrations in R1 than in R1-19 containing cells, the latter being a derepressed mutant of the former. A synthetic finP gene expressed from a synthetic lambda PL promoter markedly reduced the conjugation frequency of pDB12, a multicopy derivative of R1-19. Mutagenesis of finP showed that only finP loop II mutants have lost the ability to repress conjugation of R1-19 in trans. They are also the only ones which derepress conjugal DNA transfer of R1, probably by competing for the finO product, a molecule needed as corepressor for maximal activity. Mutations interrupting potential open reading frames of finP do not abolish finP repressor activity. Hence finP acts as an antisense RNA blocking the expression of the traJ gene by interacting with traJ mRNA through loop II.

Integration host factor affects expression of two genes at the conjugal transfer origin of plasmid R100

Integration host factor (IHF) binds to two sites near the origin of transfer of the conjugative antibiotic resistance plasmid, R100. DNase I footprinting shows that one site is immediately adjacent to oriT and the gene X promoter, and another is adjacent to the traM promoter. A third site, known only from retardation gels, is near the traJ promoter. The relative promoter activities of genes X, traJ and traM are reduced in himA mutants (IHF-), as measured by chloramphenicol-resistance assays. Transcript analyses by Northern blots showed a reduction in size of the principal gene X and traJ transcripts in the absence of IHF.