Tandem DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for transcriptional repression of thedeoP2promoter by the CytR repressor inEscherichia coli

The cytidine repressor regulates the survival of Pantoea agglomerans YS19 under oxidative stress and sulfur starvation conditions

Pantoea agglomerans YS19 is a dominant endophytic bacterium isolated from rice, which is capable of promoting host plant growth by nitrogen-fixing and phytohormone secreting. We previously found that the cytidine repressor (CytR) protein conducts the regulation of indole signal in YS19. Here, we compared the whole-cell protein of the wild type YS19 and the ΔcytR mutant and subsequently identified one differential protein as alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C related to oxidative stress and sulfur starvation tolerance. It was tested that cytR had a positive effect on the survival of YS19 under the oxidative stress and sulfur starvation conditions and this effect was inhibited by indole. To further understand the functional mode of indole in this regulation, we cloned the cytR promoter region (P_cytR) of YS19 and tested the effect of indole on P_cytR using gfp as a reporter gene. It was found that P_cytR can sense indole and significantly inhibit the expression of the downstream gene. This study provided a deeper understanding of the multiple function of cytR and expanded a new research direction of how indole participates in gene regulation.

Redefining fundamental concepts of transcription initiation in bacteria

Despite enormous progress in understanding the fundamentals of bacterial gene regulation, our knowledge remains limited when compared with the number of bacterial genomes and regulatory systems to be discovered. Derived from a small number of initial studies, classic definitions for concepts of gene regulation have evolved as the number of characterized promoters has increased. Together with discoveries made using new technologies, this knowledge has led to revised generalizations and principles. In this Expert Recommendation, we suggest precise, updated definitions that support a logical, consistent conceptual framework of bacterial gene regulation, focusing on transcription initiation. The resulting concepts can be formalized by ontologies for computational modelling, laying the foundation for improved bioinformatics tools, knowledge-based resources and scientific communication. Thus, this work will help researchers construct better predictive models, with different formalisms, that will be useful in engineering, synthetic biology, microbiology and genetics.

Nucleotides, Nucleosides, and Nucleobases

We review literature on the metabolism of ribo- and deoxyribonucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleobases in Escherichia coli and Salmonella,including biosynthesis, degradation, interconversion, and transport. Emphasis is placed on enzymology and regulation of the pathways, at both the level of gene expression and the control of enzyme activity. The paper begins with an overview of the reactions that form and break the N-glycosyl bond, which binds the nucleobase to the ribosyl moiety in nucleotides and nucleosides, and the enzymes involved in the interconversion of the different phosphorylated states of the nucleotides. Next, the de novo pathways for purine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis are discussed in detail.Finally, the conversion of nucleosides and nucleobases to nucleotides, i.e.,the salvage reactions, are described. The formation of deoxyribonucleotides is discussed, with emphasis on ribonucleotidereductase and pathways involved in fomation of dUMP. At the end, we discuss transport systems for nucleosides and nucleobases and also pathways for breakdown of the nucleobases.

An integrated toolkit for accurate prediction and analysis of cis-regulatory motifs at a genome scale

MOTIVATION

We present an integrated toolkit, BoBro2.0, for prediction and analysis of cis-regulatory motifs. This toolkit can (i) reliably identify statistically significant cis-regulatory motifs at a genome scale; (ii) accurately scan for all motif instances of a query motif in specified genomic regions using a novel method for P-value estimation; (iii) provide highly reliable comparisons and clustering of identified motifs, which takes into consideration the weak signals from the flanking regions of the motifs; and (iv) analyze co-occurring motifs in the regulatory regions.

RESULTS

We have carried out systematic comparisons between motif predictions using BoBro2.0 and the MEME package. The comparison results on Escherichia coli K12 genome and the human genome show that BoBro2.0 can identify the statistically significant motifs at a genome scale more efficiently, identify motif instances more accurately and get more reliable motif clusters than MEME. In addition, BoBro2.0 provides correlational analyses among the identified motifs to facilitate the inference of joint regulation relationships of transcription factors.

AVAILABILITY

The source code of the program is freely available for noncommercial uses at http://code.google.com/p/bobro/.

CONTACT

xyn@bmb.uga.edu

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

An unusual pattern of CytR and CRP binding energetics at Escherichia coli cddP suggests a unique blend of class I and class II mediated activation

Two transcription factors, CRP and CytR, mediate positive and negative control of nine cistrons involved in nucleoside catabolism and recycling in Escherichia coli. The ability of multiple transcription factors to combine in different ways to confer differential gene regulation is of significant interest in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic gene regulation. Analysis of cooperative interactions between CytR and CRP at the deoP2 and udpP promoters has implicated the importance of promoter architecture in controlling repression and induction. These studies have also identified competition between CytR and CRP as an additional contributor to differential regulation. The pattern and energetics of CytR and CRP interactions at the cdd promoter, the most strongly activated of the CytR-regulated promoters, have been delineated using DNase I footprinting. Surprisingly, CRP has greater affinity for the promoter proximal site at cddP, CRP1, than for the distal site, CRP2, in contrast to promoters studied previously. This difference is a major contributor to unusually high CRP-mediated activation of cddP. Additionally, while cytidine binding to CytR nearly eliminates the pairwise interactions between CytR and CRP bound at CRP1, it has little effect on pairwise cooperativity between CytR and CRP bound at CRP2 or as a consequence on the overall cooperativity of the three-protein complex in which CRP is bound to both sites. The effect of cytidine binding on cooperativity differs between the three promoters studied thus far. We propose that the different patterns of interaction reflect the spacing between CytR half-sites and the location of the CytR operator in relation to the two CRP sites.

Binding of phage phi29 protein p4 to the early A2c promoter: recruitment of a repressor by the RNA polymerase

Regulatory protein p4 from Bacillus subtilis phage Phi29 represses the early A2c promoter by binding upstream from RNA polymerase and interacting with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit. This interaction stabilizes the RNA polymerase at the promoter in such a way that promoter clearance is prevented. Here, the binding of protein p4 to the A2c promoter has been studied. In the absence of RNA polymerase, protein p4 was found to bind with low affinity to a site centered at position -39 relative to the transcription start site. When RNA polymerase was present, protein p4 was displaced from this site and bound instead to a different target centered at position -71. Stable binding to this site requires the interaction of protein p4 with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha-subunit. Both sites contain sequences resembling the well-characterized p4 binding site present at the late A3 promoter, to which p4 binds with high affinity. A mutational analysis revealed that the site at -71 is critical for a stable interaction between protein p4 and RNA polymerase, and for efficient repression, whereas mutation of the site at -39 had only a small effect on repression efficiency. Therefore, RNA polymerase plays an active role in the repression mechanism by stabilizing the repressor at the promoter, generating a nucleoprotein complex that is too stable to allow promoter clearance.

Negative regulation of IS2 transposition by the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein complex

Three sequences similar to that of the consensus binding sequence of the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex were found in the major IS2 promoter region. Experiments were performed to determine whether the cAMP-CRP complex plays a role in the regulation of IS2 transposition. In the gel retardation assay, the cAMP-CRP complex was found to be able to bind the major IS2 promoter. A DNA footprinting assay confirmed that the cAMP-CRP complex binds to the sequences mentioned above. With an IS2 promoter-luciferase gene fusion construct, the cAMP-CRP complex was shown to inhibit transcription from the major IS2 promoter. IS2 was found to transpose at a frequency approximately 200-fold higher in an Escherichia coli host defective for CRP or adenyl cyclase than in a wild-type host. These results suggest that the cAMP-CRP complex is a negative regulator of IS2 transposition.

Design of CytR regulated, cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoters in Escherichia coli: RNA polymerase-promoter interactions modulate the efficiency of CytR repression

In CytR regulated promoters in Escherichia coli, the cAMP-CRP complex acts as a transcriptional activator as well as a co-repressor for the CytR protein. Repression by CytR depends on the formation of nucleoprotein complexes in which CytR binds cooperatively to the DNA with one or two cAMP-CRP complexes. Here, we demonstrate that in order to establish CytR regulation in a cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoter with a single CRP site (CRP site centred around position -40.5) in which the CytR operator is located upstream of the CRP site, high affinity binding sites for both regulators are required. The efficiency of CytR regulation was observed to be modulated by RNA polymerase (RNAP)-promoter interactions. Specifically, in class II promoters with a single CRP site, the efficiency of CytR regulation was found to correlate inversely with cAMP-CRP independent promoter activity. These observations can be reconciled in a competition model for CytR regulation in which CytR and RNAP compete for cooperative binding with cAMP-CRP to the promoters in vivo. In this model, two mutually exclusive ternary complexes can be formed: a CytR/cAMP-CRP/promoter repression complex and an RNAP/cAMP-CRP/promoter activation complex. Thus, CytR regulation critically depends on formation of a repression complex that binds the promoter with sufficiently high affinity to exclude formation of the competing activation complex. We suggest that the transition from repression to activation involves a switch in the protein-protein interactions made by cAMP-CRP from CytR to RNAP. On the basis of the regulatory features of the promoters analysed here, we speculate about the advantages offered by the structural complexity of natural CytR/cAMP-CRP regulated promoters.

Multiple specific CytR binding sites at the Escherichia coli deoP2 promoter mediate both cooperative and competitive interactions between CytR and cAMP receptor protein

Binding of cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and CytR mediates both positive and negative control of transcription from Escherichia coli deoP2. Transcription is activated by CRP and repressed by a multi-protein CRP.CytR.CRP complex. The latter is stabilized by cooperative interactions between CRP and CytR. Similar interactions at the other transcriptional units of the CytR regulon coordinate expression of the transport proteins and enzymes required for nucleoside catabolism. A fundamental question in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic gene regulation is how combinatorial mechanisms of this sort regulate differential expression. To understand the combinatorial control mechanism at deoP2, we have used quantitative footprint and gel shift analysis of CRP and CytR binding to evaluate the distribution of ligation states. By comparison to distributions for other CytR-regulated promoters, we hope to understand the roles of individual states in differential gene expression. The results indicate that CytR binds specifically to multiple sites at deoP2, including both the well recognized CytR site flanked by CRP1 and CRP2 and also sites coincident with CRP1 and CRP2. Binding to these multiple sites yields both cooperative and competitive interactions between CytR and CRP. Based on these findings we propose that CytR functions as a differential modulator of CRP1 versus CRP2-mediated activation. Additional high affinity specific sites are located at deoP1 and near the middle of the 600-base pair sequence separating P1 and P2. Evaluation of the DNA sequence requirement for specific CytR binding suggests that a limited array of contiguous and overlapping CytR sites exists at deoP2. Similar extended arrays, but with different arrangements of overlapping CytR and CRP sites, are found at the other CytR-regulated promoters. We propose that competition and cooperativity in CytR and CRP binding are important to differential regulation of these promoters.

Protein-protein interactions in gene regulation: the cAMP-CRP complex sets the specificity of a second DNA-binding protein, the CytR repressor

Maximal repression by the CytR protein depends on the formation of nucleoprotein complexes in which CytR interacts with DNA and with cAMP-cAMP receptor protein (CRP). Here we demonstrate that CytR regulates transcription from deoP2 promoters in which the entire CytR recognition sequence has been eliminated. Furthermore, CytR proteins deleted for the DNA-binding domain repress deoP2 in vivo and interact with deoP2 in vitro in a strictly cAMP-CRP-dependent fashion. These experiments show that the site of action of CytR can be specified by protein-protein interactions to cAMP-CRP, whereas CytR-DNA interactions may primarily serve to stabilize the nucleo-protein complex. This type of specificity mechanism may represent a general concept in the recruitment of DNA-binding proteins in combinatorial regulatory systems.

Interactions between the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein and RNA polymerase at class II promoters

The effects of a number of mutations in crp have been measured at different cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP)-dependent Class II promoters, where the CRP-binding site is centred around 41 1/2 base pairs upstream from the transcription start point. The amino acid substitutions HL159 and TA158 result in reduced CRP-dependent activation, but the reduction varies from one Class II promoter to another. Deletions in the C-terminus of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit suppress the effects of HL159 and TA158. The role of the C-terminus of alpha at these promoters is assessed. Other changes at E58, K52 and E96 affect CRP activity specifically at Class II promoters and their role is discussed.

cAMP-CRP activator complex and the CytR repressor protein bind co-operatively to the cytRP promoter in Escherichia coli and CytR antagonizes the cAMP-CRP-induced DNA bend

Initiation of transcription from the cytRP promoter in Escherichia coli is activated by the cAMP-CRP complex and negatively regulated by the CytR repressor protein. By combining gel retardation and footprinting assays, we show that cAMP-CRP binds to a single site centered at position -64 and induces a considerable bend in the DNA. CytR binds to a region immediately downstream from, and partially overlapping, the CRP site, and induces a modest bend into the DNA. In combination, cAMP-CRP and CytR bind co-operatively to cytRP forming a nucleoprotein complex in which the proteins directly interact with each other and bind to the same face of the DNA helix. CytR binding concomitantly antagonizes the cAMP-CRP-induced bend. This study indicates that the minimal DNA region required to obtain CytR regulation consists of a single binding site for each of cAMP-CRP and CytR. The case described here, in which a protein-induced DNA bend is modulated by a second protein, may illustrate a mechanism that applies to other regulatory systems.

Cyclic AMP in prokaryotes

Cyclic AMP (cAMP) is found in a variety of prokaryotes including both eubacteria and archaebacteria. cAMP plays a role in regulating gene expression, not only for the classic inducible catabolic operons, but also for other categories. In the enteric coliforms, the effects of cAMP on gene expression are mediated through its interaction with and allosteric modification of a cAMP-binding protein (CRP). The CRP-cAMP complex subsequently binds specific DNA sequences and either activates or inhibits transcription depending upon the positioning of the complex relative to the promoter. Enteric coliforms have provided a model to explore the mechanisms involved in controlling adenylate cyclase activity, in regulating adenylate cyclase synthesis, and in performing detailed examinations of CRP-cAMP complex-regulated gene expression. This review summarizes recent work focused on elucidating the molecular mechanisms of CRP-cAMP complex-mediated processes. For other bacteria, less detail is known. cAMP has been implicated in regulating antibiotic production, phototrophic growth, and pathogenesis. A role for cAMP has been suggested in nitrogen fixation. Often the only data that support cAMP involvement in these processes includes cAMP measurement, detection of the enzymes involved in cAMP metabolism, or observed effects of high concentrations of the nucleotide on cell growth.

Restored DNA-binding of the cAMP-CRP activator complex reestablishes negative regulation by the CytR repressor in the deoP2 promoter in Escherichia coli

We have investigated in vivo the coupling between CytR regulation of the deoP2 promoter in Escherichia coli and the DNA-binding specificity of the cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) complex in order to obtain a more detailed picture of the role played by cAMP-CRP in CytR regulation. By introducing CRP proteins that exhibit an altered DNA binding specificity into a strain containing a mutant deoP2 promoter in which cAMP-CRP activation was decreased and CytR regulation completely abolished, we show that CytR regulation of this promoter can be reestablished by restored the DNA binding of the cAMP-CRP complex. Hence, CytR regulation of deoP2 can be modulated by simply varying DNA binding of cAMP-CRP. These data confirm the crucial role played by the cAMP-CRP activator complex in CytR regulation of the deoP2 promoter.

The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein complex functions both as an activator and as a corepressor at the tsx-p2 promoter of Escherichia coli K-12

The tsx-p2 promoter is one of at least seven Escherichia coli promoters that are activated by the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex and negatively regulated by the CytR repressor. DNase I footprinting assays were used to study the interactions of these regulatory proteins with the tsx-p2 promoter region and to characterize tsx-p2 regulatory mutants exhibiting an altered response to CytR. We show that the cAMP-CRP activator complex recognizes two sites in tsx-p2 that are separated by 33 bp: a high-affinity site (CRP-1) overlaps the -35 region, and a low-affinity site (CRP-2) is centered around position -74 bp. The CytR repressor protects a DNA segment that is located between the two CRP sites and partially overlaps the CRP-1 target. In combination, the cAMP-CRP and CytR proteins bind cooperatively to tsx-p2, and the nucleoprotein complex formed covers a region of 78 bp extending from the CRP-2 site close to the -10 region. The inducer for the CytR repressor, cytidine, does not prevent in vitro DNA binding of CytR, but releases the repressor from the nucleoprotein complex and leaves the cAMP-CRP activator bound to its two DNA targets. Thus, cytidine interferes with the cooperative DNA binding of cAMP-CRP and CytR to tsx-p2. We characterized four tsx-p2 mutants exhibiting a reduced response to CytR; three carried mutations in the CRP-2 site, and one carried a mutation in the region between CRP-1 and the -10 sequence. Formation of the cAMP-CRP-CytR DNA nucleoprotein complex in vitro was perturbed in each mutant. These data indicate that the CytR repressor relies on the presence of the cAMP-CRP activator complex to regulate tsx-p2 promoter activity and that the formation of an active repression complex requires the combined interactions of cAMP-CRP and CytR at tsx-p2.

A novel function of the cAMP-CRP complex in Escherichia coli: cAMP-CRP functions as an adaptor for the CytR repressor in the deo operon

Unlike classical bacterial repressors, the CytR repressor of Escherichia coli cannot independently regulate gene expression. Here we show that CytR binding to the deoP2 promoter relies on interaction with the master gene regulatory protein, CRP, and, furthermore, that cAMP-CRP and CytR bind co-operatively to deoP2. Using mutant promoters we show that tandem, properly spaced DNA-bound cAMP-CRP complexes are required for this co-operative binding. These data suggest that CytR forms a bridge between tandem cAMP-CRP complexes, and that cAMP-CRP functions as an adaptor for CytR. The implications of this new version of negative control in E. coli on bacterial gene expression and on combinatorial gene regulation in higher organisms are discussed.

CAP and Nag repressor binding to the regulatory regions of the nagE-B and manX genes of Escherichia coli

The divergent nagE-BACD operons located at 15.5 min on the Escherichia coli chromosome encode genes involved in the uptake and metabolism of N-acetylglucosamine. The start sites of the divergent transcripts are separated by 133 base-pairs (bp). A repressor protein for the regulon is encoded by the gene nagC, one of the genes of the nagBACD operon. Strains overproducing the NagC protein have been used to investigate the binding of repressor to the intergenic nagE-B regulatory region. Two binding sites have been detected, overlapping the promoters of the nagE and nagB genes. NagC binding produces a series of DNase I hypersensitive sites separated by 9 to 11 bp in the region between the two NagC binding sites, supporting a model where the NagC proteins bind co-operatively to these two sites on the DNA and interact to form a DNA loop. A strong CAP binding site exists between the two operator sites. It is located at -61.5 and -71.5 relative to the nagE and nagB transcription start sites. CAP and NagC can bind simultaneously and produce a complex more stable than the binary NagC-DNA complex. In addition NagC and CAP binding sites have been found upstream from the manXYZ operon. Although the sites exhibit a similar organization there is no evidence for formation of a DNA loop in this operon.