Light and oxygen effects share a common regulatory DNA sequence in Rhodobacter capsulatus

Light-dependent regulation of photosynthesis genes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 is coordinately controlled by photosynthetic electron transport via the PrrBA two-component system and the photoreceptor AppA

Formation of the photosynthetic apparatus in Rhodobacter is regulated by oxygen tension and light intensity. Here we show that in anaerobically grown Rhodobacter cells a light-dependent increase in expression of the puc and puf operons encoding structural proteins of the photosynthetic complexes requires an active photosynthetic electron transport. The redox-sensitive CrtJ/PpsR repressor of photosynthesis genes, which was suggested to mediate electron transport-dependent signals, is not involved in this light-dependent signal chain. Our data reveal that the signal initiated in the photosynthetic reaction centre is transmitted via components of the electron transport chain and the PrrB/PrrA two-component system in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Under blue light illumination in the absence of oxygen this signal leads to activation of photosynthesis genes and interferes with a blue-light repression mediated by the AppA photoreceptor and the PpsR transcriptional repressor in R. sphaeroides. Thus, light either sensed by a photoreceptor or initiating photosynthetic electron transport has opposite effects on the transcription of photosynthesis genes. Both signalling pathways involve redox-dependent steps that finally determine the effect of light on gene expression.

AerR, a second aerobic repressor of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus

Open reading frame orf192, which is located immediately upstream of the aerobic repressor gene crtJ, was genetically and biochemically demonstrated to code for a second aerobic repressor (AerR) of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Promoter-mapping studies indicate that crtJ has its own promoter but that a significant proportion of crtJ expression is promoted by read-through transcription of orf192 (aerR) transcripts through crtJ. Disruption of aerR resulted in increased photopigment biosynthesis during aerobic growth to a level similar to that of disruption of crtJ. Like that reported for CrtJ, beta-galactosidase assays of reporter gene expression indicated that disruption of aerR resulted in a two- to threefold increase in aerobic expression of the crtI and pucB operons. However, unlike CrtJ, AerR aerobically represses puf operon expression and does not aerobically repress bchC expression. Gel mobility shift analysis with purified AerR indicates that AerR does not bind to a bchC promoter probe but does bind to the crtI, puc, and puf promoter probes. These results indicate that AerR is a DNA-binding protein that targets genes partially overlapping a subset of genes that are also controlled by CrtJ. We also provide evidence for cooperative binding of AerR and CrtJ to the puc promoter region.

Regulation of bacterial photosynthesis genes by oxygen and light

Most bacteria have the capability to adapt to changes in their environment. Facultatively phototrophic bacteria like Rhodobacter can switch from aerobic respiration to anoxygenic photosynthesis in the absence of oxygen. The formation of the photosynthetic apparatus is primarily regulated by oxygen tension. The amount of photosynthetic complexes is influenced by the light intensity in anaerobic cultures. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of Rhodobacter photosynthesis genes by oxygen and light.

Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria

The aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria are a relatively recently discovered bacterial group. Although taxonomically and phylogenetically heterogeneous, these bacteria share the following distinguishing features: the presence of bacteriochlorophyll a incorporated into reaction center and light-harvesting complexes, low levels of the photosynthetic unit in cells, an abundance of carotenoids, a strong inhibition by light of bacteriochlorophyll synthesis, and the inability to grow photosynthetically under anaerobic conditions. Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria are classified in two marine (Erythrobacter and Roseobacter) and six freshwater (Acidiphilium, Erythromicrobium, Erythromonas, Porphyrobacter, Roseococcus, and Sandaracinobacter) genera, which phylogenetically belong to the alpha-1, alpha-3, and alpha-4 subclasses of the class Proteobacteria. Despite this phylogenetic information, the evolution and ancestry of their photosynthetic properties are unclear. We discuss several current proposals for the evolutionary origin of aerobic phototrophic bacteria. The closest phylogenetic relatives of aerobic phototrophic bacteria include facultatively anaerobic purple nonsulfur phototrophic bacteria. Since these two bacterial groups share many properties, yet have significant differences, we compare and contrast their physiology, with an emphasis on morphology and photosynthetic and other metabolic processes.

Redox control of transcription: sensors, response regulators, activators and repressors

In a growing number of cases, transcription of specific genes is known to be governed by oxidation or reduction of electron carriers with which the gene products interact. The biological function of such control is to activate synthesis of appropriate redox proteins, and to repress synthesis of inappropriate ones, in response to altered availability of specific electron sources and sinks. In prokaryotic systems this control appears to operate by two general classes of mechanism: by two-component regulation involving protein phosphorylation on histidine and aspartate; and by direct oxidation-reduction of gene repressors or activators. For the first class, termed 'two-component redox regulation', the term 'redox sensor' is proposed for any electron carrier that becomes phosphorylated upon oxidation or reduction and thereby controls phosphorylation of specific response regulators, while the term 'redox response regulator' is proposed for the corresponding sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that controls transcription as a result of its phosphorylation by one or more redox sensors. For the second class of redox regulatory mechanism, the terms 'redox activator protein' and 'redox repressor protein' are proposed for single proteins containing both electron transfer and sequence-specific DNA-binding domains. The structure, function and biological distribution of these components are discussed.

Molecular cloning, sequence analysis and expression of the gene for catalase-peroxidase (cpeA) from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus B10

The gene encoding catalase-peroxidase was cloned from chromosomal DNA of Rhodobacter capsulatus B10. The nucleotide sequence of a 3.7-kb SacI-HindIII fragment, containing the catalase-peroxidase gene (cpeA) and its flanking regions were determined. A 1728-bp open reading frame, coding for 576 amino acid residues (molecular mass 61516 Da) of the enzyme, was observed. A Shine-Dalgarno sequence was found 5 bp upstream from the translational start site. The deduced amino acid sequence coincides with that of the amino terminus and of four peptides derived from trypsin digestion of the purified catalase-peroxidase of R. capsulatus B10. The amino acid sequence of R. capsulatus catalase-peroxidase shows interesting similarities to the amino acid sequences of the hydroperoxidases of Escherichia coli (42.7%) and Salmonella typhimurium (39.9%), the peroxidase of Bacillus stearothermophilus (32.1%) and the catalase-peroxidase of Mycobacterium intracellulare (42.2%). As shown by a cpeA::lacZ fusion in trans in R. capsulatus, the expression of the catalase-peroxidase gene is regulated by oxygen. The promoter of the cpeA gene was localized within 320 bp upstream of the ATG start codon.

Redox control of gene expression and the function of chloroplast genomes - an hypothesis

Two-component regulatory systems that respond to changes in redox potential have recently been discovered in bacteria. 'Redox sensors' are defined as electron carriers which initiate control of gene expression upon oxidation or reduction. 'Redox response regulators' are defined as DNA-binding proteins which modify gene expression as a result of the action of redox sensors. Redox sensors and redox response regulators may comprise a mechanism for feedback control of redox potential in photosynthetic electron transport chains, thereby protecting plants, algae and photosynthetic bacteria from damage caused by electrochemistry operating on inappropriate electron donors and acceptors. Chloroplast redox sensors and redox response regulators, themselves encoded in the nucleus, may place chloroplast gene expression under redox regulatory control. This may account for the persistence, in evolution, of chloroplast genomes, and for the constancy of the sub-set of chloroplast proteins encoded and synthesised in situ. These and other predictions are discussed.

Sequence organization and regulation of the Bacillus subtilis menBE operon

Menaquinone (MK) plays a central role in the respiratory chain of Bacillus subtilis. The biosynthesis of MK requires the formation of a naphthoquinone ring via a series of specific reactions branching from the shikimate pathway. "Early" MK-specific reactions catalyze the formation of o-succinylbenzoate (OSB) from isochorismate, and "late" reactions convert OSB to dihydroxynaphthoate, by utilizing an OSB-coenzyme A intermediate. We have cloned and sequenced the B. subtilis menE and menB genes encoding, respectively, OSB-coenzyme A synthase and dihydroxynaphthoate synthase. The MenB open reading frame encodes a potential polypeptide of 261 amino acid residues with a predicted size of 28.5 kDa, while the MenE open reading frame could encode a 24.4-kDa polypeptide of 220 amino acid residues. Probable promoter sequences were identified by high-resolution primer extension assays. Organization of these genes and regulatory regions was found to be menBp menB menEp menE. Expression of menE was dependent on both menEp and menBp, indicating an operonlike organization. A region of dyad symmetry capable of forming a stable RNA secondary structure was found between menB and menE. Culture cycle-dependent expression of menB and menE was measured by steady-state transcript accumulation. For both genes, maximal accumulation was found to occur within an hour after the end of exponential growth. The menBp and menEp promoters have sequences compatible with recognition by the major vegetative form of B. subtilis RNA polymerase, E sigma A. Both promoter regions also were found to contain homologies to a sequence motif previously identified in the menCDp region and in promoters for several B. subtilis tricarboxylic acid cycle genes.

Transcriptional and posttranscriptional components of psbA response to high light intensity in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942

The psbA genes, which encode the D1 protein of photosystem II, constitute a multigene family in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. Levels of messages from the three psbA genes change rapidly when cells are shifted from low-light to high-light conditions: the psbAI message level drops, whereas psbAII and psbAIII message levels increase dramatically. We examined the potential contributions of transcriptional and posttranscriptional processes in these high-light responses by subjecting cells that had been grown in a turbidostat at a standard light intensity (130 microeinsteins [microE] m-2 s-1) to either the same or a higher light intensity (500 microE m-2 s-1) in the presence or absence of rifampin. Northern (RNA blot) analysis of RNA isolated from cells subjected to high light showed that the increases in psbAII and psbAIII transcripts were blocked by rifampin. This suggests a transcriptional induction of these genes at high light intensities. Increased mRNA stability does not contribute to their accumulation in high-light conditions, since their half-life values did not increase relative to the half-lives measured at the standard light intensity. The rate of disappearance of the psbAI transcript in cells shifted to high light was diminished when either transcription or translation was blocked by rifampin or chloramphenicol, suggesting that accelerated degradation of the message requires de novo synthesis of a protein factor. When rifampin was added 10 min after the shift to high light intensity rather than before the shift, psbAI and psbAIII messages, but not the psbAII message, decayed at a faster rate. Susceptibility of the psbAIII transcript to the high-light-induced factor was also demonstrated by addition of chloramphenicol prior to the shaft to high light. psbAIII transcript levels went up more than twofold higher in chloramphenicol-treated cells than in untreated cells, whereas psbAII transcript levels were affected by the inhibitor. These experiments provide evidence that either new or increased synthesis of a degradation factor which affects a subset of Synechococcus transcripts occurs in cells subjected to high light intensity.