Direct visualization of plasmid DNA in bacterial cells

Spatial distribution of high copy number plasmids in bacteria

Plasmids play essential roles in bacterial metabolism, evolution, and pathogenesis. The maintenance of plasmids is of great importance both scientifically and practically. In this mini-review, I look at the problem from a slightly different point of view and focus on the spatial distribution of high copy number plasmids, for which no active segregation mechanism has been identified. I review several distribution models and summarize the direct and indirect evidence in the literature, including the most recent progress on measuring the spatial distribution of high copy number plasmids using emerging super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. It is concluded that many open questions remain in the field and that in-depth studies on the spatial distribution of plasmids could shed light on the understanding of the maintenance of plasmids in bacteria.

On the Spatial Organization of mRNA, Plasmids, and Ribosomes in a Bacterial Host Overexpressing Membrane Proteins

By using fluorescence imaging, we provide a time-resolved single-cell view on coupled defects in transcription, translation, and growth during expression of heterologous membrane proteins in Lactococcus lactis. Transcripts encoding poorly produced membrane proteins accumulate in mRNA-dense bodies at the cell poles, whereas transcripts of a well-expressed homologous membrane protein show membrane-proximal localization in a translation-dependent fashion. The presence of the aberrant polar mRNA foci correlates with cessation of cell division, which is restored once these bodies are cleared. In addition, activation of the heat-shock response and a loss of nucleoid-occluded ribosomes are observed. We show that the presence of a native-like N-terminal domain is key to SRP-dependent membrane localization and successful production of membrane proteins. The work presented gives new insights and detailed understanding of aberrant membrane protein biogenesis, which can be used for strategies to optimize membrane protein production.

High-copy bacterial plasmids diffuse in the nucleoid-free space, replicate stochastically and are randomly partitioned at cell division

Bacterial plasmids play important roles in the metabolism, pathogenesis and bacterial evolution and are highly versatile biotechnological tools. Stable inheritance of plasmids depends on their autonomous replication and efficient partition to daughter cells at cell division. Active partition systems have not been identified for high-copy number plasmids, and it has been generally believed that they are partitioned randomly at cell division. Nevertheless, direct evidence for the cellular location of replicating and nonreplicating plasmids, and the partition mechanism has been lacking. We used as model pJHCMW1, a plasmid isolated from Klebsiella pneumoniae that includes two β-lactamase and two aminoglycoside resistance genes. Here we report that individual ColE1-type plasmid molecules are mobile and tend to be excluded from the nucleoid, mainly localizing at the cell poles but occasionally moving between poles along the long axis of the cell. As a consequence, at the moment of cell division, most plasmid molecules are located at the poles, resulting in efficient random partition to the daughter cells. Complete replication of individual molecules occurred stochastically and independently in the nucleoid-free space throughout the cell cycle, with a constant probability of initiation per plasmid.

Eclipse period of R1 plasmids during downshift from elevated copy number: Nonrandom selection of copies for replication

The classical Meselson-Stahl density-shift method was used to study replication of pOU71, a runaway-replication derivative of plasmid R1 in Escherichia coli. The miniplasmid maintained the normal low copy number of R1 during steady growth at 30°C, but as growth temperatures were raised above 34°C, the copy number of the plasmid increased to higher levels, and at 42°C, it replicated without control in a runaway replication mode with lethal consequences for the host. The eclipse periods (minimum time between successive replication of the same DNA) of the plasmid shortened with rising copy numbers at increasing growth temperatures (Olsson et al., 2003). In this work, eclipse periods were measured during downshifts in copy number of pOU71 after it had replicated at 39 and 42°C, resulting in 7- and 50-fold higher than normal plasmid copy number per cell, respectively. Eclipse periods for plasmid replication, measured during copy number downshift, suggested that plasmid R1, normally selected randomly for replication, showed a bias such that a newly replicated DNA had a higher probability of replication compared to the bulk of the R1 population. However, even the unexpected nonrandom replication followed the copy number kinetics such that every generation, the plasmids underwent the normal inherited number of replication, n, independent of the actual number of plasmid copies in a newborn cell.

Plasmid segregation: how to survive as an extra piece of DNA

Non-essential extra-chromosomal DNA elements such as plasmids are responsible for their own propagation in dividing host cells, and one means to ensure this is to carry a miniature active segregation system reminiscent of the mitotic spindle. Plasmids that are maintained at low numbers in prokaryotic cells have developed a range of such active partitioning systems, which are characterized by an impressive simplicity and efficiency and which are united by the use of dynamic, nucleotide-driven filaments to separate and position DNA molecules. A comparison of different plasmid segregation systems reveals (i) how unrelated filament-forming and DNA-binding proteins have been adopted and modified to create a range of simple DNA segregating complexes and (ii) how subtle changes in the few components of these DNA segregation machines has led to a remarkable diversity in the molecular mechanisms of closely related segregation systems. Here, our current understanding of plasmid segregation systems is reviewed and compared with other DNA segregation systems, and this is extended by a discussion of basic principles of plasmid segregation systems, evolutionary implications and the relationship between an autonomous DNA element and its host cell.

Localization of the naturally occurring plasmid ColE1 at the cell pole

The naturally occurring plasmid ColE1 was found to localize as a cluster in one or both of the cell poles of Escherichia coli. In addition to the polar localization of ColE1 in most cells, movement of the plasmid to the midcell position was observed in time-lapse studies. ColE1 could be displaced from its polar location by the p15A replicon, pBAD33, but not by plasmid RK2. The displacement of ColE1 by pBAD33 resulted in an almost random positioning of ColE1 foci in the cell and also in a loss of segregational stability, as evidenced by the large number of cells carrying pBAD33 with no visible ColE1 focus and as confirmed by ColE1 stability studies. The addition of the active partitioning systems of the F plasmid (sopABC) or RK2 (O(B1) incC korB) resulted in movement of the ColE1 replicon from the cell pole to within the nucleoid region. This repositioning did not result in destabilization but did result in an increase in the number of plasmid foci, most likely due to partial declustering. These results are consistent with the importance of par regions to the localization of plasmids to specific regions of the cell and demonstrate both localization and dynamic movement for a naturally occurring plasmid that does not encode a replication initiation protein or a partitioning system that is required for plasmid stability.

Regular cellular distribution of plasmids by oscillating and filament-forming ParA ATPase of plasmid pB171

Centromere-like loci from bacteria segregate plasmids to progeny cells before cell division. The ParA ATPase (a MinD homologue) of the par2 locus from plasmid pB171 forms oscillating helical structures over the nucleoid. Here we show that par2 distributes plasmid foci regularly along the length of the cell even in cells with many plasmids. In vitro, ParA binds ATP and ADP and has a cooperative ATPase activity. Moreover, ParA forms ATP-dependent filaments and cables, suggesting that ParA can provide the mechanical force for the observed regular distribution of plasmids. ParA and ParB interact with each other in a bacterial two-hybrid assay but do not interact with FtsZ, eight other essential cell division proteins or MreB actin. Based on these observations, we propose a simple model for how oscillating ParA filaments can mediate regular cellular distribution of plasmids. The model functions without the involvement of partition-specific host cell receptors and is thus consistent with the striking observation that partition loci can function in heterologous host organisms.

Active transcription of rRNA operons is a driving force for the distribution of RNA polymerase in bacteria: effect of extrachromosomal copies of rrnB on the in vivo localization of RNA polymerase

In contrast to eukaryotes, bacteria such as Escherichia coli contain only one form of RNA polymerase (RNAP), which is responsible for all cellular transcription. Using an RNAP-green fluorescent protein fusion protein, we showed previously that E. coli RNAP is partitioned exclusively in the nucleoid and that stable RNA synthesis, particularly rRNA transcription, is critical for concentrating a significant fraction of RNAP in transcription foci during exponential growth. The extent of focus formation varies under different physiological conditions, supporting the proposition that RNAP redistribution is an important element for global gene regulation. Here we show that extra, plasmid-borne copies of an rRNA operon recruit RNAP from the nucleoid into the cytoplasmic space and that this is accompanied by a reduction in the growth rate. Transcription of an intact rRNA operon is not necessary, although a minimal transcript length is required for this phenotype. Replacement of the ribosomal promoters with another strong promoter, Ptac, abolished the effect. These results demonstrate that active synthesis from rRNA promoters is a major driving force for the distribution of RNAP in bacteria. The implications of our results for the regulation of rRNA synthesis and cell growth are discussed.

Plasmid R1--replication and its control

Plasmid R1 is a low-copy-number plasmid belonging to the IncFII group. The genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, and physiology of R1 replication and its control are summarised and discussed in the present communication. Replication of R1 starts at a unique origin, oriR1, and proceeds unidirectionally according to the Theta mode. Plasmid R1 replicates during the entire cell cycle and the R1 copies in the cell are members of a pool from which a plasmid copy at random is selected for replication. However, there is an eclipse period during which a newly replicated copy does not belong to this pool. Replication of R1 is controlled by an antisense RNA, CopA, that is unstable and formed constitutively; hence, its concentration is a measure of the concentration of the plasmid. CopA-RNA interacts with its complementary target, CopT-RNA, that is located upstream of the RepA message on the repA-mRNA. CopA-RNA post-transcriptionally inhibits translation of the repA-mRNA. CopA- and CopT-RNA interact in a bimolecular reaction which results in an inverse proportionality between the relative rate of replication (replications per plasmid copy and cell cycle) and the copy number; the number of replications per cell and cell cycle, n, is independent of the actual copy number in the individual cells, the so-called +n mode of control. Single base-pair substitutions in the copA/copT region of the plasmid genome may result in mutants that are compatible with the wild type. Loss of CopA activity results in (uncontrolled) so-called runaway replication, which is lethal to the host but useful for the production of proteins from cloned genes. Plasmid R1 also has an ancillary control system, CopB, that derepresses the synthesis of repA-mRNA in cells that happen to contain lower than normal number of copies. Plasmid R1, as other plasmids, form clusters in the cell and plasmid replication is assumed to take place in the centre of the cells; this requires traffic from the cluster to the replication factories and back to the clusters. The clusters are plasmid-specific and presumably based on sequence homology.

Partition-mediated plasmid pairing

Plasmid partition systems are essential for the stability and thus the survival of low-copy-number plasmids in growing bacterial populations. The partition reaction is responsible for proper intracellular distribution of plasmids in the bacterial cell cycle. One common step in most partition models is the pairing of plasmids to each other by partition components. Here, evidence that supports the pairing of plasmids via their partition complexes is reviewed, and discussed in light of recent observations that many plasmids, including those without active partition systems are clustered in limited groups inside bacterial cells.

Compartmentalization of prokaryotic DNA replication

It becomes now apparent that prokaryotic DNA replication takes place at specific intracellular locations. Early studies indicated that chromosomal DNA replication, as well as plasmid and viral DNA replication, occurs in close association with the bacterial membrane. Moreover, over the last several years, it has been shown that some replication proteins and specific DNA sequences are localized to particular subcellular regions in bacteria, supporting the existence of replication compartments. Although the mechanisms underlying compartmentalization of prokaryotic DNA replication are largely unknown, the docking of replication factors to large organizing structures may be important for the assembly of active replication complexes. In this article, we review the current state of this subject in two bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, focusing our attention in both chromosomal and extrachromosomal DNA replication. A comparison with eukaryotic systems is also presented.

Stable propagation of 'selfish' genetic elements

Extrachromosomal or chromosomally integrated genetic elements are common among prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. These elements exhibit a variety of 'selfish' strategies to ensure their replication and propagation during the growth of their host cells. To establish long-term persistence, they have to moderate the degree of selfishness so as not to imperil the fitness of their hosts. Earlier genetic and biochemical studies together with more recent cell biological investigations have revealed details of the partitioning mechanisms employed by low copy bacterial plasmids. At least some bacterial chromosomes also appear to rely on similar mechanisms for their own segregation. The 2 mm plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and related yeast plasmids provide models for optimized eukaryotic selfish DNA elements. Selfish DNA elements exploit the genetic endowments of their hosts without imposing an undue metabolic burden on them. The partitioning systems of these plasmids appear to make use of a molecular trick by which the plasmids feed into the segregation pathway established for the host chromosomes.

Clustering versus random segregation of plasmids lacking a partitioning function: a plasmid paradox?

Plasmids lacking a functional partition system are randomly distributed to the daughter cells; plasmid-free daughter cells are formed with a frequency of (1/2)2n per cell and cell generation where 2n is the (average) copy number at cell division. Hence, the unit of segregation is one plasmid copy. However, plasmids form clusters in the cells. A putative solution to this potential paradox is presented: one plasmid copy at a time is recruited from the plasmid clusters to the replication factories that are located in the cell centres. Hence, replication offers the means of declustering that is necessary in a growing host population. The daughter copies diffuse freely and each copy may with equal probability end up in either of the two cell halves. In this way, the random segregation of the plasmids is coupled to replication and occurs continuously during the cell cycle, and is not linked to cell division. The unit of segregation is the plasmid copy and not the plasmid clusters. In contrast, the two daughters of a Par+ plasmid are directed in opposite directions by the plasmid-encoded partition system, thereby assuring that each daughter cell receives the plasmid.

Dynamic cellular location of bacterial plasmids

Recent studies have shown that plasmids are organized inside bacterial cells in a remarkably complex way. Plasmids containing active partitioning systems are tethered to specific regions of the cell, and the number and position of plasmid molecules within the cell are coordinated with the bacterial host cell cycle and growth rate. Plasmids belonging to different incompatibility groups are also tethered to different sites within the cell, and segregate at different times relative to one another and to the bacterial cell cycle. Recent studies suggest that many of these observations regarding subcellular plasmid dynamics formulated for Escherichia coli plasmids may be broadly conserved.

Compatible bacterial plasmids are targeted to independent cellular locations in Escherichia coli

Targeting of DNA molecules to specific subcellular positions is essential for efficient segregation, but the mechanisms underlying these processes are poorly understood. In Escherichia coli, several plasmids belonging to different incompatibility groups (F, P1 and RK2) localize preferentially near the midcell and quartercell positions. Here we compare the relative positions of these three plasmids using fluorescence in situ hybridization. When plasmids F and P1 were localized simultaneously using differentially labeled probes, the majority of foci (approximately 75%) were well separated from each other. Similar results were found when we compared the subcellular localization of F with RK2, and RK2 with P1: regardless of the number of foci per cell or growth conditions, most of the foci (70-80%) were not in close proximity to one another. We also localized RK2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Vibrio cholerae, and found that plasmid RK2 localization is conserved across bacterial species. Our results suggest that each plasmid has its own unique subcellular address, implying a mechanism for the stable co-existence of plasmids in which subcellular targeting plays a major role.

Multicopy plasmids are clustered and localized in Escherichia coli

We localized the multicopy plasmid RK2 in Escherichia coli and found that the number of fluorescent foci observed in each cell was substantially less than the copy number of the plasmid, suggesting that many copies of RK2 are grouped into a few multiplasmid clusters. In minimal glucose media, the majority of cells had one or two foci, with a single focus localized near midcell, and two foci near the 1/4 and 3/4 cell positions. The number of foci per cell increased with cell length and with growth rate, and decreased upon entering stationary phase, suggesting a coordination of RK2 replication or segregation with the bacterial cell cycle. Time-lapse microscopy demonstrated that partitioning of RK2 foci is achieved by the splitting of a single focus into two or three smaller foci, which are capable of separating with rapid kinetics. A derivative of the high-copy-number plasmid pUC19 containing the lacO array was also localized by tagging with GFP-LacI. Whereas many of the cells contained numerous, randomly diffusing foci, most cells exhibited one or two plasmid clusters located at midcell or the cell quarter positions. Our results suggest a model in which multicopy plasmids are not always randomly diffusing throughout the cell as previously thought, but can be replicated and partitioned in clusters targeted to specific locations.

Partitioning of the Escherichia coli chromosome: superhelicity and condensation

Segregation in Escherichia coli, the process of separating the replicated chromosomes into daughter progeny cells, seems to start long before the duplication of the genome reaches completion. Soon after initiation in mid-cell region, the daughter oriCs rapidly move apart to fixed positions inside the cell (quarter length positions from each pole) and are anchored there by yet unknown mechanism(s). As replication proceeds, the rest of the chromosome is sequentially unwound and then refolded. At termination, the two sister chromosomes are unlinked by decatenation and separated by supercoiling and/or condensation. Muk and Seq proteins are involved in different stages of this replication-cum-partition process and thus can be categorized as important partition proteins along with topoisomerases. E. coli strains, lacking mukB or seqA functions, are defective in segregation and cell division. The nucleoids in these mutant strains exhibit altered condensation and superhelicity as can be demonstrated by sedimentation analysis and by fluorescence microscopy. As the supercoiling of an extrachromosomal element (a plasmid DNA) was also influenced by the mukB and seqA mutations we concluded that the MukB and SeqA proteins are possibly involved in maintaining the general supercoiling activity in the cell. The segregation of E. coli chromosome might therefore be predominantly driven by factors that operate by affecting the superhelicity and condensation of the nucleoid (MukB, SeqA, topoisomerases and additional unknown proteins). A picture thus emerges in which replication and partition are no longer compartmentalized into separable stages with clear gaps (S and M phases in eukaryotes) but are parallel processes that proceed concomitantly through a cell cycle continuum.

Plasmid R1 is present as clusters in the cells of Escherichia coli

Fluorescence microscopy was used to determine the location(s) of the replication origin of plasmid R1 in exponentially growing cells of Escherichia coli. The number of oriR1 foci per cell was smaller than the number of R1 copies per cell and was found to be the same for a copA mutant of R1 and for the wild-type plasmid. The intensities of individual foci were stronger for the cop mutant than for the wild type. We interpreted these results to imply that the plasmid DNA molecules were localized in small groups/clusters, a result that seems contrary to the earlier observations that plasmid R1 replicates randomly and segregates as a single-copy unit. The implications for the quantitative behavior of plasmid R1 in stability, incompatibility tests, replication, and partition experiments are discussed.

Subcellular distribution of actively partitioning F plasmid during the cell division cycle in E. coli

F plasmid is partitioned with fidelity to daughter cells during cell division cycle owing to two trans-acting genes, sopA and sopB, and a cis-acting site, sopC. We visualized the subcellular distribution of mini-F-plasmid molecules by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mini-F-plasmid molecules having the sopABC segment were localized at midcell in newborn cells. Replicated plasmid molecules migrated to cell positions 1/4 and 3/4 without coupling with cell elongation and were tethered to these positions until completion of cell division. In contrast, molecules of a mini F plasmid lacking the sopABC segment were distributed randomly in spaces not occupied by nucleoids. The sopABC system caused replicated plasmid molecules to be positioned and tethered at the cell quarter sites.

Partition of P1 plasmids in Escherichia coli mukB chromosomal partition mutants

The partition system of the low-copy-number plasmid/prophage of bacteriophage P1 encodes two proteins, ParA and ParB, and contains a DNA site called parS. ParB and the Escherichia coli protein IHF bind to parS to form the partition complex, in which parS is wrapped around ParB and IHF in a precise three-dimensional conformation. Partition can be thought of as a positioning reaction; the plasmid-encoded components ensure that at least one copy of the plasmid is positioned within each new daughter cell. We have used an E. coli chromosomal partition mutant to test whether this positioning is mediated by direct plasmid-chromosomal attachment, for example, by pairing of the partition complex that forms at parS with a bacterial attachment site. The E. coli MukB protein is required for proper chromosomal positioning, so that mukB mutants generate some cells without chromosomes (anucleate cells) at each cell division. We analyzed the plasmid distribution in nucleate and anucleate mukB cells. We found that P1 plasmids are stable in mukB mutants and that they partition into both nucleate and anucleate cells. This indicates that the P1 partition complex is not used to pair plasmids with the host chromosome and that P1 plasmids must be responsible for their own proper cellular localization, presumably through host-plasmid protein-protein interactions.