Interactions between the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein and RNA polymerase at class II promoters

Inexpensive protein overexpression driven by the NarL transcription activator protein

Most Escherichia coli overexpression vectors used for recombinant protein production (RPP) depend on organic inducers, for example, sugars or simple conjugates. However, these can be expensive and, sometimes, chemically unstable. To simplify this and to cut the cost of RPP, we have developed vectors controlled by the Escherichia coli nitrate‐responsive NarL transcription activator protein, which use nitrate, a cheap, stable, and abundant inorganic ion, to induce high‐level controlled RPP. We show that target proteins, such as green fluorescent protein, human growth hormone, and single‐chain variable region antibody fragments can be expressed to high levels using our promoter systems. As nitrate levels are high in many commercial fertilizers, we demonstrate that controlled RPP can be achieved using readily available and inexpensive garden products.

An ideal spacing is required for the control of Class II CRP-dependent promoters by the status of CRP K100

Transcription activation by the Escherichia coli CRP at Class II promoters is dependent on direct interactions between RNA polymerase and CRP, therefore the spatial proximity between both proteins plays a significant role in the ability of CRP to activate transcription. Using both in vivo and in vitro techniques, here we demonstrate that the CRP K100 positive charge, adjacent to AR2, is required for full promoter activity when CRP is optimally positioned. Accordingly, K100 mediated activation is very position-dependent and our data confirm that the largest impact of the K100 status on transcription activation occurs when the spacing between the CRP binding site and the A2 of the -10 element is 22 bp. From the results of this study and the progress in the understanding about open complex DNA scrunching, we propose that CRP-dependent promoters should now be numbered by the distance from the center of the DNA site for CRP and the most highly conserved base at position 2 of the -10 hexamer in bacterial promoters.

Allosteric Response of DNA Recognition Helices of Catabolite Activator Protein to cAMP and DNA Binding

The homodimeric catabolite activator protein (CAP) regulates the transcription of several bacterial genes based on the cellular concentration of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). The binding of cAMP to CAP triggers allosteric communication between the cAMP binding domains (CBD) and DNA binding domains (DBD) of CAP, which entails repositioning of DNA recognition helices (F-helices) in the DBD to dock favorably to the target DNA. Despite considerable progress, much remains to be understood about the mechanistic details of DNA recognition by CAP and about the map of allosteric pathways involved in CAP-mediated gene transcription. The present study uses molecular dynamics and umbrella sampling simulations to investigate the mechanism of cAMP- and DNA-induced changes in the conformation and energetics of F-helices observed during the allosteric regulation of CAP by cAMP and the subsequent binding to the DNA promoter region. Using novel collective variables, the free energy profiles associated with the orientation and dynamics of F-helices in the unliganded, cAMP-bound, and cAMP-DNA-bound states of CAP are calculated and compared. The binding-induced alterations in the resultant free energy profiles reveal important flexibility constraints imposed on DBD upon cAMP and DNA binding. A comprehensive analysis of residue-wise interaction maps reveals potential allosteric pathways between CBD and DBD that facilitate the allosteric transduction of regulatory signals in CAP. The revelation that the predicted allosteric pathways crisscross the intersubunit interface offers important clues on the microscopic origin of the intersubunit cooperativity and dimer stability of CAP.

Mutations in the Global Transcription Factor CRP/CAP: Insights from Experimental Evolution and Deep Sequencing

The Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP or catabolite activator protein, CAP) provides a textbook example of bacterial transcriptional regulation and is one of the best studied transcription factors in biology. For almost five decades a large number of mutants, evolved in vivo or engineered in vitro, have shed light on the molecular structure and mechanism of CRP. Here, we review previous work, providing an overview of studies describing the isolation of CRP mutants. Furthermore, we present new data on deep sequencing of different bacterial populations that have evolved under selective pressure that strongly favors mutations in the crp locus. Our new approach identifies more than 100 new CRP mutations and paves the way for a deeper understanding of this fascinating bacterial master regulator.

ChIP-exo interrogation of Crp, DNA, and RNAP holoenzyme interactions

Numerous in vitro studies have yielded a refined picture of the structural and molecular associations between Cyclic-AMP receptor protein (Crp), the DNA motif, and RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme. In this study, high-resolution ChIP-exonuclease (ChIP-exo) was applied to study Crp binding in vivo and at genome-scale. Surprisingly, Crp was found to provide little to no protection of the DNA motif under activating conditions. Instead, Crp demonstrated binding patterns that closely resembled those generated by σ⁷⁰. The binding patterns of both Crp and σ⁷⁰ are indicative of RNAP holoenzyme DNA footprinting profiles associated with stages during transcription initiation that occur post-recruitment. This is marked by a pronounced advancement of the template strand footprint profile to the +20 position relative to the transcription start site and a multimodal distribution on the nontemplate strand. This trend was also observed in the familial transcription factor, Fnr, but full protection of the motif was seen in the repressor ArcA. Given the time-scale of ChIP studies and that the rate-limiting step in transcription initiation is typically post recruitment, we propose a hypothesis where Crp is absent from the DNA motif but remains associated with RNAP holoenzyme post-recruitment during transcription initiation. The release of Crp from the DNA motif may be a result of energetic changes that occur as RNAP holoenzyme traverses the various stable intermediates towards elongation complex formation.

An acetylatable lysine controls CRP function in E. coli

Transcriptional regulation is the key to ensuring that proteins are expressed at the proper time and the proper amount. In Escherichia coli, the transcription factor cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is responsible for much of this regulation. Questions remain, however, regarding the regulation of CRP activity itself. Here, we demonstrate that a lysine (K100) on the surface of CRP has a dual function: to promote CRP activity at Class II promoters, and to ensure proper CRP steady state levels. Both functions require the lysine's positive charge; intriguingly, the positive charge of K100 can be neutralized by acetylation using the central metabolite acetyl phosphate as the acetyl donor. We propose that CRP K100 acetylation could be a mechanism by which the cell downwardly tunes CRP-dependent Class II promoter activity, whilst elevating CRP steady state levels, thus indirectly increasing Class I promoter activity. This mechanism would operate under conditions that favor acetate fermentation, such as during growth on glucose as the sole carbon source or when carbon flux exceeds the capacity of the central metabolic pathways.

The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) regulates mqsRA, coding for the bacterial toxin-antitoxin gene pair, in Escherichia coli

Bacterial persisters represent a small number of slow-growing antibiotic-tolerant cells among populations of rapidly growing cells, and are the main cause of frequent recurrent infections. MqsR-MqsA, the toxin-antitoxin (TA) pair, is the most frequently induced TA system associated with antibiotic persistence in Escherichia coli. In this study, we show that the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) indirectly upregulates mqsRA transcription. We also show that CRP plays an important role in antibiotic persistence, which seems to be partially mediated through MqsRA. Overall, this study highlights the role of CRP as an important regulator of antibiotic persistence in E. coli.

Expression of different bacterial cytotoxins is controlled by two global transcription factors, CRP and Fis, that co-operate in a shared-recruitment mechanism

Expression of related autotransporter toxin genes in pathogenic Escherichia coli and Shigella sonnei require the CRP and Fis global regulators. At promoters controlling toxin production, CRP is suboptimally positioned and Fis compensates for this impediment by facilitating RNA polymerase recruitment.

Cyclic AMP receptor protein regulates cspD, a bacterial toxin gene, in Escherichia coli

cspD, a member of cspA family of cold shock genes in Escherichia coli, is not induced during cold shock. Its expression is induced during stationary phase. CspD inhibits DNA replication, and a high level of the protein is toxic to cells. Recently, CspD was proposed to be associated with persister cell formation in E. coli. Here, we show that cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) upregulates cspD transcription. Sequence analysis of the cspD upstream region revealed two tandem CRP target sites, CRP site-I (the proximal site centered at -83.5 with respect to the transcription start) and CRP site-II (the distal site centered at -112.5). The results from electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that CRP indeed binds to these two target sites in PcspD. The promoter-proximal CRP target site was found to play a major role in PcspD activation by CRP, as studied by transcriptional fusions carrying mutations in the target sites. The results from in vitro transcription assays demonstrated that CRP activates PcspD transcription in the absence of additional factors other than RNA polymerase. The requirement for activating region 1 of CRP in PcspD activation, along with the involvement of the 287, 265, and 261 determinants of the α-CTD, suggest that CRP activates by a class I-type mechanism. However, only moderate activation in vitro was observed compared to high activation in vivo, suggesting there might be additional activators of PcspD. Overall, our findings show that CRP, a global metabolic regulator in E. coli, activates a gene potentially related to persistence.

Transcriptional regulation by BglJ-RcsB, a pleiotropic heteromeric activator in Escherichia coli

The bacterial Rcs phosphorelay signals perturbations of the bacterial cell envelope to its response regulator RcsB, which regulates transcription of multiple loci related to motility, biofilm formation and various stress responses. RcsB is unique, as its set of target loci is modulated by interaction with auxiliary regulators including BglJ. The BglJ–RcsB heteromer is known to activate the HNS repressed leuO and bgl loci independent of RcsB phosphorylation. Here, we show that BglJ–RcsB activates the promoters of 10 additional loci (chiA, molR, sfsB, yecT, yqhG, ygiZ, yidL, ykiA, ynbA and ynjI). Furthermore, we mapped the BglJ–RcsB binding site at seven loci and propose a consensus sequence motif. The data suggest that activation by BglJ–RcsB is DNA phasing dependent at some loci, a feature reminiscent of canonical transcriptional activators, while at other loci BglJ–RcsB activation may be indirect by inhibition of HNS-mediated repression. In addition, we show that BglJ–RcsB activates transcription of bgl synergistically with CRP where it shifts the transcription start by 20 bp from a position typical for class I CRP-dependent promoters to a position typical for class II CRP-dependent promoters. Thus, BglJ–RcsB is a pleiotropic transcriptional activator that coordinates regulation with global regulators including CRP, LeuO and HNS.

Cyclic AMP receptor protein regulates pheromone-mediated bioluminescence at multiple levels in Vibrio fischeri ES114

Bioluminescence in Vibrio fischeri ES114 is activated by autoinducer pheromones, and this regulation serves as a model for bacterial cell-cell signaling. As in other bacteria, pheromone concentration increases with cell density; however, pheromone synthesis and perception are also modulated in response to environmental stimuli. Previous studies suggested that expression of the pheromone-dependent bioluminescence activator LuxR is regulated in response to glucose by cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) (P. V. Dunlap and E. P. Greenberg, J. Bacteriol. 164:45-50, 1985; P. V. Dunlap and E. P. Greenberg, J. Bacteriol. 170:4040-4046, 1988; P. V. Dunlap, J. Bacteriol. 171:1199-1202, 1989; and W. F. Friedrich and E. P. Greenberg, Arch. Microbiol. 134:87-91, 1983). Consistent with this model, we found that bioluminescence in V. fischeri ES114 is modulated by glucose and stimulated by cAMP. In addition, a Δcrp mutant was ∼100-fold dimmer than ES114 and did not increase luminescence in response to added cAMP, even though cells lacking crp were still metabolically capable of producing luminescence. We further discovered that CRP regulates not only luxR but also the alternative pheromone synthase gene ainS. We found that His-tagged V. fischeri CRP could bind sequences upstream of both luxR and ainS, supporting bioinformatic predictions of direct regulation at both promoters. Luminescence increased in response to cAMP if either the ainS or luxR system was under native regulation, suggesting cAMP-CRP significantly increases luminescence through both systems. Finally, using transcriptional reporters in transgenic Escherichia coli, we elucidated two additional regulatory connections. First, LuxR-independent basal transcription of the luxI promoter was enhanced by CRP. Second, the effect of CRP on the ainS promoter depended on whether the V. fischeri regulatory gene litR was also introduced. These results suggest an integral role for CRP in pheromone signaling that goes beyond sensing cell density.

Organizational requirements of the SaeR binding sites for a functional P1 promoter of the sae operon in Staphylococcus aureus

In Staphylococcus aureus, the SaeRS two-component system controls the expression of multiple virulence factors. Of the two promoters in the sae operon, P1 is autoinduced and has two binding sites for the response regulator SaeR. In this study, we examined the organizational requirements of the SaeR binding sites in P1 for transcription activation. Mutational studies showed that both binding sites are essential for binding to phosphorylated SaeR (P-SaeR) and transcription activation. When the 21-bp distance between the centers of the two SaeR binding sites was altered to 26 bp, 31 bp, 36 bp, or 41 bp, only the 31-bp mutant retained approximately 40% of the original promoter activity. When the -1-bp spacing (i.e.,1-bp overlap) between the primary SaeR binding site and the -35 promoter region was altered, all mutant P1 promoters failed to initiate transcription; however, when the first nucleotide of the -35 region was changed from A to T, the mutants with 0-bp or 22-bp spacing showed detectable promoter activity. Although P-SaeR was essential for the binding of RNA polymerase to P1, it was not essential for the binding of the enzyme to the alpha-hemolysin promoter. When the nonoptimal spacing between promoter elements in P1 or the coagulase promoter was altered to the optimal spacing of 17 bp, both promoters failed to initiate transcription. These results suggest that SaeR binding sites are under rather strict organizational restrictions and provide clues for understanding the molecular mechanism of sae-mediated transcription activation.

Cyclic AMP receptor protein regulates cspE, an early cold-inducible gene, in Escherichia coli

cspE, a member of the cspA family of cold shock proteins in Escherichia coli, is an early cold-inducible protein. The nucleic acid melting ability and transcription antiterminator activity of CspE have been reported to be critical for growth at low temperature. Here, we show that the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), a global regulator involved in sugar metabolism, upregulates cspE in E. coli. Sequence analysis of the cspE upstream region revealed a putative CRP target site centered at -61.5 relative to the transcription start. The binding of CRP to this target site was demonstrated using electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The presence of this site was shown to be essential for P(cspE) activation by CRP. Mutational analysis of the binding site indicated that the presence of an intact second core motif is more important than the first core motif for CRP-P(cspE) interaction. Based on the promoter architecture, we classified P(cspE) as a class I CRP-dependent promoter. This was further substantiated by our data demonstrating the involvement of the AR1 domain of CRP in P(cspE) transcription. Furthermore, the substitutions in the key residues of the RNA polymerase α-subunit C-terminal domain (α-CTD), which are important for class I CRP-dependent transcription, showed the involvement of 265 and 287 determinants in P(cspE) transcription. In addition, the deletion of crp led to a growth defect at low temperature, suggesting that CRP plays an important role in cold adaptation.

Ligand responses of Vfr, the virulence factor regulator from Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Vfr, a transcription factor homologous to the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP), regulates many aspects of virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Vfr, like CRP, binds to cAMP and then recognizes its target DNA and activates transcription. Here we report that Vfr has important functional differences from CRP in terms of ligand sensing and response. First, Vfr has a significantly higher cAMP affinity than does CRP, which might explain the mysteriously unidirectional functional complementation between the two proteins (S. E. H. West et al., J. Bacteriol. 176:7532-7542, 1994). Second, Vfr is activated by both cAMP and cGMP, while CRP is specific to cAMP. Mutagenic analyses show that Thr133 (analogous to Ser128 of CRP) is the key residue for both of these distinct Vfr properties. On the other hand, substitutions that cause cAMP-independent activity in Vfr are similar to those seen in CRP, suggesting that a common cAMP activation mechanism is present. In the course of these analyses, we found a remarkable class of Vfr variants that have completely reversed the regulatory logic of the protein: they are active in DNA binding without cAMP and are strongly inhibited by cAMP. The physiological impact of Vfr's ligand sensing and response is discussed, as is a plausible basis for the fundamental change in protein allostery in the novel group of Vfr variants.

Transcription of the plasmid-encoded toxin gene from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli is regulated by a novel co-activation mechanism involving CRP and Fis

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) is a major cause of diarrhoea in developing countries. EAEC 042 is the prototypical strain. EAEC 042 secretes the functionally well-characterized Pet autotransporter toxin that contributes to virulence through its cytotoxic effects on intestinal epithelial cells. Following a global transposon mutagenesis screen of EAEC 042, the transcription factors, CRP and Fis, were identified as essential for transcription of the pet gene. Using both in vivo and in vitro techniques, we show that the pet promoter is co-dependent on CRP and Fis. We present a novel co-activation mechanism whereby CRP is placed at a non-optimal position for transcription initiation, creating dependence on Fis for full activation of pet. This study complements previous findings that establish Fis as a key virulence regulator in EAEC 042.

Downregulation of the Escherichia coli guaB promoter by upstream-bound cyclic AMP receptor protein

The Escherichia coli guaB promoter (P(guaB)) is responsible for directing transcription of the guaB and guaA genes, which specify the biosynthesis of the nucleotide GMP. P(guaB) is subject to growth rate-dependent control (GRDC) and possesses an UP element that is required for this regulation. In addition, P(guaB) contains a discriminator, three binding sites for the nucleoid-associated protein FIS, and putative binding sites for the regulatory proteins DnaA, PurR, and cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP). Here we show that the CRP-cyclic AMP (cAMP) complex binds to a site located over 100 bp upstream of the guaB transcription start site, where it serves to downregulate P(guaB). The CRP-mediated repression of P(guaB) activity increases in media that support lower growth rates. Inactivation of the crp or cyaA gene or ablation/translocation of the CRP site relieves repression by CRP and results in a loss of GRDC of P(guaB). Thus, GRDC of P(guaB) involves a progressive increase in CRP-mediated repression of the promoter as the growth rate decreases. Our results also suggest that the CRP-cAMP complex does not direct GRDC at P(guaB) and that at least one other regulatory factor is required for conferring GRDC on this promoter. However, PurR and DnaA are not required for this regulatory mechanism.

Poly(A)-polymerase I links transcription with mRNA degradation via sigmaS proteolysis

Bacteria rapidly adapt to changes in growth conditions through control of transcription and specific mRNA degradation. Interplay of both mechanisms must exist in order to achieve fine-tuned regulation of gene expression. Transcription of the Escherichia coli bolA gene is mediated by the RpoS/sigmaS transcription factor in response to environmental signals. In this report it is shown that the mechanisms of bolA1p mRNA transcription and degradation are tightly connected at the onset of stationary phase and in response to sudden carbon starvation. In stationary phase, bolA1p mRNA levels were reduced 2.5-fold in a poly(A)-polymerase I (PAPI) mutant, explained by the significant threefold reduction in sigmaS protein levels in the same strain. Furthermore, fusions with the rpoS gene, analysis of the stability of sigmaS and the levels of RssB indicate that the absence of PAPI enhances RssB-mediated sigmaS proteolysis specifically in starved cells. The fact that PAPI induces higher cellular levels of a global regulator is a novel finding of wide biological significance. PAPI could work as a linker between transcription and mRNA degradation with the ultimate goal of adapting and surviving to growth-limiting conditions.

Oxygen-dependent regulation of the central pathway for the anaerobic catabolism of aromatic compounds in Azoarcus sp. strain CIB

The role of oxygen in the transcriptional regulation of the PN promoter that controls the bzd operon involved in the anaerobic catabolism of benzoate in the denitrifying Azoarcus sp. strain CIB has been investigated. In vivo experiments using PN::lacZ translational fusions, in both Azoarcus sp. strain CIB and Escherichia coli cells, have shown an oxygen-dependent repression effect on the transcription of the bzd catabolic genes. E. coli Fnr was required for the anaerobic induction of the PN promoter, and the oxygen-dependent repression of the bzd genes could be bypassed by the expression of a constitutively active Fnr* protein. In vitro experiments revealed that Fnr binds to the PN promoter at a consensus sequence centered at position -41.5 from the transcription start site overlapping the -35 box, suggesting that PN belongs to the class II Fnr-dependent promoters. Fnr interacts with RNA polymerase (RNAP) and is strictly required for transcription initiation after formation of the RNAP-PN complex. An fnr ortholog, the acpR gene, was identified in the genome of Azoarcus sp. strain CIB. The Azoarcus sp. strain CIB acpR mutant was unable to grow anaerobically on aromatic compounds and it did not drive the expression of the PN::lacZ fusion, suggesting that AcpR is the cognate transcriptional activator of the PN promoter. Since the lack of AcpR in Azoarcus sp. strain CIB did not affect growth on nonaromatic carbon sources, AcpR can be considered a transcriptional regulator of the Fnr/Crp superfamily that has evolved to specifically control the central pathway for the anaerobic catabolism of aromatic compounds in Azoarcus.

Catabolite activator protein: DNA binding and transcription activation

Recently determined structures of the Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein (CAP) in complex with DNA, and in complex with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain (alphaCTD) and DNA, have yielded insights into how CAP binds DNA and activates transcription. Comparison of multiple structures of CAP-DNA complexes has revealed the contributions of direct and indirect readout to DNA binding by CAP. The structure of the CAP-alphaCTD-DNA complex has provided the first structural description of interactions between a transcription activator and its functional target within the general transcription machinery. Using the structure of the CAP-alphaCTD-DNA complex, the structure of an RNA polymerase-DNA complex, and restraints from biophysical, biochemical and genetic experiments, it has been possible to construct detailed three-dimensional models of intact class I and class II transcription activation complexes.

Cyclic AMP receptor protein-dependent activation of the Escherichia coli acsP2 promoter by a synergistic class III mechanism

The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) activates transcription of the Escherichia coli acs gene, which encodes an acetate-scavenging enzyme required for fitness during periods of carbon starvation. Two promoters direct transcription of acs, the distal acsP1 and the proximal acsP2. In this study, we demonstrated that acsP2 can function as the major promoter and showed by in vitro studies that CRP facilitates transcription by "focusing" RNA polymerase to acsP2. We proposed that CRP activates transcription from acsP2 by a synergistic class III mechanism. Consistent with this proposal, we showed that CRP binds two sites, CRP I and CRP II. Induction of acs expression absolutely required CRP I, while optimal expression required both CRP I and CRP II. The locations of these DNA sites for CRP (centered at positions -69.5 and -122.5, respectively) suggest that CRP interacts with RNA polymerase through class I interactions. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrated that acs transcription requires the surfaces of CRP and the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase holoenzyme (alpha-CTD), which is known to participate in class I interactions: activating region 1 of CRP and the 287, 265, and 261 determinants of the alpha-CTD. Other surface-exposed residues in the alpha-CTD contributed to acs transcription, suggesting that the alpha-CTD may interact with at least one protein other than CRP.

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein bound at a single target can activate transcription initiation at divergent promoters: a systematic study that exploits new promoter probe plasmids

We report the first detailed quantitative study of divergent promoters dependent on the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP), a factor known to activate transcription initiation at target promoters by making direct interactions with the RNA polymerase holoenzyme. In this work, we show that CRP bound at a single target site is able to activate transcription at two divergently organized promoters. Experiments using promoter probe plasmids, designed to study divergent promoters in vivo and in vitro, show that the divergent promoters function independently. Further in vitro experiments show that two holo RNA polymerase molecules cannot be accommodated simultaneously at the divergent promoters.

ToxR interferes with CRP-dependent transcriptional activation of ompT in Vibrio cholerae

In pathogenic Vibrio cholerae, the transmembrane DNA-binding protein ToxR co-ordinates the expression of over 20 genes, including those encoding important virulence factors such as cholera toxin and the toxin-co-regulated pilus. The outer membrane protein OmpT is the only member of the ToxR regulon known to be repressed by ToxR. In this study, we examined the environmental conditions that regulate OmpT expression and demonstrated that ompT transcription is upregulated 14-fold when the bacteria enter late log phase from early log phase. Deletion of the crp gene completely abolishes OmpT expression. Comparison of ompT transcription levels in the isogenic crp-, toxR- and crp-toxR- mutants revealed that (i) in the absence of ToxR, constitutive high-level ompT transcription is dependent on cAMP receptor protein (CRP); (ii) ToxR not only interferes with CRP-dependent ompT activation, but also abolishes the CRP-independent, basal level ompT transcription; thus, the mechanism by which ToxR represses ompT transcription involves both antiactivation and direct repression; (iii) both CRP and ToxR are required for the regulation of OmpT expression by growth phase. To provide further insights into the molecular mecha-nism of CRP-dependent activation of ompT transcription, we demonstrated that CRP-dependent activation requires a CRP binding site centred at -310 of the ompT promoter, without which the interaction of CRP with other CRP binding site(s) more proximal to the promoter results in repression. Mutations in two regions on CRP (AR1 and AR2) that directly contact RNA polymerase (RNAP) abolish activation, suggesting direct interaction of CRP with RNAP from -310 of the ompT promoter via DNA looping.

Repression of deoP2 in Escherichia coli by CytR: conversion of a transcription activator into a repressor

In the deoP2 promoter of Escherichia coli, a transcription activator, cAMP-CRP, binds at two sites, centered at -41.5 and -93.5 from the start site of transcription, while a repressor, CytR, binds to a space between the two cAMP-CRP complexes. The mechanisms for the cAMP-CRP-mediated transcription activation and CytR-mediated transcription repression were investigated in vitro using purified components. We classified the deoP2 promoter as a class II cAMP-CRP-dependent promoter, primarily by the action of cAMP-CRP at the downstream site. Interestingly, we also found that deoP2 carries an "UP-element" immediately upstream of the downstream cAMP-CRP site. The UP-element overlaps with the DNA site for CytR. However, it was observed that CytR functions with the RNA polymerase devoid of the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit as well as with intact RNA polymerase. The mechanism of repression by CytR proposed in this study is that the cAMP-CRP bound at -41.5 undergoes an allosteric change upon direct interaction with CytR such that it no longer maintains a productive interaction with the N-terminal domain of alpha, but instead acts as a repressor to interfere with RNA polymerase acting on deoP2.

The essential role of the promoter-proximal subunit of CAP in pap phase variation: Lrp- and helical phase-dependent activation of papBA transcription by CAP from -215

Catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) is essential for the expression of Pap pili by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Both in vitro and in vivo analyses indicate that binding of cAMP-CAP centred at 215.5 bp upstream of the papBA promoter is essential for activation of transcription. CAP-dependent activation of papBA requires binding of the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) at binding sites that extend from -180 to -149 relative to the start site of papBA. Our data indicate that CAP and Lrp bind independently to their respective pap DNA sites. Activation of papBA transcription was eliminated by mutations in the activating region 1 (AR1) of CAP, but not in the AR2 region, similar to class I CAP-dependent promoters. Also, like class I promoters, the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase appears to play a role in transcription activation. Moreover, phase variation is strictly dependent upon the helical phase of the CAP DNA binding site with respect to the papBA transcription start site. Using an 'oriented heterodimer' approach with wild-type and AR1 mutant CAPs, it was shown that the AR1 region of the CAP subunit proximal to papBA is required for stimulation of papBA transcription, whereas AR1 of the promoter-distal subunit is not. Previously, CAP was hypothesized to activate pap transcription indirectly by disrupting repression mediated by H-NS. The results presented here show that AR1 of the promoter-proximal CAP subunit was required for papBA transcription even in the absence of the histone-like protein H-NS. These results show that the promoter-proximal subunit of CAP, bound 215.5 bp upstream of the papBA transcription start site, plays an active role in stimulating papBA transcription, possibly by interacting with the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase.

Interdependence of activation at rhaSR by cyclic AMP receptor protein, the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain, and rhaR

The Escherichia coli rhaSR operon encodes two AraC family transcription activators, RhaS and RhaR, and is activated by RhaR in the presence of L-rhamnose. beta-Galactosidase assays of various rhaS-lacZ promoter fusions combined with mobility shift assays indicated that a cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) site located at -111.5 is also required for full activation of rhaSR expression. To address the mechanisms of activation by CRP and the RNA polymerase alpha-subunit C-terminal domain (alpha-CTD) at rhaSR, we tested the effects of alanine substitutions in CRP activating regions 1 and 2, overexpression of a truncated version of alpha (alpha-Delta235), and alanine substitutions throughout alpha-CTD. We found that DNA-contacting residues in alpha-CTD are required for full activation, and for simplicity, we discuss alpha-CTD as a third activator of rhaSR. CRP and RhaR could each partially activate transcription in the absence of the other two activators, and alpha-CTD was not capable of activation alone. In the case of CRP, this suggests that this activation involves neither an alpha-CTD interaction nor cooperative binding with RhaR, while in the case of RhaR, this suggests the likelihood of direct interactions with core RNA polymerase. We also found that CRP, RhaR, and alpha-CTD each have synergistic effects on activation by the others, suggesting direct or indirect interactions among all three. We have some evidence that the alpha-CTD-CRP and alpha-CTD-RhaR interactions might be direct. The magnitude of the synergistic effects was usually greater with just two activators than with all three, suggesting possible redundancies in the mechanisms of activation by CRP, alpha-CTD, and RhaR.

CO sensing and regulation of gene expression by the transcriptional activator CooA

The transcriptional activator CooA from Rhodospirillum rubrum contains a six-coordinate protoheme that acts as a CO sensor in vivo. CO is a physiological effector of CooA and replaces one of the axial ligands of the ferrous heme to form the CO-bound CooA that is active as the transcriptional activator. Cys75 or His77 is coordinated to the ferric and ferrous hemes in CooA, respectively. The redox-controlled ligand exchange between Cys75 and His77 proceeds during the change in the redox state of the heme. The reduction and oxidation midpoint potentials of CooA have been determined to be -320 and -260 mV, respectively. The properties of a functional chimera derived from CRP and CooA suggest that CooA activates the transcription by a similar mechanism to that for CRP at Class II CRP-dependent promoters. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis has revealed that Arg24 and Arg53 of CooA, which will be concerned with the protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase, are critical amino acid residues for the transcriptional activator activity of CooA, and that Lys26 and Asp94 modulate the activity of CooA.

FNR-dependent activation of the class II dmsA and narG promoters of Escherichia coli requires FNR-activating regions 1 and 3

In Escherichia coli, the anaerobic expression of genes encoding the nitrate (narGHJI) and dimethyl sulphoxide (dmsABC) terminal reductases is stimulated by the global anaerobic regulator FNR. The ability of FNR to activate transcription initiation has been proposed to be dependent on protein-protein interactions between RNA polymerase and two activating regions (AR) of FNR, FNR-AR1 and FNR-AR3. To further our understanding of the role of FNR-AR1 and FNR-AR3 in transcription activation, we measured the effects of FNR-AR mutants on expression of the narG and dmsA promoters, PnarG and PdmsA. All the FNR-AR1 (FNR-S73F, FNR-T118A, FNR-S187P), FNR-AR3 (FNR-G85A) and FNR-AR1-AR3 (FNR-G85A-S187P) mutants that were tested decreased expression from PnarG and PdmsA in vivo. Transcription assays of PdmsA also showed that the FNR-AR mutant proteins impaired transcription activation in vitro. Furthermore, DNase I footprinting analysis confirmed that this transcription defect was not a result of altered DNA-binding properties. The function of FNR-S187P and FNR-G85A was also measured in strains containing sigma70 mutants (sigma70-K593A, sigma70-R596A and sigma70-K597A) known to be impaired in FNR-dependent transcription activation. Of all of the combinations analysed, only FNR-G85 and sigma70-K597 showed a genetic interaction, supporting the notion that FNR-AR3 and sigma70 interact functionally in the process of transcription activation. Lastly, the transcription activation defect of the FNR-AR1 and FNR-AR3 mutants was greatly reduced when expression of PnarG was assayed in the presence of nitrate. As these growth conditions promote maximal activity of PnarG as a result of the combined function of NarL, IHF and FNR, these results suggest that the requirements for FNR-AR1 and FNR-AR3 are altered in the presence of additional activators.

Silencing and activation of ClyA cytotoxin expression in Escherichia coli

Cytolysin A (ClyA) is a pore-forming cytotoxic protein encoded by the clyA gene of Escherichia coli K-12. Genetic analysis suggested that clyA is silenced by the nucleoid protein H-NS. Purified H-NS protein showed preferential binding to clyA sequences in the promoter region, as evidenced by DNase I footprinting and gel mobility shift assays. Transcriptional derepression and activation of a chromosomal clyA::luxAB operon fusion were seen under conditions of H-NS deficiency and SlyA overproduction, respectively. In H-NS-deficient bacteria neither the absence nor the overproduction of SlyA affected the derepressed ClyA expression any further. Therefore, we suggest that overproduction of SlyA in hns(+) E. coli derepresses clyA transcription by counteracting H-NS. The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) was required for ClyA expression, and it interacted with a predicted, albeit suboptimal, CRP binding site in the clyA upstream region. Site-specific alterations of the CRP binding site to match the consensus resulted in substantially higher levels of ClyA expression, while alterations that were predicted to reduce CRP binding reduced ClyA expression. During anaerobic growth the fumarate and nitrate reduction regulator (FNR) was important for ClyA expression, and the clyA gene could be activated by overexpression of FNR. A major clyA transcript having its 5' end (+1) located 72 bp upstream of the translational start codon and 61 bp downstream of the CRP-FNR binding site was detected in the absence of H-NS. The clyA promoter was characterized as a class I promoter that could be transcriptionally activated by CRP and/or FNR. According to DNA bending analyses, the clyA promoter region has high intrinsic curvature. We suggest that it represents a regulatory region which is particularly susceptible to H-NS silencing, and its features are discussed in relation to regulation of other silenced operons.

Interactions between activating region 3 of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein and region 4 of the RNA polymerase sigma(70) subunit: application of suppression genetics

The Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP, induces transcription at Class II CRP-dependent promoters by making three different activatory contacts with different surfaces of holo RNA polymerase. One contact surface of CRP, known as Activating Region 3 (AR3), is functional in the downstream subunit of the CRP dimer and is predicted to interact with region 4 of the RNAP sigma(70) subunit. We have previously shown that a mutant CRP derivative that activates transcription primarily via AR3, CRP HL159 KE101 KN52, requires the positively charged residues K593, K597 and R599 in sigma(70) for activation. Here, we have used the positive control substitution, EK58, to disrupt AR3-dependent activation by CRP HL159 KE101 KN52. We then screened random mutant libraries and an alanine scan library of sigma(70) for candidates that restore activation by CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 EK58. We found that changes at R596 and R599 in sigma(70) can restore activation by CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 EK58. This suggests that the side-chains of both R596 and R599 in sigma(70) clash with K58 in CRP. Maximal activation by CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 EK58 is achieved with the substitutions RE596 or RD596 in sigma(70). We propose that there are specific charge-charge interactions between E596 or D596 in sigma(70) and K58 in AR3. Thus, no increase in activation is observed in the presence of another positive control substitution, EG58 (CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 EG58). Similarly, both sigma(70) RE596 and sigma(70) RD596 can restore activation by CRP EK58 but not CRP EG58, and they both decrease activation by wild-type CRP. We suggest that E596 and D596 in sigma(70) can positively interact with K58 in AR3, thereby enhancing activation, but negatively interact with E58, thereby decreasing activation. The substitution, KA52 in AR3 increases Class II CRP-dependent activation by removing an inhibitory lysine residue. However, this increase is not observed in the presence of either sigma(70) RE596 or sigma(70) RD596. We conclude that the inhibitory side-chain, K52 in AR3, clashes with R596 in sigma(70). Finally, we show that the sigma(70) RE596 and RD596 substitutions affect CRP-dependent activation from Class II, but not Class I, promoters.

Transcription activation by the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein: determinants within activating region 3

At Class II CRP-dependent promoters, the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) activates transcription by making multiple interactions with RNA polymerase (RNAP). Two discrete surfaces of CRP, known as Activating Region 1 (AR1) and Activating Region 2 (AR2), interact with the C-terminal and N-terminal domains, respectively, of the alpha subunit of RNAP. Activating Region 3 (AR3) is a third separate surface of CRP, which is thought to interact with a target in the C-terminal region of the RNAP sigma(70) subunit. We have used a CRP mutant that functions primarily via AR3, CRP HL159 KE101 KN52, as a tool to identify residues within AR3 that are important for activation. This was achieved by screening a random mutant library of the gene encoding CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 for positive control mutants at Class II CRP-dependent promoters, and also by performing alanine scanning mutagenesis. Using both in vivo reporter assays and in vitro transcription assays, we measured the effects of key substitutions within AR3 on transcription activation in both CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 and wild-type CRP. We show that a cluster of negatively charged surface-exposed residues at positions 53, 54, 55 and 58 is required for optimal activation at a Class II, but not at a Class I, CRP-dependent promoter. We conclude that these residues in AR3 of CRP form an activatory determinant for Class II transcription activation. Abortive initiation assays were used to show that this activatory determinant accelerates the rate of isomerisation from the closed to open complex at a Class II CRP-dependent promoter. AR3 of CRP also contains an inhibitory determinant: the lysine residue at position 52 of CRP is inhibitory to maximal levels of transcription activation from Class II promoters. We show that the negative effects of K52 are not simply due to "masking" of the negatively charged residues at positions 53, 54, 55 and 58. Our results suggest that, during activation by wild-type CRP, the activatory and inhibitory determinants of AR3 balance each other. Thus, activation is predominantly determined by AR1 and AR2.

Roles of cyclic AMP receptor protein and the carboxyl-terminal domain of the alpha subunit in transcription activation of the Escherichia coli rhaBAD operon

The Escherichia coli rhaBAD operon encodes the enzymes for catabolism of the sugar L-rhamnose. Full rhaBAD activation requires the AraC family activator RhaS (bound to a site that overlaps the -35 region of the promoter) and the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP; bound immediately upstream of RhaS at -92.5). We tested alanine substitutions in activating regions (AR) 1 and 2 of CRP for their effect on rhaBAD activation. Some, but not all, of the substitutions in both AR1 and AR2 resulted in approximately twofold defects in expression from rhaBAD promoter fusions. We also expressed a derivative of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase deleted for the entire C-terminal domain (alpha-Delta235) and assayed expression from rhaBAD promoter fusions. The greatest defect (54-fold) occurred at a truncated promoter where RhaS was the only activator, while the defect at the full-length promoter (RhaS plus CRP) was smaller (13-fold). Analysis of a plasmid library expressing alanine substitutions at every residue in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alpha-CTD) identified 15 residues (mostly in the DNA-binding determinant) that were important at both the full-length and truncated promoters. Only one substitution was defective at the full-length but not the truncated promoter, and this residue was located in the DNA-binding determinant. Six substitutions were defective only at the promoter activated by RhaS alone, and these may define a protein-contacting determinant on alpha-CTD. Overall, our results suggest that CRP interaction with alpha-CTD may not be required for rhaBAD activation; however, alpha-CTD does contribute to full activation, probably through interactions with DNA and possibly RhaS.

Transcription activation at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter: the role of MelR and the cyclic AMP receptor protein

MelR is a melibiose-triggered transcription activator that belongs to the AraC family of transcription factors. Using purified Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and a cloned DNA fragment carrying the entire melibiose operon intergenic region, we have demonstrated in vitro open complex formation and activation of transcription initiation at the melAB promoter. This activation is dependent on MelR and melibiose. These studies also show that the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) interacts with the melAB promoter and increases MelR-dependent transcription activation. DNAase I footprinting has been exploited to investigate the location of MelR-and CRP-binding sites at the melAB promoter. We showed previously that MelR binds to two identical 18 bp target sequences centred at position -100.5 (Site 1) and position -62.5 (Site 2). In this work, we show that MelR additionally binds to two other related 18 bp sequences: Site 1', centred at position -120.5, located immediately upstream of Site 1, and Site R, at position -238.5, which overlaps the transcription start site of the divergent melR promoter. MelR can bind to Site 1', Site 1, Site 2 and Site R, in both the absence and the presence of melibiose. However, in the presence of melibiose, MelR also binds to a fifth site (Site 2', centred at position -42.5) located immediately downstream of Site 2, and overlapping the -35 region of the melAB promoter. Additionally, although CRP is unable to bind to the melAB promoter in the absence of MelR, in the presence of MelR, it binds to a site located between MelR binding Site 1 and Site 2. Thus, tandem-bound MelR recruits CRP to the MelR. We propose that expression from the melAB promoter has an absolute requirement for MelR binding to Site 2'. Optimal expression of the melAB promoter requires Sites 1', Site 1, Site 2 and Site 2'; CRP acts as a 'bridge' between MelR bound at Sites 1' and 1 and at Sites 2 and 2', increasing expression from the melAB promoter. In support of this model, we show that improvement of the base sequence of Site 2' removes the requirement for Site 1' and Site 1, and short circuits the effects of CRP.

Control of CooA activity by the mutation at the C-terminal end of the heme-binding domain

A constitutively active mutant of a CooA, in which Met131 was replaced by Leu, was isolated by random mutagenesis. Site-directed mutagenesis at position 131 revealed that M131R-CooA was also constitutively active even in the absence of CO and that M131P-, M131D-, and M131E-CooA were constitutively inactive regardless of the presence or absence of CO. While M131L- and M131E-CooA showed almost the same electronic absorption spectra as those of the wild type in the ferric, ferrous, and CO-bound forms, M131D-CooA showed the typical spectrum of a five-coordinate heme protein in the ferric form. The conformational change around the heme induced by CO binding, which triggers the activation of CooA, is thought to be linked to the rearrangement of the conformation around the hinge region between the heme-binding and DNA-binding domains and/or of the relative orientation of the two domains to activate CooA.

Multiple control of flagellum biosynthesis in Escherichia coli: role of H-NS protein and the cyclic AMP-catabolite activator protein complex in transcription of the flhDC master operon

Little is known about the molecular mechanism by which histone-like nucleoid-structuring (H-NS) protein and cyclic AMP-catabolite activator protein (CAP) complex control bacterial motility. In the present paper, we show that crp and hns mutants are nonmotile due to a complete lack of flagellin accumulation. This results from a reduced expression in vivo of fliA and fliC, which encode the specific flagellar sigma factor and flagellin, respectively. Overexpression of the flhDC master operon restored, at least in part, motility in crp and hns mutant strains, suggesting that this operon is the main target for both regulators. Binding of H-NS and CAP to the regulatory region of the master operon was demonstrated by gel retardation experiments, and their DNA binding sites were identified by DNase I footprinting assays. In vitro transcription experiments showed that CAP activates flhDC expression while H-NS represses it. In agreement with this observation, the activity of a transcriptional fusion carrying the flhDC promoter was decreased in the crp strain and increased in the hns mutant. In contrast, the activity of a transcriptional fusion encompassing the entire flhDC regulatory region extending to the ATG translational start codon was strongly reduced in both hns and crp mutants. These results suggest that the region downstream of the +1 transcriptional start site plays a crucial role in the positive control by H-NS of flagellum biosynthesis in vivo. Finally, the lack of complementation of the nonmotile phenotype in a crp mutant by activation-deficient CAP mutated proteins and characterization of cfs, a mutation resulting in a CAP-independent motility behavior, demonstrate that CAP activates flhDC transcription by binding to its promoter and interacting with RNA polymerase.

Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP)

Transcription activation by Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein (CAP) at each of two classes of simple CAP-dependent promoters is understood in structural and mechanistic detail. At class I CAP-dependent promoters, CAP activates transcription from a DNA site located upstream of the DNA site for RNA polymerase holoenzyme (RNAP); at these promoters, transcription activation involves protein-protein interactions between CAP and the RNAP alpha subunit C-terminal domain that facilitate binding of RNAP to promoter DNA to form the RNAP-promoter closed complex. At class II CAP-dependent promoters, CAP activates transcription from a DNA site that overlaps the DNA site for RNAP; at these promoters, transcription activation involves both: (i) protein-protein interactions between CAP and RNAP alpha subunit C-terminal domain that facilitate binding of RNAP to promoter DNA to form the RNAP-promoter closed complex; and (ii) protein-protein interactions between CAP and RNAP alpha subunit N-terminal domain that facilitates isomerization of the RNAP-promoter closed complex to the RNAP-promoter open complex. Straightforward combination of the mechanisms for transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters permits synergistic transcription activation by multiple molecules of CAP, or by CAP and other activators. Interference with determinants of CAP or RNAP involved in transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters permits "anti-activation" by negative regulators. Basic features of transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters appear to be generalizable to other activators.

A second operator is involved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase (lasB) activation

Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasB elastase gene (lasB) transcription is controlled by the two-component quorum-sensing system of LasR, and the autoinducer, 3OC(12)-HSL (N-3-[oxododecanoyl]homoserine lactone). LasR and 3OC(12)-HSL-mediated lasB activation requires a functional operator sequence (OP1) in the lasB promoter region. Optimal activation of lasB, however, requires a second sequence of 70% identity to OP1, named OP2, located 43 bp upstream of OP1. In this study, we used sequence substitutions and insertion mutations in lasBp-lacZ fusion plasmids to explore the role of OP2 in lasB activation. Our results demonstrate that (i) OP1 and OP2 synergistically mediate lasB activation; (ii) OP2, like OP1, responds to LasR and 3OC(12)-HSL; and (iii) the putative autoinducer-binding domain of LasR is not required for synergistic activation from OP1 and OP2.

Recognition of target DNA and transcription activation by the CO-sensing transcriptional activator CooA

CooA from Rhodospirillum rubrum is a heme-based CO-sensing transcriptional activator, in which CO acts as a physiological effector. In this study, we examined the mechanism of site-specific recognition and transcriptional activation by CooA by elucidating the transcriptional activator activity of the mutant CooA proteins and the chimeric proteins derived from CRP and CooA and the promoter activity of the mutant promoters. Site-directed mutagenesis has revealed that Arg(177), Gln(178), and Ser(181) on the recognition helix of the helix-turn-helix motif in CooA are responsible for the site-specific recognition. The side chains of these amino acid residues at positions 177, 178, and 181 are believed to be hydrogen bonding to the G:A, T:A, and C:G pairs at positions 2/15, 3/14, and 4/13 in the CooA-dependent promoters to recognize the DNA site for CooA. The properties of the CRP/CooA chimeric proteins constructed in this work suggest that CooA activates transcription by a similar mechanism to that of CRP at Class II CRP-dependent promoters.

Identification of a contact site for different transcription activators in region 4 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma70 subunit

The sigma subunit of RNA polymerase orchestrates basal transcription by first binding to core RNA polymerase and then recognizing promoters. Using a series of 16 alanine-substitution mutations, we show that residues in a narrow region of Escherichia coli sigma70 (590 to 603) are involved in transcription activation by a mutationally altered CRP derivative, FNR and AraC. Homology modeling of region 4 of sigma70 to the closely related NarL or 434 Cro proteins, suggests that the five basic residues implicated in activation are either in the C terminus of a long recognition helix that includes residues recognizing the -35 hexamer region of the promoter, or in the subsequent loop, and are ideally positioned to permit interaction with activators. The only substitution that has a significant effect on activator-independent transcription is at R603, indicating that this residue of sigma70 may play a distinct role in transcription initiation.

Transcription activation at Class II CRP-dependent promoters: identification of determinants in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

Many transcription factors, including the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), act by making direct contacts with RNA polymerase. At Class II CRP-dependent promoters, CRP activates transcription by making two such contacts: (i) an interaction with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain (alphaCTD) that facilitates initial binding of RNA polymerase to promoter DNA; and (ii) an interaction with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit N-terminal domain that facilitates subsequent promoter opening. We have used random mutagenesis and alanine scanning to identify determinants within alphaCTD for transcription activation at a Class II CRP-dependent promoter. Our results indicate that Class II CRP-dependent transcription requires the side chains of residues 265, 271, 285-288 and 317. Residues 285-288 and 317 comprise a discrete 20x10 A surface on alphaCTD, and substitutions within this determinant reduce or eliminate cooperative interactions between alpha subunits and CRP, but do not affect DNA binding by alpha subunits. We propose that, in the ternary complex of RNA polymerase, CRP and a Class II CRP-dependent promoter, this determinant in alphaCTD interacts directly with CRP, and is distinct from and on the opposite face to the proposed determinant for alphaCTD-CRP interaction in Class I CRP-dependent transcription.

Transcription activation at promoters carrying tandem DNA sites for the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein: organisation of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits

We have constructed a family of promoters carrying tandem DNA sites for the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), with one of the sites centred between base-pairs 41 and 42 upstream from the transcription start site, and the second site located further upstream. In vivo activity measurements show that the activity of these promoters is completely dependent on CRP and that, depending on the precise location, CRP bound at the upstream site increases transcription activation. Hydroxyl radical footprinting was exploited to investigate the binding of CRP and RNA polymerase holoenzyme (RNAP) to these promoters. The study shows that the C-terminal domains of the RNAP alpha subunits bind adjacent to the upstream CRP and that their precise positioning depends on the location of upstream-bound CRP. The C-terminal domains of the RNAP alpha subunits interact with both the upstream and downstream-bound CRP via activating region 1 of CRP.

Control of the expression of the manXYZ operon in Escherichia coli: Mlc is a negative regulator of the mannose PTS

The manXYZ operon of Escherichia coli encodes a sugar transporter of the phosphoenol pyruvate (PEP)-dependent phosphotransferase system, which is capable of transporting many sugars, including glucose, mannose and the aminosugars, glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine. Transcription of manX is strongly dependent on cyclic AMP (cAMP)/cAMP receptor protein (CAP). A cAMP/CAP binding site is located at -40.5, and activation by cAMP/CAP is shown to be typical of a class II promoter. The 5' end of a transcript, potentially encoding two proteins, is expressed divergently from the manXYZ operon. Previously, two binding sites for the NagC repressor were detected upstream of manX, but a mutation in nagC has very little effect on manX expression. However, a mutation in the mlc gene, encoding a homologue of nagC, results in a threefold derepression of manX expression, suggesting that this protein is a more important regulator of manX expression than NagC. The Mlc protein binds to the NagC operators, binding preferentially to the promoter-proximal operator. Plasmids overproducing either the NagC protein or the Mlc protein repress the expression of manX, but the effect of the Mlc protein is stronger. The mlc gene is shown to be allelic with the previously characterized dgsA mutation affecting the mannose phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS).

FNR-dependent repression of ndh gene expression requires two upstream FNR-binding sites

The ndh gene of Escherichia coli encodes a non-proton-translocating NADH dehydrogenase (NdhII) that is anaerobically repressed by the global transcription regulator, FNR. FNR binds at two sites (centred at -50.5 and -94.5) in the ndh promoter but the mechanism of FNR-mediated repression appears not to be due to promoter occlusion. This mechanism has been investigated using an aerobically active derivative of FNR, FNR* (FNR-D154A), with ndh promoters containing altered FNR-binding sites. FNR* repressed ndh gene expression both aerobically and anaerobically in vivo. Gel retardation analysis and DNase I footprinting with purified FNR* protein confirmed that FNR interacts at two sites in the ndh promoter, and that FNR and RNA polymerase (RNAP) can bind simultaneously. Studies with three altered ndh promoters, each containing an impaired or improved FNR-site, indicated that both FNR-sites are needed for efficient repression in vivo. The alpha-subunit of RNAP interacted with two regions (centred at -105 and -46), each overlapping one of the FNR-sites in the ndh promoter. Footprints of the FNR*-RNAP-ndh ternary complex indicated that FNR*-binding at -50.5 prevents the alpha-subunit of RNAP from docking with the DNA just upstream of the -35 element. Binding of a second FNR* molecule at the -105 site likewise prevents binding of the alpha-subunit at its alternative site, thus providing a plausible mechanism for FNR-mediated repression based on displacement of the alpha-subunit of RNAP.

The structure of a CAP-DNA complex having two cAMP molecules bound to each monomer

The 2.2 A resolution crystal structure of the Escherichia coli catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) complexed with cAMP and a 46-bp DNA fragment reveals a second cAMP molecule bound to each protein monomer. The second cAMP is in the syn conformation and is located on the DNA binding domain interacting with the helix-turn-helix, a beta-hairpin from the regulatory domain and the DNA (via water molecules). The presence of this second cAMP site resolves the apparent discrepancy between the NMR and x-ray data on the conformation of cAMP, and explains the cAMP concentration-dependent behaviors of the protein. In addition, this site's close proximity to mutations affecting transcriptional activation and its water-mediated interactions with a DNA recognition residue (E181) and DNA raise the possibility that this site has biological relevance.

Transcription activation at class II CRP-dependent promoters: the role of different activating regions

Transcription activation by the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) at Class II promoters is dependent on direct interactions between two surface-exposed activating regions (AR1 and AR2) and two contact sites in RNA polymerase. The effects on transcription activation of disrupting either AR1 or AR2 have been measured at different Class II promoters. AR2 but not AR1 is essential for activation at all the Class II promoters that were tested. The effects of single positive control substitutions in AR1 and AR2 vary from one promoter to another: the effects of the different substitutions are contingent on the -35 hexamer sequence. Abortive initiation assays have been used to quantify the effects of positive control substitutions in each activating region on the kinetics of transcription initiation at the Class II CRP- dependent promoter pmelRcon. At this promoter, the HL159 substitution in AR1 results in a defect in the initial binding of RNA polymerase whilst the KE101 substitution in AR2 reduces the rate of isomerization from the closed to the open complex.

Function of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in basal expression and integration host factor-mediated activation of the early promoter of bacteriophage Mu

Integration host factor (IHF) can activate transcription from the early promoter (Pe) of bacteriophage Mu both directly and indirectly. Indirect activation occurs through alleviation of H-NS-mediated repression of the Pe promoter (P. Van Ulsen, M. Hillebrand, L. Zulianello, P. Van de Putte, and N. Goosen, Mol. Microbiol. 21:567-578, 1996). The direct activation involves the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alphaCTD) of RNA polymerase. We investigated which residues in the alphaCTD are important for IHF-mediated activation of the Pe promoter. Initial in vivo screening, using a set of substitution mutants derived from an alanine scan (T. Gaal, W. Ross, E. E. Blatter, T. Tang, X. Jia, V. V. Krishnan, N. Assa-Munt, R. Ebright, and R. L. Gourse, Genes Dev. 10:16-26, 1996; H. Tang, K. Severinov, A. Goldfarb, D. Fenyo, B. Chait, and R. H. Ebright, Genes Dev. 8:3058-3067, 1994), indicated that the residues, which are required for transcription activation by the UP element of the rrnB P1 promoter (T. Gaal, W. Ross, E. E. Blatter, T. Tang, X. Jia, V. V. Krishnan, N. Assa-Munt, R. Ebright, and R. L. Gourse, Genes Dev. 10:16-26, 1996), are also important for Pe expression in the presence of IHF. Two of the RNA polymerase mutants, alphaR265A and alphaG296A, that affected Pe expression most in vivo were subsequently tested in in vitro transcription experiments. Mutant RNA polymerase with alphaR265A showed no IHF-mediated activation and a severely reduced basal level of transcription from the Pe promoter. Mutant RNA polymerase with alphaG296A resulted in a slightly reduced transcription from the Pe promoter in the absence of IHF but could still be activated by IHF. These results indicate that interaction of the alphaCTD with DNA is involved not only in the IHF-mediated activation of Pe transcription but also in maintaining the basal level of transcription from this promoter. Mutational analysis of the upstream region of the Pe promoter identified a sequence, positioned from -39 to -51 with respect to the transcription start site, that is important for basal Pe expression, presumably through binding of the alphaCTD. The role of the alphaCTD in IHF-mediated stimulation of transcription from the Pe promoter is discussed.

Transcription activation at class II CAP-dependent promoters: two interactions between CAP and RNA polymerase

At Class II catabolite activator protein (CAP)-dependent promoters, CAP activates transcription from a DNA site overlapping the DNA site for RNA polymerase. We show that transcription activation at Class II CAP-dependent promoters requires not only the previously characterized interaction between an activating region of CAP and the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain, but also an interaction between a second, promoter-class-specific activating region of CAP and the RNA polymerase alpha subunit N-terminal domain. We further show that the two interactions affect different steps in transcription initiation. Transcription activation at Class II CAP-dependent promoters provides a paradigm for understanding how an activator can make multiple interactions with the transcription machinery, each interaction being responsible for a specific mechanistic consequence.

A single substitution in the putative helix-turn-helix motif of the pleiotropic activator PrfA attenuates Listeria monocytogenes virulence

PrfA, the regulator of virulence-gene expression in the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes, displays sequence similarity to members of the CAP-FNR family of transcriptional regulators. To test the functional significance of this similarity, we constructed and analysed substitutions of two amino acids of PrfA predicted to contact DNA, i.e. Ser-184 and Ser-183. Substitution of Ser-184 by Ala reduced DNA binding and virulence-gene activation, and attenuated the virulence in a mouse model of infection. In contrast, substitution of Ser-183 by Ala had the opposite effect in these functional assays. A 17bp DNA sequence, which includes a putative PrfA site, was shown to be sufficient for target-site recognition by PrfA and PrfA-S183A. Our results strongly support the hypothesis that PrfA is a structural and functional homologue of CAP. In addition, they establish a clear correlation between DNA binding by PrfA, virulence-gene activation, and virulence.

Protein-protein interactions during transcription activation: the case of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein

The Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) is a homodimeric transcription activator triggered by cyclic AMP. Escherichia coli contains more than 100 different promoters that can be activated by CRP: in most cases the CRP acts by making direct contact with RNA polymerase. Remarkably, there is considerable variation in the location of the DNA site for CRP from one CRP-dependent promoter to another. Genetic methods have been used to locate the activating regions of CRP that make contact with RNA polymerase at promoters of different architectures. At promoters where the DNA site for CRP is centred near to positions -61, -71 or -81 (i.e. 61, 71 or 81 base pairs upstream of the transcript start-point, respectively), a single surface-exposed loop (Activating Region 1) in the downstream subunit of the CRP dimer makes contact with RNA polymerase. The contact site in RNA polymerase is located in one of the C-terminal domains of two RNA polymerase alpha subunits. At promoters where the DNA site for CRP is centred near to position-41, both subunits of the CRP dimer make contact with RNA polymerase via three separate surface exposed regions (Activating Regions 1, 2 and 3). At these promoters, where bound CRP overlaps with RNA polymerase-binding elements, the C-terminal domains of the polymerase alpha subunits are displaced and bind upstream of CRP. Activation at a number of E. coli promoters is dependent on binding of two CRP dimers, with one dimer bound near to position-41 and the other dimer bound further upstream. In these cases, both bound CRP dimers contact RNA polymerase. The CRP dimer bound around position-41 contacts RNA polymerase via Activating Regions 1, 2 and 3, whereas the upstream bound CRP dimer contacts one of the displaced alpha C-terminal domains via Activating Region 1 in the downstream CRP subunit. Thus in these cases, codependence on two activators is due to simultaneous contacts between separate activators and RNA polymerase. This mechanism allows great flexibility, as any activator that can contact the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits can act cooperatively with CRP.