Promoter selectivity control of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by ionic strength: differential recognition of osmoregulated promoters by E sigma D and E sigma S holoenzymes

Building a complete image of genome regulation in the model organism Escherichia coli

The model organism, Escherichia coli, contains a total of more than 4,500 genes, but the total number of RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme or the transcriptase is only about 2,000 molecules per genome. The regulatory targets of RNAP are, however, modulated by changing its promoter selectivity through two-steps of protein-protein interplay with 7 species of the sigma factor in the first step, and then 300 species of the transcription factor (TF) in the second step. Scientists working in the field of prokaryotic transcription in Japan have made considerable contributions to the elucidation of genetic frameworks and regulatory modes of the genome transcription in E. coli K-12. This review summarizes the findings by this group, first focusing on three sigma factors, the stationary-phase sigma RpoS, the heat-shock sigma RpoH, and the flagellar-chemotaxis sigma RpoF, as examples. It also presents an overview of the current state of the systematic research being carried out to identify the regulatory functions of all TFs from a single and the same bacterium E. coli K-12, using the genomic SELEX and PS-TF screening systems. All these studies have been undertaken with the aim of understanding the genome regulation in E. coli K-12 as a whole.

Osmotic Stress

Escherichia coli and Salmonella encounter osmotic pressure variations in natural environments that include host tissues, food, soil, and water. Osmotic stress causes water to flow into or out of cells, changing their structure, physics, and chemistry in ways that perturb cell functions. E. coli and Salmonella limit osmotically induced water fluxes by accumulating and releasing electrolytes and small organic solutes, some denoted compatible solutes because they accumulate to high levels without disturbing cell functions. Osmotic upshifts inhibit membrane-based energy transduction and macromolecule synthesis while activating existing osmoregulatory systems and specifically inducing osmoregulatory genes. The osmoregulatory response depends on the availability of osmoprotectants (exogenous organic compounds that can be taken up to become compatible solutes). Without osmoprotectants, K+ accumulates with counterion glutamate, and compatible solute trehalose is synthesized. Available osmoprotectants are taken up via transporters ProP, ProU, BetT, and BetU. The resulting compatible solute accumulation attenuates the K+ glutamate response and more effectively restores cell hydration and growth. Osmotic downshifts abruptly increase turgor pressure and strain the cytoplasmic membrane. Mechanosensitive channels like MscS and MscL open to allow nonspecific solute efflux and forestall cell lysis. Research frontiers include (i) the osmoadaptive remodeling of cell structure, (ii) the mechanisms by which osmotic stress alters gene expression, (iii) the mechanisms by which transporters and channels detect and respond to osmotic pressure changes, (iv) the coordination of osmoregulatory programs and selection of available osmoprotectants, and (v) the roles played by osmoregulatory mechanisms as E. coli and Salmonella survive or thrive in their natural environments.

Stationary-Phase Gene Regulation in Escherichia coli §

In their stressful natural environments, bacteria often are in stationary phase and use their limited resources for maintenance and stress survival. Underlying this activity is the general stress response, which in Escherichia coli depends on the σS (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase. σS is closely related to the vegetative sigma factor σ70 (RpoD), and these two sigmas recognize similar but not identical promoter sequences. During the postexponential phase and entry into stationary phase, σS is induced by a fine-tuned combination of transcriptional, translational, and proteolytic control. In addition, regulatory "short-cuts" to high cellular σS levels, which mainly rely on the rapid inhibition of σS proteolysis, are triggered by sudden starvation for various nutrients and other stressful shift conditons. σS directly or indirectly activates more than 500 genes. Additional signal input is integrated by σS cooperating with various transcription factors in complex cascades and feedforward loops. Target gene products have stress-protective functions, redirect metabolism, affect cell envelope and cell shape, are involved in biofilm formation or pathogenesis, or can increased stationary phase and stress-induced mutagenesis. This review summarizes these diverse functions and the amazingly complex regulation of σS. At the molecular level, these processes are integrated with the partitioning of global transcription space by sigma factor competition for RNA polymerase core enzyme and signaling by nucleotide second messengers that include cAMP, (p)ppGpp, and c-di-GMP. Physiologically, σS is the key player in choosing between a lifestyle associated with postexponential growth based on nutrient scavenging and motility and a lifestyle focused on maintenance, strong stress resistance, and increased adhesiveness. Finally, research with other proteobacteria is beginning to reveal how evolution has further adapted function and regulation of σS to specific environmental niches.

Computational prediction of the osmoregulation network in Synechococcus sp. WH8102

Background

Osmotic stress is caused by sudden changes in the impermeable solute concentration around a cell, which induces instantaneous water flow in or out of the cell to balance the concentration. Very little is known about the detailed response mechanism to osmotic stress in marine Synechococcus, one of the major oxygenic phototrophic cyanobacterial genera that contribute greatly to the global CO₂ fixation.

Results

We present here a computational study of the osmoregulation network in response to hyperosmotic stress of Synechococcus sp strain WH8102 using comparative genome analyses and computational prediction. In this study, we identified the key transporters, synthetases, signal sensor proteins and transcriptional regulator proteins, and found experimentally that of these proteins, 15 genes showed significantly changed expression levels under a mild hyperosmotic stress.

Conclusions

From the predicted network model, we have made a number of interesting observations about WH8102. Specifically, we found that (i) the organism likely uses glycine betaine as the major osmolyte, and others such as glucosylglycerol, glucosylglycerate, trehalose, sucrose and arginine as the minor osmolytes, making it efficient and adaptable to its changing environment; and (ii) σ³⁸, one of the seven types of σ factors, probably serves as a global regulator coordinating the osmoregulation network and the other relevant networks.

General stress response signalling: unwrapping transcription complexes by DNA relaxation via the sigma38 C-terminal domain

Escherichia coli responds to stress by a combination of specific and general transcription signalling pathways. The general pathways typically require the master stress regulator sigma38 (rpoS). Here we show that the signalling from multiple stresses that relax DNA is processed by a non-conserved eight-amino-acid tail of the sigma 38 C-terminal domain. By contrast, responses to two stresses that accumulate potassium glutamate do not rely on this short tail, but still require the overall C-terminal domain. In vitro transcription and footprinting studies suggest that multiple stresses can target a poised RNA polymerase and activate it by unwrapping DNA from a nucleosome-like state, allowing the RNA polymerase to escape into productive mode. This transition can be accomplished by either the DNA relaxation or potassium glutamate accumulation that characterizes many stresses.

Roles of K+, H+, H2O, and DeltaPsi in solute transport mediated by major facilitator superfamily members ProP and LacY

H (+)-solute symporters ProP and LacY are members of the major facilitator superfamily. ProP mediates osmoprotectant (e.g., proline) accumulation, whereas LacY transports the nutrient lactose. The roles of K (+), H (+), H 2O, and DeltaPsi in H (+)-proline and H (+)-lactose symport were compared using right-side-out cytoplasmic membrane vesicles (MVs) from bacteria expressing both transporters and proteoliposomes (PRLs) reconstituted with pure ProP-His 6. ProP activity increased as LacY activity decreased when osmotic stress (increasing osmolality) was imposed on MVs. The activities of both transporters decreased to similar extents when Na (+) replaced K (+) in MV preparations. Thus, K (+) did not specifically control ProP activity. As with LacY, an increasing extravesicular pH stimulated ProP-mediated proline efflux much more than ProP-mediated proline exchange from de-energized MVs. In contrast to that of LacY, ProP-mediated exchange was only 2-fold faster than ProP-mediated efflux and was inhibited by respiration. In the absence of the protonmotive force (Deltamu H (+) ), efflux of lactose from MVs was much more sensitive to increasing osmolality than lactose exchange. Thus, H 2O may be directly involved in proton transport via LacY. In the absence of Deltamu H (+) , proline efflux and exchange from MVs were osmolality-independent. In PRLs with a DeltapH of 1 (lumen alkaline), ProP-His 6 was inactive when the membrane potential (DeltaPsi) was zero, was active but insensitive to osmolality when DeltaPsi was -100 mV, and became osmolality-sensitive as DeltaPsi increased further to -137 mV. ProP-His 6 had the same membrane orientation in PRLs as in cells and MVs. ProP switches among "off", "on", and "osmolality-sensitive" states as the membrane potential increases. Kinetic parameters determined in the absence of Deltamu H (+) represent a ProP population that is predominantly off.

Poising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and its release from the sigma 38 C-terminal tail for osmY transcription

Bacteria must adapt their transcription to overcome the osmotic stress associated with the gastrointestinal tract of their host. This requires the sigma 38 (rpoS) form of RNA polymerase. Here, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that activation is associated with a poise-and-release mechanism in vivo. A C-terminal tail unique among sigma factors is shown to be required for in vivo recruitment of RNA polymerase to the promoter region prior to osmotic shock. C-terminal domain tail-dependent transcription in vivo can be mimicked by using the intracellular signaling molecule potassium glutamate in vitro. Following signaling, the barrier to elongation into the gene body is overcome and RNA polymerase is released to produce osmY mRNA.

Plant sigma factors and their role in plastid transcription

Plant sigma factors determine the promoter specificity of the major RNA polymerase of plastids and thus regulate the first level of plastome gene expression. In plants, sigma factors are encoded by a small family of nuclear genes, and it is not yet clear if the family members are functionally redundant or each paralog plays a particular role. The review presents the analysis of the information on plant sigma factors obtained since their discovery a decade ago and focuses on similarities and differences in structure and functions of various paralogs. Special attention is paid to their interaction with promoters, the regulation of their expression, and their role in the development of a whole plant. The analysis suggests that though plant sigma factors are basically similar, at least some of them perform distinct functions. Finally, the work presents the scheme of this gene family evolution in higher plants.

The molecular basis of selective promoter activation by the ?Ssubunit of RNA polymerase

Different environmental stimuli cause bacteria to exchange the sigma subunit in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) and, thereby, tune their gene expression according to the newly emerging needs. Sigma factors are usually thought to recognize clearly distinguishable promoter DNA determinants, and thereby activate distinct gene sets, known as their regulons. In this review, we illustrate how the principle sigma factor in stationary phase and in stressful conditions in Escherichia coli, sigmaS (RpoS), can specifically target its large regulon in vivo, although it is known to recognize the same core promoter elements in vitro as the housekeeping sigma factor, sigma70 (RpoD). Variable combinations of cis-acting promoter features and trans-acting protein factors determine whether a promoter is recognized by RNAP containing sigmaS or sigma70, or by both holoenzymes. How these promoter features impose sigmaS selectivity is further discussed. Moreover, additional pathways allow sigmaS to compete more efficiently than sigma70 for limiting amounts of core RNAP (E) and thereby enhance EsigmaS formation and effectiveness. Finally, these topics are discussed in the context of sigma factor evolution and the benefits a cell gains from retaining competing and closely related sigma factors with overlapping sets of target genes.

Sigma factor selectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi: RpoS recognition of the ospE/ospF/elp promoters is dependent on the sequence of the -10 region

Members of the ospE/ospF/elp lipoprotein gene families of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent, are transcriptionally upregulated in response to the influx of blood into the midgut of an infected tick. We recently have demonstrated that despite the high degree of similarity between the promoters of the ospF (P(ospF)) and ospE (P(ospE)) genes of B. burgdorferi strain 297, the differential expression of ospF is RpoS-dependent, while ospE is controlled by sigma(70). Herein we used wild-type and RpoS-deficient strains of B. burgdorferi and Escherichia coli to analyse transcriptional reporters consisting of a green fluorescent protein (gfp) gene fused to P(ospF), P(ospE), or two hybrid promoters in which the -10 regions of P(ospF) and P(ospE) were switched [P(ospF ) ((E - 10)) and P(ospE) ((F - 10)) respectively]. We found that the P(ospF)-10 region is both necessary and sufficient for RpoS-dependent recognition in B. burgdorferi, while sigma(70) specificity for P(ospE) is dependent on elements outside of the -10 region. In E. coli, sigma factor selectivity for these promoters was much more permissive, with expression of each being primarily due to sigma(70). Alignment of the sequences upstream of each of the ospE/ospF/elp genes from B. burgdorferi strains 297 and B31 revealed that two B31 ospF paralogues [erpK (BBM38) and erpL (BBO39)] have -10 regions virtually identical to that of P(ospF). Correspondingly, expression of gfp reporters based on the erpK and erpL promoters was RpoS-dependent. Thus, the sequence of the P(ospF)-10 region appears to serve as a motif for RpoS recognition, the first described for any B. burgdorferi promoter. Taken together, our data support the notion that B. burgdorferi utilizes sequence differences at the -10 region as one mechanism for maintaining the transcriptional integrity of RpoS-dependent and -independent genes activated at the onset of tick feeding.

The role of the Rcs phosphorelay in Enterobacteriaceae

The Rcs phosphorelay is composed of the sensor kinase, RcsC, the HPt-domain protein RcsD and the response regulator, RcsB. In this review we discuss the role of the Rcs phosphorelay in the Enterobacteriaceae, highlighting the observation that the Rcs phosphorelay appears to play a key role in the temporal regulation of biofilm formation and pathogenicity.

The upstream-activating sequences of the sigma54 promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida filter transcription readthrough from upstream genes

Although the m-xylene-responsive sigma54 promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida mt-2, borne by the TOL plasmid pWWO, is one of the strongest known promoters in vivo, its base-line level in the absence of its aromatic inducer is below the limit of any detection procedure. This is unusual because regulatory networks (such as the one to which Pu belongs) can hardly escape the noise caused by intrinsic fluctuations in background transcription, including that transmitted from upstream promoters. This study provides genetic evidence that the upstream-activating sequences (UAS), which serve as the binding sites for the pWW0-encoded XylR protein (the m-xylene-responsive sigma54-dependent activator of Pu), isolate expression of the upper TOL genes from any adventitious transcriptional flow originating further upstream. An in vivo test system was developed in which different segments of the Pu promoter were examined for the inhibition of incoming transcription products from an upstream promoter in P. putida and Escherichia coli. Minimal transcription filter ability was located within a 105-bp fragment encompassing the UAS of Pu. Although S1 nuclease assays showed that the UAS prevented the buildup of downstream transcripts, the mechanism seems to diverge from a typical termination system. This was shown by the fact that the UAS did not halt transcription in vitro and that the filter effect could not be relieved by the anti-termination system of lambda phage. Because the Pu promoter lies adjacent to the edge of a transposon in pWW0, the preset transcriptional filter in the UAS may isolate the upper TOL operon from undue expression after random insertion of the mobile genetic element in a new replicon.

Role of the spacer between the -35 and -10 regions in sigmas promoter selectivity in Escherichia coli

In vitro, the sigma(s) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP), RpoS, recognizes nearly identical -35 and -10 promoter consensus sequences as the vegetative sigma70. In vivo, promoter selectivity of RNAP holoenzyme containing either sigma(s) (Esigma(s)) or sigma70 (Esigma70) seems to be achieved by the differential ability of the two holoenzymes to tolerate deviations from the promoter consensus sequence. In this study, we suggest that many natural sigma(s)-dependent promoters possess a -35 element, a feature that has been considered as not conserved among sigma(s)-dependent promoters. These -35 hexamers are mostly non-optimally spaced from the -10 region, but nevertheless functional. A +/- 2 bp deviation from the optimal spacer length of 17 bp or the complete absence of a -35 consensus sequence decreases overall promoter activity, but at the same time favours Esigma(s) in its competition with Esigma70 for promoter recognition. On the other hand, the reduction of promoter activity due to shifting of the -35 element can be counterbalanced by an activity-stimulating feature such as A/T-richness of the spacer region without compromising Esigma(s) selectivity. Based on mutational analysis of sigma(s), we suggest a role of regions 2.5 and 4 of sigma(s) in sensing sub-optimally located -35 elements.

Multistress regulation in Escherichia coli: expression of osmB involves two independent promoters responding either to sigmaS or to the RcsCDB His-Asp phosphorelay

Transcription of the Escherichia coli osmB gene is induced by several stress conditions. osmB is expressed from two promoters, osmBp1 and osmBp2. The downstream promoter, osmBp2, is induced after osmotic shock or upon entry into stationary phase in a sigma(S)-dependent manner. The upstream promoter, osmBp1, is independent of sigma(S) and is activated by RcsB, the response regulator of the His-Asp phosphorelay signal transduction system RcsCDB. RcsB is responsible for the induction of osmBp1 following treatment with chlorpromazine. Activation of osmBp1 by RcsB requires a sequence upstream of its -35 element similar to the RcsB binding site consensus, suggesting a direct regulatory role. osmB appears as another example of a multistress-responsive gene whose transcription involves both a sigma(S)-dependent promoter and a second one independent of sigma(S) but controlled by stress-specific transcription factors.

SigmaS-dependent gene expression at the onset of stationary phase in Escherichia coli: function of sigmaS-dependent genes and identification of their promoter sequences

The sigma(S) subunit of RNA polymerase, the product of the rpoS gene, controls the expression of genes responding to starvation and cellular stresses. Using gene array technology, we investigated rpoS-dependent expression at the onset of stationary phase in Escherichia coli grown in rich medium. Forty-one genes were expressed at significantly lower levels in an rpoS mutant derived from the MG1655 strain; for 10 of these, we also confirmed rpoS and stationary-phase dependence by reverse transcription-PCR. Only seven genes (dps, osmE, osmY, sodC, rpsV, wrbA, and yahO) had previously been recognized as rpoS dependent. Several newly identified rpoS-dependent genes are involved in the uptake and metabolism of amino acids, sugars, and iron. Indeed, the rpoS mutant strain shows severely impaired growth on some sugars such as fructose and N-acetylglucosamine. The rpoS gene controls the production of indole, which acts as a signal molecule in stationary-phase cells, via regulation of the tnaA-encoded tryptophanase enzyme. Genes involved in protein biosynthesis, encoding the ribosome-associated protein RpsV (sra) and the initiation factor IF-1 (infA), were also induced in an rpoS-dependent fashion. Using primer extension, we determined the promoter sequences of a selection of rpoS-regulated genes representative of different functional classes. Significant fractions of these promoters carry sequence features specific for Esigma(S) recognition of the -10 region, such as cytosines at positions -13 (70%) and -12 (30%) as well as a TG motif located upstream of the -10 region (50%), thus supporting the TGN(0-2)C(C/T)ATA(C/A)T consensus sequence recently proposed for sigma(S).

Classification and strength measurement of stationary-phase promoters by use of a newly developed promoter cloning vector

When an Escherichia coli culture changes from exponential growth to the stationary phase, expression of growth-related genes levels off, while a number of stationary-phase-specific genes are turned on. To gain insight into the growth phase-dependent global regulation of genome transcription, we analyzed the strength and specificity of promoters associated with the stationary-phase genes. For the in vivo assay of promoter activity, 300- to 500-bp DNA fragments upstream from the translation initiation codon were isolated and inserted into a newly constructed doubly fluorescent protein (DFP) vector. The activity of test promoters was determined by measuring the green fluorescent protein (GFP). To avoid the possible influence of plasmid copy number, the level of transcription of reference promoter lacUV5 on the same plasmid was determined by measuring the red fluorescent protein (RFP). Thus, the activities of test promoters could be easily and accurately determined by determining the GFP/RFP ratio. Analysis of the culture time-dependent variation of 100 test promoters indicated that (i) a major group of the stationary-phase promoters are up-regulated only in the presence of RpoS sigma; (ii) the phase-coupled increase in the activity of some promoters takes place even in the absence of RpoS; and (iii) the activity of some promoters increases in the absence of RpoS. This classification was confirmed by testing in vitro transcription by using reconstituted RpoD and RpoS holoenzymes.

Multiple stress signal integration in the regulation of the complex sigma S-dependent csiD-ygaF-gabDTP operon in Escherichia coli

The csiD-ygaF-gabDTP region in the Escherichia coli genome represents a cluster of sigma S-controlled genes. Here, we investigated promoter structures, sigma factor dependencies, potential co-regulation and environmental regulatory patterns for all of these genes. We find that this region constitutes a complex operon with expression being controlled by three differentially regulated promoters: (i) csiDp, which affects the expression of all five genes, is cAMP-CRP/sigma S-dependent and activated exclusively upon carbon starvation and stationary phase; (ii) gabDp1, which is sigma S-dependent and exhibits multiple stress induction like sigma S itself; and (iii) gabDp2[previously suggested by Schneider, B.L., Ruback, S., Kiupakis, A.K., Kasbarian, H., Pybus, C., and Reitzer, L. (2002) J. Bacteriol. 184: 6976-6986], which appears to be Nac/sigma 70-controlled and to respond to poor nitrogen sources. In addition, we identify a novel repressor, CsiR, which modulates csiDp activity in a temporal manner during early stationary phase. Finally, we propose a physiological role for sigma S-controlled GabT/D-mediated gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) catabolism and glutamate accumulation in general stress adaptation. This physiological role is reflected by the activation of the operon-internal gabDp1 promoter under the different conditions that also induce sigma S, which include shifts to acidic pH or high osmolarity as well as starvation or stationary phase.

Osmo-regulation of bacterial transcription via poised RNA polymerase

Adaptation to high-salt environments is critical for the survival of a wide range of cells, especially for pathogenic bacteria that colonize the animal gut and urinary tract. The adaptation strategy involves production of the salt potassium glutamate, which induces a specific gene expression program that produces electro-neutral osmolytes while inhibiting general sigma(70) transcription. These data show that in Escherichia coli potassium glutamate stimulates transcription by disengaging inhibitory polymerase interactions at a sigma(38) promoter. These occur in an upstream region that is marked by an osmotic shock promoter DNA consensus sequence. The disruption activates a poised RNA polymerase to transcribe. This transcription program leads to the production of osmolytes that are shown to have only minor effects on transcription and therefore help to restore normal cell function. An osmotic shock gene expression cycle is discussed.

Crl, a low temperature-induced protein in Escherichia coli that binds directly to the stationary phase sigma subunit of RNA polymerase

The alternative sigma factor sigma(S) (RpoS) of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase regulates the expression of stationary phase and stress-response genes. sigma(S) is also required for the transcription of the cryptic genes csgBA that encode the subunits of the curli proteins. The expression of the csgBA genes is regulated in response to a multitude of physiological signals. In stationary phase, these genes are transcribed by the sigma(S) factor, and expression of the operon is enhanced by the small protein Crl. It has been shown that Crl stimulates the activity of sigma(S), leading to an increased transcription rate of a subset of genes of the rpoS regulon in stationary phase. However, the underlying molecular mechanism has remained elusive. We show here that Crl interacts directly with sigma(S) and that this interaction promotes binding of the sigma(S) holoenzyme (Esigma(S)) to the csgBA promoter. Expression of Crl is increased during the transition from growing to stationary phase. Crl accumulates in stationary phase cells at low temperature (30 degrees C) but not at 37 degrees C. We therefore propose that Crl is a second thermosensor, besides DsrA, controlling sigma(S) activity.

Regulation of transcription of compatible solute transporters by the general stress sigma factor, sigmaB, in Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes is well known for its durable physiological characteristics, which allow the organism to grow at low temperature and pH and high osmolarity. Growth under high osmolarity depends on the accumulation of compatible solutes, among which glycine betaine and carnitine are the preferred solutes for this organism. Three different transport systems, Gbu, BetL, and OpuC, have been identified in L. monocytogenes which serve to scavenge the preferred compatible solutes. The general stress response regulator sigma(B) has been shown to play an important role in osmotic adaptation in L. monocytogenes, presumably by directing transcription from one or more of the solute transport genes. In the studies presented here, we have used primer extension analyses to identify the promoter elements responsible for transcription of the opuC, gbuA, and betL genes. All three genes are osmotically inducible to some degree. betL is transcribed from a sigma(B)-independent promoter, while gbuA is transcribed from dual promoters, one of which is sigma(B) dependent. opuC is transcribed exclusively from a sigma(B)-dependent promoter. The betL promoter is similar in sequence to the sigma(B)-independent gbuAP1 promoter. Kinetic analysis of transcript accumulation after osmotic upshift demonstrated that sigma(B)-dependent transcripts from gbuAP2 and sigB accumulate for an extended period after upshift, suggesting that sigma(B) activity may provide a mechanism for sustained high-level expression during osmotic challenge. In contrast to osmotic upshift, expression from the sigma(B)-dependent opuC and gbuAP2 promoters after temperature upshift and ethanol stress was minimal, suggesting that additional mechanisms may also participate in regulating transcription from these sigma(B)-dependent promoters.

Open complex formation in vitro by sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase: roles for region 2 amino acids

Non-functional mutants of sigma(38)(sigma(S)) were studied in vitro to identify the nature of their defects. Mutations in four amino acids led to severe defects in DNA binding and enzyme isomerization with promoter fork junction probes containing single-stranded non-template DNA. The same properties were previously seen with DNA mutations at the fork junction, implying that sigma:DNA interactions at the fork junction are used both for DNA binding and enzyme isomerization. An overlapping set of four mutants had defects that appear to be associated with DNA melting to create the fork junction. When mapped onto the sigma(70) structure, these groups of mutants suggest motifs used by sigma factors to melt DNA and isomerize RNA polymerase to form functional open promoter complexes.

DNA supercoiling contributes to disconnect sigmaS accumulation from sigmaS-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli

The sigmaS subunit of RNA polymerase is a key regulator of Escherichia coli transcription in stress conditions. sigmaS accumulates in cells subjected to stresses such as an osmotic upshift or the entry into stationary phase. We show here that, at elevated osmolarity, sigmaS accumulates long before the beginning of the sigmaS-dependent induction of osmEp, one of its target promoters. A combination of in vivo and in vitro evidence indicates that a high level of DNA negative supercoiling inhibits transcription by EsigmaS. The variations in superhelical densities occurring as a function of growth conditions can modulate transcription of a subset of sigmaS targets and thereby contribute to the temporal disconnection between the accumulation of sigmaS and sigmaS-driven transcription. We propose that, in stress conditions leading to the accumulation of sigmaS without lowering the growth rate, the level of DNA supercoiling acts as a checkpoint that delays the shift from the major (Esigma70) to the general stress (EsigmaS) transcriptional machinery, retarding the induction of a subset of the sigmaS regulon until the conditions become unfavourable enough to cause entry into stationary phase.

Promoter use by sigma 38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase. Amino acid clusters for DNA binding and isomerization

Sigma(38) is a non-essential but highly homologous member of the sigma(70) family of transcription factors. In vitro mutagenesis and in vivo screening were used to identify 22 critical amino acids in the promoter interaction domain of Escherichia coli sigma(38). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay studies showed that residues involved in duplex DNA binding largely segregated into distinct regions that coincided with those of sigma(70). However, the majority of these amino acids were in non-conserved positions. Analysis indicates that this region of the two sigma(s) probably has a common overall organization but differs in how its amino acids are used to form functional open complexes. Placement of the mutations on the known sigma(70) holoenzyme structure shows two clusters; one appears to be used for duplex DNA recognition and the other for the subsequent isomerization events. Permanganate assays for DNA melting support this view.

Stationary phase gene regulation: what makes an Escherichia coli promoter sigmaS-selective?

The general stress sigma factor sigma(S) and the vegetative sigma(70) are highly related and recognise the same core promoter elements. Nevertheless, they clearly control different sets of genes in vivo. Recent studies have demonstrated that Esigma(S) selectivity is based on modular combinations of several sequence and structural features of a promoter, to which also trans-acting factors can strongly contribute. These results throw novel light on the details of transcription initiation, as well as on the co-evolution of sigma factors and their cognate promoter sequences.

The interaction between sigmaS, the stationary phase sigma factor, and the core enzyme of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

BACKGROUND

The RNA polymerase holoenzyme of Escherichia coli is composed of a core enzyme (subunit structure alpha2betabeta') associated with one of the sigma subunits, required for promoter recognition. Different sigma factors compete for core binding. Among the seven sigma factors present in E. coli, sigma70 controls gene transcription during the exponential phase, whereas sigmaS regulates the transcription of genes in the stationary phase or in response to different stresses. Using labelled sigmaS and sigma70, we compared the affinities of both sigma factors for core binding and investigated the structural changes in the different subunits involved in the formation of the holoenzymes.

RESULTS

Using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, we demonstrate that sigmaS binds to the core enzyme with fivefold reduced affinity compared to sigma70. Using iron chelate protein footprinting, we show that the core enzyme significantly reduces polypeptide backbone solvent accessibility in regions 1.1, 2.5, 3.1 and 3.2 of sigmaS, while increasing the accessibility in region 4.1 of sigmaS. We have also analysed the positioning of sigmaS on the holoenzyme by the proximity-dependent protein cleavage method using sigmaS derivatives in which FeBABE was tethered to single cysteine residues at nine different positions. Protein cutting patterns are observed on the beta and beta' subunits, but not alpha. Regions 2.5, 3.1 and 3.2 of sigmaS are close to both beta and beta' subunits, in agreement with iron chelate protein footprinting data.

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison between these results using sigmaS and previous data from sigma70 indicates similar contact patterns on the core subunits and similar characteristic changes associated with holoenzyme formation, despite striking differences in the accessibility of regions 4.1 and 4.2.

Promoter recognition and discrimination by EsigmaS RNA polymerase

Although more than 30 Escherichia coli promoters utilize the RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing sigmaS (EsigmaS), and it is known that there is some overlap between the promoters recognized by EsigmaS and by the major E. coli holoenzyme (Esigma70), the sequence elements responsible for promoter recognition by EsigmaS are not well understood. To define the DNA sequences recognized best by EsigmaS in vitro, we started with random DNA and enriched for EsigmaS promoter sequences by multiple cycles of binding and selection. Surprisingly, the sequences selected by EsigmaS contained the known consensus elements (-10 and -35 hexamers) for recognition by Esigma70. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we show that EsigmaS and Esigma70 do not achieve specificity through 'best fit' to different consensus promoter hexamers, the way that other forms of holoenzyme limit transcription to discrete sets of promoters. Rather, we suggest that EsigmaS-specific promoters have sequences that differ significantly from the consensus in at least one of the recognition hexamers, and that promoter discrimination against Esigma70 is achieved, at least in part, by the two enzymes tolerating different deviations from consensus. DNA recognition by EsigmaS versus Esigma70 thus presents an alternative solution to the problem of promoter selectivity.

Role of activator site position and a distal UP-element half-site for sigma factor selectivity at a CRP/H-NS-activated sigma(s)-dependent promoter in Escherichia coli

Transcription initiation by the stress-associated sigma(S)-containing RNA polymerase holoenzyme (E sigma(S)) in Escherichia coli is often subject to complex regulation that involves multiple additional regulators and histone-like proteins. csiD is a stationary phase-inducible sigma(S)-dependent gene in E. coli that requires activation by cAMP-CRP (bound to a site centred at -68.5 nucleotides upstream of the transcriptional start site) and is positively modulated by the abundant nucleoid-associated proteins H-NS and Lrp. By shifting the CRP box to positions between -80.5 and -60.5, we could demonstrate that: (i) activation is equally helix phase dependent as at classic class I promoters; (ii) E sigma(S) prefers a CRP box location at -68.5/-70.5, whereas E sigma(70) is nearly inactive with such an arrangement; and (iii) with the CRP site moved to -60.5, transcription can be initiated efficiently by both holoenzymes. The csiD promoter region also contains a distal UP-element half-site located downstream of the CRP box, as demonstrated by mutational studies, in which this element was either eliminated or completed to a full UP-element. The UP-element half-site favours E sigma(S)-mediated expression, whereas with the full UP-element, nearly wild-type levels of csiD transcription were observed in the absence of sigma(S). Finally, we show that the two histone-like proteins, H-NS and Lrp, both act by influencing activation by cAMP-CRP, but do so by different mechanisms. In particular, H-NS directly or indirectly increases positional stringency for the CRP binding site. The implications of these findings with respect to sigma factor selectivity, activation mechanisms used by the two holoenzymes and the architecture of sigma(S)-dependent promoters are discussed.

Sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase promoter engagement via -10 region nucleotides

Band shift assays using DNA probes that mimic closed and open complexes were used to explore the determinants of promoter recognition by sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase. Duplex recognition was found to be much weaker than that observed in sigma70 promoter usage. However, binding to fork junction probes, which attempt to mimic melted DNA, was very strong. This binding occurs via the non-template strand with the identity of the two conserved junction nucleotides (-12T and -11A) being of paramount importance. A modified promoter consensus sequence identified these two nucleotides as among only four (underlined) that are highly conserved, and all four were in the -10 region (CTAcacT from -13 to -7). The remaining two nucleotides were shown to have different roles, -13C in preventing recognition by the heterologous sigma70 polymerase and -7T in directing enzyme isomerization. These -10 region nucleotides appear to have their primary function prior to full melting because probes that had a melted start site were relatively insensitive to substitution at these positions. These results suggest the sigma38 mechanism differs from the sigma70 mechanism, and this difference likely contributes to selective use of sigma38 under conditions that exist during stationery phase.

What makes an Escherichia coli promoter sigma(S) dependent? Role of the -13/-14 nucleotide promoter positions and region 2.5 of sigma(S)

The sigmaS and sigma70 subunits of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase recognize very similar promoter sequences. Therefore, many promoters can be activated by both holoenzymes in vitro. The same promoters, however, often exhibit distinct sigma factor selectivity in vivo. It has been shown that high salt conditions, reduced negative supercoiling and the formation of complex nucleoprotein structures in a promoter region can contribute to or even generate sigmaS selectivity. Here, we characterize the first positively acting sigmaS-selective feature in the promoter sequence itself. Using the sigmaS-dependent csiD promoter as a model system, we demonstrate that C and T at the -13 and -14 positions, respectively, result in strongest expression. We provide allele-specific suppression data indicating that these nucleotides are contacted by K173 in region 2.5 of sigmaS. In contrast, sigma70, which features a glutamate at the corresponding position (E458), as well as the sigmaS(K173E) variant, exhibit a preference for a G(-13). C(-13) is highly conserved in sigmaS-dependent promoters, and additional data with the osmY promoter demonstrate that the K173/C(-13) interaction is of general importance. In conclusion, our data demonstrate an important role for region 2.5 in sigmaS in transcription initiation. Moreover, we propose a consensus sequence for a sigmaS-selective promoter and discuss its emergence and functional properties from an evolutionary point of view.

Functional modulation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

The promoter recognition specificity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is modulated by replacement of the sigma subunit in the first step and by interaction with transcription factors in the second step. The overall differentiated state of approximately 2000 molecules of the RNA polymerase in a single cell can be estimated after measurement of both the intracellular concentrations and the RNA polymerase-binding affinities for all seven species of the sigma subunit and 100-150 transcription factors. The anticipated impact from this line of systematic approach is that the prediction of the expression hierarchy of approximately 4000 genes on the E. coli genome can be estimated.

Effects of combination of different -10 hexamers and downstream sequences on stationary-phase-specific sigma factor sigma(S)-dependent transcription in Pseudomonas putida

The main sigma factor activating gene expression, necessary in stationary phase and under stress conditions, is sigma(S). In contrast to other minor sigma factors, RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing sigma(S) (Esigma(S)) recognizes a number of promoters which are also recognized by that containing sigma(70) (Esigma(70)). We have previously shown that transposon Tn4652 can activate silent genes in starving Pseudomonas putida cells by creating fusion promoters during transposition. The sequence of the fusion promoters is similar to the sigma(70)-specific promoter consensus. The -10 hexameric sequence and the sequence downstream from the -10 element differ among these promoters. We found that transcription from the fusion promoters is stationary phase specific. Based on in vivo experiments carried out with wild-type and rpoS-deficient mutant P. putida, the effect of sigma(S) on transcription from the fusion promoters was established only in some of these promoters. The importance of the sequence of the -10 hexamer has been pointed out in several published papers, but there is no information about whether the sequences downstream from the -10 element can affect sigma(S)-dependent transcription. Combination of the -10 hexameric sequences and downstream sequences of different fusion promoters revealed that sigma(S)-specific transcription from these promoters is not determined by the -10 hexameric sequence only. The results obtained in this study indicate that the sequence of the -10 element influences sigma(S)-specific transcription in concert with the sequence downstream from the -10 box.

Competition among seven Escherichia coli sigma subunits: relative binding affinities to the core RNA polymerase

Seven different species of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit exist in Escherichia coli, each binding to a single species of the core enzyme and thereby directing transcription of a specific set of genes. To test the sigma competition model in the global regulation of gene transcription, all seven E.coli sigma subunits have been purified and compared for their binding affinities to the same core RNA polymerase (E). In the presence of a fixed amount of sigma(70), the principal sigma for growth-related genes, the level of Esigma(70) holoenzyme formation increased linearly with the increase in core enzyme level, giving an apparent K:(d) for the core enzyme of 0.26 nM. Mixed reconstitution experiments in the presence of a fixed amount of core enzyme and increasing amounts of an equimolar mixture of all seven sigma subunits indicated that sigma(70) is strongest in terms of core enzyme binding, followed by sigma(N), sigma(F), sigma(E)/sigma(FecI), sigma(H) and sigma(S) in decreasing order. The orders of core binding affinity between sigma(70) and sigma(N) and between sigma(70) and sigma(H) were confirmed by measuring the replacement of one core-associated sigma by another sigma subunit. Taken together with the intracellular sigma levels, we tried to estimate the number of each holoenzyme form in growing E. coli cells.

A carboxy-terminal 16-amino-acid region of sigma(38) of Escherichia coli is important for transcription under high-salt conditions and sigma activities in vivo

sigma(38) (or sigma(S), the rpoS gene product) is a sigma subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli and directs transcription from a number of stationary-phase promoters as well as osmotically inducible promoters. In this study, we analyzed the function of the carboxy-terminal 16-amino-acid region of sigma(38) (residues 315 to 330), which is well conserved among the rpoS gene products of enteric bacterial species. Truncation of this region was shown to result in the loss of sigma activity in vivo using promoter-lacZ fusion constructs, but the mutant sigma(38) retained the binding activity in vivo to the core enzyme. The in vitro transcription analysis revealed that the transcription activity of sigma(38) holoenzyme under high potassium glutamate concentrations was significantly decreased by the truncation of the carboxy-terminal tail element.

sigma factor selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: role for CRP, IHF and lrp transcription factors

osmY is a stationary phase-induced and osmotically regulated gene in Escherichia coli that requires the stationary phase RNA polymerase (Esigma(S)) for in vivo expression. We show here that the major RNA polymerase, Esigma(70), also transcribes osmY in vitro and, depending on genetic background, even in vivo. The cAMP receptor protein (CRP) bound to cAMP, the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) and the integration host factor (IHF) inhibit transcription initiation at the osmY promoter. The binding site for CRP is centred at -12.5 from the transcription start site, whereas Lrp covers the whole promoter region. The site for IHF maps in the -90 region. By mobility shift assay, permanganate reactivity and in vitro transcription experiments, we show that repression is much stronger with Esigma(70) than with Esigma(S) holoenzyme. We conclude that CRP, Lrp and IHF inhibit open complex formation more efficiently with Esigma(70) than with Esigma(S). This different ability of the two holoenzymes to interact productively with promoters once assembled in complex nucleoprotein structures may be a crucial factor in generating sigma(S) selectivity in vivo.

RpoS-dependent promoters require guanosine tetraphosphate for induction even in the presence of high levels of sigma(s)

RpoS-dependent promoters require ppGpp for induction in the stationary phase. This has been thought to be a simple consequence of final sigma(S) itself requiring ppGpp for its production. By using four model promoters requiring final sigma(S) for normal induction in the stationary phase, we demonstrate that final sigma(S)-dependent promoters require ppGpp even in the presence of high levels of final sigma(S) produced ectopically. Similar to final sigma(70)-dependent promoters under positive control by ppGpp, the requirement of final sigma(S)-dependent promoters for this alarmone is bypassed by specific "stringent" mutations in the beta-subunit of RNA polymerase. The results suggest that stationary phase induction of both final sigma(S)- and final sigma(70)-dependent genes requires the stringent control modulon and that stringency confers dual control on the RpoS regulon by affecting promoter activity and the levels of the required final sigma-factor.

The response regulator RssB, a recognition factor for sigmaS proteolysis in Escherichia coli, can act like an anti-sigmaS factor

sigmaS (RpoS) is the master regulator of the general stress response in Escherichia coli. Several stresses increase cellular sigmaS levels by inhibiting proteolysis of sigmaS, which under non-stress conditions is a highly unstable protein. For this ClpXP-dependent degradation, the response regulator RssB acts as a recognition factor, with RssB affinity for sigmaS being modulated by phosphorylation. Here, we demonstrate that RssB can also act like an anti-sigma factor for sigmaS in vivo, i.e. RssB can inhibit the expression of sigmaS-dependent genes in the presence of high sigmaS levels. This becomes apparent when (i) the cellular RssB/sigmaS ratio is at least somewhat elevated and (ii) proteolysis is reduced (for example in stationary phase) or eliminated (for example in a clpP mutant). Two modes of inhibition of sigmaS by RssB can be distinguished. The 'catalytic' mode is observed in stationary phase cells with a substoichiometric RssB/sigmaS ratio, requires ClpP and therefore probably corresponds to sequestering of sigmaS to Clp protease (even though sigmaS is not degraded). The 'stoichiometric' mode occurs in clpP mutant cells upon overproduction of RssB to levels that are equal to those of sigmaS, and therefore probably involves binary complex formation between RssB and sigmaS. We also show that, under standard laboratory conditions, the cellular level of RssB is more than 20-fold lower than that of sigmaS and is not significantly controlled by stresses that upregulate sigmaS. We therefore propose that antisigma factor activity of RssB may play a role under not yet identified growth conditions (which may result in RssB induction), or that RssB is a former antisigma factor that during evolution was recruited to serve as a recognition factor for proteolysis.

Two extracytoplasmic function sigma subunits, sigma(E) and sigma(FecI), of Escherichia coli: promoter selectivity and intracellular levels

The promoter selectivity of two extracytoplasmic function (ECF) subfamily sigma subunits, sigma(E) (sigma(24)) and sigma(FecI) (sigma(18)), of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase was analyzed by using an in vitro transcription system and various promoters. The Esigma(E) holoenzyme recognized only the known cognate promoters, rpoEP2, rpoHP3, and degP, and the Esigma(FecI) recognized only one known cognate promoter, fecA. The strict promoter recognition properties of sigma(E) and sigma(FecI) are similar to those of other minor sigma subunits. Transcription by Esigma(E) and Esigma(FecI) was enhanced by high concentrations of glutamate, as in the case of other minor sigma subunits. The optimum temperature for transcription by Esigma(FecI) was low, around 25 degrees C, apparently in agreement with the high rate of iron sequestration by E. coli at low temperatures. By quantitative Western blot analysis, the intracellular levels of sigma(E) and sigma(FecI) in the uninduced steady-state culture of E. coli W3110 (type A) were determined to be 0.7 to 2.0 and 0.1 to 0.2 fmol per microg of total proteins (or 3 to 9 and 0.4 to 0.9 molecules per cell), respectively, and less than 1% of the level of the major sigma(70) subunit.

Transcriptional organization and in vivo role of the Escherichia coli rsd gene, encoding the regulator of RNA polymerase sigma D

The regulator of sigma D (Rsd) was identified as an RNA polymerase sigma70-associated protein in stationary-phase Escherichia coli with the inhibitory activity of sigma70-dependent transcription in vitro (M. Jishage and A. Ishihama, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4953-4958, 1998). Primer extension analysis of rsd mRNA indicated the presence of two promoters, sigmaS-dependent P1 and sigma70-dependent P2 with the gearbox sequence. To get insight into the in vivo role of Rsd, the expression of a reporter gene fused to either the sigma70- or sigmaS-dependent promoter was analyzed in the absence of Rsd or the presence of overexpressed Rsd. In the rsd null mutant, the sigma70- and sigmaS-dependent gene expression was increased or decreased, respectively. On the other hand, the sigma70- or sigmaS-dependent transcription was reduced or enhanced, respectively, after overexpression of Rsd. The repression of the sigmaS-dependent transcription in the rsd mutant is overcome by increased production of the sigmaS subunit. Together these observations support the prediction that Rsd is involved in replacement of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit from sigma70 to sigmaS during the transition from exponential growth to the stationary phase.

Interplay of global regulators and cell physiology in the general stress response of Escherichia coli

Under various stress conditions, two sigma subunits of RNA polymerase, sigmaS and sigma70, coexist in Escherichia coli cells. In contrast to sigma70, sigmaS is subject to intricate regulation and coordinates an emergency reaction to stress as well as long term stress adaptation. In vivo, the two sigma factors clearly control different genes. Yet, they are structurally and functionally very similar and basically recognize the same promoter sequences. Recent data suggest that sigma factor specificity at stress-activated promoters is affected by the interplay of the two RNA polymeraseholoenzymes with additional regulatory factors, such as H-NS, Lrp, CRP, IHF or Fis, that differentially affect transcription initiation by sigmaS or sigma70 in a promoter-specific manner.

Role of the alternative sigma factor sigmaS in expression of the AlkS regulator of the Pseudomonas oleovorans alkane degradation pathway

The AlkS protein activates transcription from the PalkB promoter, allowing the expression of a number of genes required for the assimilation of alkanes in Pseudomonas oleovorans. We have identified the promoter from which the alkS gene is transcribed, PalkS, and analyzed its expression under different conditions and genetic backgrounds. Transcription from PalkS was very low during the exponential phase of growth and increased considerably when cells reached the stationary phase. The PalkS -10 region was similar to the consensus described for promoters recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase bound to the alternative sigma factor sigmaS, which directs the expression of many stationary-phase genes. Reporter strains containing PalkS-lacZ transcriptional fusions showed that PalkS promoter is very weakly expressed in a Pseudomonas putida strain bearing an inactivated allele of the gene coding for sigmaS, rpoS. When PalkS was transferred to E. coli, transcription started at the same site and expression was higher in stationary phase only if sigmaS-RNA polymerase was present. The low levels of AlkS protein generated in the absence of sigmaS were enough to support a partial induction of the PalkB promoter. The -10 and -35 regions of PalkS promoter also show some similarity to the consensus recognized by sigmaD-RNA polymerase, the primary form of RNA polymerase. We propose that in exponential phase PalkS is probably recognized both by sigmaD-RNA polymerase (inefficiently) and by sigmaS-RNA polymerase (present at low levels), leading to low-level expression of the alkS gene. sigmaS-RNA polymerase would be responsible for the high level of activity of PalkS observed in stationary phase.

Modulation of the nucleoid, the transcription apparatus, and the translation machinery in bacteria for stationary phase survival

Upon sensing an impending saturation level of their population density, Escherichia coli cells enter into the stationary phase. We have identified structural and functional modulations of the nucleoid, the transcription apparatus and the translation machinery occurring during the transition from exponential growth to stationary phase. The major DNA-binding proteins, Fis, HU and Hfq, in the exponential-phase nucleoid are replaced by a single stationary-phase protein Dps, thereby compacting the nucleoid and ultimately leading to silencing of the DNA functions. The transcription apparatus is modified by replacing the major promoter recognition subunit, sigma70, with sigmaS. A stationary-phase protein, Rsd (Regulator of Sigma D), with the binding activity of sigma70 is involved in the efficient replacement of sigma and/or the storage of unused sigma70. Changes in cytoplasmic composition also differentially influence the activity of Esigma70 and EsigmaS holoenzymes. Together, these effects may result in the preferential transcription of stationary-phase specific genes. The translation machinery is also modulated in stationary phase, by the formation of translationally incompetent 100S ribosomes. A small stationary-phase protein, RMF (Ribosome Modulation Factor), is involved in the dimerization of 70S ribosome monomers.

The ftsQ1p gearbox promoter of Escherichia coli is a major sigma S-dependent promoter in the ddlB-ftsA region

The most potent promoters in the ddlB-ftsA region of the dcw cluster have been analysed for sigmaS-dependent transcription. Only the gearbox promoter ftsQ1p was found to be transcribed in vitro by RNA polymerase holoenzyme coupled to sigmaS (EsigmaS). This dependency on sigmaS was also found in vivo when single-copy fusions to a reporter gene were analysed in rpoS and rpoS+ backgrounds. Although ftsQ1p can be transcribed by RNA polymerase containing either sigmaD or sigmaS, there is a preference for EsigmaS when the assay conditions include potassium glutamate and supercoiled templates, a property shared with the bolA1p gearbox promoter. The rest of the promoters assayed, ftsQ2p and ftsZ2p3p4p, similarly to the control bolA2p promoter, were preferentially transcribed by EsigmaD, the housekeeper polymerase. The ftsQ1p and the bolA1p promoters also share the presence of AT-rich sequences upstream of the - 35 region and the requirement for an intact wild-type alpha-subunit for a proficient transcription, allowing their joint classification as gearboxes.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

Negative regulation by RpoS: a case of sigma factor competition

A mutation in the Escherichia coli gene encoding the stationary phase-inducible sigma factor (sigmaS, RpoS) not only abolishes transcription of some genes in stationary phase, but also causes superinduction of other stationary phase-induced genes. We have examined this phenomenon of repression by sigmaS using as a model system the divergently transcribed stationary phase-inducible genes, uspA and uspB. uspA is transcribed by sigma70-programmed RNA polymerase and is superinduced in an rpoS mutant, while uspB induction is sigmaS dependent. The data suggest that the superinduction of uspA is caused by an increased amount of sigma70 bound to RNA polymerase in the absence of the competing sigmaS. Increasing the ability of sigma70 to compete against sigmaS by overproducing sigma70 mimics the effect of an rpoS mutation by causing superinduction of sigma70-dependent stationary phase-inducible genes (uspA and fadD), silencing of sigmaS-dependent genes (uspB, bolAp1 and fadL) and inhibiting the development of sigmaS-dependent phenotypes, such as hydrogen peroxide resistance in stationary phase. In addition, overproduction of sigmaS markedly reduced stationary phase expression of a sigma70-dependent promoter. Thus, we conclude that sigma factors compete for a limiting amount of RNA polymerase during stationary phase. The implications of this competition in the passive control of promoter activity is discussed.

The entericidin locus of Escherichia coli and its implications for programmed bacterial cell death

Antidote/toxin gene pairs known as "addiction modules" can maintain plasmids in bacterial populations by means of post-segregational killing. However, several chromosome-encoded addiction modules may provide an entirely distinct function in the programmed cell death of moribund subpopulations under starvation conditions. We now report a novel chromosomal bacteriolytic module of Escherichia coli called the entericidin locus, which is activated in stationary phase under high osmolarity conditions by sigmaS and simultaneously repressed by the osmoregulatory EnvZ/OmpR signal transduction pathway. The entericidin locus encodes tandem paralogous genes (ecnAB) and directs the synthesis of two small cell-envelope lipoproteins. An attenuator precedes ecnA and an ompR-sensitive sigmaS promoter governs expression of ecnB. The entericidin A lipoprotein is an antidote to the bacteriolytic lipoprotein entericidin B. The entericidins are predicted to adopt amphipathic alpha-helical structures and to reciprocally modulate membrane stability. The entericidin locus is not present on any known plasmids, but is conserved in the homologous region of the Citrobacter freundii chromosome. Although the cloned C. freundii entericidin locus is expressed in E. coli independently of ompR, it carries an additional ompR-like gene called ecnR. The organization of the entericidin locus as a chromosomal antidote/toxin gene pair, which is regulated by both positive and negative osmotic signals during starvation, is consistent with an emerging paradigm of programmed bacterial cell death.

Interplay between global regulators of Escherichia coli: effect of RpoS, Lrp and H-NS on transcription of the gene osmC

The transcription of the osmC gene of Escherichia coli is regulated as a function of the phase of growth. It is induced during the decelerating phase, before entry into stationary phase. osmC expression is directed by two overlapping promoters, osmCp1 and osmCp2. osmCp2 is mainly transcribed by E-sigma(s), the RNA polymerase using the sigma(s) (RpoS) sigma factor, and is responsible for the growth phase regulation. Transcription from osmCp1 is independent of sigma(s). The leucine-responsive protein (Lrp) has been shown to bind the osmC promoter region in band shift experiments. In vivo analysis using osmC-lacZ transcriptional fusions demonstrated that Lrp affects the expression of both promoters. It represses the transcription of osmCp1 and activates the transcription of osmCp2 by E-sigma(s). An absence of Lrp results in an increase in the amount of RpoS during exponential growth in minimal medium. The nucleoid-associated protein H-NS also represses osmC transcription from both promoters. However, this happens through different mechanisms. The effect on osmCp2 is probably mediated by the increase in sigma(s) concentration in the cytoplasm of hns- mutants, while the effect on osmCp1 is independent of sigma(s). No binding of H-NS to the promoter region DNA could be detected, indicating that the effect on osmCp1 could also be indirect.

A stationary phase protein in Escherichia coli with binding activity to the major sigma subunit of RNA polymerase

Switching of the transcription pattern in Escherichia coli during the growth transition from exponential to stationary phase is accompanied by the replacement of the RNA polymerase-associated sigma70 subunit (sigmaD) with sigma38 (sigmaS). A fraction of the sigma70 subunit in stationary phase cell extracts was found to exist as a complex with a novel protein, designated Rsd (Regulator of sigma D). The intracellular level of Rsd starts to increase during the transition from growing to stationary phase. The rsd gene was identified at 90 min on the E. coli chromosome. Overexpressed and purified Rsd protein formed complexes in vitro with sigma70 but not with other sigma subunits, sigmaN, sigmaS, sigmaH, sigmaF, and sigmaE. Analysis of proteolytic fragments of sigma70 indicated that Rsd binds at or downstream of region 4, the promoter -35 recognition domain. The isolated Rsd inhibited transcription in vitro to various extents depending on the promoters used. We propose that Rsd is a stationary phase E. coli protein with regulatory activity of the sigma70 function.