Versatility of the carboxy-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase in transcriptional activation: use of the DNA contact site as a protein contact site for MarA

Investigating and Engineering an 1,2-Propanediol-Responsive Transcription Factor-Based Biosensor

Transcription factor (TF)-based biosensors have arisen as powerful tools in the advancement of metabolic engineering. However, with the emergence of numerous bioproduction targets, the variety of applicable TF-based biosensors remains severely limited. In this study, we investigated and engineered an 1,2-propanediol (1,2-PD)-responsive transcription activator, PocR, from Salmonella typhimurium to enrich the current biosensor repertoire. Heterologous characterization of PocR in E. coli revealed a significantly limited operational range and dynamic range, primarily attributed to the leaky binding between PocR and its corresponding promoters in the absence of the 1,2-PD inducer. Promiscuity characterization uncovered the minor responsiveness of PocR toward glycerol and 1,2-butanediol (1,2-BD). Using AlphaFold-predicted structure and protein mutagenesis, we preliminarily explored the underlying mechanism of PocR. Based on the investigated mechanism, we engineered a PcoR-F46R/G105D variant with an altered inducer specificity to glycerol, as well as a PocR-ARE (Q107A/S192R/A203E) variant with nearly a 4-fold higher dynamic range (6.7-fold activation) and a 20-fold wider operational range (0-20 mM 1,2-PD). Finally, we successfully converted PocR to a repressor through promoter engineering. Integrating the activation and repression functions established a versatile 1,2-PD-induced bifunctional regulation system based on PocR-ARE. Our work showcases the exploration and exploitation of an underexplored type of transcriptional activator capable of recruiting RNA polymerase. It also expands the biosensor toolbox by providing a 1,2-PD-responsive bifunctional regulator and glycerol-responsive activator.

The interaction of InvF-RNAP is mediated by the chaperone SicA in Salmonella sp: an in silico prediction

In this work we carried out an in silico analysis to understand the interaction between InvF-SicA and RNAP in the bacterium Salmonella Typhimurium strain LT2. Structural analysis of InvF allowed the identification of three possible potential cavities for interaction with SicA. This interaction could occur with the structural motif known as tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) 1 and 2 in the two cavities located in the interface of the InvF and α-CTD of RNAP. Indeed, molecular dynamics simulations showed that SicA stabilizes the Helix-turn-Helix DNA-binding motifs, i.e., maintaining their proper conformation, mainly in the DNA Binding Domain (DBD). Finally, to evaluate the role of amino acids that contribute to protein-protein affinity, an alanine scanning mutagenesis approach, indicated that R177 and R181, located in the DBD motif, caused the greatest changes in binding affinity with α-CTD, suggesting a central role in the stabilization of the complex. However, it seems that the N-terminal region also plays a key role in the protein-protein interaction, especially the amino acid R40, since we observed conformational flexibility in this region allowing it to interact with interface residues. We consider that this analysis opens the possibility to validate experimentally the amino acids involved in protein-protein interactions and explore other regulatory complexes where chaperones are involved.

Interactions between the AraC/XylS-like transcriptional activator InvF of Salmonella Typhimurium, the RNA polymerase alpha subunit and the chaperone SicA

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium causes gastroenteritis and systemic infections in humans. For this bacterium the expression of a type III secretion system (T3SS) and effector proteins encoded in the Salmonella pathogenicity island-1 (SPI-1), is keystone for the virulence of this bacterium. Expression of these is controlled by a regulatory cascade starting with the transcriptional regulators HilD, HilC and RtsA that induce the expression of HilA, which then activates expression of the regulator InvF, a transcriptional regulator of the AraC/XylS family. InvF needs to interact with the chaperone SicA to activate transcription of SPI-1 genes including sicA, sopB, sptP, sopE, sopE2, and STM1239. InvF very likely acts as a classical activator; however, whether InvF interacts with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit RpoA has not been determined. Results from this study confirm the interaction between InvF with SicA and reveal that both proteins interact with the RNAP alpha subunit. Thus, our study further supports that the InvF/SicA complex acts as a classical activator. Additionally, we showed for the first time an interaction between a chaperone of T3SS effectors (SicA) and the RNAP.

Mechanism of δ Mediated Transcription Activation in Bacillus subtilis: Interaction with α CTD of RNA Polymerase Stabilizes δ and Successively Facilitates the Open Complex Formation

The α CTD (C-terminal domain of the α subunit) of RNA polymerase (RNAP) is a target for transcriptional regulators. In the transcription activation at Class I, Class II, and Class III promoters of bacteria, the transcriptional regulator, binds to DNA at different sites and interacts with the α CTD to stabilize the RNAP at the promoter or it binds to the α CTD to form a prerecruitment complex that searches for its cognate binding site. This 'simple recruitment mechanism' of the transcriptional machinery at the promoter is responsible for the activation of transcription. Strikingly, in B. subtilis the binding of RNAP at the promoter stabilizes the transcriptional regulator, δ at the -41 site of the promoter DNA through an interaction with its α CTD and successively facilitates the open complex formation. Two residues R293 and K294 of α CTD (equivalent to K297 and K298 of E. coli) are involved in the interactions with δ and essential for the activation of transcription. R293 is responsible for the stabilization of δ, while K294 is responsible for facilitating the open complex formation. Based on our data we propose a new model of transcription activation by δ of B. subtilis that is similar to (its binding location and interaction with α CTD), but distinct from (the recruitment of transcription factor by RNAP at the DNA, and enhancement of the open complex formation) the model Class II promoters in bacteria.

The Mar, Sox, and Rob Systems

Environments inhabited by Enterobacteriaceae are diverse and often stressful. This is particularly true for Escherichia coli and Salmonella during host association in the gastrointestinal systems of animals. There, E. coli and Salmonella must survive exposure to various antimicrobial compounds produced or ingested by their host. A myriad of changes to cellular physiology and metabolism are required to achieve this feat. A central regulatory network responsible for sensing and responding to intracellular chemical stressors like antibiotics are the Mar, Sox, and Rob systems found throughout the Enterobacteriaceae. Each of these distinct regulatory networks controls expression of an overlapping set of downstream genes whose collective effects result in increased resistance to a wide array of antimicrobial compounds. This collection of genes is known as the mar-sox-rob regulon. This review will provide an overview of the mar-sox-rob regulon and molecular architecture of the Mar, Sox, and Rob systems.

Structural basis of three different transcription activation strategies adopted by a single regulator SoxS

Transcription activation is established through extensive protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions that allow an activator to engage and remodel RNA polymerase. SoxS, a global transcription activator, diversely regulates subsets of stress response genes with different promoters, but the detailed SoxS-dependent transcription initiation mechanisms remain obscure. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of three SoxS-dependent transcription activation complexes (SoxS-TAC^I, SoxS-TAC^II and SoxS-TAC^III) comprising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), SoxS protein and three representative classes of SoxS-regulated promoters. The structures reveal that SoxS monomer orchestrates transcription initiation through specific interactions with the promoter DNA and different conserved domains of RNAP. In particular, SoxS is positioned in the opposite orientation in SoxS-TAC^III to that in SoxS-TAC^I and SoxS-TAC^II, unveiling a novel mode of transcription activation. Strikingly, two universally conserved C-terminal domains of alpha subunit (αCTD) of RNAP associate with each other, bridging SoxS and region 4 of σ⁷⁰. We show that SoxS interacts with RNAP directly and independently from DNA, remodeling the enzyme to activate transcription from cognate SoxS promoters while repressing transcription from UP-element containing promoters. Our data provide a comprehensive summary of SoxS-dependent promoter architectures and offer new insights into the αCTD contribution to transcription control in bacteria.

Structural basis of transcription activation by Rob, a pleiotropic AraC/XylS family regulator

Rob, which serves as a paradigm of the large AraC/XylS family transcription activators, regulates diverse subsets of genes involved in multidrug resistance and stress response. However, the underlying mechanism of how it engages bacterial RNA polymerase and promoter DNA to finely respond to environmental stimuli is still elusive. Here, we present two cryo-EM structures of Rob-dependent transcription activation complex (Rob-TAC) comprising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), Rob-regulated promoter and Rob in alternative conformations. The structures show that a single Rob engages RNAP by interacting with RNAP αCTD and σ70R4, revealing their generally important regulatory roles. Notably, by occluding σ70R4 from binding to -35 element, Rob specifically binds to the conserved Rob binding box through its consensus HTH motifs, and retains DNA bending by aid of the accessory acidic loop. More strikingly, our ligand docking and biochemical analysis demonstrate that the large Rob C-terminal domain (Rob CTD) shares great structural similarity with the global Gyrl-like domains in effector binding and allosteric regulation, and coordinately promotes formation of competent Rob-TAC. Altogether, our structural and biochemical data highlight the detailed molecular mechanism of Rob-dependent transcription activation, and provide favorable evidences for understanding the physiological roles of the other AraC/XylS-family transcription factors.

Functional insights into Mycobacterium tuberculosis DevR-dependent transcriptional machinery utilizing Escherichia coli

DevR/DosR response regulator is believed to participate in virulence, dormancy adaptation and antibiotic tolerance mechanisms of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by regulating the expression of the dormancy regulon. We have previously shown that the interaction of DevR with RNA polymerase is essential for the expression of DevR-regulated genes. Here, we developed a M. tuberculosis-specific in vivo transcription system to enrich our understanding of DevR-RNA polymerase interaction. This in vivo assay involves co-transforming E. coli with two plasmids that express α, β, β' and σA subunits of M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase and a third plasmid that harbors a DevR expression cassette and a GFP reporter gene under the DevR-regulated fdxA promoter. We show that DevR-dependent transcription is sponsored exclusively by M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase and regulated by α and σA subunits of M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase. Using this E. coli triple plasmid system to express mutant variants of M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase, we identified E280 residue in C-terminal domain of α and K513 and R515 residues of σA to participate in DevR-dependent transcription. In silico modeling of a ternary complex of DevR, σA domain 4 and fdxA promoter suggest an interaction of Q505, R515 and K513 residues of σA with E178 and D172 residues of DevR and E471 of σA, respectively. These findings provide us with new insights into the interactions between DevR and RNA polymerase of M. tuberculosis which can be targeted for intercepting DevR function. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of this system for screening of anti-DevR compounds.

The N-terminal Helix-Turn-Helix Motif of Transcription Factors MarA and Rob Drives DNA Recognition

DNA-binding proteins play an important role in gene regulation and cellular function. The transcription factors MarA and Rob are two homologous members of the AraC/XylS family that regulate multidrug resistance. They share a common DNA-binding domain, and Rob possesses an additional C-terminal domain that permits binding of low-molecular weight effectors. Both proteins possess two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs capable of binding DNA; however, while MarA interacts with its promoter through both HTH-motifs, prior studies indicate that Rob binding to DNA via a single HTH-motif is sufficient for tight binding. In the present work, we perform microsecond time scale all-atom simulations of the binding of both transcription factors to different DNA sequences to understand the determinants of DNA recognition and binding. Our simulations characterize sequence-dependent changes in dynamical behavior upon DNA binding, showcasing the role of Arg40 of the N-terminal HTH-motif in allowing for specific tight binding. Finally, our simulations demonstrate that an acidic C-terminal loop of Rob can control the DNA binding mode, facilitating interconversion between the distinct DNA binding modes observed in MarA and Rob. In doing so, we provide detailed molecular insight into DNA binding and recognition by these proteins, which in turn is an important step toward the efficient design of antivirulence agents that target these proteins.

The transcriptional activator of the bfp operon in EPEC (PerA) interacts with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

Enteropathogenic E. coli virulence genes are under the control of various regulators, one of which is PerA, an AraC/XylS-like regulator. PerA directly promotes its own expression and that of the bfp operon encoding the genes involved in the biogenesis of the bundle-forming pilus (BFP); it also activates PerC expression, which in turn stimulates locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) activation through the LEE-encoded regulator Ler. Monomeric PerA directly binds to the per and bfp regulatory regions; however, it is not known whether interactions between PerA and the RNA polymerase (RNAP) are needed to activate gene transcription as has been observed for other AraC-like regulators. Results showed that PerA interacts with the alpha subunit of the RNAP polymerase and that it is necessary for the genetic and phenotypic expression of bfpA. Furthermore, an in silico analysis shows that PerA might be interacting with specific alpha subunit amino acids residues highlighting the direction of future experiments.

An update of the unceasingly growing and diverse AraC/XylS family of transcriptional activators

Transcriptional factors play an important role in gene regulation in all organisms, especially in Bacteria. Here special emphasis is placed in the AraC/XylS family of transcriptional regulators. This is one of the most abundant as many predicted members have been identified and more members are added because more bacterial genomes are sequenced. Given the way more experimental evidence has mounded in the past decades, we decided to update the information about this captivating family of proteins. Using bioinformatics tools on all the data available for experimentally characterized members of this family, we found that many members that display a similar functional classification can be clustered together and in some cases they have a similar regulatory scheme. A proposal for grouping these proteins is also discussed. Additionally, an analysis of surveyed proteins in bacterial genomes is presented. Altogether, the current review presents a panoramic view into this family and we hope it helps to stimulate future research in the field.

The Escherichia coli MarA protein regulates the ycgZ-ymgABC operon to inhibit biofilm formation

The Escherichia coli marRAB operon is a paradigm for chromosomally encoded antibiotic resistance. The operon exerts its effect via an encoded transcription factor called MarA that modulates efflux pump and porin expression. In this work, we show that MarA is also a regulator of biofilm formation. Control is mediated by binding of MarA to the intergenic region upstream of the ycgZ-ymgABC operon. The operon, known to influence the formation of curli fibres and colanic acid, is usually expressed during periods of starvation. Hence, the ycgZ-ymgABC promoter is recognised by σ³⁸ (RpoS)-associated RNA polymerase (RNAP). Surprisingly, MarA does not influence σ³⁸ -dependent transcription. Instead, MarA drives transcription by the housekeeping σ⁷⁰ -associated RNAP. The effects of MarA on ycgZ-ymgABC expression are coupled with biofilm formation by the rcsCDB phosphorelay system, with YcgZ, YmgA and YmgB forming a complex that directly interacts with the histidine kinase domain of RcsC.

Inverted Regulation of Multidrug Efflux Pumps, Acid Resistance, and Porins in Benzoate-Evolved Escherichia coli K-12

Benzoic acid, a partial uncoupler of the proton motive force (PMF), selects for sensitivity to chloramphenicol and tetracycline during the experimental evolution of Escherichia coli K-12. Transcriptomes of E. coli isolates evolved with benzoate showed the reversal of benzoate-dependent regulation, including the downregulation of multidrug efflux pump genes, the gene for the Gad acid resistance regulon, the nitrate reductase genes narHJ, and the gene for the acid-consuming hydrogenase Hyd-3. However, the benzoate-evolved strains had increased expression of OmpF and other large-hole porins that admit fermentable substrates and antibiotics. Candidate genes identified from benzoate-evolved strains were tested for their roles in benzoate tolerance and in chloramphenicol sensitivity. Benzoate or salicylate tolerance was increased by deletion of the Gad activator ariR or of the acid fitness island from slp to the end of the gadX gene encoding Gad regulators and the multidrug pump genes mdtEF Benzoate tolerance was also increased by deletion of multidrug component gene emrA, RpoS posttranscriptional regulator gene cspC, adenosine deaminase gene add, hydrogenase gene hyc (Hyd-3), and the RNA chaperone/DNA-binding regulator gene hfq Chloramphenicol resistance was decreased by mutations in genes for global regulators, such as RNA polymerase alpha subunit gene rpoA, the Mar activator gene rob, and hfq Deletion of lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic kinase gene rfaY decreased the rate of growth in chloramphenicol. Isolates from experimental evolution with benzoate had many mutations affecting aromatic biosynthesis and catabolism, such as aroF (encoding tyrosine biosynthesis) and apt (encoding adenine phosphoribosyltransferase). Overall, benzoate or salicylate exposure selects for the loss of multidrug efflux pumps and of hydrogenases that generate a futile cycle of PMF and upregulates porins that admit fermentable nutrients and antibiotics.IMPORTANCE Benzoic acid is a common food preservative, and salicylic acid (2-hydroxybenzoic acid) is the active form of aspirin. At high concentrations, benzoic acid conducts a proton across the membrane, depleting the proton motive force. In the absence of antibiotics, benzoate exposure selects against proton-driven multidrug efflux pumps and upregulates porins that admit fermentable substrates but that also allow the entry of antibiotics. Thus, evolution with benzoate and related molecules, such as salicylates, requires a trade-off for antibiotic sensitivity, a trade-off that could help define a stable gut microbiome. Benzoate and salicylate are naturally occurring plant signal molecules that may modulate the microbiomes of plants and animal digestive tracts so as to favor fermenters and exclude drug-resistant pathogens.

Continuous Adaptive Evolution of a Fast-Growing Corynebacterium glutamicum Strain Independent of Protocatechuate

Corynebacterium glutamicum is a commonly applied host for the industrial production of amino acids. While valued for its robustness, it is somewhat inferior to competing strains such as Escherichia coli because of the relatively low growth rate of 0.40 h-1 in synthetic, industrial media. Accordingly, adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) experiments were performed in continuous cultivation mode to select for a growth-improved host. To ensure industrial attractiveness, this ALE study aimed at a reduction of dependency on costly growth-boosting additives such as protocatechuate (PCA) or complex media supplements. Consequently, double selection pressures were installed consisting of a steady increase in growth rate demands and a parallel reduction of complex medium fractions. Selection yielded C. glutamicum EVO5 achieving 0.54 h-1 and 1.03 gGlc gCDW -1 h-1 in minimal medium without abovementioned supplements. Sequencing revealed 10 prominent mutations, three of them in key regulator genes.

Unraveling the role of the transcriptional regulator VirS in low pH-induced responses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and identification of VirS inhibitors

The ability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to respond and adapt to various stresses such as oxygen/nitrogen radicals and low pH inside macrophages is critical for the persistence of this human pathogen inside its host. We have previously shown that an AraC/XylS-type transcriptional regulator, VirS, which is induced in low pH, is involved in remodeling the architecture of the bacterial cell envelope. However, how VirS influences gene expression to coordinate these pH responses remains unclear. Here, using a genetic biosensor of cytoplasmic pH, we demonstrate that VirS is required for the intracellular pH maintenance in response to acidic stress and inside acidified macrophages. Furthermore, we observed that VirS plays an important role in blocking phagosomal-lysosomal fusions. Transcriptomics experiments revealed that VirS affects the expression of genes encoding metabolic enzymes, cell-wall envelope proteins, efflux pumps, ion transporters, detoxification enzymes, and transcriptional regulators expressed under low-pH stress. Employing electrophoretic mobility-shift assays, DNA footprinting, and in silico analysis, we identified a DNA sequence to which VirS binds and key residues in VirS required for its interaction with DNA. A significant role of VirS in M. tuberculosis survival in adverse conditions suggested it as a potential anti-mycobacterial drug target. To that end, we identified VirS inhibitors in a virtual screen; the top hit compounds inhibited its DNA-binding activity and also M. tuberculosis growth in vitro and inside macrophages. Our findings establish that VirS mediates M. tuberculosis responses to acidic stress and identify VirS-inhibiting compounds that may form the basis for developing more effective anti-mycobacterial agents.

Architecture of a transcribing-translating expressome

DNA transcription is functionally coupled to messenger RNA (mRNA) translation in bacteria, but how this is achieved remains unclear. Here we show that RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the ribosome of Escherichia coli can form a defined transcribing and translating "expressome" complex. The cryo-electron microscopic structure of the expressome reveals continuous protection of ~30 nucleotides of mRNA extending from the RNAP active center to the ribosome decoding center. The RNAP-ribosome interface includes the RNAP subunit α carboxyl-terminal domain, which is required for RNAP-ribosome interaction in vitro and for pronounced cell growth defects upon translation inhibition in vivo, consistent with its function in transcription-translation coupling. The expressome structure can only form during transcription elongation and explains how translation can prevent transcriptional pausing, backtracking, and termination.

When the Scaffold Cannot Be Ignored: The Role of the Hydrophobic Core in Ligand Binding and Specificity

The traditional view of protein-ligand binding treats a protein as comprising distinct binding epitopes on the surface of a degenerate structural scaffold, largely ignoring the impact of a protein's energy landscape. To determine the robustness of this simplification, we compared two small helix-turn-helix transcription factors with different energy landscapes. λ-Repressor is stable and well folded, while MarA appears to be marginally stable with multiple native conformations (molten). While λ-repressor is known to tolerate any hydrophobic mutation in the core, we find MarA drastically less tolerant to core mutation. Moreover, core mutations in MarA (distant from the DNA-binding interface) change the relative affinities of its binding partners, altering ligand specificity. These results can be explained by taking into account the effects of mutations on the entire energy landscape and not just the native state. Thus, for proteins with multiple conformations that are close in energy, such as many intrinsically disordered proteins, residues distant from the active site can alter both binding affinity and specificity.

Helicobacter pylori RNA polymerase α-subunit C-terminal domain shows features unique to ɛ-proteobacteria and binds NikR/DNA complexes

Bacterial RNA polymerase is a large, multi-subunit enzyme responsible for transcription of genomic information. The C-terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase (αCTD) functions as a DNA and protein recognition element localizing the polymerase on certain promoter sequences and is essential in all bacteria. Although αCTD is part of RNA polymerase, it is thought to have once been a separate transcription factor, and its primary role is the recruitment of RNA polymerase to various promoters. Despite the conservation of the subunits of RNA polymerase among bacteria, the mechanisms of regulation of transcription vary significantly. We have determined the tertiary structure of Helicobacter pylori αCTD. It is larger than other structurally determined αCTDs due to an extra, highly amphipathic helix near the C-terminal end. Residues within this helix are highly conserved among ɛ-proteobacteria. The surface of the domain that binds A/T rich DNA sequences is conserved and showed binding to DNA similar to αCTDs of other bacteria. Using several NikR dependent promoter sequences, we observed cooperative binding of H. pylori αCTD to NikR:DNA complexes. We also produced αCTD lacking the 19 C-terminal residues, which showed greatly decreased stability, but maintained the core domain structure and binding affinity to NikR:DNA at low temperatures. The modeling of H. pylori αCTD into the context of transcriptional complexes suggests that the additional amphipathic helix mediates interactions with transcriptional regulators.

MarA, SoxS and Rob of Escherichia coli - Global regulators of multidrug resistance, virulence and stress response

Bacteria have a great capacity for adjusting their metabolism in response to environmental changes by linking extracellular stimuli to the regulation of genes by transcription factors. By working in a co-operative manner, transcription factors provide a rapid response to external threats, allowing the bacteria to survive. This review will focus on transcription factors MarA, SoxS and Rob in Escherichia coli, three members of the AraC family of proteins. These homologous proteins exemplify the ability to respond to multiple threats such as oxidative stress, drugs and toxic compounds, acidic pH, and host antimicrobial peptides. MarA, SoxS and Rob recognize similar DNA sequences in the promoter region of more than 40 regulatory target genes. As their regulons overlap, a finely tuned adaptive response allows E. coli to survive in the presence of different assaults in a co-ordinated manner. These regulators are well conserved amongst Enterobacteriaceae and due to their broad involvement in bacterial adaptation in the host, have recently been explored as targets to develop new anti-virulence agents. The regulators are also being examined for their roles in novel technologies such as biofuel production.

Conservation of the three-dimensional structure in non-homologous or unrelated proteins

In this review, we examine examples of conservation of protein structural motifs in unrelated or non-homologous proteins. For this, we have selected three DNA-binding motifs: the histone fold, the helix-turn-helix motif, and the zinc finger, as well as the globin-like fold. We show that indeed similar structures exist in unrelated proteins, strengthening the concept that three-dimensional conservation might be more important than the primary amino acid sequence.

Activating transcription in bacteria

Bacteria use a variety of mechanisms to direct RNA polymerase to specific promoters in order to activate transcription in response to growth signals or environmental cues. Activation can be due to factors that interact at specific promoters, thereby increasing transcription directed by these promoters. We examine the range of architectures found at activator-dependent promoters and outline the mechanisms by which input from different factors is integrated. Alternatively, activation can be due to factors that interact with RNA polymerase and change its preferences for target promoters. We summarize the different mechanistic options for activation that are focused directly on RNA polymerase.

Computer-based annotation of putative AraC/XylS-family transcription factors of known structure but unknown function

Currently, about 20 crystal structures per day are released and deposited in the Protein Data Bank. A significant fraction of these structures is produced by research groups associated with the structural genomics consortium. The biological function of many of these proteins is generally unknown or not validated by experiment. Therefore, a growing need for functional prediction of protein structures has emerged. Here we present an integrated bioinformatics method that combines sequence-based relationships and three-dimensional (3D) structural similarity of transcriptional regulators with computer prediction of their cognate DNA binding sequences. We applied this method to the AraC/XylS family of transcription factors, which is a large family of transcriptional regulators found in many bacteria controlling the expression of genes involved in diverse biological functions. Three putative new members of this family with known 3D structure but unknown function were identified for which a probable functional classification is provided. Our bioinformatics analyses suggest that they could be involved in plant cell wall degradation (Lin2118 protein from Listeria innocua, PDB code 3oou), symbiotic nitrogen fixation (protein from Chromobacterium violaceum, PDB code 3oio), and either metabolism of plant-derived biomass or nitrogen fixation (protein from Rhodopseudomonas palustris, PDB code 3mn2).

Characterization of the RNA polymerase α subunit operon from Corynebacterium ammoniagenes

The rpoA gene, which encodes the α subunit of RNA polymerase, and the surrounding regions were cloned from Corynebacterium ammoniagenes (ATCC 6872), a parental strain of an industrial nucleotide producer in Korea. This region encodes genes for the following proteins (in order): initiation factor IF-1, the ribosomal proteins S13, S11 and S4, the α subunit of RNA polymerase and the ribosomal protein L17. Transcript mapping via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction demonstrates that IF1, S13, S11, S4, α and L17 are transcribed as a polycistronic transcript from two tandem promoters preceding the IF-1 gene. The gene order of the C. ammoniagenes rpoA operon is characteristic of Corynebacteria. The rpoA gene encodes a protein of 334 amino acids with a deduced molecular weight of 35,971 Da, exhibiting 42 and 82% similarity to the Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum α subunits, respectively. The regions that mediate interactions with β and β' subunits and the residues that participate in the recognition of the UP element are conserved in the C. ammoniagenes α subunit. In contrast, there are differences between the C. ammoniagenes and E. coli α subunits in the residues assigned to the dimerization domain and the amino acids adjacent to conserved residues that mediate UP element recognition. The C. ammoniagenes rpoA gene expressed in E. coli complemented a temperature sensitive rpoA mutation, indicating that the C. ammoniagenes α subunit can function in E. coli.

NusA interaction with the α subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase is via the UP element site and releases autoinhibition

Elongating Escherichia coli RNAP is modulated by NusA protein. The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the RNAP α subunit (αCTD) interacts with the acidic CTD 2 (AR2) of NusA, releasing the autoinhibitory blockade of the NusA S1-KH1-KH2 motif and allowing NusA to bind nascent nut spacer RNA. We determined the solution conformation of the AR2:αCTD complex. The αCTD residues that interface with AR2 are identical to those that recognize UP promoter elements A nusA-ΔAR2 mutation does not affect UP-dependent rrnH transcription initiation in vivo. Instead, the mutation inhibits Rho-dependent transcription termination at phage λtR1, which lies adjacent to the λnutR sequence. The Rho-dependent λtimm terminator, which is not preceded by a λnut sequence, is fully functional. We propose that constitutive binding of NusA-ΔAR2 to λnutR occludes Rho. In addition, the mutation confers a dominant defect in exiting stationary phase.

Promoter discrimination at class I MarA regulon promoters mediated by glutamic acid 89 of the MarA transcriptional activator of Escherichia coli

Three paralogous transcriptional activators MarA, SoxS, and Rob, activate > 40 Escherichia coli promoters. To understand why MarA does not activate certain promoters as strongly as SoxS, we compared MarA, MarA mutants, and SoxS for their abilities to activate 16 promoters and to bind their cognate marbox binding sites. Replacement of the MarA glutamic acid residue 89 with alanine greatly increased the marbox binding and activation of many class I promoters. Like cells constitutive for SoxS, cells expressing the MarA with the E89A mutation were more resistant to superoxides than those harboring WT MarA. The activities of several other E89 substitutions ranked as follows: E89A > E89G > E89V > WT > E89D. Increased binding and activation occurred only at class I promoters when the 12th base of the promoter's marbox (a position at which there is no known interaction between the marbox and MarA) was not a T residue. Furthermore, WT MarA binding to a synthetic marbox in vitro was enhanced when the phosphate group between positions 12 and 13 was eliminated on one strand. The results demonstrate that relatively minor changes in a single amino acid side chain (e.g., alanine to valine or glutamic acid to aspartic acid) can strongly influence activity despite any evidence that the side chain is involved in positive interactions with either DNA or RNA polymerase. We present a model which attributes the differences in binding and activation to the interference between the β- and γ-carbons of the amino acid at position 89 and the phosphate group between positions 12 and 13.

Protein-protein interactions between sigma(70) region 4 of RNA polymerase and Escherichia coli SoxS, a transcription activator that functions by the prerecruitment mechanism: evidence for "off-DNA" and "on-DNA" interactions

According to the prerecruitment hypothesis, Escherichia coli SoxS activates the transcription of the genes of the SoxRS regulon by forming binary complexes with RNA polymerase (RNAP) that scan the chromosome for class I and class II SoxS-dependent promoters. We showed previously that the alpha subunit's C-terminal domain plays a role in activating both classes of promoter by making protein-protein contacts with SoxS; some of these contacts are made in solution in the absence of promoter DNA, a critical prediction of the prerecruitment hypothesis. Here, we identified seven single-alanine substitutions of the region 4 of sigma(70) (sigma(70) R4) of RNAP that reduce SoxS activation of class II promoters. With genetic epistasis tests between these sigma(70) R4 mutants and positive control mutants of SoxS, we identified 10 pairs of amino acids that interact with each other in E. coli. Using the yeast two-hybrid system and affinity immobilization assays, we showed that SoxS and sigma(70) R4 can interact in solution (i.e., "off-DNA"). The interaction requires amino acids of the class I/II (but not the class II) positive control surface of SoxS, and five amino acids of sigma(70) R4 that reduce activation in E. coli also reduce the SoxS-sigma(70) R4 interaction in yeast. One of the epistatic interactions that occur in E. coli also occurs in the yeast two-hybrid system (i.e., off-DNA). Importantly, we infer that the five epistatic interactions occurring in E. coli that require an amino acid of the class II surface occur "on-DNA" at class II promoters. Finding that SoxS contacts sigma(70) R4 both off-DNA and on-DNA is consistent with the prerecruitment hypothesis. Moreover, SoxS is now the first example of an E. coli transcriptional activator that uses a single positive control surface to make specific protein-protein contacts with two different subunits of RNAP.

Evidence that regulatory protein MarA of Escherichia coli represses rob by steric hindrance

The MarA protein of Escherichia coli can both activate and repress the initiation of transcription, depending on the position and orientation of its degenerate 20-bp binding site ("marbox") at the promoter. For all three known repressed genes, the marbox overlaps the promoter. It has been reported that MarA represses the rob promoter via an RNA polymerase (RNAP)-DNA-MarA ternary complex. Under similar conditions, we found a ternary complex for the repressed purA promoter also. These findings, together with the backwards orientation of repressed marboxes, suggested a unique interaction of MarA with RNAP in repression. However, no repression-specific residues of MarA could be found among 38 single-alanine replacement mutations previously shown to retain activation function or among mutants from random mutagenesis. Mutations Thr12Ala, Arg36Ala, Thr95Ile, and Pro106Ala were more damaging for activation than for repression, some up to 10-fold, so these residues may play a specific role in activation. We found that nonspecific binding of RNAP to promoterless regions of DNA was presumably responsible for the ternary complexes seen previously. When RNAP binding was promoter specific, MarA reduced RNAP access to the rob promoter; there was little or no ternary complex. These findings strongly implicate steric hindrance as the mechanism of repression of rob by MarA.

Model of transcriptional activation by MarA in Escherichia coli

The AraC family transcription factor MarA activates ∼40 genes (the marA/soxS/rob regulon) of the Escherichia coli chromosome resulting in different levels of resistance to a wide array of antibiotics and to superoxides. Activation of marA/soxS/rob regulon promoters occurs in a well-defined order with respect to the level of MarA; however, the order of activation does not parallel the strength of MarA binding to promoter sequences. To understand this lack of correspondence, we developed a computational model of transcriptional activation in which a transcription factor either increases or decreases RNA polymerase binding, and either accelerates or retards post-binding events associated with transcription initiation. We used the model to analyze data characterizing MarA regulation of promoter activity. The model clearly explains the lack of correspondence between the order of activation and the MarA-DNA affinity and indicates that the order of activation can only be predicted using information about the strength of the full MarA-polymerase-DNA interaction. The analysis further suggests that MarA can activate without increasing polymerase binding and that activation can even involve a decrease in polymerase binding, which is opposite to the textbook model of activation by recruitment. These findings are consistent with published chromatin immunoprecipitation assays of interactions between polymerase and the E. coli chromosome. We find that activation involving decreased polymerase binding yields lower latency in gene regulation and therefore might confer a competitive advantage to cells. Our model yields insights into requirements for predicting the order of activation of a regulon and enables us to suggest that activation might involve a decrease in polymerase binding which we expect to be an important theme of gene regulation in E. coli and beyond.

When environmental conditions change, cell survival can depend on sudden production of proteins that are normally in low demand. Protein production is controlled by transcription factors which bind to DNA near genes and either increase or decrease RNA production. Many puzzles remain concerning the ways transcription factors do this. Recently we collected data relating the intracellular level of a single transcription factor, MarA, to the increase in expression of several genes related to antibiotic and superoxide resistance in Escherichia coli. These data indicated that target genes are turned on in a well-defined order with respect to the level of MarA, enabling cells to mount a response that is commensurate to the level of threat detected in the environment. Here we develop a computational model to yield insight into how MarA turns on its target genes. The modeling suggests that MarA can increase the frequency with which a transcript is made while decreasing the overall presence of the transcription machinery at the start of a gene. This mechanism is opposite to the textbook model of transcriptional activation; nevertheless it enables cells to respond quickly to environmental challenges and is likely of general importance for gene regulation in E. coli and beyond.

Two functions of the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli Rob: mediating "sequestration-dispersal" as a novel off-on switch for regulating Rob's activity as a transcription activator and preventing degradation of Rob by Lon protease

In Escherichia coli, Rob activates transcription of the SoxRS/MarA/Rob regulon. Previous work revealed that Rob resides in three to four immunostainable foci, that dipyridyl and bile salts are inducers of its activity, and that inducers bind to Rob's C-terminal domain (CTD). We propose that sequestration inactivates Rob by blocking its access to the transcriptional machinery and that inducers activate Rob by mediating its dispersal, allowing interaction with RNA polymerase. To test "sequestration-dispersal" as a new mechanism for regulating the activity of transcriptional activators, we fused Rob's CTD to SoxS and used indirect immunofluorescence microscopy to determine the effect of inducers on SoxS-Rob's cellular localization. Unlike native SoxS, which is uniformly distributed throughout the cell, SoxS-Rob is sequestered without an inducer, but is rapidly dispersed when cells are treated with an inducer. In this manner, Rob's CTD serves as an anti-sigma factor in regulating the co-sigma-factor-like activity of SoxS when fused to it. Rob's CTD also protects its N-terminus from Lon protease, since Lon's normally rapid degradation of SoxS is blocked in the chimera. Accordingly, Rob's CTD has novel regulatory properties that can be bestowed on another E. coli protein.

Mutagenesis of the bacterial RNA polymerase alpha subunit for improvement of complex phenotypes

Combinatorial or random methods for strain engineering have been extensively used for the improvement of multigenic phenotypes and other traits for which the underlying mechanism is not fully understood. Although the preferred method has traditionally been mutagenesis and selection, our laboratory has successfully used mutant transcription factors, which direct the RNA polymerase (RNAP) during transcription, to engineer complex phenotypes in microbial cells. Here, we show that it is also possible to impart new phenotypes by altering the RNAP core enzyme itself, in particular through mutagenesis of the alpha subunit of the bacterial polymerase. We present the use of this tool for improving tolerance of Escherichia coli to butanol and other solvents and for increasing the titers of two commercially relevant products, L-tyrosine and hyaluronic acid. In addition, we explore the underlying physiological changes that give rise to the solvent-tolerant mutant.

Flexibility of Vibrio cholerae ToxT in transcription activation of genes having altered promoter spacing

Cholera, a severe diarrheal disease, is caused by ingestion of the gram-negative bacterium Vibrio cholerae. Expression of V. cholerae virulence factors is highly regulated at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels by a complex network of proteins and small noncoding RNAs. The direct activator of transcription of most V. cholerae virulence genes is the ToxT protein. ToxT binds to a 13-bp sequence, the toxbox, located upstream of genes in its regulon. However, the organization of toxboxes relative to each other and to the core promoter elements at different genes varies dramatically. At different ToxT-activated genes a single toxbox may be necessary and sufficient for full activation, or pairs of toxboxes organized as either inverted or direct repeats may be required for full activation. Although all toxboxes are located at positions consistent with a class I promoter architecture, the locations of toxboxes relative to the transcription start site also vary from gene to gene. To further assess the ability of ToxT to activate transcription from different configurations relative to the core promoter elements, we constructed promoter-lacZ fusions having altered spacing both between toxbox pairs and between the promoter-proximal toxbox and the -35 box at five different ToxT-activated promoters. Our results suggest that that ToxT has remarkable flexibility in its positioning as a transcription activator and that different interactions between ToxT and RNA polymerase occur during transcription activation of promoters having different toxbox configurations.

Differences in the mechanism of the allosteric l-rhamnose responses of the AraC/XylS family transcription activators RhaS and RhaR

Proteins in the largest subset of AraC/XylS family transcription activators, including RhaS and RhaR, have C-terminal domains (CTDs) that mediate DNA-binding and transcription activation, and N-terminal domains (NTDs) that mediate dimerization and effector binding. The mechanism of the allosteric effector response in this family has been identified only for AraC. Here, we investigated the mechanism by which RhaS and RhaR respond to their effector, l-rhamnose. Unlike AraC, N-terminal truncations suggested that RhaS and RhaR do not use an N-terminal arm to inhibit activity in the absence of effector. We used random mutagenesis to isolate RhaS and RhaR variants with enhanced activation in the absence of l-rhamnose. NTD substitutions largely clustered around the predicted l-rhamnose-binding pockets, suggesting that they mimic the structural outcome of effector binding to the wild-type proteins. RhaS-CTD substitutions clustered in the first HTH motif, and suggested that l-rhamnose induces improved DNA binding. In contrast, RhaR-CTD substitutions clustered at a single residue in the second HTH motif, at a position consistent with improved RNAP contacts. We propose separate allosteric mechanisms for the two proteins: Without l-rhamnose, RhaS does not effectively bind DNA while RhaR does not effectively contact RNAP. Upon l-rhamnose binding, both proteins undergo structural changes that enable transcription activation.

The role of DNA-binding specificity in the evolution of bacterial regulatory networks

Understanding the mechanisms by which transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) change through evolution is a fundamental problem.Here, we analyze this question using data from Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, and find that paralogy relationships are insufficient to explain the global or local role observed for transcription factors (TFs) within regulatory networks. Our results provide a picture in which DNA-binding specificity, a molecular property that can be measured in different ways, is a predictor of the role of transcription factors. In particular, we observe that global regulators consistently display low levels of binding specificity, while displaying comparatively higher expression values in microarray experiments. In addition, we find a strong negative correlation between binding specificity and the number of co-regulators that help coordinate genetic expression on a genomic scale. A close look at several orthologous TFs,including FNR, a regulator found to be global in E. coli and local in B.subtilis, confirms the diagnostic value of specificity in order to understand their regulatory function, and highlights the importance of evaluating the metabolic and ecological relevance of effectors as another variable in the evolutionary equation of regulatory networks. Finally, a general model is presented that integrates some evolutionary forces and molecular properties,aiming to explain how regulons grow and shrink, as bacteria tune their regulation to increase adaptation.

Look, no hands! Unconventional transcriptional activators in bacteria

Transcriptional activation in bacteria usually involves an activator protein that binds to sites near the target promoter. Some activators of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme, however, can stimulate transcription even when their DNA-binding domains are removed. Recent studies have revealed examples of sigma(54)-dependent activators that naturally lack DNA-binding domains and seem to activate transcription from solution rather than from specific DNA sites. In addition, some activators that function with other forms of RNA polymerase holoenzyme, including Bacillus subtilis Spx and the bacteriophage N4 single-stranded DNA-binding protein, also stimulate transcription without binding to DNA. Because binding to regulatory sites enables activators to stimulate transcription from specific promoters, alternative strategies for achieving specificity are required for activators that do not bind to DNA.

MarA-mediated transcriptional repression of the rob promoter

The Escherichia coli transcriptional regulator MarA affects functions that include antibiotic resistance, persistence, and survival. MarA functions as an activator or repressor of transcription utilizing similar degenerate DNA sequences (marboxes) with three different binding site configurations with respect to the RNA polymerase-binding sites. We demonstrate that MarA down-regulates rob transcripts both in vivo and in vitro via a MarA-binding site within the rob promoter that is positioned between the -10 and -35 hexamers. As for the hdeA and purA promoters, which are repressed by MarA, the rob marbox is also in the "backward" orientation. Protein-DNA interactions show that SoxS and Rob, like MarA, bind the same marbox in the rob promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses with a MarA-specific antibody demonstrate that MarA and RNA polymerase form a ternary complex with the rob promoter DNA. Transcription experiments in vitro and potassium permanganate footprinting analysis show that MarA affects the RNA polymerase-mediated closed to open complex formation at the rob promoter.

Sequence requirements for Lon-dependent degradation of the Escherichia coli transcription activator SoxS: identification of the SoxS residues critical to proteolysis and specific inhibition of in vitro degradation by a peptide comprised of the N-terminal 21 amino acid residues

When Escherichia coli encounter redox-cycling compounds that endogenously generate superoxide, the cell's defense response is initiated by the de novo synthesis of SoxS, which then activates transcription of the genes of the SoxRS regulon. Recently, we showed that after the oxidative stress is relieved, the SoxRS system resets by an active process wherein SoxS synthesis ceases and the intrinsically unstable SoxS protein is rapidly degraded, primarily by Lon protease. Here, we use deletion mutants and a library of alanine-stretch mutants of the entire protein to identify the SoxS features responsible for Lon-dependent proteolysis in vivo. We found that the 17 amino acid residues at the SoxS N terminus play the primary role in protease recognition and that the addition of the N-terminal 21 residues of SoxS to the otherwise stable green fluorescent protein is sufficient to signal the chimera for Lon-dependent degradation. With a minimal in vitro degradation system, we confirm the intrinsic instability of SoxS and the sequence requirements for Lon-dependent degradation. Lastly, we demonstrate that the addition of a peptide comprised of the 21 N-terminal amino acid residues of SoxS is able to inhibit specifically the in vitro proteolysis of SoxS.

NMR analysis of protein interactions

Recent technological advances in NMR spectroscopy have alleviated the size limitations for the determination of biomolecular structures in solution. At the same time, novel NMR parameters such as residual dipolar couplings are providing greater accuracy. As this review shows, the structures of protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid complexes up to 50 kDa can now be accurately determined. Although de novo structure determination still requires considerable effort, information on interaction surfaces from chemical shift perturbations is much easier to obtain. Advances in modelling and data-driven docking procedures allow this information to be used for determining approximate structures of biomolecular complexes. As a result, a wealth of information has become available on the way in which proteins interact with other biomolecules. Of particular interest is the fact that these NMR-based methods can be applied to weak and transient protein-protein complexes that are difficult to study by other structural methods.

Characterization of TetD as a transcriptional activator of a subset of genes of the Escherichia coli SoxS/MarA/Rob regulon

In Escherichia coli, SoxS, MarA and Rob form a closely related subset of the AraC/XylS family of positive regulators, sharing approximately 42% amino acid sequence identity over the length of SoxS and the ability to activate transcription of a common set of target genes that provide resistance to redox-cycling compounds and antibiotics. On the basis of its approximately 43% amino acid sequence identity with SoxS, MarA and Rob, TetD, encoded by transposon Tn10, appears to be a fourth member of the subset. However, although its expression has been shown to be negatively regulated by TetC and not inducible by tetracycline, the physiological function of TetD is unknown. Accordingly, in the work presented here, we initiate a molecular characterization of TetD. We show that expression of TetD activates transcription of a subset of the SoxS/MarA/Rob regulon genes and confers resistance to redox-cycling compounds and antibiotics. We show that mutations in the putative TetD binding site of a TetD-activatable promoter and a mutation in the protein's N-terminal DNA recognition helix interfere with transcription activation, thereby indicating that TetD directly activates target gene transcription. Finally, we show that TetD, like SoxS and MarA, is intrinsically unstable; however, unlike SoxS and MarA, TetD is not degraded by Lon or any of the cell's known cytoplasmic ATP-dependent proteases. Thus, we conclude that TetD is a bona fide member of the SoxS/MarA/Rob subfamily of positive regulators.