Resistance to secondary amyloidosis in A/J mice is not significantly associated with allelic variants linked to the serum amyloid A gene cluster

Expression of SAA and amyloidogenesis in congenic mice of CE/J and C57BL/6 strains

Inbred strains of mice display different susceptibilities to experimental induction of reactive amyloidosis. CBA/J, C57BL/6, and ICR are among the most susceptible strains, while CE/J mice appear to be totally resistant. In contrast to amyloidogenic strains which express two major acute phase serum amyloid A proteins (SAA1 and SAA2), CE/J mice produce only a single isoform, designated SAA2.2. Studies indicate that CE/J x CBA/J hybrid mice expressing both SAA2.2 and SAA1.1/SAA2.1 are amyloid resistant, and this has led to the hypothesis that SAA2.2 may protect mice against amyloid formation even in the presence of fibrillogenic SAA1.1. We have tested this hypothesis in mice derived from CE/J and C57BL/6 strains. CE/J mice were mated with C57BL/6 mice to produce F1 hybrids. Congenic mice were then produced by backcrossing each successive generation to C57BL/6 mice. Representative mice from F2 and F3 generations were analyzed to determine SAA genotype and susceptibility to amyloid induction by repeated casein injections. All F2 and F3 mice examined, including those which carried the SAA2.2 gene, developed extensive splenic AA amyloid. Expression of SAA2.2 in mice testing positive for the SAA2.2 gene was confirmed by sequence analysis of HDL-associated SAA proteins. These results demonstrate that the presence of SAA2.2 is not sufficient to protect CE/J x C57BL/6 hybrid mice from amyloid development. This is consistent with our observation that macrophage cultures, derived from C57BL/6, CBA/J, or CE/J mice, undergo amyloid deposition when treated with SAA1.1 alone or with equal amounts of SAA1.1 and SAA2.2, but show no deposition when treated solely with SAA2.2. We conclude from these studies that while SAA2.2 is non-fibrillogenic, its physical presence is not sufficient for protection against amyloid formation.

Linkage of protection against amyloid fibril formation in the mouse to a single, autosomal dominant gene

Inbred strains of mice provide a model for studies of the pathogenesis of amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis. All susceptible strains of mice described to date codominantly express two serum amyloid A (apoSAA) isoforms, apoSAA1 and apoSAA2, of which only apoSAA2 serves as a precursor for amyloid fibrils. In previous studies, we have shown that the CE/J strain, which produces a single, novel apoSAA isoform, apoSAACE/J, is amyloid resistant. In the present study amyloid-resistant CE/J females were mated with amyloid-susceptible CBA/J males to produce F1 hybrid offspring which were then backcrossed to the parental CBA/J mouse strain. Amyloid susceptibility was determined in 30 backcrossed mice 72 h after injection of murine amyloid enhancing factor and silver nitrate. ApoSAA isoforms in plasma were separated by isoelectric focusing gel electrophoresis and visualized after immunoblotting with anti-AA antiserum. Amyloid A fibrils in spleen homogenates were denatured by formic acid and AA protein was quantified by ELISA using anti-mouse apoSAA antibodies. Values < 5 apoSAA equivalent units were considered negative. 13 mice expressed an apoSAA1 and apoSAA2 doublet characteristic of CBA/J mice, whereas 17 mice, expressed the apoSAACE/J isoform codominantly with apoSAA1 and apoSAA2. The correlation of amyloid resistance to expression of the apoSAACE/J isoform was absolute (17/17 were negative; mean score 2.6 +/- 0.17 [standard error of the mean] apoSAA equivalent units) and the correlation between amyloid susceptibility and the expression of apoSAA2/apoSAA1 was also striking (12/13 were amyloid positive; mean score 47.9 +/- 9.0 [standard error of the mean] apoSAA equivalent units (P < 0.001). This is not significantly different from the 50% segregation of apoSAA phenotypes expected for linkage to a single gene. These results indicate that a single gene governs apoSAACE/J expression and thus confers protection against amyloid deposition even in the presence of apoSAA1 and apoSAA2 isoforms and show for the first time that resistance to AA amyloidosis is a dominant trait governed by a single gene.