A commentary on the Zinkernagel-Hengartner 'Credo 2004'

Analysis of Paris meeting redefining the "self" of the immune system

Some ideas because of their intuitive appeal never die by neglect and survive because they are not amenable to experimental disproof. They can only be evaluated by weighing them against competing ideas and by invoking a credibility factor when used to explain observation. Most scientists would recommend ignoring such ideas, yet there is much to be learned by engaging their proponents in debate. The immune system viewed as an idiotype network, and its tweaking by the new school of "contextualists" is an example of such an idea. As chance would have it, the supporters of this idea gathered in a meeting, thereby permitting a cumulative analysis of this conceptualization. The goal of this essay is to compare the views of each of the speakers in light of a competing theory with the hope that a better understanding of immune responsiveness will emerge.

On the critique by Colin Anderson of 'A reply to Dembic: on an end to the beginning of mis-understanding the immune response'

My proposal of a set of postulates that can be used to guide computer modeling has understandably met with significant criticism at two levels, semantic and conceptual. The major source of contention is my assumption that the sorting of the paratopic repertoire is both necessary and sufficient to explain the evolutionarily selected mechanism for the self-nonself discrimination. While 'necessary' is agreed upon, 'sufficient' is debatable as this commentary illustrates. My essay is in defense of 'sufficiency'.

Biomarker profiles in serum and saliva of experimental Sjögren's syndrome: associations with specific autoimmune manifestations

INTRODUCTION

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a systemic autoimmune disease that mainly targets the exocrine glands. The aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of 87 proteins measured in serum and 75 proteins analyzed in saliva in spontaneous experimental SS. In addition, we intended to compute a model of the immunological situation representing the overt disease stage of SS.

METHODS

Nondiabetic, nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice aged 21 weeks were evaluated for salivary gland function, salivary gland inflammation and extraglandular disease manifestations. The analytes, comprising chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, autoantibodies and other biomarkers, were quantified using multi-analyte profile technology and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Age-matched and sex-matched Balb/c mice served as a reference.

RESULTS

We found NOD mice to exhibit impaired salivary flow, glandular inflammation and increased secretory SSB (anti-La) levels. Thirty-eight biomarkers in serum and 34 in saliva obtained from NOD mice were significantly different from those in Balb/c mice. Eighteen biomarkers in serum and three chemokines measured in saliva could predict strain membership with 80% to 100% accuracy. Factor analyses identified principal components mostly correlating with one clinical aspect of SS and having distinct associations with components extracted from other families of proteins.

CONCLUSION

Autoimmune manifestations of SS are greatly independent and associated with various immunological processes. However, CD40, CD40 ligand, IL-18, granulocyte chemotactic protein-2 and anti-muscarinic M3 receptor IgG3 may connect the different aspects of SS. Processes related to the adaptive immune system appear to promote SS with a strong involvement of T-helper-2 related proteins in hyposalivation. This approach further established saliva as an attractive biofluid for biomarker analyses in SS and provides a basis for the comparison and selection of potential drug targets and diagnostic markers.

Tissue Homeostasis and Immunity – More on Models

This article continues the ongoing debate around models of the immune system. Earlier contributors have paid much attention to the various processes that lead to adaptive immune system aggression or tolerance. They have often based their discussions around facts that have been established by experimental investigation. However, both the observation and interpretation of these facts have been influenced by the function--or system goal--that is believed to have generated them. The perception of this function (of all or part of the immune system) is influenced by long established theories in immunology (e.g. horror autotoxicus, clonal deletion in utero, pathogen elimination, clonal selection, auto-immunity and so on) which, for many, have become enshrined as facts. One function that has had less consideration and has not been extensively investigated is the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. When the immune system is viewed from this perspective, the facts invite alternative interpretations. Whilst this perspective may not necessarily be the only valid one, let alone a correct one, viewing things this way--at least briefly--might help to expose hidden assumptions. It also emphasizes that the immune system is a system and, as such, it can by analysed through the principles of general systems theory.

Time, space and contextual models of the immunity tolerance decision: bridging the geographical divide of Zinkernagel and Hengartner's 'Credo 2004'

In Credo 2004, Zinkernagel and Hengartner (Z&H) have continued their challenge to the immunological community to reconsider assumptions regarding the most fundamental aspects of adaptive immunity. They have appropriately championed the role of persistent, widely distributed antigen in tolerance induction, parameters that do not figure prominently in most other models. The global theory of immunity they have developed is predominantly based on observations from studies with viruses and tumours. I suggest here that a more successful approach to generating a theory of the default rules of immunity can be obtained through the study of immunity versus tolerance in the setting of transplantation. Transplantation studies lack the confounding variable of competing evolution present in responses to specific infectious agents and tumours and, therefore, more clearly elucidate default rules of immunity. The geographical model in Credo 2004, primarily a one-signal model regulated by antigen, is contrasted with (1) Cohn's time-based two-signal model and (2) a development-context model that postulates distinct central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms.