Efficacy and limitations of cyclophosphamide-induced tolerance against alphaGal antigen

Application of cyclophosphamide-induced tolerance in alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout mice presensitized with Gal alpha 1-3Gal beta-4-GlcNAc antigens

PURPOSE

Hyperacute rejection (HAR) mediated by the natural antibody (nAb) against Gal alpha 1-3Gal beta-4-GlcNAc (alpha Gal) is the major obstacle in xenogeneic organ transplantation. Previously, we reported the acceptance of donor heart grafts in anti-alpha Gal nAb-producing galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT KO) mice after cyclophosphamide (CP)-induced tolerance conditioning. In the present study, we applied our tolerance induction conditioning in presensitized recipient mice.

METHODS

GalT KO (alpha Gal(-/-), H-2(b/d)) recipient mice were presensitized with alpha Gal(+) rabbit red blood cells (RRBCs). Presensitized or nonsensitized recipient mice were treated with CP-induced tolerance conditioning, consisting of AKR (alpha Gal(+/+), H-2(k)) spleen cells (SC), CP, busulfan (BU), and AKR bone marrow cells (BMC). We assessed the survival of donor hearts and skin grafts and analyzed the production of anti-alpha Gal Abs by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Donor mixed chimerism was achieved in the presensitized GalT KO mice treated with CP-induced tolerance conditioning. In parallel with the disappearance of anti-alpha Gal Abs, permanent acceptance of donor heart grafts and skin grafts was observed in presensitized and GalT KO mice treated with CP-induced tolerance conditioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Both B-cell and T-cell tolerance was achieved in the presence of a higher titer of anti-alpha Gal Abs after treatment with CP-induced tolerance conditioning.

The xenoantibody response and immunoglobulin gene expression profile of cynomolgus monkeys transplanted with hDAF-transgenic porcine hearts

BACKGROUND

Recent work has indicated a role for anti-Gal alpha 1-3Gal (Gal) and anti-non-Gal xenoantibodies in the primate humoral rejection response against human-decay accelerating factor (hDAF) transgenic pig organs. Our laboratory has shown that anti-porcine xenograft antibodies in humans and non-human primates are encoded by a small number of germline IgV(H) progenitors. In this study, we extended our analysis to identify the IgV(H) genes encoding xenoantibodies in immunosuppressed cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) transplanted with hDAF-transgenic pig organs.

METHODS

Three immunosuppressed monkeys underwent heterotopic heart transplantation with hDAF porcine heart xenografts. Two of three animals were given GAS914, a poly-L-lysine derivative shown to bind to anti-Gal xenoantibodies and neutralize them. One animal rejected its heart at post-operative day (POD) 39; a second animal rejected the transplanted heart at POD 78. The third monkey was euthanized on POD 36 but the heart was not rejected. Peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) and serum were obtained from each animal before and at multiple time points after transplantation. We analyzed the immune response by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to confirm whether anti-Gal or anti-non-Gal xenoantibodies were induced after graft placement. Immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene (V(H)) cDNA libraries were then produced and screened. We generated soluble single-chain antibodies (scFv) to establish the binding specificity of the cloned immunoglobulin genes.

RESULTS

Despite immunosuppression, which included the use of the polymer GAS914, the two animals that rejected their hearts showed elevated levels of cytotoxic anti-pig red blood cell (RBC) antibodies and anti-pig aortic endothelial cell (PAEC) antibodies. The monkey that did not reject its graft showed a decline in serum anti-RBC, anti-PAEC, and anti-Gal xenoantibodies when compared with pre-transplant levels. A V(H)3 family gene with a high level of sequence similarity to an allele of V(H)3-11, designated V(H)3-11(cyno), was expressed at elevated levels in the monkey that was not given GAS914 and whose graft was not rejected until POD 78. IgM but not IgG xenoantibodies directed at N-acetyl lactosamine (a precursor of the Gal epitope) were also induced in this animal. We produced soluble scFv from this new gene to determine whether this antibody could bind to the Gal carbohydrate, and demonstrated that this protein was capable of blocking the binding of human serum xenoantibody to Gal oligosaccharide, as had previously been shown with human V(H)3-11 scFv.

CONCLUSIONS

DAF-transgenic organs transplanted into cynomolgus monkeys induce anti-Gal and anti-non-Gal xenoantibody responses mediated by both IgM and IgG xenoantibodies. Anti-non-Gal xenoantibodies are induced at high levels in animals treated with GAS914. Antibodies that bind to the Gal carbohydrate and to N-acetyl lactosamine are induced in the absence of GAS914 treatment. The animal whose heart remained beating for 78 days demonstrated increased usage of an antibody encoded by a germline progenitor that is structurally related, but distinct from IGHV311. This antibody binds to the Gal carbohydrate but does not induce the rapid rejection of the xenograft when expressed at high levels as early as day 8 post-transplantation.

Application of chimerism-based drug-induced tolerance to rat into mouse xenotransplantation

The current critical shortage of human donor organs has stimulated the feasibility of the xenogenic transplantation, such as swine to primate. We have previously reported the induction of donor-specific tolerance in MHC-disparated recipient mice by using our cyclophosphamide (CP)-induced tolerance conditioning. In this study, we examined the efficacy of our CP-induced tolerance conditioning in xenogenic transplantation model. F344 rats and B10 mice were used as donors and recipients. Recipient mice were treated with donor spleen cells, CP, Busulfan and bone marrow cells, with or without prior NK-cell depletion. Donor mixed chimerism, and the presence of donor reactive T-cell population were analysed by flow cytometry. The survival of the donor skin grafts were observed after the conditioning. Donor mixed chimerism was temporary induced but terminated at 10 weeks after treatments. Donor-specific prolongation of the skin graft survival was observed after the treatments, however, grafts were rejected in the long term. NK-cell depletion, prior to the treatments, did not affect the levels of the mixed chimerism or graft prolongation. The donor-reactive recipient T-cell population was remained the same level as the untreated mice, suggesting the failure of the induction of the central T-cell tolerance. Thus, partial efficacy of our CP-induced tolerance treatments in the rat to mice xenotransplantation was observed. Our results suggested that the additional treatments were required to establish the stable xenogenic tolerance.

Sequential analysis of anti-alpha Gal natural antibody-producing B cells in GalT knockout mice in cyclophosphamide-induced tolerance

Previously, we have shown that cyclophosphamide (CP)-induced tolerance, marked by permanent acceptance of donor skin graft and establishment of donor mixed chimerism, was readily induced with treatment with donor spleen cells (SC), CP, busulfan (BU) and donor bone marrow cells (BMC). Here, we investigated the mechanism of anti-donor natural antibody (nAb) producing B-cell tolerance in our CP-induced tolerance systems in alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient knockout mice (GalT KO; GalT-/-, H-2(b/d)). After induction of tolerance using donor AKR SC and BMC, survival of donor heart and skin grafts and production of anti-Galalpha1-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAc (anti-alphaGal) Ab in recipient GalT KO mice were analyzed. In addition, the production of anti-alphaGal Ab and the presence of Gal-BSA binding B cells in GalT KO mice were analyzed by flow cytometry (FCM) after treatments with rabbit red blood cells (RRBC) and CP. Permanent acceptance of donor skin and heart grafts and abrogation of anti-alphaGal Ab were achieved in GalT KO mice treated with donor SC + CP/BU + BMC. However, in the GalT KO mice treated with donor SC and CP, donor skin grafts were acutely rejected, even though anti-alphaGal Ab was undetectable. Similarly, anti-alphaGal Ab was undetectable in GalT KO mice treated with RRBC and CP. Our data strongly indicated the following mechanisms: the clonal destruction in the early stage and the clonal anergy or ignorance in the late stage after conventional conditioning with RRBC and CP. In conclusion, our drug-induced tolerance protocols are effective to induce tolerance in recipients that produce anti-donor nAb.