Is there an optimal timing of administration of single-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in bilateral total knee arthroplasty? A comparison between preoperative and intraoperative dose

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the optimum timing of administration of tranexamic acid (TA) in bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine whether the timing of administration of single-dose intravenous TA (either given preoperatively or intraoperatively) has a significant effect on blood loss reduction.

METHODS

We compared two cohorts of patients with end-stage arthritis of knees who underwent bilateral TKA and were given single-dose intravenous TA (1 g or 15 mg/kg) at different times during surgery. The retrospective cohort group consisting of 40 patients (preoperative (PO) group) received TA before the skin incision. The prospective cohort consisting of 40 patients (intraoperative (IO) group) received TA 10 min before deflating the tourniquet on the first knee. Primary outcome measures were mean hemoglobin difference, A (between PO and day 1 postoperative hemoglobin), mean hemoglobin difference, B (between PO and lowest postoperative hemoglobin), and rate of allogeneic blood transfusion. Secondary measure was drain blood loss.

RESULTS

Both cohorts were well matched with respect to age, gender, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. The hemoglobin drop in the IO group was significantly lesser than the PO group on the first postoperative day (2 vs. 2.9 g/dL, p < 0.001). Although statistically insignificant, the patients in the IO group received less allogenic transfusion of packed cell units than in the PO group (11/40, 27.5% vs. 14/40, 35% ). Mean hemoglobin difference, B, and secondary drain loss were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose intravenous TA given before the start of surgery is as effective as a dose given during arthroplasty of the first knee in reducing blood loss in bilateral TKA.

Closed suction drains, reinfusion drains or no drains in primary total knee replacement?

INTRODUCTION

Controversy still surrounds the use of drains after total knee replacement (TKR). We compared closed suction drains, reinfusion drains and no drains by studying haemoglobin (Hb) levels, blood transfusion requirements and functional knee outcome scores in a single surgeon series.

METHODS

A total of 102 consecutive primary TKRs were performed by the senior author between September 2006 and July 2008. All were cemented fixed bearing devices with patellar resurfacing. Of the 102 patients, 30 had closed suction drainage, 33 had an unwashed reinfusion drainage system and 39 had no drains. Data regarding pre and post-operative Hb and units transfused were gathered retrospectively. Pre and post-operative American Knee Society scores (AKSS) and Oxford knee scores (OKS) were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

The pre-operative Hb levels were comparable among the groups. There was no statistically significant difference in Hb level reduction or autologous transfusion rates among the groups. Pre-operative AKSS and OKS were statistically comparable in each group. There was no statistical difference between the improvement in AKSS knee and function scores in all three groups. There was a slightly smaller improvement in the OKS of the ‘no drain’ group. There were no complications of drain usage and no deep infections. No patient required manipulation under anaesthesia and range of movement outcomes were the same for each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study does not support the use of either closed suction drains or reinfusion drains in primary elective TKR.