Is nitric oxide involved in the pathophysiology of essential hyperhidrosis?

Can thiol-disulfide balance be an indicator of oxidative stress for hyperhidrosis?

BACKGROUND

Hyperhidrosis is responsible for various causes. The increased reactive oxygen radical production with insufficient antioxidant mechanism capacity may play a role in the etiopathogenesis of hyperhidrosis. It is probable to gather data about oxidative stress by detecting plasma thiol/disulfide ratio. The aim of this study was to determine whether thiol-disulfide balance changes in patients with hyperhidrosis.

METHODS

The files of patients who were diagnosed with hyperhidrosis in the dermatology outpatient clinic between 2015 and 2018 and whose native thiol, total thiol, and disulfide values were examined for any reason were examined.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included in the study. 33 of the patients with hyperhidrosis were primary. Mean age; for primary hyperhidrosis patients (PHH) = 26.36 ± 7.61, primary hyperhidrosis (PHH) control group = 27.16 ± 7.94; secondary hyperhidrosis (SHH) patients = 47.88 ± 12.29, SHH control (45.40 ± 12.02). The native thiol values of PHH (469.93 ± 56.82 μmol/L) were higher than SHH (440.64 ± 62.72) (p = 0.024). However, as a result of thiol-disulfide comparison between hyperhidrosis patients (PHH and SHH) and control groups, disulfide levels increased (p = 0.04). In the PHH group, total thiol was measured as 512 ± 54.84 μmol/L, and SHH was measured as 484.11 ± 58.9 μmol/L, (p = 0.074).

CONCLUSION

Serum thiol levels in SHH increased more than PHH. As a result of thiol-disulfide comparison between hyperhidrosis patients and control groups, the balance shifted in favor of disulfide and oxidative side.

Primary focal hyperhidrosis: current treatment options and a step-by-step approach

Primary focal hyperhidrosis is a common disorder for which treatment is often a therapeutic challenge. A systematic review of current literature on the various treatment modalities for primary focal hyperhidrosis was performed and a step-by-step approach for the different types of primary focal hyperhidrosis (axillary, palmar, plantar and craniofacial) was established. Non-surgical treatments (aluminium salts, local and systemic anticholinergics, botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injections and iontophoresis) are adequately supported by the current literature. More invasive surgical procedures (suction curettage and sympathetic denervation) have also been extensively investigated, and can offer a more definitive solution for cases of hyperhidrosis that are unresponsive to non-surgical treatments. There is no consensus on specific techniques for sympathetic denervation, and this issue should be further examined by meta-analysis. There are numerous treatment options available to improve the quality of life (QOL) of the hyperhidrosis patient. In practice, however, the challenge for the dermatologist remains to evaluate the severity of hyperhidrosis to achieve the best therapeutic outcome, this can be done most effectively using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS).