The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after first and repeated dosing with 0.03% ointment in infants with atopic dermatitis

S3 Guideline Atopic dermatitis: Part 1 - General aspects, topical and non-drug therapies, special patient groups

This S3 guideline was created based on the European S3 guideline, with special consideration of the medical conditions in the German-speaking region and incorporating additions from the previous German-language version. The interdisciplinary guideline commission consisted of representatives from the German Dermatological Society, the Professional Association of German Dermatologists, the Austrian Society of Dermatology and Venereology, the Swiss Society of Dermatology and Venereology, the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology, the German Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, the Professional Association of Pediatricians and Adolescent Medicine, the Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine, the German Society for Pediatric Rehabilitation and Prevention, the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy, the German Network for Health Services Research, the German Eczema Association and the German Allergy and Asthma Association. This first part of the guideline focuses on the definition and diagnostic aspects of atopic dermatitis (AD), addressing topical therapy as well as non-pharmacological treatment approaches such as UV therapy, psychoeducational therapy, dietary interventions for AD, allergen immunotherapy for AD, and complementary medicine. This part of the guideline also covers specific aspects of AD in children and adolescents, during pregnancy and lactation, and in the context of family planning. Additionally, it addresses occupational aspects of AD and highlights the perspective of the patients. The second part of the guideline, published separately, addresses the systemic therapy of AD.

S3-Leitlinie Atopische Dermatitis: Teil 1- Allgemeine Aspekte, topische und nichtmedikamentöse Therapien, besondere Patientengruppen: S3 guideline Atopic dermatitis: Part 1- General aspects, topical and non-drug therapies, special patient groups

Diese S3‐Leitlinie wurde auf der Basis der europäischen S3‐Leitlinie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der medizinischen Gegebenheiten im deutschsprachigen Raum und mit Ergänzungen der deutschsprachigen Vorgängerversion erstellt. Die interdisziplinäre Leitlinienkommission bestand aus Vertretern der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, dem Berufsverband der Deutschen Dermatologen, der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Dermatologie und Venerologie, der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Dermatologie und Venerologie, der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allergologie und Klinische Immunologie, der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder‐ und Jugendmedizin, dem Berufsverband der Kinder‐ und Jugendärzte, der Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Allergologie und Umweltmedizin, der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Rehabilitation und Prävention, der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychosomatische Medizin und Ärztliche Psychotherapie, dem Deutschen Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung, dem Deutschen Neurodermitis Bund und dem Deutschen Allergie‐ und Asthmabund. Dieser erste Teil der Leitlinie geht auf die Definition und die diagnostischen Aspekte der atopischen Dermatitis (AD) ein, behandelt die topische Therapie sowie die nichtmedikamentösen Therapieverfahren wie die UV‐Therapie, die psychoedukative Therapie, diätische Interventionen bei AD, die Allergen‐spezifische Immuntherapie bei AD und die Komplementärmedizin. Auch behandelt dieser Teil der Leitlinie die besonderen Aspekte der AD bei Kindern und Jugendlichen, in der Schwangerschaft und in der Stillzeit sowie bei Kinderwunsch. Außerdem wird auf berufsbezogene Aspekte der AD eingegangen und die Perspektive der Patienten hervorgehoben. Der zweite, separat publizierte Teil der Leitlinie adressiert die systemische Therapie der AD.

Harmine and Kaempferol treatment enhances NFATC1 and FOXP3 mediated regulatory T-cells' suppressive capacity in generalized vitiligo

BACKGROUND

Generalized vitiligo (GV) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the progressive loss of melanocytes.

OBJECTIVES

Current study was undertaken to assess in-vitro therapeutic potential of Harmine and Kaempferol for GV.

METHODS

Calcium, calcineurin, NFATC1 levels, cell proliferation were assessed by various kits and ORAI1, PEIZO1, Calcineurin, GSK3B, DYRK1A transcripts and IFN-γ,IL-10,TGF-β protein levels were assessed by qPCR and ELISA in blood and skin biopsy samples from Tregs of 52 patients and 50 controls.

RESULTS

Harmine and Kaempferol treatment enhances Treg suppressive capacity, NFATs and FOXP3 expression in blood and skin Tregs of GV patients (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Harmine and Kaempferol treatment in Tregs increased calcineurin and NFATC1 activity and decreased DYRK1A transcripts in blood and skin Tregs of GV patients(p < 0.05). In-silico analysis revealed that Harmine and Kaempferol might boost Treg suppressive capacity by increasing calcineurin dephosphorylation activity leading to increase NFATs activation and also increase nuclear retention of NFATs by inhibiting DYRK1a phosphorylation activity. Moreover, calcineurin and NFATC1 activity in Tregs were positively correlated with Treg suppressive capacity, NFATC1 and FOXP3 expression (p < 0.05), whereas, DYRK1A transcripts were negatively correlated with Treg suppressive capacity, NFATC1 and FOXP3 expression (p < 0.05). These compounds significantly increased melanocytes' survival and proliferation in Treg:CD4+/CD8+:SK-Mel-28 cell line co-culture system from GV patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time the study suggests that Harmine and Kaempferol treated Tregs could control the CD8+ and CD4+T-cells' proliferation and IFN-γ production, leading to melanocytes' survival and proliferation. These compounds may serve as novel Treg-based therapeutics for GV; however, in vivo studies are warranted to assess the safety and efficacy of these compounds.

Topical Medications for Atopic Dermatitis and Effects on Increasing Lymphoma Risks

Atopic dermatitis is an immune-mediated skin condition that causes relapsing, pruritic skin lesions. Flares of this disease are often treated with topical corticosteroids; however, the use of these drugs can cause unwanted side effects, such as cutaneous atrophy and impaired wound healing. To minimize these common side effects, severe forms of this disease have been treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, which previously had no known long-term side effects. Recently, there has been debate on the immunosuppressive effects of these drugs and whether chronic use could result in non-melanoma skin cancer. Systemic absorption of topical calcineurin inhibitors is extremely limited compared to oral formulation, although it is directly proportional to the total body surface area applied with medication. Patients with atopic dermatitis can have an increased risk of lymphoma, so it is hard to distinguish the causative factor, e.g., severe atopic dermatitis or being treated with calcineurin inhibitors. While inconclusive, the Food and Drug Administration recently issued a black box warning, and currently, topical calcineurin inhibitors are considered a second-line treatment. The present investigation reviews the findings of multiple studies conducted to determine if there is a link between the usage of topical calcineurin inhibitors and lymphoma.

European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema - part II: non-systemic treatments and treatment recommendations for special AE patient populations

The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This second part of the guideline includes recommendations and detailed information on basic therapy with emollients and moisturizers, topical anti-inflammatory treatment, antimicrobial and antipruritic treatment and UV phototherapy. Furthermore, this part of the guideline covers techniques for avoiding provocation factors, as well as dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine and educational interventions for patients with atopic eczema and deals with occupational and psychodermatological aspects of the disease. It also contains guidance on treatment for paediatric and adolescent patients and pregnant or breastfeeding women, as well as considerations for patients who want to have a child. A chapter on the patient perspective is also provided. The first part of the guideline, published separately, contains recommendations and guidance on systemic treatment with conventional immunosuppressive drugs, biologics and janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, as well as information on the scope and purpose of the guideline, and a section on guideline methodology.

Calcium controlled NFATc1 activation enhances suppressive capacity of regulatory T cells isolated from generalized vitiligo patients

BACKGROUND

NFATs and FOXP3 are linked with impaired regulatory T-cells(Tregs) in generalized vitiligo(GV).

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate calcium mediated NFATc1 signalling pathway and its effect on Treg suppressive capacity in GV.

METHODS

Calcium levels,calcineurin,NFATc1 & GSK-3β activity and cell proliferation were assessed in 52 GV patients and 50 controls by calcium assay kit,calcineurin phosphatase assay kit,TransAM NFATc1 kit,GSK-3β ELISA and BrdU cell proliferation assay. Transcripts(CNB,CAM,GSK3B,DYRK1A & calcium channel genes) and protein(IFN-γ,IL-10 & TGF-β)expressions were assessed by qPCR and ELISA respectively.

RESULTS

Reduced plasma & intracellular Tregs calcium levels and ORAI1 transcripts suggested altered calcium homeostasis in GV Tregs(p=0.00387,p=0.0048,p<0.0001),which led to decreased calcineurin and NFATc1 activity in GV Tregs(p=0.0299,p<0.0001). CNB and CAM transcripts were reduced in GV Tregs(p<0.0001,p=0.0004). GSK-3β activity,GSK3B & DYRK1A transcripts significantly increased in GV Tregs(p=0.0134,p<0.0001&p<0.0001). Plasma(p=0.0225,p=0.032) and intracellular Treg(p=0.0035,p=0.005) calcium levels,calcineurin(p=0.001) & NFATc1(p=0.001,p<0.0001) activity and ORAI1(p=0.0093,p<0.0001),CAM and CNB(p=0.0214) transcripts significant decreased in active vitiligo(AV) and severe GV(sGV) Tregs. Calcium treatment significantly increased intracellular calcium and ORAI1 transcripts in GV Tregs(p=0.0042,p=0.0035). Moreover, calcium treatment enhanced calcineurin and NFATc1 activity in GV Tregs(p=0.0128,p<0.0001). Remarkably, calcium treatment increased Treg mediated suppression of CD4⁺ &CD8⁺ T-cells(p=0.015,p=0.006) in GV and increased Tregs associated cytokines:IL-10(p=0.0323,p=0.009), TGF-β(p=0.0321,p=0.01) and decreased IFN-γ production(p=0.001,p=0.016) by CD4⁺ &CD8⁺ T-cells. Intracellular calcium levels positively correlated with calcineurin(r=0.83;p<0.0001) and NFATc1(r=0.61;p<0.0001) activity, suggesting the enhanced Treg immunosuppressive capacity after calcium treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study for the first time suggests that reduced plasma calcium and ORAI1 transcripts are linked to calcium uptake defects in Tregs, which leads to reduced calcineurin and NFATc1 activation, thereby contributing to decreased Tregs immunosuppressive capacity in GV. Elevated GSK-3β activity and GSKB & DYRK1A transcripts are involved in reduced NFATc1 activity in GV Tregs. Overall, the study suggests that calcium-NFATc1-signalling pathway is likely to be involved in defective Tregs function and can be implicated for development of effective Treg mediated therapeutics for GV.

Safety of tacrolimus 0.03% and 0.1% ointments in young children with atopic dermatitis - a 36-month follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Topical tacrolimus is used off-label in young children, but data remains limited regarding children under 2 years of age and long-term treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To compare safety differences between tacrolimus 0.03% and 0.1% ointments with mild and moderate potency topical corticosteroids in young children with atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

We conducted a 36-month follow-up study with 152 young children from one to three years of age with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Children were followed prospectively and data concerning infections, disease severity, growth parameters, vaccination responses, and other relevant laboratory tests were gathered.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the treatment groups in skin-related infections (p = 0.198), other infections (p = 0.498), growth parameters height (p = 0.601) and weight (p = 0.812), EASI scores (p = 0.187), vaccination responses (p = 0.620), serum cortisone levels (p = 0.228) and serum levels of IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, IL-31 and IFN gamma. EASI decreased significantly in both groups (p < 0.0001). In the tacrolimus group, nine patients (11.68%) had detectable tacrolimus blood concentrations at the 1-week visit. We observed no malignancies or severe infections during the study. Blood eosinophil counts were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical tacrolimus (0.03% and 0.1%) and topical corticosteroids (mild and moderate potency) are safe to use in young children with moderate-to severe-atopic dermatitis and have comparable efficacy and safety profiles.

Efficacy and Safety of a 0.1% Tacrolimus Nasal Ointment as a Treatment for Epistaxis in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia is a rare but ubiquitous genetic disease. Epistaxis is the most frequent and life-threatening manifestation and tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent, appears to be an interesting new treatment option because of its anti-angiogenic properties. Our objective was to evaluate, six weeks after the end of the treatment, the efficacy on the duration of nosebleeds of tacrolimus nasal ointment, administered for six weeks to patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia complicated by nosebleeds, and we performed a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, ratio 1:1 phase II study. Patients were recruited from three French Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) centers between May 2017 and August 2018, with a six-week follow-up, and we included people aged over 18 years, diagnosed with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and epistaxis (total duration > 30 min/6 weeks prior to inclusion). Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% was self-administered by the patients twice daily. About 0.1 g of product was to be administered in each nostril with a cotton swab. A total of 50 patients was randomized and treated. Mean epistaxis duration before and after treatment in the tacrolimus group were 324.64 and 249.14 min, respectively, and in the placebo group 224.69 and 188.14 min, respectively. Epistaxis duration improved in both groups, with no significant difference in our main objective comparing epistaxis before and after treatment (p = 0.77); however, there was a significant difference in evolution when comparing epistaxis before and during treatment (p = 0.04). Toxicity was low and no severe adverse events were reported. In conclusion, tacrolimus nasal ointment, administered for six weeks, did not improve epistaxis in HHT patients after the end of the treatment. However, the good tolerance, associated with a significant improvement in epistaxis duration during treatment, encouraged us to perform a phase 3 trial on a larger patient population with a main outcome of epistaxis duration during treatment and a longer treatment time.

Young children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis can be treated safely and effectively with either topical tacrolimus or mild corticosteroids

AIM

We collected evidence and safety data for topical tacrolimus in small children with atopic dermatitis (AD) and compared the usage with topical corticosteroid.

METHODS

This was an interim analysis of 75 patients (55% female) at 1 year of an ongoing 3-year randomised open-label comparative follow-up study of topical tacrolimus vs corticosteroid treatment. One- to three-year-old children with moderate-to-severe eczema referred to the Skin and Allergy Hospital in Helsinki, Finland, were enrolled.

RESULTS

Efficacy parameters, the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), eczema area, serum total immunoglobulin E (IgE) and the blood eosinophil count, showed improvement in both groups during the study. However, patients with signs of early sensitisation at baseline (elevated serum total IgE, elevated eosinophil count, positive prick tests or specific IgEs to aero or food allergens) had statistically significantly lower TEWL at the eczema site and a smaller eczema area at 12 months in the tacrolimus group. No severe adverse effects were seen during the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Children with AD and signs of early sensitisation appeared to benefit more from early tacrolimus than corticosteroid treatment. Small children may need stronger but nevertheless safe ointment options when treating moderate-to-severe AD.

Contemporary Role of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors: A Pediatric Dermatology Perspective

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common pediatric chronic inflammatory skin disease in North America, often involving complex treatment regimens and impairing the quality of life of affected children and their families. Two topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) have been available for the treatment of AD in pediatric patients for more than 15 years, and they continue to represent an important steroid-sparing option for the management of AD. Despite the large body of evidence and extensive clinical experience with these agents, there remain concerns among parents and clinicians regarding the long-term safety of this class of therapy, particularly with respect to the boxed warning about the potential risk of lymphoma and malignancy associated with TCIs. Concerns about burning or stinging with initial applications are also common. This review examines the literature on the clinical effectiveness of TCIs, with a focus on the pivotal research that supports the efficacy of these agents, and the reassuring body of evidence supporting their long-term safety in pediatric patients. Practical recommendations for maximizing the utility of TCIs in pediatric patients, including discussion points to address with parents, are offered.

Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part I

This guideline was developed as a joint interdisciplinary European project, including physicians from all relevant disciplines as well as patients. It is a consensus-based guideline, taking available evidence from other guidelines, systematic reviews and published studies into account. This first part of the guideline covers methods, patient perspective, general measures and avoidance strategies, basic emollient treatment and bathing, dietary intervention, topical anti-inflammatory therapy, phototherapy and antipruritic therapy, whereas the second part covers antimicrobial therapy, systemic treatment, allergen-specific immunotherapy, complementary medicine, psychosomatic counselling and educational interventions. Management of AE must consider the individual clinical variability of the disease; highly standardized treatment rules are not recommended. Basic therapy is focused on treatment of disturbed barrier function by hydrating and lubricating topical treatment, besides further avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Topical anti-inflammatory treatment based on glucocorticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors is used for flare management and for proactive therapy for long-term control. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, whereas tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are preferred in sensitive skin areas and for long-term use. Topical phosphodiesterase inhibitors may be a treatment alternative when available. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation, preferably with UVB 311 nm or UVA1. Pruritus is targeted with the majority of the recommended therapies, but some patients may need additional antipruritic therapy. Antimicrobial therapy, systemic anti-inflammatory treatment, immunotherapy, complementary medicine and educational intervention will be addressed in part II of the guideline.

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of adult and pediatric atopic dermatitis: Review on safety and benefits

Atopic dermatitis (AD) requires long-term management, mainly with topical anti-inflammatory agents. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) and tacrolimus ointment (TAC-O) are recommended as first-line treatments for AD. However, the long-term use of TCS is limited by cutaneous adverse events such as skin atrophy. For TAC-O, Japanese and US labelings were updated in 2003 and 2006, respectively, to include a boxed warning about a theoretical risk of skin cancer and lymphoma in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors. However, TAC-O has been used worldwide for longer than 15 years to treat adult and pediatric patients with AD. Available data suggest that TAC-O is effective and well tolerated, and can improve quality of life. TAC-O has successfully been used in the proactive management of AD consisting of long-term intermittent use to prevent, delay or reduce the occurrence of AD flares. Systemic drug absorption after TAC-O application is negligible and unlikely to result in systemic immunosuppression. There is currently no strong evidence of an increased rate of malignancy in treated patients, and observational data from postmarketing surveillance studies have shown no safety concerns. In the absence of robust evidence, the warning about the carcinogenic potential in the Japanese labeling for TAC-O does not appear justified and should be reconsidered. This mitigation of description would allow adult and pediatric patients with AD to receive the effective treatment more appropriately.

Atopic dermatitis: a review of topical nonsteroid therapy

Background

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects up to 20% of children and 3% of adults globally. Although topical corticosteroids are considered to be the first-line agents, they can be associated with cutaneous and systemic adverse effects. Since the early 2000s, two new classes of nonsteroid topical therapies, topical calcineurin inhibitors and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors, have been introduced and provide a safe treatment alternative.

Method

We performed a search and review of clinical trials that examined the safety and efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors and PDE4 inhibitors. The search was conducted using the PubMed database as well as preselected keywords and filters. This review focuses on the safety and efficacy of each therapy.

Results

Sixty-nine clinical trials identified in this study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of topical calcineurin and a single novel PDE4 inhibitor in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Topical calcineurin inhibitors have been shown to be effective in both achieving lesion clearance as well as reducing relapse when used long-term and proactively. Similarly, in clinical trials the PDE4 inhibitor showed success in lesion clearance and symptom management. All three therapies (pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, crisaborole) are associated with low systemic absorption. No clinical trials to date have shown an increased risk of systemic adverse events or malignancy such as lymphoma. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event across all three therapies was application-site discomfort, pain or pruritus. It is important to note that long-term studies are not yet available for the novel PDE4 inhibitor.

Discussion

Topical calcineurin inhibitors provide a safe and effective alternative to topical corticosteroid use in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) black box warning for topical calcineurin inhibitors remains, studies have not shown an increased risk of malignancy. These warnings have caused a decline in use in favor of topical steroids. A novel PDE4 inhibitor has shown efficacy and safety in studies up to one year. Further long-term safety data is needed.

Topical treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: current challenges and answers

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most prevalent skin disease in the early childhood and is a considerable problem both for patients and members of their families and for the society on the whole. In most cases, AD requires a long-term therapy such as the use of anti-inflammatory drugs. Selective inhibitors of the synthesis and release of proinflammatory cytokines - topical calcineurin inhibitors (Tcis) - are now used to solve this problem, with pimecrolimus being one of them. Pimecrolimus has been thoroughly examined for the past decade in different clinical studies involving a total of over 4,000 infants (below 2 years of age). These studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus for AD in children provided it is used in a long-term therapy on an intermittent basis. Unlike topical corticosteroids, the long-term use of pimecrolimus is not associated with any risk of development of systemic immunosuppression, skin atrophy, skin barrier dysfunction or systemic absorption so it is safe even if applied to the most sensitive skin areas. In view of this, the authors make a conclusion that pimecrolimus used in the form of a cream is a safe and efficient drug for the treatment of infants aged over three months suffering from atopic dermatitis.

Scoping systematic review of treatments for eczema

Background

Eczema is a very common chronic inflammatory skin condition.

Objectives

To update the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) systematic review of treatments for atopic eczema, published in 2000, and to inform health-care professionals, commissioners and patients about key treatment developments and research gaps.

Data sources

Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched from the end of 2000 to 31 August 2013. Retrieved articles were used to identify further randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Review methods

Studies were filtered according to inclusion criteria and agreed by consensus in cases of uncertainty. Abstracts were excluded and non-English-language papers were screened by international colleagues and data were extracted. Only RCTs of treatments for eczema were included, as other forms of evidence are associated with higher risks of bias. Inclusion criteria for studies included availability of data relevant to the therapeutic management of eczema; mention of randomisation; comparison of two or more treatments; and prospective data collection. Participants of all ages were included. Eczema diagnosis was determined by a clinician or according to published diagnostic criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. We used a standardised approach to summarising the data and the assessment of risk of bias and we made a clear distinction between what the studies found and our own interpretation of study findings.

Results

Of 7198 references screened, 287 new trials were identified spanning 92 treatments. Trial reporting was generally poor (randomisation method: 2% high, 36% low, 62% unclear risk of bias; allocation concealment: 3% high, 15% low, 82% unclear risk of bias; blinding of the intervention: 15% high, 28% low, 57% unclear risk of bias). Only 22 (8%) trials were considered to be at low risk of bias for all three criteria. There was reasonable evidence of benefit for the topical medications tacrolimus, pimecrolimus and various corticosteroids (with tacrolimus superior to pimecrolimus and corticosteroids) for both treatment and flare prevention; oral ciclosporin; oral azathioprine; narrow band ultraviolet B (UVB) light; Atopiclair™ and education. There was reasonable evidence to suggest no clinically useful benefit for twice-daily compared with once-daily topical corticosteroids; corticosteroids containing antibiotics for non-infected eczema; probiotics; evening primrose and borage oil; ion-exchange water softeners; protease inhibitor SRD441 (Serentis Ltd); furfuryl palmitate in emollient; cipamfylline cream; andMycobacterium vaccaevaccine. Additional research evidence is needed for emollients, bath additives, antibacterials, specialist clothing and complementary and alternative therapies. There was no RCT evidence for topical corticosteroid dilution, impregnated bandages, soap avoidance, bathing frequency or allergy testing.

Limitations

The large scope of the review coupled with the heterogeneity of outcomes precluded formal meta-analyses. Our conclusions are still limited by a profusion of small, poorly reported studies.

Conclusions

Although the evidence base of RCTs has increased considerably since the last NIHR HTA systematic review, the field is still severely hampered by poor design and reporting problems including failure to register trials and declare primary outcomes, small sample size, short follow-up duration and poor reporting of risk of bias. Key areas for further research identified by the review include the optimum use of emollients, bathing frequency, wash products, allergy testing and antiseptic treatments. Perhaps the greatest benefit identified is the use of twice weekly anti-inflammatory treatment to maintain disease remission. More studies need to be conducted in a primary care setting where most people with eczema are seen in the UK. Future studies need to use the same core set of outcomes that capture patient symptoms, clinical signs, quality of life and the chronic nature of the disease.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.

Topical calcineurin inhibitors in eczema and cancer association: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Cancer risk associated with topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between TCIs and cancer among patients with atopic and endogenous eczema.

METHODS

Incident cancers were identified from the National Cancer Registry. Data were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

880 unique cases of cancer developed in 66 176 patients from 2004 to 2012. The adjusted HRs for overall malignancy were 0.82 (95%CI 0.44-1.39) for tacrolimus-exposed and 1.30 (95%CI 0.59-2.45) for pimecrolimus-exposed. The only significant cancer association observed was lymphoid leukemia among the tacrolimus-exposed: HR 7.58 (95%CI 1.64-25.8). All affected patients had young-onset B-cell leukemia. Subgroup analysis of pediatric patients (≤16 years) showed significant association between tacrolimus use and B-cell leukemia: HR 26.4 (95%CI 4.77-146).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first Asian study on the risk of TCIs and malignancies, we do not find an association between use of tacrolimus and pimecrolimus in atopic and endogenous eczema and the overall development of malignancies. However, the use of topical tacrolimus was found to be associated with the development of B-cell acute lymphoid leukemia in pediatric eczema patients; further studies are required to investigate if a true association indeed occurs.

Topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) (or atopic eczema) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects children and adults and has an important impact on quality of life. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are the first-line therapy for this condition; however, they can be associated with significant adverse effects when used chronically. Tacrolimus ointment (in its 2 manufactured strengths of 0.1% and 0.03%) might be an alternative treatment. Tacrolimus, together with pimecrolimus, are drugs called topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus for moderate and severe atopic dermatitis compared with other active treatments.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to 3 June 2015: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2015), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974), LILACS (from 1982), and the Global Resource of Eczema Trials (GREAT database). We searched six trials registers and checked the bibliographies of included studies for further references to relevant trials. We contacted specialists in the field for unpublished data.A separate search for adverse effects of topical tacrolimus was undertaken in MEDLINE and EMBASE on 30 July 2013. We also scrutinised the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) websites for adverse effects information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (both children and adults) using topical tacrolimus at any dose, course duration, and follow-up time compared with other active treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened and examined the full text of selected studies for compliance with eligibility criteria, risk of bias, and data extraction. Our three prespecified primary outcomes were physician's assessment, participant's self-assessment of improvement, and adverse effects. Our secondary outcomes included assessment of improvement of the disease by validated or objective measures, such as SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis), the EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index), and BSA (Body Surface Area) scores.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 studies, with 5885 participants. The variability of drug doses, outcomes, and follow-up periods made it difficult to carry out meta-analyses.A single trial showed that tacrolimus 0.1% was better than low-potency TCS by the physician's assessment (risk ratio (RR) 3.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14 to 4.45, 1 study, n = 371, moderate-quality evidence). It was also marginally better than low-potency TCS on face and neck areas and moderate-potency TCS on the trunk and extremities by the physician's assessment (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.49, 1 study, n = 972, moderate level of evidence) and for some of the secondary outcomes. Compared with pimecrolimus 1%, people treated with tacrolimus were almost twice as likely to improve by the physician's assessment (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.42, 2 studies, n = 506, moderate quality of evidence). Compared with the lower concentration of 0.03%, the tacrolimus 0.1% formulation reduced the risk of not having an improvement by 18% as evaluated by the physician's assessment (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92, 6 studies, n = 1640, high-quality evidence). Tacrolimus 0.1% compared with moderate-to-potent TCS showed no difference by the physician's assessment, and 2 secondary outcomes (1 study, 377 participants) and a marginal benefit favouring tacrolimus 0.1% was found by the participant's assessment (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.29, 1 study, n = 974, low quality of evidence) and SCORAD.Based on data from 2 trials, tacrolimus 0.03% was superior to mild TCS for the physician's assessment (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.96 to 3.38, 2 studies, n = 790, moderate-quality evidence) and the participant's self-assessment (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.90, 1 study, n = 416, moderate quality of evidence). One trial showed moderate benefit of tacrolimus 0.03% compared with pimecrolimus 1% on the physician's assessment (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.98, 1 study, n = 139, low-quality evidence), but the effects were equivocal when evaluating BSA. In the comparison of tacrolimus 0.03% with moderate-to-potent corticosteroids, no difference was found in most of the outcomes measured (including physician's and participant's assessment and also for the secondary outcomes), but in two studies, a marginal benefit favouring the corticosteroid group was found for the EASI and BSA scores.Burning was more frequent in those using calcineurin inhibitors than those using corticosteroid tacrolimus 0.03% (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.96 to 3.14, 5 studies, 1883 participants, high-quality evidence), but no difference was found for skin infections. Symptoms observed were mild and transient. The comparison between the two calcineurin inhibitors (pimecrolimus and tacrolimus) showed the same overall incidence of adverse events, but with a small difference in the frequency of local effects.Serious adverse events were rare; occurred in both the tacrolimus and corticosteroid groups; and in most cases, were considered to be unrelated to the treatment. No cases of lymphoma were noted in the included studies nor in the non-comparative studies. Cases were only noted in spontaneous reports, cohorts, and case-control studies. Systemic absorption was rarely detectable, only in low levels, and this decreased with time. Exception is made for diseases with severe barrier defects, such as Netherton's syndrome, lamellar ichthyosis, and a few others, with case reports of a higher absorption. We evaluated clinical trials; case reports; and in vivo, in vitro, and animal studies; and didn't find any evidence that topical tacrolimus could cause skin atrophy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus 0.1% was better than low-potency corticosteroids, pimecrolimus 1%, and tacrolimus 0.03%. Results were equivocal when comparing both dose formulations to moderate-to-potent corticosteroids. Tacrolimus 0.03% was superior to mild corticosteroids and pimecrolimus. Both tacrolimus formulations seemed to be safe, and no evidence was found to support the possible increased risk of malignancies or skin atrophy with their use. The reliability and strength of the evidence was limited by the lack of data; thus, findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. We did not evaluate costs.

How Often Do Comparative Randomised Controlled Trials in the Field of Eczema Fail to Directly Compare the Treatments Being Tested?

The objective of the study was to identify all parallel design randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for eczema in recent dermatology literature that have failed to report a between-group analysis. The GREAT database (www.greatdatabase.org.uk) was searched to identify parallel group RCTs comparing two or more interventions published in the English language in the last decade, 2004 to 2013. The primary outcome was the number of studies that had not reported a between-group analysis for any of the outcomes. Where possible we re-analysed the data to determine whether a between-group analysis would have given a different conclusion to that reported. Out of a total of 304 RCTs in the study period, 173 (56.9%) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 173 eligible studies, 12 (6.9%) had not conducted a between-group analysis for any of the reported outcomes. There was no clear improvement over time. Five of the eight studies that were re-analysed yielded non-significant between-group differences yet reported significant within-group comparisons. All but one of the 12 studies implied that the experimental intervention was successful despite not undertaking any between-group comparisons. Although the proportion of all RCTs that fail to report an appropriate between-group analysis is small, the fact that any scientist who purports to compare one treatment against another then chooses to omit the key comparison statistic is worrying.

Pimecrolimus in atopic dermatitis: consensus on safety and the need to allow use in infants

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a distressing dermatological disease, which is highly prevalent during infancy, can persist into later life and requires long-term management with anti-inflammatory compounds. The introduction of the topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, more than 10 yr ago was a major breakthrough for the topical anti-inflammatory treatment of AD. Pimecrolimus 1% is approved for second-line use in children (≥2 yr old) and adults with mild-to-moderate AD. The age restriction was emphasized in a boxed warning added by the FDA in January 2006, which also highlights the lack of long-term safety data and the theoretical risk of skin malignancy and lymphoma. Since then, pimecrolimus has been extensively investigated in short- and long-term studies including over 4000 infants (<2 yr old). These studies showed that pimecrolimus effectively treats AD in infants, with sustained improvement with long-term intermittent use. Unlike topical corticosteroids, long-term TCI use does not carry the risks of skin atrophy, impaired epidermal barrier function or enhanced percutaneous absorption, and so is suitable for AD treatment especially in sensitive skin areas. Most importantly, the studies of pimecrolimus in infants provided no evidence for systemic immunosuppression, and a comprehensive body of evidence from clinical studies, post-marketing surveillance and epidemiological investigations does not support potential safety concerns. In conclusion, the authors consider that the labelling restrictions regarding the use of pimecrolimus in infants are no longer justified and recommend that the validity of the boxed warning for TCIs should be reconsidered.

Topical calcineurin inhibitors and lymphoma risk: evidence update with implications for daily practice

Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), commercially available since 2000–2001, are the first and only topical medications approved for chronic treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in pediatric patients and remain a welcomed alternative to topical corticosteroids. In January 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a boxed warning requirement based on a theoretical risk of malignancy (including lymphoma) with TCI use. However, in the years since, analyses of epidemiologic and clinical data have failed to demonstrate a causal relationship between TCI use and malignancy or lymphoma risk, especially for pimecrolimus cream. In fact, the observed number of malignancies and lymphomas observed both in post-marketing surveillance and reported to the FDA using its adverse events reporting system is much lower among TCI-exposed patients than the expected number for the general population. Furthermore, among children enrolled in post-marketing pediatric registry studies for both tacrolimus and pimecrolimus followed for up to 5.5 years [10,724 patient-years (PY)] or 6.5 years (16,219 PY), respectively, the observed number of malignancies and lymphomas is very low and similar to the number expected for a sample of similar size in the general population. In addition to reporting these comparative malignancy and lymphoma data, this article provides a historical overview of the boxed warning requirement and critically evaluates the preclinical, clinical, and epidemiological evidence that has thus far failed to substantiate a relationship between TCI use and malignancy. The authors also provide practical clinical advice for optimizing AD management and patient care in the context of the boxed warning.

Guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) part I

The existing evidence for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis, AE) is evaluated using the national standard Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation. The consensus process consisted of a nominal group process and a DELPHI procedure. Management of AE must consider the individual symptomatic variability of the disease. Basic therapy is focused on hydrating topical treatment, and avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Anti-inflammatory treatment based on topical glucocorticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) is used for exacerbation management and more recently for proactive therapy in selected cases. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, but the TCI tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are preferred in certain locations. Systemic immune-suppressive treatment is an option for severe refractory cases. Microbial colonization and superinfection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial treatment. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation preferably with UVA1 wavelength or UVB 311 nm. Dietary recommendations should be specific and given only in diagnosed individual food allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Stress-induced exacerbations may make psychosomatic counselling recommendable. 'Eczema school' educational programs have been proven to be helpful. Pruritus is targeted with the majority of the recommended therapies, but some patients need additional antipruritic therapies.

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment in infants:* a two-year open-label study

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus ointment is effective for treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in children aged ≥2 years (Br J Dermatol, 2004; 150: 554). Here, efficacy and tolerability of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment were evaluated in 50 infants aged <2 years at start of treatment.

METHODS

Infants with AD previously enrolled in a tacrolimus ointment pharmacokinetics trial were eligible for a 24-month open-label phase II study. Tacrolimus 0.03% ointment was applied to affected areas until clearance. In cases of exacerbation or clinical worsening, patients restarted treatment.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score improved, from 11.2 ± 10.5 baseline to 2.6 ± 4.1 at endpoint (24 months); mean affected body surface area decreased from 25.2 ± 21.1% to 5.1 ± 9.0%, with improvement on all items of the Physicians' Assessment of Individual Signs. The Physicians' Global Evaluation of Clinical Response showed a result of "cleared"/"excellent" for 63.3% of patients; 85.7% of parents/guardians assessed symptoms as "much better." Treatment was well tolerated, with common, nonserious respiratory infections and gastroenteritis the most frequently reported adverse events. The most common application-site events were infections and pruritus. Over 98% of blood samples showed tacrolimus concentrations <1.0 ng/ml; >40% showed concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (0.0250 ng/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

Over a period of two years, tacrolimus 0.03% ointment was associated with substantial clinical improvement of AD in infants aged <2 years. Treatment tolerability was similar to that seen in older children.

Optimizing the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: a review of the benefit/risk ratio of methylprednisolone aceponate

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, recurring, pruritic, inflammatory skin condition which has its onset in early childhood in most cases. A stepped approach to therapy, starting with emollients and adding first mild and then more potent topical medications is recommended. For more than 50 years, topical corticosteroids (TCs) have been the gold standard in AD therapy. Increasingly potent TCs have tended to come with increasing risk of adverse events, however. Calculating the benefit/risk ratio [or therapeutic index (TIX)] for TCs when treating children and infants is more challenging in this population. Not only does their increased surface area to volume ratio as a result of their small size mean that they are likely to absorb a greater proportion of any active agent applied to their skin, but drug metabolism is slower than in adults and the systemic effects of corticosteroids are more pronounced (in particular reduction of serum cortisol levels through suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis). Unlike traditional TCs, topical calcineurin inhibitors are not associated with the systemic effects and have shown good efficacy in treating AD in children. Parental/Carer concerns about their long-term use can limit their acceptance for treatment in the paediatric population, however. Modifications to the structure of fourth generation corticosteroids mean that increased potency is not accompanied by increased risk of adverse events and hence they have an improved TIX. Methylprednisolone aceponate is a potent fourth generation corticosteroid which has demonstrated efficacy and safety in acute and maintenance programmes in infants and children. It is licenced for once-daily use, and is available in four formulations - ointment, fatty ointment, cream and milk, which combine with its improved TIX to meet the needs of young patients and their carers.

The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common skin disease in children, and its prevalence is increasing. It is a chronic disorder, characterized by intermittent flares and phases of remission. Treatment regimens often require multiple therapies. These can vary between patients, and in an individual patient, depending on the state of disease. The traditional treatment for AD flares is topical corticosteroids, which are fast acting and effective for relief of symptoms, but may cause adverse effects, including those resulting from systemic absorption, particularly in children. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) are alternative treatments for AD. Tacrolimus ointment, a TCI, is approved for patients aged 2 years and older. Multiple studies have shown that tacrolimus is effective for short-term relief of symptoms in pediatric patients with AD. Long-term trials have demonstrated that the effectiveness of tacrolimus is maintained for up to 4 years in children. Additional studies have revealed that long-term intermittent use of tacrolimus as part of maintenance therapy can prevent AD flares. Tacrolimus has a low potential for systemic accumulation, and analysis of long-term studies indicates that it has a good safety profile. Treatment with tacrolimus, alone or in combination with topical corticosteroids for acute flares, may be a useful option for long-term management of AD in pediatric patients.

Long-term safety of tacrolimus ointment in atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus ointment has shown efficacy as monotherapy in both short- and long-term studies in atopic dermatitis. Absorption of tacrolimus after topical application is dependent on the barrier function of the skin. Absorption through the intact epidermis is very low and eczematic skin a little higher. In comparison to systemic tacrolimus used for prevention and treatment of rejection after organ transplantation, the bioavailability of topical tacrolimus in patients with atopic dermatitis is between 3 and 4%. Long-term safety studies of up to 4 years have not shown adverse events associated with systemic use of immunosuppressive agents, that is, increased risk of infections, lymphomas or skin cancers. Despite these findings, many physicians remain concerned about possible long-term malignancies associated with long-term treatment with a topical calcineurin inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE

To identify in the published literature possible long-term safety issues associated with topical tacrolimus treatment.

METHODS

PubMed was used to identify studies of atopic dermatitis therapy in which tacrolimus ointment was used for at least 6 months. We evaluated the safety data available from these studies. In addition, some safety data were evaluated from clinical follow-up of our own patients who have used tacrolimus ointment intermittently for up to 14 years.

CONCLUSIONS

During a follow-up period of 4 years in clinical studies, no increased risk of infections or cancer was associated with long-term use of tacrolimus ointment. Only short-term adverse events were detected. They included increased burning and stinging of the skin, and a temporary increase in skin infections. No signs of immunosuppression were observed after 1 - 4 years of intermittent treatment with tacrolimus ointment.