High-sensitivity C-reactive protein in psoriasis

The efficacy and safety of probiotics in the adjuvant treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

It has been reported that the imbalance of gut microbiota is involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. We retrieved randomized placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotic administration in the treatment of psoriasis.

Methods

The outcomes were changes in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and serum inflammatory indicators after treatment, and adverse events (AEs). Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated using random or fixed effects model.

Results

Seven qualified studies were identified in our study. The pooled percentage of patients with ≥75% reduction from baseline in PASI was higher in the probiotic group than that in the placebo group (33.57% vs. 23.61%; RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.98-1.98, p = 0.06). Compared with the placebo group, the PASI (MD -3.09, 95% CI -5.04 to -0.74, p = 0.01) and CRP level (MD -2.36, 95% CI -2.77 to -1.95, p < 0.0001) were significantly reduced in the probiotic group. There was no significant difference in DLQI (MD -1.45, 95% CI -6.72 to 3.82, p = 0.59) and AEs (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.37-1.25, p = 0.22) between the two groups.

Conclusion

Oral administration of probiotics can improve psoriasis; however, large randomized controlled trials are needed to support this conclusion.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024506286, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024506286.

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a biomarker in detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in psoriasis

Psoriasis is known to be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is a marker of inflammation and an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. We aimed to assess the correlation between hs-CRP and subclinical atherosclerosis in psoriatic patients. In 60 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and 60 age- and gender matched healthy controls, we evaluated the serum hs-CRP level and mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (MIMT-CCA). Psoriatic patients had higher levels of hs-CRP (median, 2.25 mg/L; IQR, 0.98-3.80; and range, 0.29-11.60) than did those in the control group (median, 1.03 mg/L; IQR, 0.36-2.15; and range, 0.10-3.35). Psoriatic patients also had higher mean MIMT (0.74 ± 0.19 and 0.54 ± 0.12, respectively, and P < .0001) compared with healthy subjects. The serum level of hs-CRP was significantly correlated with MIMT (P < .0001). Our results indicate that psoriatic patients have a higher risk of subclinical atherosclerosis and hs-CRP may be a useful marker for future risk of cardiovascular diseases in these patients. So, not only does anti-inflammatory drugs play a key role in the treatment of psoriasis, but also they may reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases by decreasing level of inflammatory markers including hs-CRP.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition and narrow-band ultraviolet-B light in psoriasis (DINUP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Moderate to severe psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease associated with insulin resistance, obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Sitagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor that improves glycaemia and has a marketing authorisation for the treatment of T2DM. Non-immunosuppressive therapies that are effective for psoriasis and its associated comorbidities would be a significant advance in the treatment of this chronic disease.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a single centre, 39-week, prospective, randomised, open label, clinical trial of oral sitagliptin (Januvia(®)) in psoriasis patients who are due to undergo a course of narrow-band ultraviolet-B (NB-UVB) phototherapy. We plan to enrol 120 participants and allocate participants on a random and 1:1 basis to receive sitagliptin 100 mg daily for 24 weeks combined with NB-UVB or NB-UVB monotherapy. Participants will be followed up for 12 weeks after sitagliptin therapy is discontinued. The primary endpoint is the change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 24 weeks after treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints include cumulative NB-UVB dose, number of NB-UVB treatments required to clear psoriasis, proportions of participants who achieve PASI-50 (50 % reduction in PASI from baseline), PASI-75, PASI-90 and the proportion of participants who relapse in each group. We will also analyse changes in cardiovascular disease risk factors, serum cytokine and hormone levels and peripheral blood mononuclear expression of immune proteins at 24 and 36 weeks. A subgroup of participants will have skin biopsies taken and analysed for skin levels and expression of immune cells, receptors, hormones and immune proteins. The genetic or epigenetic profile that predicts best response to DPP-4 inhibitor therapy will be analysed. The safety endpoints include the rate and severity of adverse events.

DISCUSSION

This is the first randomised clinical trial assessing dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition therapy in psoriasis. We hypothesise that sitagliptin therapy in combination with NB-UVB improves psoriasis severity compared to NB-UVB monotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02347501 (Date of registration: 27 January 2015).

C-reactive protein in psoriasis: a review of the literature

A great deal of research has addressed the elevation of C-reactive protein (CRP) among psoriatic patients and the role of this marker in assessment of disease severity and progression. However, there are some discrepancies in this area. We sought to figure out the relationship between CRP values and disease severity as well as the changes in marker levels after treatment through an extensive literature review. Comparison between CRP levels in psoriatic patients and those in healthy or non-psoriatic individuals was also another focus of this review. A thorough search in Pubmed and Embase was conducted for articles investigating different aspects of CRP measurement in patients with psoriasis. Overall, 32 articles were found to meet our inclusion criteria. Of 28 studies comparing the CRP values in psoriatic patients with those of controls, 24 found a statistically significant difference. In addition, 12 out of 16 papers examining the association between disease severity and CRP values noted significant results. With regard to CRP changes over the course of a treatment, all 15 studies addressing this issue revealed a significant decrease in marker levels. In conclusion, high CRP levels only for moderate and severe forms of disease might be inferred from the literature and there is no sufficient evidence suggesting a similar association for mild disease as well. Moreover, CRP may serve interchangeably with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) as a measure of disease severity in the case of untreated psoriatic patients who do not have disease related arthritis. For other patients, however, a careful clinical examination and PASI calculation still remain the mainstay of severity assessment.