Therapy, outcome and analysis of c-kit expression in patients with extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma

Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma of lymph node: Pooled analysis of all reported cases

AIM

To study clinical outcomes and management of lymph nodes extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (LNEPSCC).

METHODS

Herein, we perform a systematic search of published literature in the PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies describing LNEPSCC. For uniformity of reporting, LNEPSCC was staged as limited if it involved either single lymph node station or if surgery with curative intent had been undertaken. The disease was staged extensive if it involved two or more lymph node regions.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review yielded eight descriptions (n = 14) involving cervical, submandibular and inguinal lymph nodes. Eleven (64.7%) patients had limited disease (LD) and six (35.3%) had extensive disease (ED) at presentation. Chemotherapy (n = 6, 35.3%) or surgery (n = 4, 23.5%) were the most common form of treatment given to these patients. Complete response was achieved in 12 (70.6%) of the patients. Median (interquartile range) progression free survival and overall survival was 15 (7-42) mo and 22 (12.75-42) mo respectively. Of the three illustrative cases, two patients each had ED at presentation and achieved complete remission with platinum based combination chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

LNEPSCC is a rare disease with less than 15 reported cases in world literature. Surgical resection with curative intent is feasible in those with LD while platinum based combination chemoradiation is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with ED. Prognosis of LNEPSCC is better than that of small cell lung cancer in general.

Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma localized in lymph nodes: is it a different clinical entity?

BACKGROUND

Extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas (EPSCC) can clinically progress differently depending on the primary site of disease involvement. This review is focused on patients with small cell carcinoma (SmCC) exclusively localized in a lymph node or in multiple lymph nodes without any evidence of a primary tumor in any other organ.

METHODS

We searched the period 1980 to 2007 in the PubMed database and identified 11 publications in the English language presenting at least one case of SmCC. In total 28 individual patients were included in the present study. They were scrutinized in terms of epidemiology, clinical presentation, staging, pathology, etiology, treatment and prognosis.

RESULTS

Characteristics such as age, gender and smoking were similar to those seen in other EPSCCs. Median survival was not reached (42+, range, 9.1 to 100 months). The survival rate was found to be 79% at 3 years. Seventy-seven percent of the patients had limited stage disease. These patients completely responded to surgical therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or to a combination of these treatments. Seventy-one percent of the patients with limited stage SmCC localized in lymph nodes were recurrence-free during the study periods.

DISCUSSION

Our review patient group with SmCC localized in lymph nodes exhibited an excellent clinical behavior and survival results when compared to other patients with pulmonary and non-pulmonary SmCCs. SmCCs localized in lymph nodes may be a separate clinical entity.

Extrapulmonary small-cell carcinoma compared with small-cell lung carcinoma: a retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

The study was conducted with the aim of reviewing the clinical features, therapy, and natural course of patients with extrapulmonary small-cell carcinoma (EPSCC) and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) to better define current concepts regarding EPSCCs.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with proven diagnosis of small-cell carcinoma (SmCC) between January 1999 and May 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 65 SmCC cases were included in the study (11 [17%] cases of EPSCC and 54 [83%] cases of SCLC).

RESULTS

Progression-free survival of all patients with EPSCC and patients with extensive EPSCC disease was 7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-13.42) and 7 months (95% CI, 4.71-13.29), respectively. Overall survival of all patients with EPSCC and patients with extensive EPSSC disease was 32 months (95% CI, 18.74-45.26) and 28 months (95% CI, 12.24-43.76), respectively. Progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients with SCLC were 5 months (95% CI, 2.26-7.74) and 10 months (95% CI, 5.95-14.05), respectively. Progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with extensive disease were 3 months (95% CI, 4.71-13.29) and 5 months (95% CI, 3.33-6.67), respectively. Overall survival was significantly better in all patients with EPSCC and in patients with extensive EPSCC disease compared with all patients with SCLC and patients with extensive SCLC disease (P = .014, P = .004, respectively). Early death and brain metastasis were observed in a higher number of patients with SCLC compared with EPSCC; however, these results were not statistically significant (P = .33 and P = .076, respectively). Smoking history was significantly less in the EPSCC group (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

EPSCC is usually treated similarly to SCLC. However, this study suggests some differences such as etiology, clinic course, survival, frequency of brain metastases, and early death between these entities. These possible differences may influence the choice of therapeutic approach.