Antihistamines: do they work? Further well-controlled trials involving larger samples are needed

Effect of antihistamine-containing syrup on salivary metabolites: an in vitro and in vivo study

This study tested the null hypothesis that antihistamine-containing syrup does not change salivary metabolites in vitro and in vivo. For the in vitro experiments, saliva from 10 volunteers was mixed with a syrup or pill suspension of loratadine (1 mg/ml Claritin®, Schering-Plough, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). For the in vivo experiment, 10 volunteers performed a mouth rinse with 10 mL of antihistamine syrup (Claritin®; Schering-Plough, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) for 20 seconds and then discarded the rinse water. After 20 seconds, 5 mL of unstimulated whole saliva was spit into a plastic tube kept on ice. The protein profile of in vitro and in vivo experiments was analyzed using 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The samples were also analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, followed by Principal Component Analysis and Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). There were differences in salivary metabolites after syrup interaction. The salivary concentrations of acetate, n-caproate, arginine, glutamate, and lysine among other metabolites were reduced with the syrup in both in vivo and in vitro experiments (p < 0.05), but no differences were observed when the pill suspension was used (p > 0.05). Similar changes in metabolite profiles were observed in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Electrophoresis revealed no difference in the salivary protein pattern. The null hypothesis was rejected because the intake of syrup medicine changes the salivary composition and influences oral homeostasis and susceptibility to oral diseases.

Drug repurposing to treat asthma and allergic disorders: Progress and prospects

Allergy and atopic asthma have continued to become more prevalent in modern society despite the advent of new treatments, representing a major global health problem. Common medications such as antihistamines and steroids can have undesirable long-term side-effects and lack efficacy in some resistant patients. Biologic medications are increasingly given to treatment-resistant patients, but they can represent high costs, complex dosing and management, and are not widely available around the world. The field needs new, cheap, and convenient treatment options in order to bring better symptom relief to patients. Beyond continued research and development of new drugs, a focus on drug repurposing could alleviate this problem by repositioning effective and safe small-molecule drugs from other fields of medicine and applying them toward the treatment for asthma and allergy. Herein, preclinical models, case reports, and clinical trials of drug repurposing efficacy in allergic disease are reviewed. Novel drugs are also proposed for repositioning based on their mechanism of action to treat asthma and allergy. Overall, drug repurposing could become increasingly important as a way of advancing allergy and atopic asthma therapy, filling a need in treatment of patients today.

Quality of sleep in allergic children and their parents

BACKGROUND

Quality of sleep is essential for physical and mental health and influences the perception of the patient's well-being during the day. In patients with chronic allergic diseases sleep disorders may increase the severity of the condition, complicate the management and impair their quality of life. When children are concerned, their parents are also affected by the problem. We evaluated the presence of disrupted sleep in parents of children with atopic disorders, and its relationship with clinical features and the presence of disturbed sleep in children.

METHODS

Parents of children suffering from allergic diseases were recruited from the Pediatric Allergy Units of Parma University. Evaluation of sleep in parents was based on the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), while in children it was based on the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC).

RESULTS

Of the 102 parents invited, 92 filled in the questionnaire. Only the questionnaires with more than a 95% completion rate were considered for analysis. PSQI mean score in parents was 6.6 (SD 2.6); 75.6% of them had a PSQI ≥ 5, indicating that most parents had a sleep quality perceived as bad. The PSQI ≥ 5 was more common in parents of children with asthma and rhinitis. In children, SDSC mean score was 42.1 (SD: 9.4); 62.3% had a total score ≥ 39. The quality of sleep in parents and children was significantly correlated (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

These findings make it apparent that an alteration of sleep in children can also affect the parents. Such effect further weighs the burden of respiratory allergy and needs to be considered in future studies.

Histamine H₂ receptor signaling × environment interactions determine susceptibility to experimental allergic encephalomyelitis

Histamine and its receptors are important in both multiple sclerosis and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE). C57BL/6J (B6) mice deficient for the histamine H2 receptor (H2RKO) are less susceptible to EAE and exhibit blunted Th1 responses. However, whether decreased antigen-specific T-cell effector responses in H2RKO mice were due to a lack of H2R signaling in CD4(+) T cells or antigen-presenting cells has remained unclear. We generated transgenic mice expressing H2R specifically in T cells on the H2RKO background, and, using wild-type B6 and H2RKO mice as controls, induced EAE either in the presence or absence of the ancillary adjuvant pertussis toxin (PTX), which models the effects of infectious inflammatory stimuli on autoimmune disease. We monitored the mice for clinical signs of EAE and neuropathology, as well as effector T-cell responses using flow cytometry. EAE severity and neuropathology in H2RKO mice expressing H2R exclusively in T cells become equal to those in wild-type B6 mice only when PTX is used to elicit disease. EAE complementation was associated with frequencies of CD4(+)IFN-γ(+) and CD4(+)IL-17(+) cells that are equal to or greater than those in wild-type B6, respectively. Thus, the regulation of encephalitogenic T-cell responses and EAE susceptibility by H2R signaling in CD4(+) T cells is dependent on gene × environment interactions.

A direct comparison of efficacy between desloratadine and rupatadine in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Background

H1-antihistamines are recommended as the first-line symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of rupatadine (RUP) versus desloratadine (DES) in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).

Method

To assess the efficacy and safety of RUP in SAR in comparison with placebo (PL) and DES. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, international, and PL-controlled study was carried out. The main selection criteria included SAR patients over 12 years old with a positive prick test to a relevant seasonal allergen for the geographic area. Symptomatic patients at screening with a nasal symptom sum score of ≥6 points (nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, sneezing, and nasal pruritus), a non-nasal score of ≥3 points (ocular pruritus, ocular redness, and tearing eyes), and a rhinorrhea score of ≥2 points with laboratory test results and electrocardiography within acceptable limits were included in the study. Change from baseline in the total symptom-score (T7SS) over the 4-week treatment period (reflective evaluation) was considered the primary efficacy variable. Secondary efficacy measures included total nasal symptom score (T4NSS) and conjunctival symptom score (T3NNSS), both of which are reflective and instantaneous evaluations. Furthermore questions related to quality of life (eg, sleep disturbances or impairment of daily activities) have also been evaluated. Safety was assessed according to adverse events reported, as well as laboratory and electrocardiography controls.

Results

A total of 379 patients were randomized, of which 356 were included and allocated to PL (n = 122), RUP (n = 117), or DES (n = 117). Mean change of T7SS over the 4-week treatment period was significantly reduced in the RUP (–46.1%, P = 0.03) and DES (–48.9%, P = 0.01) groups, compared with PL. Similarly, RUP and DES were comparable and significantly superior to PL for all secondary endpoints, including nasal and conjunctival symptoms and patients’ and investigator’s overall clinical opinions. Symptom score evaluation (both reflective and instantaneous evaluations) throughout the treatment period showed a progressive and maintained significant improvement with both treatments at day 7 (P = 0.01), day 14 (P = 0.007), and day 21 (P = 0.01) in comparison with PL. Adverse events were scarce and were similar in both treatment groups. Electrocardiography (QTc) and lab test results did not show any relevant findings

Conclusion

RUP is a very good choice for SAR due to its contribution to the improvement of nasal (including obstruction) and non-nasal symptoms to a similar degree as DES.

Cellular adhesion molecules in chronic urticaria: modulation of serum levels occurs during levocetirizine treatment

BACKGROUND

Some antihistamines are capable of reducing levels of adhesion molecules in wealing tissues of patients with chronic urticaria (CU).

OBJECTIVES

To determine if 6 weeks of therapy with levocetirizine 5 mg once daily would also induce any decrease in serum levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, endothelial leucocyte adhesion molecule-1 (ELAM-1) or P-selectin in subjects with CU and chronic autoimmune urticaria.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with CU (18 with positive and 18 with negative autologous serum skin test) were studied, together with 10 control healthy subjects. All patients received levocetirizine 5 mg daily. Serum soluble cellular adhesion molecule (CAM) levels were determined by immunoenzymatic assay before and after the end of the study period. Disease activity was recorded according to the EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF scoring system.

RESULTS

After levocetirizine therapy CAM levels decreased in patients with CU, significantly in the cases of ELAM-1 and P-selectin. Patients' clinical scores improved during regular antihistamine therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Levocetirizine 5 mg daily demonstrated a broad anti-inflammatory effect in patients with CU. The significant decrease in serum levels of ELAM-1 and P-selectin might reflect the inhibitory activity on neutrophil rolling and extravasation towards inflamed skin.

Sleep disturbances in allergic diseases

Sleep is fundamental for physical and mental health as well as daytime performance and represents a crucial aspect in the personal representations of well-being. Sleep disturbances in patients with chronic disorders constitute a factor that contributes to exacerbate symptoms, complicate management, and affect mood and quality of life (QoL). Allergic diseases are a global health problem of increasing prevalence that affects up to 15% of the population in Western countries. Sleep problems associated with allergic diseases may play a role in worsening the burden of illness, contributing to impairment of the QoL. The aim of this review was to describe the most common causes leading to sleep disturbance in allergic patients and their consequences on the QoL. The possible negative effects of treatment on sleep parameters has been also considered.

Effects of levocetirizine as add-on therapy to fluticasone in seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Addition of H(1) antagonists to intranasal corticosteroid treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) is common in clinical practice and recommended by guidelines, despite some evidence that the additive benefits are negligible.

OBJECTIVE

To assess additional benefits of 5 mg levocetirizine dihydrochloride in seasonal AR patients using 200 mcg fluticasone propionate nasal spray once daily.

METHODS

In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of 27 patients, following 2 weeks without treatment, subjects used fluticasone with levocetirizine or identical placebo for 2 weeks each. Assessments were the Juniper mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (mini-RQLQ), domiciliary peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), total nasal symptoms (TNS) scores and nasal nitric oxide concentrations. Effects were interpreted and tested against minimal clinically important differences.

RESULTS

Add-on effects for levocetirizine vs. placebo excluded any clinically significant benefits: mean effects (one sided 95% confidence intervals) were mini-RQLQ -0.11 (-0.34), PNIF +0.57 (+5.23), and TNS -0.11 (-0.60). Numbers needed to treat (95% confidence intervals) by outcome were mini-RQLQ 14 (5 to 49), PNIF 4 (3-7), and TNS 3 (2-6). No significant within or between treatment effects were seen for nasal nitric oxide.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to current practice, the present results demonstrate that for the majority of patients, antihistamine add-on to effective nasal steroid treatment is inappropriate. Further work is required to confirm that this is also true in the most severe cases, and the available evidence needs to be put into guidelines and implemented.

Antiallergic drugs and quality of life

Allergic diseases represent a global health problem with a substantial impact on medical costs and socioeconomic outcomes. Furthermore, as well documented in the recent literature, these pathologies also have negative consequences on the functional, emotional and psychosocial aspects of daily life. Using validated and standardized tools, it is possible to evaluate individual outcomes. At present, the health-related quality of life parameter is used in clinical trials, population studies and public health, providing a comprehensive picture of both the disease and its treatment on the quality of life. While many studies have addressed this topic in respiratory allergy, further studies are needed to explore the use of health-related quality of life both before and after treatment in other allergic conditions such as dermatitis, eczema, urticaria and food allergy.