Toward understanding the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis through clinical and molecular correlates

Management of Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is a condition characterized by the premature fusion of 2 or more skull bones. Craniosynostosis of the lambdoid suture is one of the rarest forms, accounting for 1-4% of all craniosynostoses. Documented cases are separated into simple (single suture), complex (bilateral), and associated with adjacent synostoses ("Mercedes Benz" Pattern) or syndromes (i.e., Crouzon, Sathre-Chotzen, Antley-Bixler). This condition can manifest phenotypic deformities and neurological sequelae that can lead to impaired cognitive function if improperly treated or left undiagnosed. Preferred surgical techniques have varied over time but all maintain the common goals of establishing proper head shape and preventing of complications that could contribute to aforementioned sequelae.

SUMMARY

This comprehensive review highlights demographic distributions, embryological development, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, neurological sequelae, radiologic findings, surgical techniques, surgical outcomes, and postoperative considerations of patients with lambdoid craniosynostosis presentation. In addition, a systematic review was conducted to explore the operative management of lambdoid craniosynostosis using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, with 38 articles included after screening. Key Messages: Due to a low volume of published cases, diagnosis and treatment can vary. Large overlap in presentation can occur in patients that display lambdoid craniosynostosis and posterior plagiocephaly, furthering the need for comprehensive analysis. Possessing the knowledge and tools to properly assess patients with lambdoid craniosynostosis will allow for more precise care and improved outcomes.

Gain-of-function variants and overexpression of RUNX2 in patients with nonsyndromic midline craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis (CS), the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, is a relatively common congenital anomaly, occurring in 3-5 per 10,000 live births. Nonsyndromic CS (NCS) accounts for up to 80% of all CS cases, yet the genetic factors contributing to the disorder remain largely unknown. The RUNX2 gene, encoding a transcription factor critical for bone and skull development, is a well known CS candidate gene, as copy number variations of this gene locus have been found in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. In the present study, we aimed to characterize RUNX2 to better understand its role in the genetic etiology and in the molecular mechanisms underlying midline suture ossification in NCS. We report four nonsynonymous variants, one intronic variant and one 18 bp in-frame deletion in RUNX2 not found in our study control population. Significant difference in allele frequency (AF) for the deletion variant RUNX2 p.Ala84-Ala89del (ClinVar 257,095; dbSNP rs11498192) was observed in our sagittal NCS cohort when compared to the general population (P = 1.28 × 10^-6), suggesting a possible role in the etiology of NCS. Dual-luciferase assays showed that three of four tested RUNX2 variants conferred a gain-of-function effect on RUNX2, further suggesting their putative pathogenicity in the tested NCS cases. Downregulation of RUNX2 expression was observed in prematurely ossified midline sutures. Metopic sites showed significant downregulation of promoter 1-specific isoforms compared to sagittal sites. Suture-derived mesenchymal stromal cells showed an increased expression of RUNX2 over matched unfused suture derived cells. This demonstrates that RUNX2, and particularly the distal promoter 1-isoform group, are overexpressed in the osteogenic precursors within the pathological suture sites.

Genetic advances in craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis, the premature ossification of one or more skull sutures, is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous congenital anomaly affecting approximately one in 2,500 live births. In most cases, it occurs as an isolated congenital anomaly, that is, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NCS), the genetic, and environmental causes of which remain largely unknown. Recent data suggest that, at least some of the midline NCS cases may be explained by two loci inheritance. In approximately 25-30% of patients, craniosynostosis presents as a feature of a genetic syndrome due to chromosomal defects or mutations in genes within interconnected signaling pathways. The aim of this review is to provide a detailed and comprehensive update on the genetic and environmental factors associated with NCS, integrating the scientific findings achieved during the last decade. Focus on the neurodevelopmental, imaging, and treatment aspects of NCS is also provided.

Apert syndrome: A case report and review of the literature

Apert syndrome is the rare acrocephalosyndactyly syndrome type 1, characterized by craniosynostosis, severe syndactyly of hands and feet, and dysmorphic facial features. It demonstrates autosomal dominant inheritance assigned to mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor gene. Presently described is case of a 19-year-old female patient diagnosed on physical examination with Apert syndrome based on acrocephaly, prominent forehead, ocular hypertelorism, proptosis, short and broad nose, pseudoprognathism, dental crowding and ectopia, maxillar hypoplasia, low hairline, webbed neck, pectus excavatum, and severe, bilateral syndactyly of hands and feet. The multiple phenotypic signs of Apert syndrome make multidisciplinary team, including dentist, neurosurgeon, plastic surgeon, physiatrist, ophthalmologist, perinatalogist and geneticist, essential for successful management.

Evolving concepts of heredity and genetics in orthodontics

The field of genetics emerged from the study of heredity early in the 20th century. Since that time, genetics has progressed through a series of defined eras based on a number of major conceptual and technical advances. Orthodontics also progressed through a series of conceptual stages over the past 100 years based in part on the ongoing and often circular debate about the relative importance of heredity (nature) and the local environment (nurture) in the etiology and treatment of malocclusion and dentofacial deformities. During the past 20 years, significant advancements in understanding the genomic basis of craniofacial development and the gene variants associated with dentofacial deformities have resulted in a convergence of the principles and concepts in genetics and in orthodontics that will lead to significant advancement of orthodontic treatments. Fundamental concepts from genetics and applied translational research in orthodontics provide a foundation for a new emphasis on precision orthodontics, which will establish a modern genomic basis for major improvements in the treatment of malocclusion and dentofacial deformities as well as many other areas of concern to orthodontists through the assessment of gene variants on a patient-by-patient basis.

Leucine-rich repeat, immunoglobulin-like and transmembrane domain 3 (LRIT3) is a modulator of FGFR1

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) play critical roles in craniofacial and skeletal development via multiple signaling pathways including MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and PLC-?. FGFR-mediated signaling is modulated by several regulators. Proteins with leucine-rich repeat (LRR) and/or immunoglobulin (IG) superfamily domains have been suggested to interact with FGFRs. In addition, fibronectin leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein 3 (FLRT3) has been shown to modulate the FGFR-mediated signaling via the fibronectin type III (FNIII) domain. Therefore proteins with LRR, IG, and FNIII are candidate regulators of the FGFRs. Here we identify leucine-rich repeat, immunoglobulin-like and transmembrane domain 3 (LRIT3) as a regulator of the FGFRs.

Pictorial essay: The many faces of craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis is a common condition in the pediatric age group, which may either be isolated or may present as part of a craniofacial syndrome. This pictorial review illustrates the underlying mechanisms and pathophysiology of craniosynostosis, the various types of craniosynostoses, common craniofacial syndromes and the role of imaging in their diagnosis and management.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling crosstalk in skeletogenesis

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) play important roles in the control of embryonic and postnatal skeletal development by activating signaling through FGF receptors (FGFRs). Germline gain-of-function mutations in FGFR constitutively activate FGFR signaling, causing chondrocyte and osteoblast dysfunctions that result in skeletal dysplasias. Crosstalk between the FGFR pathway and other signaling cascades controls skeletal precursor cell differentiation. Genetic analyses revealed that the interplay of WNT and FGFR1 determines the fate and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells during mouse craniofacial skeletogenesis. Additionally, interactions between FGFR signaling and other receptor tyrosine kinase networks, such as those mediated by the epidermal growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α, were associated with excessive osteoblast differentiation and bone formation in the human skeletal dysplasia called craniosynostosis, which is a disorder of skull development. We review the roles of FGFR signaling and its crosstalk with other pathways in controlling skeletal cell fate and discuss how this crosstalk could be pharmacologically targeted to correct the abnormal cell phenotype in skeletal dysplasias caused by aberrant FGFR signaling.

Craniosynostosis: a radiological and surgical perspective

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of the cranial sutures. It is identified early in life either due to cosmetic deformity or due to more serious functional complications. Isolated forms of craniosynostosis are much more common and less challenging in their management than their syndromic counterpart. Modern multislice computed tomography and 3D reconstructions have revolutionized surgical planning and follow-up. We review the radiological features of the craniosynostoses, complications, and associated conditions that may alter patient management. Common surgical techniques and postoperative appearances are illustrated in the article.

Increased EFG- and PDGFalpha-receptor signaling by mutant FGF-receptor 2 contributes to osteoblast dysfunction in Apert craniosynostosis

Dysregulations of osteoblast function induced by gain-of-function genetic mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) cause premature fusion of cranial sutures in syndromic craniosynostosis. The pathogenic signaling mechanisms induced by FGFR genetic mutations in human craniosynostosis remain largely unknown. In this study, we have used microarray analysis to investigate the signaling pathways that are activated by FGFR2 mutations in Apert craniosynostosis. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that EGFR and PDGFRalpha expression is abnormally increased in human Apert calvaria osteoblasts compared with wild-type cells. Quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analyses in Apert osteoblasts and immunohistochemical analysis of Apert sutures confirmed the increased EGFR and PDGFRalpha expression in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of EGFR and PDGFR reduces the pathological upregulation of phenotypic osteoblast genes and in vitro matrix mineralization in Apert osteoblasts. Investigation of the underlying molecular mechanisms revealed that activated FGFR2 enhances EGFR and PDGFRalpha mRNA expression via activation of PKCalpha-dependent AP-1 transcriptional activity. We also show that the increased EGFR protein expression in Apert osteoblasts results in part from a post-transcriptional mechanism involving increased Sprouty2-Cbl interaction, leading to Cbl sequestration and reduced EGFR ubiquitination. These data reveal novel molecular crosstalks between activated FGFR2, EGFR and PDGFRalpha that functionally contribute to the osteoblastic dysfunction in Apert craniosynostosis, which may provide a molecular basis for novel therapeutic approaches in this severe skeletal disorder.

Genetics of craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis is a defect of the skull caused by early fusion of one or more of the cranial sutures and affects 3 to 5 individuals per 10,000 live births. Craniosynostosis can be divided into two main groups: syndromic and nonsyndromic. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is typically an isolated finding that is classified according to the suture(s) involved. Syndromic craniosynostosis is associated with various dysmorphisms involving the face, skeleton, nervous system, and other anomalies and is usually accompanied by developmental delay. More than 180 syndromes exist that contain craniosynostosis. Secondary effects of craniosynostosis may include vision problems and increased intracranial pressure, among others. The molecular basis of many types of syndromic craniosynostosis is known, and diagnostic testing strategies will often lead to a specific diagnosis.

Genetic analysis of non-syndromic craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis is a common malformation occurring in 3-5 per 10,000 live births. Most often craniosynostosis occurs as an isolated (i.e. non-syndromic) anomaly. Non-syndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous condition that has the characteristics of a multifactorial trait. It is believed that each sutural synostosis (e.g. sagittal, coronal) represents a different disease. Significant progress has been made in understanding the clinical and molecular aspects of monogenic syndromic craniosynostosis. However, the phenotypic characterization of NSC is incomplete and its causes remain unknown. This review summarizes the available knowledge on NSC and presents a systematic approach aimed at the identification of genetic and non-genetic factors contributing to the risk of this common craniofacial defect.

Mutational screening of FGFR1, CER1, and CDON in a large cohort of trigonocephalic patients

OBJECTIVE

Screen the known craniosynostotic related gene, FGFR1 (exon 7), and two new identified potential candidates, CER1 and CDON, in patients with syndromic and nonsyndromic metopic craniosynostosis to determine if they might be causative genes.

DESIGN

Using single-strand conformational polymorphisms (SSCPs), denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, and/or direct sequencing, we analyzed a total of 81 patients for FGFR1 (exon 7), 70 for CER1, and 44 for CDON.

PATIENTS

Patients were ascertained in the Centro de Estudos do Genoma Humano in São Paulo, Brazil (n = 39), the Craniofacial Unit, Oxford, U.K. (n = 23), and the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (n = 31). Clinical inclusion criteria included a triangular head and/or forehead, with or without a metopic ridge, and a radiographic documentation of metopic synostosis. Both syndromic and nonsyndromic patients were studied.

RESULTS

No sequence alterations were found for FGFR1 (exon 7). Different patterns of SSCP migration for CER1 compatible with the segregation of single nucleotide polymorphisms reported in the region were identified. Seventeen sequence alterations were detected in the coding region of CDON, seven of which are new, but segregation analysis in parents and homology studies did not indicate a pathological role.

CONCLUSIONS

FGFR1 (exon 7), CER1, and CDON are not related to trigonocephaly in our sample and should not be considered as causative genes for metopic synostosis. Screening of FGFR1 (exon 7) for diagnostic purposes should not be performed in trigonocephalic patients.

Société Française d’Orthopédie Pédiatrique

Limb malformations are frequent. These malformations are isolated or associated with anomalies of other developmental fields and accurate diagnostic is essential for prognosis evaluation, treatment and genetic counseling. Animal embryology and molecular biology techniques, have given us a better understanding of the processes of growth and patterning of the limb buds. The key genes that are involved in these processes have been identified and their interactions recognized. Human genetics has been able to identify, or at least localize, several genes implicated in limb development. We here review the present knowledge on these genes and their mutations responsible for limb anomalies.

Raman imaging demonstrates FGF2-induced craniosynostosis in mouse calvaria

Craniosynostosis is a severe craniofacial disease where one or more sutures, the fibrous tissue that lies between the cranial bones, fuses prematurely. Some craniosynostosis syndromes are known to be caused by mutations in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors. Mutated FGF receptors are thought to cause constitutive signaling. In this study, heparin acrylic beads released fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) to mimic constitutive signaling by mutated receptors, delivering FGF2 in addition to already existing normal tissue amounts. Fetal day 18.5 mouse sutures were treated with FGF2-soaked beads and cultured in serum free media for 48 h. We have shown previously that this treatment leads to fusion and increased Msx2 expression, but here we use near-infrared Raman imaging to simultaneously examine the mineral components and matrix components of cranial tissue while providing light microscopic spatial information. FGF2-treated mouse sutures show increased v1 phosphate and v1 carbonate bandwidths, indicating a slightly chemically modified mineral being rapidly deposited. In addition, FGF2-treated mouse sutures show a marked increase in mineral-to-matrix ratios compared to control mouse sutures, typical of increased mineralization.

A novel dysmorphic syndrome with open calvarial sutures and sutural cataracts maps to chromosome 14q13-q21

We describe a new dysmorphic syndrome in an inbred Saudi Arabian family with 21 members. Five males and one female have similar craniofacial features including wide open calvarial sutures with large and late-closing anterior fontanels, frontal bossing, hyperpigmentation with capillary hemangioma of the forehead, significant hypertelorism, and a broad and prominent nose. In addition, these individuals have Y-shaped sutural cataracts diagnosed by 1-2 years of age. No chromosomal or biochemical abnormalities were identified. A genome-wide scan was performed, and two-point LOD score analysis, assuming autosomal recessive inheritance, detected linkage to chromosome 14q13-q21. The highest LOD scores were obtained for marker GATA136A04 (LOD=4.58 at theta=0.00) and for the adjacent telomeric marker D14S1048 (LOD=4.32 at theta=0.00). Multipoint linkage analysis resulted in a maximum LOD score of 5.44 between markers D14S1048 and GATA136A04. Model independent analysis by SIBPAL confirmed linkage to the same chromosomal region. Haplotype analysis indicated that all affected individuals were homozygous for the interval on chromosome 14q13-q21 with two recombinants for D14S1014 (centromeric) and one recombinant for D14S301 (telomeric). These recombinations limit the disease locus to a region of approximately 7.26 Mb. Candidate genes localized to this region were identified, and analysis of PAX9 did not identify mutations in these patients. The unique clinical phenotype and the mapping data suggest that this family represents a novel autosomal recessive syndrome.

Pfeiffer Syndrome type 2--case report

OBJECTIVE

To report on a case of Pfeiffer Syndrome, with a discussion of the diagnostic characteristics and features of disease types and the differential diagnosis.

DESCRIPTION

The authors describe a newborn with cloverleaf skull, extreme bilateral exorbitism and choanal atresia, partial syndactyly of the second and third toes and broad medially-deviated big toes. The case reported was Pfeiffer Syndrome type 2, which usually has a poor prognosis.

COMMENTS

Pfeiffer Syndrome is a clinically variable disorder and consists of an autosomal dominantly-inherited osteochondrodysplasia with craniosynostosis. It has been divided into three types. Type 1 is commonly associated with normal intelligence and generally good outcome. Types 2 and 3 generally have severe neurological compromise, poor prognosis, early death and sporadic occurrence. Potential for prolonged useful survival outcome can be achieved in some cases with early aggressive medical and surgical management according to recent literature.

Management of craniosynostosis

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Review the etiopathogenesis of craniosynostosis and craniofacial anomalies. 2. Develop a basic understanding of the clinical manifestations and diagnosis of craniofacial anomalies. 3. Describe the surgical principles of managing craniosynostosis and craniofacial anomalies.Craniosynostosis, or the premature closure of calvarial sutures, results in deformed calvaria at birth. Although the etiology of craniosynostosis is currently unknown, animal experiments and a recent interest in molecular biology point toward interplay between the dura and the underlying brain. This interaction occurs by means of a local alteration in the expression of transforming growth factor, MSX2, fibroblast growth factor receptor, and TWIST. The fused suture restricts growth of the calvaria, thus leading to a characteristic deformation, each associated with a different type of craniosynostosis. Uncorrected craniosynostosis leads to a continuing progression of the deformity, and in some cases, an elevation of intracranial pressure. Clinical examination should include not only an examination of the skull but also a general examination to rule out the craniofacial syndromes that accompany craniosynostosis. Because deformational plagiocephaly, or plagiocephaly without synostosis, occurs secondary to sleeping in the supine position during the early perinatal period, the physician should be aware of this abnormality. Treatment for deformational plagiocephaly is conservative when compared with treatment for craniosynostosis, which requires surgery. Appropriate investigations should include genetic screening, radiologic examination with a computerized tomographic scan, and neurodevelopmental analysis. Surgical intervention should be performed during infancy, preferably in the first 6 months of postnatal life, to prevent the further progression of the deformity and possible complications associated with increased intracranial pressure. The principles of surgical intervention are not only to excise the fused suture but also to attempt to normalize the calvarial shape. Long-term follow-up is critical to determine the effect of the surgical outcome.

Amelogenesis imperfecta: a classification and catalogue for the 21st century

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a collective term for a number of conditions with abnormal enamel formation. Many cases are inherited, either as an X-linked, autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive trait. Several classifications have evolved since 1945, based primarily on phenotype with the mode of inheritance being used in some systems as a secondary factor in allocating a case into a particular category. The benefits and shortcomings of these systems are reviewed. As we move into an era of establishing the molecular basis of AI we propose a robust mechanism for classification and cataloguing of the disorder which parallels systems used in medical genetics. This system is applicable to individuals and families irrespective of current or future knowledge of the molecular defect involved. We argue that this system is of more benefit to these individuals and families than previous classifications.

Limb anomalies: Developmental and evolutionary aspects

In this review we describe the developmental mechanisms involved in the making of a limb, by focusing on the nature and types of interactions of the molecules that play a part in the regulation of limb patterning and characterizing clinical conditions that are known to result from the abnormal function of these molecules. The latter subject is divided into sections dealing with syndromal and nonsyndromal deficiencies, polydactylies, and brachydactylies. Conditions caused by mutations in homeobox genes and fibroblast growth factors and their receptor genes are listed separately. Since the process of limb development has been conserved for more than 300 millions years, with all the necessary adaptive modifications occurring throughout evolution, we also take into consideration the evolutionary aspects of limb development in terms of genetic repertoire, molecular pathways, and morphogenetic events.

The molecular genetics of bone formation: implications for therapeutic interventions in bone disorders

Skeletal biology is a complex process involving the developmental commitment and differentiation of chondrocytes and osteoblasts which produce and mineralize cartilage and bone matrix during growth and postnatal life. Several genes are involved in controlling osteogenesis by acting on target cells in a very complex manner. Manipulation of genes in mice and studies of genetic mutations affecting the skeleton in humans have enabled the assessment of the role of transcription factors, bone matrix proteins and regulatory factors involved in the control of chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation, and have considerably improved our understanding of the bone formation process. Clinical studies and gene polymorphism analyses suggest that the variable expression of particular genes may be linked to clinical osteoporosis. A major challenge in the future will be to develop molecularly targeted approaches to stimulating bone formation and increasing bone mass. The use of mouse strain models and transgenic animals with variable bone density may be useful to identify genetic determinants of bone mass which may serve as a basis for drug discovery and development. On the other hand, the availability of gene microarrays and other emerging genomic techniques are promising tools to identify genes that are distinctly expressed in health and disease. These technologies may also serve to test the mechanisms of action of drugs aimed at increasing bone formation. Genetic studies of the molecular signaling pathways involved in normal and pathological osteogenesis may also help to identify genes that could be targeted for therapeutic intervention. Candidate approaches include selective gene transfection in target cells and the use of drugs acting on gene promoters to selectively enhance gene expression in osteoblasts. The development of these strategies is expected not only to bring new insight into the molecular mechanisms that govern bone formation in normal and pathological situations but, in the long term, may also result in the identification of novel molecular targets for therapeutic interventions for bone formation disorders.

Endocranial vascular patterns in a familial rabbit model of coronal suture synostosis

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigates the potential relationship between craniosynostosis and any changes in endocranial vasculature. The hypothesis that crania from rabbits with familial, nonsyndromic coronal suture synostosis and crania from rabbits with experimental immobilization of the coronal suture are associated with altered form of the middle meningeal vessels and dural venous sinuses is tested.

DESIGN

Silicone rubber endocasts from 14 adult New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with familial nonsyndromic coronal suture synostosis (five with bilateral coronal suture synostosis and nine with unilateral coronal suture synostosis) were made to assess middle meningeal vessel and dural venous sinus form. For comparative purposes, endocasts were made from 25 rabbits with normal, patent coronal sutures and 10 rabbits with experimental immobilization of the coronal suture. Impressions of the dural venous sinuses were assessed for depth and width. The area of the confluens of sinuses was also assessed. Impressions of the middle meningeal vessels were assessed for depth, width, and degree of convolution. For width of the dural venous sinuses and area of the confluens of sinuses, comparisons among groups were made with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). For depth of the dural venous sinuses and impressions of the middle meningeal vessels, comparisons among groups were made using a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Crania with familial coronal suture synostosis had significantly (p <.05) reduced posterior dural venous sinus dimensions when compared with both crania from rabbits with experimental immobilization of the coronal suture and rabbits with normal coronal sutures. Crania with both coronal suture synostosis and experimental immobilization had significant increases in dimensions of the middle meningeal vessels relative to normal crania. In addition, casts from rabbits with unicoronal suture synostosis showed marked asymmetry in the dural venous sinuses.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the hypothesis that craniosynostosis is associated with alterations in endocranial vasculature. These changes are most likely a secondary response to synostosis rather than a causal factor and may reflect increased intracranial pressure, decreased intracranial volume, and local accumulations and reductions of cerebrospinal fluid in the posterior region of the skull and immediately deep to the coronal suture.

A splicing switch and gain-of-function mutation in FgfR2-IIIc hemizygotes causes Apert/Pfeiffer-syndrome-like phenotypes

Intercellular signaling by fibroblast growth factors plays vital roles during embryogenesis. Mice deficient for fibroblast growth factor receptors (FgfRs) show abnormalities in early gastrulation and implantation, disruptions in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, as well as profound defects in membranous and endochondrial bone formation. Activating FGFR mutations are the underlying cause of several craniosynostoses and dwarfism syndromes in humans. Here we show that a heterozygotic abrogation of FgfR2-exon 9 (IIIc) in mice causes a splicing switch, resulting in a gain-of-function mutation. The consequences are neonatal growth retardation and death, coronal synostosis, ocular proptosis, precocious sternal fusion, and abnormalities in secondary branching in several organs that undergo branching morphogenesis. This phenotype has strong parallels to some Apert's and Pfeiffer's syndrome patients.

In vivo modulation of FGF biological activity alters cranial suture fate

Gain-of-function mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptors have been identified in numerous syndromes associated with premature cranial suture fusion. Murine models in which the posterior frontal suture undergoes programmed fusion after birth while all other sutures remain patent provide an ideal model to study the biomolecular mechanisms that govern cranial suture fusion. Using adenoviral vectors and targeted in utero injections in rats, we demonstrate that physiological posterior frontal suture fusion is inhibited using a dominant-negative fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 construct, whereas the normally patent coronal suture fuses when infected with a construct that increases basic fibroblast growth factor biological activity. Our data may facilitate the development of novel, less invasive treatment options for children with craniosynostosis.

Regional differentiation of cranial suture-associated dura mater in vivo and in vitro: implications for suture fusion and patency

Despite its prevalence, the etiopathogenesis of craniosynostosis is poorly understood. To better understand the biomolecular events that occur when normal craniofacial growth development goes awry, we must first investigate the mechanisms of normal suture fusion. Murine models in which the posterior frontal (PF) suture undergoes programmed sutural fusion shortly after birth provide an ideal model to study these mechanisms. In previous studies, our group and others have shown that sutural fate (i.e., fusion vs. patency) is regulated by the dura mater (DM) directly underlying a cranial suture. These studies have led to the hypothesis that calvarial DM is regionally differentiated and that this differentiation guides the development of the overlying suture. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of osteogenic cytokines (transforming growth factor beta1 [TGF-beta1] and TGF-beta3) and bone-associated extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules (collagen I, collagen III, osteocalcin, and alkaline phosphatase) in freshly isolated, rat dural tissues associated with the PF (programmed to fuse) or sagittal (SAG; remains patent) sutures before histological evidence of sutural fusion (postnatal day 6 [N6]). In addition, osteocalcin protein expression and cellular proliferation were localized using immunohistochemical staining and 5-bromo-2'deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, respectively. We showed that the expression of osteogenic cytokines and bone-associated ECM molecules is potently up-regulated in the DM associated with the PF suture. In addition, we showed that cellular proliferation in the DM associated with the fusing PF suture is significantly less than that found in the patent SAG suture just before the initiation of sutural fusion N6. Interestingly, no differences in cellular proliferation rates were noted in younger animals (embryonic day 18 [E18] and N2). To further analyze regional differentiation of cranial suture-associated dural cells, we established dural cell cultures from fusing and patent rat cranial sutures in N6 rats and evaluated the expression of osteogenic cytokines (TGF-beta1 and fibroblast growth factor 2 [FGF-2]) and collagen I. In addition, we analyzed cellular production of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). These studies confirmed our in vivo findings and showed that dural cell cultures derived from the fusing PF suture expressed significantly greater amounts of TGF-beta1, FGF-2, and collagen I. In addition, similar to our in vivo findings, we showed that PF suture-derived dural cells produced significantly less PCNA than SAG suture-derived dural cells. Finally, coculture of dural cells with fetal rat calvarial osteoblastic cells (FRCs) revealed a statistically significant increase in proliferation (*p < 0.001) in FRCs cocultured with SAG suture-derived dural cells as compared with FRCs cocultured alone or with PF suture-derived dural cells. Taken together, these data strongly support the hypothesis that the calvarial DM is regionally differentiated resulting in the up-regulation of osteogenic cytokines and bone ECM molecules in the dural tissues underlying fusing but not patent cranial sutures. Alterations in cytokine expression may govern osteoblastic differentiation and ECM molecule deposition, thus regulating sutural fate. Elucidation of the biomolecular events that occur before normal cranial suture fusion in the rat may increase our understanding of the events that lead to premature cranial suture fusion.

Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites

Intramembranous bone growth is achieved through bone formation within a periosteum or by bone formation at sutures. Sutures are formed during embryonic development at the sites of approximation of the membranous bones of the craniofacial skeleton. They serve as the major sites of bone expansion during postnatal craniofacial growth. For sutures to function as intramembranous bone growth sites, they need to remain in an unossified state, yet allow new bone to be formed at the edges of the overlapping bone fronts. This process relies on the production of sufficient new bone cells to be recruited into the bone fronts, while ensuring that the cells within the suture remain undifferentiated. Unlike endochondral growth plates, which expand through chondrocyte hypertrophy, sutures do not have intrinsic growth potential. Rather, they produce new bone at the sutural edges of the bone fronts in response to external stimuli, such as signals arising from the expanding neurocranium. This process allows growth of the cranial vault to be coordinated with growth of the neurocranium. Too little or delayed bone growth will result in wide-open fontanels and suture agenesis, whereas too much or accelerated bone growth will result in osseous obliteration of the sutures or craniosynostosis. Craniosynostosis in humans, suture fusion in animals, and induced suture obliteration in vitro has been associated with mutations or alterations in expression of several transcription factors, growth factors, and their receptors. Much of the data concerning signaling within sutures has been garnered from research on cranial sutures; hence, only the cranial sutures will be discussed in detail in this review. This review synthesizes classic descriptions of suture growth and pathology with modern molecular analysis of genetics and cell function in normal and abnormal suture morphogenesis and growth in a unifying hypothesis. At the same time, the reader is reminded of the importance of the suture as an intramembranous bone growth site.

Clinical findings in a patient with FGFR1 P252R mutation and comparison with the literature

We report on a patient with the skeletal findings of Jackson-Weiss syndrome, who manifests only mild craniofacial anomalies. Molecular analysis of her fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene (FGFR1) identified a heterozygous P252R missense mutation, previously only reported with FGFR1-Pfeiffer syndrome like manifestations. Mutations in the immunoglobulin-like, II-III (IgII-III) linker region of FGFR1 and FGFR3 molecules may present as a skeletal dysplasia affecting the appendicular skeleton including, brachydactyly, short broad middle phalanges, phalangeal epiphyseal coning and broad halluces. This communication is a further example of the phenomenon of an activated FGFR molecule resulting in overlapping manifestations in FGFR syndromes.

A new era of discovery in facial plastic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To review recent advances in our understanding of molecular biology and wound healing relevant to facial plastic surgery.

DATA SOURCES

Recent basic science literature relevant to molecular biology and wound healing and its clinical implications.

CONCLUSIONS

During the 21st century, we will experience a new biological and informational age that will have profound implications for facial plastic surgery. This modern era will be driven by discoveries in molecular biology and wound healing that will result in new diagnosis and treatment modalities.

Genomic organization, expression, and chromosome location of the human SNAIL gene (SNAI1) and a related processed pseudogene (SNAI1P)

Some of the zinc finger proteins of the snail family are essential in the formation of mesoderm during gastrulation and the development of neural crest and its derivatives. We have isolated the human SNAIL gene (HGMW-approved symbol SNAI1) and describe its genomic organization, having sequenced a region spanning more than 5882 bp. The human SNAIL gene contains three exons. The SNAIL transcript is 2. 0 kb and is found in placenta and adult heart, lung, brain, liver, and skeletal muscle. It codes for a protein of 264 amino acids and 29.1 kDa. This protein contains three classic zinc fingers and one atypical zinc finger. The human SNAIL protein is 87.5, 58.7, 50.9, 50.7, 55.4, and 31.5% identical to mouse Snail, chicken snail-like, zebrafish snail1, zebrafish snail2, Xenopus snail, and Drosophila snail proteins, respectively. The zinc finger region is 95.5% identical between human and mouse Snail. Because Drosophila snail and twist are important regulators during mesoderm development and because human TWIST mutations have been implicated in craniosynostosis, a cohort of 59 patients with craniosynostosis syndromes were screened for SNAIL mutations. None were found. By somatic cell and radiation hybrid mapping panels, SNAIL was localized to human chromosome 20q13.2, between markers D20S886 and D20S109. A SNAIL-related, putative processed pseudogene (HGMW-approved symbol SNAI1P) was also isolated and maps to human chromosome 2q33-q37.

Genetics of limb anomalies in humans

The limbs have an essential function in all vertebrates. In animals, the key genes that are involved in the growth and patterning of the limb buds, and of the development of the complex extremities, have been identified and their interactions recognized. Aided by these discoveries, human genetics has also been able to identify, or at least localize, certain genes responsible for anomalies of the limbs. These malformations are isolated or associated with anomalies of other developmental fields, according to the expression domain of the gene involved. Increasing knowledge of the embryology and genes involved has lead to a regrouping of malformation manifestations in genetics terms. Clear genotype-phenotype correlations are difficult to establish owing to the interlinking network of genetic signals underlying limb development.

Ocular anterior chamber dysgenesis in craniosynostosis syndromes with a fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 mutation

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) mutations have been found in craniosynostosis syndromes with and without limb and/or dermatologic anomalies. Ocular manifestations of FGFR2 syndromes are reported to include shallow orbits, proptosis, strabismus, and hypertelorism, but no ocular anterior chamber, structural abnormalities have been reported until now. We evaluated three unrelated patients with severe Crouzon or Pfeiffer syndrome. Two of them had ocular findings consistent with Peters anomaly, and the third patient had opaque corneae, thickened irides and ciliary bodies, and shallow anterior chambers with occluded angles. Craniosynostosis with and without cloverleaf skull deformity, large anterior fontanelle, hydrocephalus, proptosis, depressed nasal bridge, choanal stenosis/ atresia, midface hypoplasia, and elbow contractures were also present. These patients had airway compromise, seizures, and two died by age 15 months. All three cases were found to have the same FGFR2 Ser351Cys (1231C to G) mutation predicted to form an aberrant disulfide bond(s) and affect ligand binding. Seven patients with isolated Peters anomaly, two patients with Peters plus syndrome, and three cases with typical Antley-Bixler syndrome were screened for this mutation, but none was found. These phenotype/genotype data demonstrate that FGFR2 is involved in the development of the anterior chamber of the eye and that the Ser351Cys mutation is associated with a severe phenotype and clinical course.

Progress toward understanding craniofacial malformations

Significant advances in the study of the human face have revealed the genetic and gene-environment bases of numerous common and rare craniofacial disorders. Classification of craniofacial malformations based on clinical phenotypes is sometimes quite different from the genetic findings of patients. Different mutations in a single gene can cause distinct syndromes, and mutations in different genes can cause the same syndrome. The extracellular signaling molecule SHH, fibroblast growth factor receptors, and transcription factors GLI3, MSX2, and TWIST are discussed as examples of molecules involved in interrelated signal transduction networks regulating craniofacial development. Progress in the understanding of normal and abnormal craniofacial development, through the study of morphoregulatory signaling pathways, has benefited from multifactorial approaches recommended 40 years ago at the National Institute of Dental Research-sponsored landmark Gatlinburg Conference. The utilization of biochemistry, protein structure analyses, tissue culture, and animal model systems for developmental genetics has resulted in remarkable scientific advances. The evolutionary conservation of morphoregulatory pathways has revealed the homology of genes associated with human craniofacial malformations and their counterparts that regulate the morphogenesis of fruit flies. The continued investments in basic, translational, and patient-oriented research regarding normal and abnormal craniofacial development will translate into substantial improvements in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of craniofacial diseases and disorders.