1
|
Levine R, Kahn RM, Perez L, Brewer J, Ratner S, Li X, Yeoshoua E, Frey MK. Cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: a review of barriers and breakthroughs. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:111-120. [PMID: 38530571 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00373-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Germline genetic sequencing is now at the forefront of cancer treatment and preventative medicine. Cascade genetic testing, or the testing of at-risk relatives, is extremely promising as it offers genetic testing and potentially life-saving risk-reduction strategies to a population exponentially enriched for the risk of carrying a cancer-associated pathogenic variant. However, many relatives do not complete cascade testing due to barriers that span individual, relationship, healthcare community, and societal/policy domains. We have reviewed the published research on cascade testing. Our aim is to evaluate barriers to cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes and explore strategies to mitigate these barriers, with the goal of promoting increased uptake of cascade genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Levine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HCA Florida Brandon, Brandon, FL, USA.
| | - Ryan M Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luiza Perez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse Brewer
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Ratner
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xuan Li
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Effi Yeoshoua
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa K Frey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Genetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lindberg LJ, Wadt KAW, Therkildsen C, Petersen HV. National Experiences from 30 Years of Provider-Mediated Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome Families-The Danish Model. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1577. [PMID: 38672659 PMCID: PMC11048852 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cascade genetic testing and surveillance reduce morbidity and mortality in Lynch syndrome. However, barriers to conveying information about genetic disorders within families result in low uptake of genetic testing. Provider-mediated interventions may increase uptake but raise legal and ethical concerns. We describe 30 years of national experience with cascade genetic testing combining family- and provider-mediated contact in Lynch syndrome families in the Danish Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) Register. We aimed to estimate the added value of information letters to family members in Lynch syndrome families (provider-mediated contact) compared to family members not receiving such letters and thus relying on family-mediated contact. National clinical practice for cascade genetic testing, encompassing infrastructure, legislation, acceptance, and management of the information letters, is also discussed. Cascade genetic testing resulted in 7.3 additional tests per family. Uptake of genetic testing was 54.4% after family-mediated and 64.9% after provider-mediated contact, corresponding to an odds ratio of 1.8 (p < 0.001). The uptake of genetic testing was highest in the first year after diagnosis of Lynch syndrome in the family, with 72.5% tested after provider-mediated contact. In conclusion, the Danish model combining family- and provider-mediated contact can increase the effect of cascade genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Joachim Lindberg
- The Danish HNPCC Register, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, DK2650 Hvidovre, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark;
| | - Karin A. W. Wadt
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, DK2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Christina Therkildsen
- The Danish HNPCC Register, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, DK2650 Hvidovre, Denmark;
| | - Helle Vendel Petersen
- Medical Department, Zealand University Hospital, DK4800 Nykøbing Falster, Denmark;
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Frey MK, Ahsan MD, Bergeron H, Lin J, Li X, Fowlkes RK, Narayan P, Nitecki R, Rauh-Hain JA, Moss HA, Baltich Nelson B, Thomas C, Christos PJ, Hamilton JG, Chapman-Davis E, Cantillo E, Holcomb K, Kurian AW, Lipkin S, Offit K, Sharaf RN. Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:4129-4143. [PMID: 35960887 PMCID: PMC9746789 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence-based guidelines recommend cascade genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer syndromes, providing relatives the opportunity for early detection and prevention of cancer. The current standard is for patients to contact and encourage relatives (patient-mediated contact) to undergo counseling and testing. Direct relative contact by the medical team or testing laboratory has shown promise but is complicated by privacy laws and lack of infrastructure. We sought to compare outcomes associated with patient-mediated and direct relative contact for hereditary cancer cascade genetic counseling and testing in the first meta-analysis on this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO No.: CRD42020134276). We searched key electronic databases to identify studies evaluating hereditary cancer cascade testing. Eligible trials were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS Eighty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Among relatives included in the meta-analysis, 48% (95% CI, 38 to 58) underwent cascade genetic counseling and 41% (95% CI, 34 to 48) cascade genetic testing. Compared with the patient-mediated approach, direct relative contact resulted in significantly higher uptake of genetic counseling for all relatives (63% [95% CI, 49 to 75] v 35% [95% CI, 24 to 48]) and genetic testing for first-degree relatives (62% [95% CI, 49 to 73] v 40% [95% CI, 32 to 48]). Methods of direct contact included telephone calls, letters, and e-mails; respective rates of genetic testing completion were 61% (95% CI, 51 to 70), 48% (95% CI, 37 to 59), and 48% (95% CI, 45 to 50). CONCLUSION Most relatives at risk for hereditary cancer do not undergo cascade genetic counseling and testing, forgoing potentially life-saving medical interventions. Compared with patient-mediated contact, direct relative contact increased rates of cascade genetic counseling and testing, arguing for a shift in the care delivery paradigm, to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jenny Lin
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Xuan Li
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kenneth Offit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ekwueme DU, Halpern MT, Chesson HW, Ashok M, Drope J, Hong YR, Maciosek M, Pesko MF, Kenkel DS. Health Economics Research in Primary Prevention of Cancer: Assessment, Current Challenges, and Future Directions. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2022; 2022:28-41. [PMID: 35788376 PMCID: PMC9609253 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past 2 decades, the demand for information on health economics research to guide health care decision making has substantially increased. Studies have provided evidence that eliminating or reducing tobacco use; eating a healthy diet, including fruit and vegetables; being physically active; reducing alcohol consumption; avoiding ultraviolet radiation; and minimizing exposure to environmental and occupational carcinogenic agents should substantially reduce cancer incidence in the population. The benefits of these primary prevention measures in reducing cancer incidence are not instantaneous. Therefore, health economics research has an important role to play in providing credible information to decision makers on the health and economic benefits of primary prevention. This article provides an overview of health economics research related to primary prevention of cancer. We addressed the following questions: 1) What are the gaps and unmet needs for performing health economics research focused on primary prevention of cancer? 2) What are the challenges and opportunities to conducting health economics research to evaluate primary prevention of cancer? and 3) What are the future directions for enhancing health economics research on primary prevention of cancer? Modeling primary prevention of cancer is often difficult given data limitations, long delays before the policy or intervention is effective, possible unintended effects of the policy or intervention, and the necessity of outside expertise to understand key inputs or outputs to the modeling. Despite these challenges, health economics research has an important role to play in providing credible information to decision makers on the health and economic benefits of primary prevention of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatus U Ekwueme
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michael T Halpern
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Harrell W Chesson
- Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mahima Ashok
- Health Transformation & Network Management, Blue Shield of California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Drope
- Health Policy and Administration Division of the School of Public Health at University of Illinois, Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Department of Health Service Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Michael F Pesko
- Department of Economics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Donald S Kenkel
- Department of Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Whitaker KD, Obeid E, Daly MB, Hall MJ. Cascade Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer Risk: An Underutilized Tool for Cancer Prevention. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 5:1387-1396. [PMID: 34994636 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen D Whitaker
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center. Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elias Obeid
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center. Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center. Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael J Hall
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center. Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beard VK, Bedard AC, Nuk J, Lee PWC, Hong Q, Bedard JEJ, Sun S, Schrader KA. Genetic testing in families with hereditary colorectal cancer in British Columbia and Yukon: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. CMAJ Open 2020; 8:E637-E642. [PMID: 33077534 PMCID: PMC7588261 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer enables identification of people most likely to benefit from intensive screening and preventive measures; however, the uptake of testing in relatives (known as cascade carrier testing) for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes has been shown to be low. Our objective was to report rates of familial testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes in a publicly funded hereditary cancer clinic in Canada. METHODS A cross-sectional retrospective database review was used to determine testing uptake between 1997 and 2016 for families served by the provincial Hereditary Cancer Program for British Columbia and Yukon. Analyses were conducted for genes associated with syndromes with an increased risk for colorectal cancer, including Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM) and familial adenomatous polyposis (APC), and for additional moderate- to high-penetrance genes (STK11, TP53, SMAD4, MUTYH, PTEN and CHEK2). Descriptive statistics were used and all analyses were 2-tailed. RESULTS The study cohort included 245 index patients, with carrier testing performed in 382 relatives. The mean age at family member testing was 41.2 years, and most (61.0%) of the family members who underwent testing were women. The median time between disclosure of index cases and their family member's results was 8.3 months. Among eligible first-degree relatives, 32.6% (268/821) underwent testing in BC. Of 67 cancer diagnoses in family members, most (62.7%) occurred before genetic testing. INTERPRETATION A substantial proportion of people at risk for hereditary colorectal cancer do not undergo genetic testing. This gap highlights the need to explore barriers to testing and to consider interventions to promote uptake; more aggressive efforts by hereditary cancer programs are needed to reach this highest risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivienne K Beard
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Angela C Bedard
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jennifer Nuk
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Petra W C Lee
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Quan Hong
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - James E J Bedard
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sophie Sun
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hadley DW, Eliezer D, Addissie Y, Goergen A, Ashida S, Koehly L. Uptake and predictors of colonoscopy use in family members not participating in cascade genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. Sci Rep 2020; 10:15959. [PMID: 32994442 PMCID: PMC7525436 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72938-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Cascade genetic testing provides a method to appropriately focus colonoscopy use in families with Lynch syndrome (LS). However, research suggests that up to two-thirds at risk to inherit LS don’t participate. Within the United States, no studies have assessed colonoscopy use within this elusive and high-risk subset. We set forth to (1) document colonoscopy use within those not undergoing genetic testing (NGT) and (2) identify factors associated with completing colonoscopy. Data came from a cross sectional survey of families with molecularly confirmed LS. One hundred seventy-six (176) adults participated; 47 of unknown variant status and 129 with variant status known (59 carriers/70 non-carriers). Despite a high level of awareness of LS (85%) and identical recommendations for colonoscopy, NGT reported significantly lower use of colonoscopy than carriers (47% vs. 73%; p = 0.003). Our results show that perceived risk to develop colon cancer (AOR = 1.99, p < 0.05) and physician recommendations (AOR = 7.64, p < 0.01) are significant predictors of colonoscopy use across all family members controlling for carrier status. Given these findings, health care providers, should assess patients’ perceived risk to develop cancer, assist them in adjusting risk perceptions and discuss recommendations for colonoscopy with all members in families with LS. Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00004210.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald W Hadley
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 35 Convent Drive, MSC 3717, Bldg. 35, Room 1B205, Bethesda, MD, 20892-3717, USA.
| | - Dina Eliezer
- Social Networks Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Yonit Addissie
- Social Networks Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrea Goergen
- Social Networks Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sato Ashida
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Laura Koehly
- Social Networks Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pastorino R, Basile M, Tognetto A, Di Marco M, Grossi A, Lucci-Cordisco E, Scaldaferri F, De Censi A, Federici A, Villari P, Genuardi M, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235038. [PMID: 32609729 PMCID: PMC7329085 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed CRC to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in relatives. Economic evaluations in support of such approach, however, are not available in Italy. We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Three testing strategies: the sequencing of all MMR genes without prior tumor analysis (Strategy 1), a sequential IHC and MS-MLPA analysis (Strategy 2), and an age-targeted strategy with a revised Bethesda criteria assessment before IHC and methylation-specific MLPA for patients ≥ than 70 years old (Strategy 3) were analyzed and compared to the “no testing” strategy. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in relatives after colonoscopy, aspirin prophylaxis and an intensive gynecological surveillance were estimated through a Markov model. Assuming a CRC incidence rate of 0.09% and a share of patients affected by LS equal to 2.81%, the number of detected pathogenic variants among CRC cases ranges, in a given year, between 910 and 1167 depending on the testing strategy employed. The testing strategies investigated, provided one-time to the entire eligible population (CRC patients), were associated with an overall cost ranging between €1,753,059.93-€10,388,000.00. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the Markov model ranged from €941.24 /QALY to €1,681.93 /QALY, thus supporting that “universal testing” versus “no testing” is cost-effective, but not necessarily in comparison with age-targeted strategies. This is the first economic evaluation on different testing strategies for LS in Italy. The results might support the introduction of cost-effective recommendations for LS screening in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Pastorino
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health-Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Michele Basile
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Alta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari (ALTEMS), Roma, Italia
| | - Alessia Tognetto
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Marco Di Marco
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Adriano Grossi
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Emanuela Lucci-Cordisco
- Department of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, Medical Genetics Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e di Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Medicina Genomica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Scaldaferri
- UOC Medicina Interna, Gastroenterologia e Malattie del Fegato, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Genuardi
- Department of Laboratory and Infectious Sciences, Medical Genetics Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e di Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Medicina Genomica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Walter Ricciardi
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health-Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia.,Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health-Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia.,Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van den Heuvel LM, Hoedemaekers YM, Baas AF, van Tintelen JP, Smets EMA, Christiaans I. A tailored approach towards informing relatives at risk of inherited cardiac conditions: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025660. [PMID: 31289060 PMCID: PMC6615798 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In current practice, probands are asked to inform relatives about the possibility of predictive DNA testing when a pathogenic variant causing an inherited cardiac condition (ICC) is identified. Previous research on the uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing in relatives suggests that not all relatives are sufficiently informed. We developed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored approach in which probands decide together with the genetic counsellor which relatives they inform themselves and which relatives they prefer to have informed by the genetic counsellor. Here, we present the study protocol of this randomised controlled trial. METHODS A multicentre randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design will be conducted in which an intervention group receiving the tailored approach will be compared with a control group receiving usual care. Adult probands diagnosed with an ICC in whom a likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant is identified will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (total sample: n=85 probands). Primary outcomes are uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing by relatives (total sample: n=340 relatives). Secondary outcomes are appreciation of the approach used and impact on familial and psychological functioning, which will be assessed using questionnaires. Relatives who attend genetic counselling will be asked to fill out a questionnaire as well. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centres (MEC 2017-145), the Netherlands. All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation in the study. Results of the study on primary and secondary outcome measures will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR6657; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke M van den Heuvel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne M Hoedemaekers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annette F Baas
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Peter van Tintelen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Imke Christiaans
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heuvel L, Smets E, Tintelen J, Christiaans I. How to inform relatives at risk of hereditary diseases? A mixed‐methods systematic review on patient attitudes. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1042-1058. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L.M. Heuvel
- Department of Clinical Genetics Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - E.M.A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - J.P. Tintelen
- Department of Genetics University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - I. Christiaans
- Department of Clinical Genetics Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Menko FH, Ter Stege JA, van der Kolk LE, Jeanson KN, Schats W, Moha DA, Bleiker EMA. The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice. Fam Cancer 2019; 18:127-135. [PMID: 29846880 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-018-0089-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Following the identification in a proband of a germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) or a DNA mismatch repair gene mutation in Lynch syndrome (LS) he or she will be asked to inform at-risk family members about the option for presymptomatic DNA testing. However, in clinical practice multiple factors may complicate the process of information sharing. We critically evaluated studies on the uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in both syndromes. A search of relevant MeSH terms and key words in PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO yielded 795 articles published between 2001 and 2017. Thirty of these publications included outcome measures relevant for the current study. Based on information provided by the proband (15 studies) the uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing ranged from 15 to 57% in HBOC, while one study in LS kindreds reported an uptake of 70%. Based on information provided by genetics centres (the remaining 15 studies) the uptake ranged from 21 to 44% in HBOC and from 41 to 94% in LS. However, when genetics centres contacted relatives directly a substantial number of additional family members could be tested. Proband-mediated provision of information to at-risk relatives is a standard procedure in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome. However, the resulting uptake of presymptomatic testing is disappointing-an issue that is now urgent due to the increased use of genetic testing in clinical oncology. We propose that additional strategies should be introduced including the geneticist directly contacting relatives. The outcomes of these strategies should be carefully monitored and evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred H Menko
- Family Cancer Clinic, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jacqueline A Ter Stege
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lizet E van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kiki N Jeanson
- Family Cancer Clinic, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Winnie Schats
- Department of Scientific Information Service, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daoud Ait Moha
- Family Cancer Clinic, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Eijzenga W, de Geus E, Aalfs CM, Menko FH, Sijmons RH, de Haes HCJM, Smets EMA. How to support cancer genetics counselees in informing at-risk relatives? Lessons from a randomized controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:1611-1619. [PMID: 29789176 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In hereditary and familial cancer, counselees are requested to inform their at-risk relatives. We developed an intervention to support counselees in this task. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted aimed at improving cancer genetic counselees' i) knowledge, ii) motivation to disclose information, and ii) self-efficacy in this regard. Eligible participants were randomized to telephonic counseling (n = 148), or standard care (n = 157) and assessed at baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 4 months after study enrolment. RESULTS No between-group differences were found in participants' knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy. Knowledge concerning which second-degree relatives to inform was lower compared to first-degree relatives. About 60% of the participants was of the opinion that they needed to inform more relatives than stated in their summary letter and only about 50% were correctly aware of which information to disclose. Of note, at baseline, almost 80% of the participants had already correctly informed their at-risk relatives. CONCLUSIONS Since, unexpectedly, counselees already informed most of their relatives before the intervention was offered, efficacy of the intervention could not convincingly be determined. Counselees' knowledge about whom to inform about what is suboptimal. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Future interventions should target a more homogeneous sample and address counselees' understanding and recall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem Eijzenga
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline de Geus
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fred H Menko
- Cancer Family Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rolf H Sijmons
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Medical Centre Groningen, University Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke C J M de Haes
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Seppälä TT, Pylvänäinen K, Mecklin JP. Uptake of genetic testing by the children of Lynch syndrome variant carriers across three generations. Eur J Hum Genet 2017; 25:1237-1245. [PMID: 28832568 PMCID: PMC5643966 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Many Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers remain unidentified, thus missing early cancer detection and prevention opportunities. Tested probands should inform their relatives about cancer risk and options for genetic counselling and predictive gene testing, but many fail to undergo testing. To assess predictive testing uptake and demographic factors influencing this decision in LS families, a cross-sectional registry-based cohort study utilizing the Finnish Lynch syndrome registry was undertaken. Tested LS variant probands (1184) had 2068 children divided among three generations: 660 parents and 1324 children (first), 445 and 667 (second), and 79 and 77 (third). Of children aged >18 years, 801 (67.4%), 146 (43.2%), and 5 (23.8%), respectively, were genetically tested. Together, 539 first-generation LS variant carriers had 2068 children and grandchildren (3.84 per carrier). Of the 1548 (2.87 per carrier) eligible children, 952 (61.5%) were tested (1.77 per carrier). In multivariate models, age (OR 1.08 per year; 95% CI 1.06-1.10), family gene (OR 2.83; 1.75-4.57 for MLH1 and 2.59; 1.47-4.56 for MSH2 compared with MSH6), one or more tested siblings (OR 6.60; 4.82-9.03), no siblings (OR 4.63; 2.64-8.10), and parent under endoscopic surveillance (OR 5.22; 2.41-11.31) were independent predictors of having genetic testing. Examples of parental adherence to regular surveillance and genetically tested siblings strongly influenced children at 50% risk of LS to undergo predictive gene testing. High numbers of untested, adult at-risk individuals exist even among well-established cohorts of known LS families with good adherence to endoscopic surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni T Seppälä
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kirsi Pylvänäinen
- Department of Education and Science, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
- Department of Education and Science, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Department of Surgery, University of Eastern Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li CG, Jin P, Yang L, Zang WC, Kang Q, Li N, He Y, Xu J, Zhang C, Wang X, Sheng JQ. Germline mutations in patients with multiple colorectal polyps in China. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32:1723-1729. [PMID: 28251689 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2016] [Revised: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Multiple colorectal polyps are relevant in hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndromes, which are thought to be caused by multiple events including germline mutations. This study was aimed to characterize germline mutations in Chinese patients with multiple colorectal polyps. METHODS Patients with > 10 colorectal polyps at the Department of Gastroenterology of the PLA Army General Hospital were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2015. These patients were divided into the high-risk, moderate-risk, and mild-risk groups. White blood cell samples were collected, and DNA was extracted to sequence a panel of 19 genes previously associated with CRC by next-generation sequencing. RESULTS A total of 96 patients were enrolled in the study. Pathogenic germline mutations were found in 24 (24/33, 72.73%), nine (9/24, 37.5%), and three patients (3/39, 7.7%) in the high-risk, moderate-risk, and mild-risk groups, respectively. Based on the results given, we suggested a strategy about gene sequencing test for the patients with multiple polyps, and the sensitivity and specificity of the screening strategy were 97% and 57%, respectively. Four of eight patients with MUTYH pathogenic germline mutations had the c.A934-2G monoallelic germline mutation, whereas three of eight patients had the C55T MUTYH germline mutation. Concurrent pathogenic germline mutations in APC and MUTYH were also observed. CONCLUSIONS A genetic screening strategy comprising 19 genes was effective to screen for hereditary CRC syndromes in patients with multiple colorectal polyps. The MUTYH germline mutation hotspots in Chinese patients may be different from those in Caucasian patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Guang Li
- The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lang Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wan-Chun Zang
- Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Kang
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Na Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuqi He
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junfeng Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Qiu Sheng
- Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wilson RD, Langlois S. Facteurs génétiques à prendre en considération dans le cadre de l'examen gynécologique annuel. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2017; 38:S22-S33. [PMID: 28063537 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIF Offrir aux médecins un survol des troubles génétiques courants qui devraient être pris en considération dans le cadre de l'examen gynécologique annuel d'une patiente, et ce, afin de déterminer le risque que court celle-ci ou d'en venir à procéder à des examens particuliers ou à orienter la patiente vers un autre service de sous-spécialité, en fonction de ses antécédents personnels ou familiaux. OPTIONS Ces renseignements d'ordre génétique peuvent être utilisés aux fins de la sensibilisation des patientes et du dépistage ou du diagnostic de possibles maladies et/ou mutations. ISSUES L'utilisation de ces renseignements d'ordre génétique pourrait mener à l'amélioration de l'évaluation des risques et des avantages et à celle de la prise en charge dans le cadre de l'examen gynécologique annuel. RéSULTATS: Les études publiées en anglais, jusques et y compris en mai 2010, ont été récupérées par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans PubMed et la Cochrane Library au moyen d'un vocabulaire contrôlé (« gynaecological diagnosis », « genetic inheritance ») et de mots clés (« genetic risk », « genetic mutation », « inheritance », « family history », « uterus », « ovary », « endometrial », « vagina », « colon », « gastric », « renal », « breast », « cardiac », « thrombophilia », « diabetes », « epilepsy », « leiomyomata uteri ») appropriés. D'autres sources ont été identifiées par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans les sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, dans des registres d'essais cliniques et auprès de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. VALEURS Le niveau des résultats ne permet pas la formulation de recommandations factuelles. AVANTAGES, DéSAVANTAGES ET COûTS: La présente opinion de comité améliorera l'utilisation de nouvelles connaissances génétiques et leur application aux soins gynécologiques offerts annuellement aux femmes. Les occasions de gestion du risque et de diagnostic, pour ce qui est des troubles gynécologiques génétiques, s'en trouveront améliorées. Une compréhension plus exhaustive des troubles génétiques pourrait entraîner une hausse de l'anxiété et du stress psychologique chez les femmes et les membres de leur famille. COMMANDITAIRE Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. RECOMMANDATIONS Le niveau des résultats ne permet pas la formulation de recommandations factuelles.
Collapse
|
16
|
Recognition of Lynch Syndrome Amongst Newly Diagnosed Colorectal Cancers at St. Paul's Hospital. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2017:9625638. [PMID: 28752083 PMCID: PMC5511674 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9625638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch Syndrome (LS) is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC). In British Columbia, most centres still use clinical criteria (Amsterdam II, Revised Bethesda, or the BC Cancer Agency's criteria) to determine who should undergo further first-line testing in the form of microsatellite instability or immunohistochemistry staining. Given the limitations with this strategy, LS is thought to be underrecognized. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether LS is truly underrecognized when compared to the reported prevalence. METHODS A retrospective chart review of all CRC cases diagnosed at St. Paul's Hospital from 2010 to 2013 was conducted. RESULTS 246 patients met inclusion criteria. 76% (83/109) with a family history of malignancy were unable to recall the specific malignancy or age of diagnosis. 18% (43/235) were only asked about a history of gastrointestinal related malignancy and 26% (65/246) met at least one of the three criteria but only 21% (13/63) received further investigation. Only 1.6% (4/246) had LS compared to the reported prevalence of 2-5% of all CRC cases. CONCLUSION This data supports our hypothesis that LS is underrecognized. Issues at the patient, physician, and systems level need to be evaluated to determine where the limitations preventing appropriate testing are occurring.
Collapse
|
17
|
Yang J, Liu QW, Li LW, Wang QZ, Hong M, Dong J. Familial adenomatous polyposis in China. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:4877-4882. [PMID: 28105195 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disease with a poor prognosis, and has been studied by clinicians and geneticists in China for the past three decades. It is estimated that FAP has an incidence of between 1 in 8,000 and 1 in 10,000 individuals, and accounts for 0.94% of colorectal cancer cases in China. Recent advances in the understanding of FAP suggest that the genotype of the patient may allow for early diagnosis and surveillance, and guide surgical and chemopreventive management. However, the genetic mechanisms of FAP vary between different countries. FAP in China has its own characteristics, and this may be due to ethnic and geographical genetic variation. In the present review the clinical manifestations and genetics of FAP in China are discussed, as well as the surgical strategies, chemotherapeutics and traditional Chinese medicines used in its treatment. Increased insight into the genetic and clinical features of FAP in the Chinese population may aid in the prevention and management of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Yang
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650032, P.R. China
| | - Qing Wei Liu
- Department of Internal Medicine-Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650032, P.R. China
| | - Liang Wen Li
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650032, P.R. China
| | - Qiang Zhi Wang
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650032, P.R. China
| | - Min Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine-Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650032, P.R. China
| | - Jian Dong
- Department of Internal Medicine-Oncology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650106, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Leenen CHM, Heijer MD, van der Meer C, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME, Wagner A. Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: family communication and motivation. Fam Cancer 2016; 15:63-73. [PMID: 26446592 PMCID: PMC4698279 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9842-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Current genetic counselling practice for Lynch syndrome (LS) relies on diagnosed index patients to inform their biological family about LS, referred to as the family-mediated approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate this approach and to identify factors influencing the uptake of genetic testing for LS. In 59 mutation carriers, 70 non carriers and 16 non-tested relatives socio-demographic characteristics, family communication regarding LS, experiences and attitudes towards the family-mediated approach and motivations for genetic testing, were assessed. The majority of all respondents (73 %) were satisfied with the family-mediated approach. Nevertheless, 59 % of the respondents experienced informing a family member and 57 % being informed by a family member as burdensome. Non-tested differed from tested respondents, in that they were younger, less closely related to the index patient and a lower proportion had children. The most important reasons for declining genetic testing were (1) anticipating problems with life insurance and mortgage, (2) being content with life as it is, and (3) not experiencing any physical complaints. In conclusion, the majority of respondents consider the current family-mediated information procedure acceptable, although the provision of information on LS by relatives may be burdensome. Special attention should be paid to communication of LS to more distant relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine H M Leenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mariska den Heijer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Conny van der Meer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cruz-Mariño T, Vázquez-Mojena Y, Velázquez-Pérez L, González-Zaldívar Y, Aguilera-Rodríguez R, Velázquez-Santos M, Estupiñán-Rodríguez A, Laffita-Mesa JM, Almaguer-Mederos LE, Paneque M. SCA2 predictive testing in Cuba: challenging concepts and protocol evolution. J Community Genet 2015; 6:265-73. [PMID: 25893506 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-015-0226-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the ATXN2 gene. Cuba has the highest prevalence (6.57 cases/10(5) inhabitants) of SCA2 in the world. The existence of 753 affected individuals and 7173 relatives at risk prompted the development in 2001 of the first predictive testing program in the country. The medical records of over 1193 individuals, who requested the test within a 13-year period, were analyzed retrospectively. The presymptomatic and the prenatal tests had uptake rates of 43.4 and 23.9 %, respectively. Several ethical challenges resulted from this program. These include the following: (1) withdrawal due to the initial protocol's length; (2) the request to participate by 16 at-risk adolescents; (3) the decision made by ten out of 33 couples with a test-positive fetus to carry the pregnancy to term, leading to de facto predictive testing of minors; (4) the elevated frequency of the ATXN2 gene large normal alleles (≥23 to 31 repeats) in the reference population. These issues have led to major changes in the guidelines of the predictive testing protocol: (1) the protocol length was shortened; (2) the inclusion criteria were expanded to reach at-risk adolescents with an interest in prenatal diagnosis; (3) interdisciplinary follow-up was offered to families in which test-positive fetuses were not aborted; (4) prenatal testing was made available to carriers of large normal alleles with ≥27 CAG repeats. The profiles of the participants were similar to those reported for other predictive testing programs for conditions like Huntington disease and familial adenomatous polyposis. The genetic counseling practices at the community level, the ample health education provided to the at-risk population, together with multidisciplinary and specialized attention to the affected families, are lessons from the Cuban experience that can be relevant for other international teams conducting predictive testing for other late-onset neurodegenerative disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Cruz-Mariño
- Predictive Genetics Department, Center for the Research and Rehabilitation of Hereditary Ataxias, Holguín, Cuba,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Severin F, Stollenwerk B, Holinski-Feder E, Meyer E, Heinemann V, Giessen-Jung C, Rogowski W. Economic evaluation of genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in Germany. Genet Med 2015; 17:765-73. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
21
|
Kastrinos F, Stoffel EM. History, genetics, and strategies for cancer prevention in Lynch syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:715-27; quiz e41-3. [PMID: 23891921 PMCID: PMC3995833 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2013] [Revised: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 06/24/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal malignancy and the third cause of cancer death in men and women in the United States. The majority of CRC cases diagnosed annually are due to sporadic events, but up to 6% are attributed to known monogenic disorders that confer a markedly increased risk for the development of CRC and multiple extracolonic malignancies. Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited CRC syndrome and is associated with mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, mainly MLH1 and MSH2 but also MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM. Although the risk of CRC and endometrial cancer may approach near 75% and 50%, respectively, in gene mutation carriers, the identification of these individuals and at-risk family members through predictive genetic testing provides opportunities for cancer prevention including specialized cancer screening, intensified surveillance, and/or prophylactic surgeries. This article will provide a review of the major advances in risk assessment, molecular genetics, DNA mutational analyses, and cancer prevention and management made since Lynch syndrome was first described 100 years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fay Kastrinos
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Menko FH, Aalfs CM, Henneman L, Stol Y, Wijdenes M, Otten E, Ploegmakers MMJ, Legemaate J, Smets EMA, de Wert GMWR, Tibben A. Informing family members of individuals with Lynch syndrome: a guideline for clinical geneticists. Fam Cancer 2014; 12:319-24. [PMID: 23535968 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9636-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The diagnosis of Lynch syndrome can lead to the prevention of colorectal cancer through periodic colonoscopies and removal of premalignant lesions in susceptible individuals. Therefore, predisposed individuals identified by mutation analysis are advised to inform their at-risk relatives about the options of predictive DNA testing and preventive measures. However, it has now been established that more than half of these relatives do not receive the necessary information. Barriers in conveying information include family communication problems and variable attitudes and practice among clinical geneticists. In this complex field, both medical, psychological, ethical and juridical aspects deserve consideration. Here we summarize the development of a revised guideline for clinical geneticists that allows a more active role of the geneticist, aimed at improving procedures to inform family members in Lynch syndrome and other hereditary and familial cancer syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred H Menko
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Clayton EW, McCullough LB, Biesecker LG, Joffe S, Ross LF, Wolf SM. Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2014; 14:3-9. [PMID: 24592828 PMCID: PMC3950962 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.879945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) recently provided two recommendations about predictive genetic testing of children. The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium's Pediatrics Working Group compared these recommendations, focusing on operational and ethical issues specific to decision making for children. Content analysis of the statements addresses two issues: (1) how these recommendations characterize and analyze locus of decision making, as well as the risks and benefits of testing, and (2) whether the guidelines conflict or come to different but compatible conclusions because they consider different testing scenarios. These statements differ in ethically significant ways. AAP/ACMG analyzes risks and benefits using best interests of the child and recommends that, absent ameliorative interventions available during childhood, clinicians should generally decline to order testing. Parents authorize focused tests. ACMG analyzes risks and benefits using the interests of the child and other family members and recommends that sequencing results be examined for additional variants that can lead to ameliorative interventions, regardless of age, which laboratories should report to clinicians who should contextualize the results. Parents must accept additional analysis. The ethical arguments in these statements appear to be in tension with each other.
Collapse
|
24
|
Sharaf RN, Myer P, Stave CD, Diamond LC, Ladabaum U. Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11:1093-100. [PMID: 23669308 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2012] [Revised: 03/15/2013] [Accepted: 04/07/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Screening of persons with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome can yield substantial benefits at acceptable costs, presuming sufficient uptake of genetic testing by first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the frequency of and factors associated with genetic testing of first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. METHODS We searched 4 databases (CINAHL, PsycInfo, PUBMED, and SCOPUS) for articles published through May 2011 reporting uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. Two investigators independently screened articles to determine whether they met inclusion criteria; data were collected on study population, genetic counseling, and genetic testing. A narrative, qualitative systematic review was performed. RESULTS We identified 1258 potentially relevant articles; 533 underwent full-text review, and 8 were included in the final analysis. Of first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands, 52% or less received genetic testing. For each proband, 3.6 or fewer relatives underwent genetic testing. Demographic factors (age <50 years, female sex, parenthood, level of education, employment, participation in medical studies), psychological factors (lack of depressive symptoms), and possibly family history (greater number of relatives with cancer) were associated with uptake of genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS Genetic testing appears to be underutilized by first-degree relatives of patients with Lynch syndrome. The clinical benefit and economic feasibility of screening persons with colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome depend on optimizing family-wide uptake of genetic testing. Future research and clinical efforts should focus on ways to overcome barriers to genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi N Sharaf
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Douglas Wilson R, Langlois S. Genetic considerations for a woman's annual gynaecological examination. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2012; 34:276-284. [PMID: 22385672 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)35189-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide the physician with an overview of common genetic conditions that should be considered during a women's annual gynaecological assessment to determine the patient's risk or to initiate specific testing or referral to another subspecialty service, depending on personal or family history. OPTIONS This genetic information can be used for patient education and possible disease and/or mutation screening or diagnosis. OUTCOMES The use of this genetic information may allow improved risk-benefit assessment and management at the annual gynaecological examination. EVIDENCE Studies published in English up to and including May 2010 were retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library, using appropriate controlled vocabulary (gynaecological diagnosis, genetic inheritance) and key words (genetic risk, genetic mutation, inheritance, family history, uterus, ovary, endometrial, vagina, colon, gastric, renal, breast, cardiac, thrombophilia, diabetes, epilepsy, leiomyomata uteri). Other literature sources were identified through searching the web sites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES The levels of evidence are not adequate for evidence-based recommendations to be made. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS This committee opinion will enhance the use of new genetic knowledge and its application to the annual gynaecological care of women. Risk management and diagnostic opportunities for genetic gynaecological conditions will be improved. A more complete understanding of genetic conditions may increase anxiety and psychological stress for women and their families. SPONSORS Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. RECOMMENDATIONS The levels of evidence are not adequate for evidence-based recommendations to be made.
Collapse
|
26
|
Cragun D, Malo TL, Pal T, Shibata D, Vadaparampil ST. Colorectal cancer survivors' interest in genetic testing for hereditary cancer: implications for universal tumor screening. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2012; 16:493-9. [PMID: 22224634 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Benefits of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome (LS), the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC), will be realized only if patients are interested in genetic counseling and testing. This study explores interest in genetic testing for hereditary CRC among CRC patients who have never received genetic counseling or testing. METHODS Using results from a cross-sectional survey of CRC patients (n=91) at varying categories of risk for hereditary CRC, bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to compare positive and negative attitudinal beliefs regarding genetic testing, risk perceptions, demographics, and tumor stage of those who were interested in genetic testing (n=61) and those who were not interested or were not sure (n=30). RESULTS Although significant at the bivariate level, gender, perceived relative risk of hereditary cancer, employment status, and belief that genetic testing would help in preparing for the future were not significantly related to interest in genetic testing when controlling for all other variables in a logistic regression model. The two factors that remained significant include a single-item question measuring the belief that genetic testing is warranted based on personal/family history and a positive attitudinal scale regarding the utility of genetic testing in medical decision making and cancer prevention. CONCLUSION Results have potential implications for policies regarding universal tumor screening for LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Cragun
- Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Arar N, Knight SJ, Modell SM, Issa AM. The Genome-based Knowledge Management in Cycles model: a complex adaptive systems framework for implementation of genomic applications. Per Med 2011; 8:191-205. [PMID: 29783413 DOI: 10.2217/pme.11.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The main mission of the Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Network™ is to advance collaborative efforts involving partners from across the public health sector to realize the promise of genomics in healthcare and disease prevention. We introduce a new framework that supports the Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Network mission and leverages the characteristics of the complex adaptive systems approach. We call this framework the Genome-based Knowledge Management in Cycles model (G-KNOMIC). G-KNOMIC proposes that the collaborative work of multidisciplinary teams utilizing genome-based applications will enhance translating evidence-based genomic findings by creating ongoing knowledge management cycles. Each cycle consists of knowledge synthesis, knowledge evaluation, knowledge implementation and knowledge utilization. Our framework acknowledges that all the elements in the knowledge translation process are interconnected and continuously changing. It also recognizes the importance of feedback loops, and the ability of teams to self-organize within a dynamic system. We demonstrate how this framework can be used to improve the adoption of genomic technologies into practice using two case studies of genomic uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nedal Arar
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
| | - Sara J Knight
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, & Departments of Psychiatry & Urology, University of California, CA, USA
| | - Stephen M Modell
- Center for Public Health & Community Genomics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, MI, USA
| | - Amalia M Issa
- Program in Personalized Medicine & Targeted Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wang CW, Hui EC. Ethical, legal and social implications of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 19 Suppl 2:23-33. [PMID: 19891845 DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60274-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
With the progress in cancer genetics and assisted reproductive technologies, it is now possible for cancer gene mutation carriers not only to reduce cancer mortality through the targeting of surveillance and preventive therapies, but also to avoid the birth of at-risk babies through the choice of different means of reproduction. Thus, the incidence of hereditary cancer syndromes may be decreased in the future. The integration of cancer genetic testing and assisted reproductive technologies raises certain ethical, legal and social issues beyond either genetic testing or assisted reproductive technology itself. In this paper, the reproductive decisions/choices of at-risk young couples and the ethical, legal and social concerns of prenatal genetic testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for susceptibility to hereditary cancer syndromes are discussed. Specifically, three ethical principles related to the integration of cancer genetic testing and assisted reproductive technologies, i.e. informed choice, beneficence to children and social justice, and their implications for the responsible translation of these medical techniques into common practice of preventive medicine are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-W Wang
- Medical Ethics Unit, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cancer risk in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation carriers; different risk profiles may influence clinical management. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2009; 7:17. [PMID: 20028567 PMCID: PMC2804564 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-7-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2009] [Accepted: 12/23/2009] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with a high risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and extracolonic malignancies, such as endometrial carcinoma (EC). The risk is dependent of the affected mismatch repair gene. The aim of the present study was to calculate the cumulative risk of LS related cancers in proven MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation carriers. METHODS The studypopulation consisted out of 67 proven LS families. Clinical information including mutation status and tumour diagnosis was collected. Cumulative risks were calculated and compared using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. RESULTS MSH6 mutation carriers, both males and females had the lowest risk for developing CRC at age 70 years, 54% and 30% respectively and the age of onset was delayed by 3-5 years in males. With respect to endometrial carcinoma, female MSH6 mutation carriers had the highest risk at age 70 years (61%) compared to MLH1 (25%) and MSH2 (49%). Also, the age of EC onset was delayed by 5-10 years in comparison with MLH1 and MSH2. CONCLUSIONS Although the cumulative lifetime risk of LS related cancer is similar, MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutations seem to cause distinguishable cancer risk profiles. Female MSH6 mutation carriers have a lower CRC risk and a higher risk for developing endometrial carcinoma. As a consequence, surveillance colonoscopy starting at age 30 years instead of 20-25 years is more suitable. Also, prophylactic hysterectomy may be more indicated in female MSH6 mutation carriers compared to MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
|
30
|
Oseni T, Jatoi I. An Overview of the Role of Prophylactic Surgery in the Management of Individuals with a Hereditary Cancer Predisposition. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88:739-58, vi. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2008.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|