Surgical considerations in the correction of valve dysfunction following heart transplantation

Outcomes of left-sided heart valve surgery after heart transplantation: a systematic review

As the survival after heart transplantation (HTx) is steadily improving, an increasing number of patients with late cardiac pathologies such as valvular disease is expected to rise. Nevertheless, no guidelines for indication of redo cardiac surgery after HTx exists. The aim of the present systematic review is to describe the results reported in the literature of surgical management of severe aortic and/or mitral valve disease. A systematic review was conducted including studies reporting on adult patients with severe mitral or aortic valve pathology needing surgery after their previous HTx. Exclusion criteria consisted in surgery with no left heart valve surgery, concomitant valve surgery during heart transplant, transcatheter interventions, and heterotopic HTx. A total of 35 papers met our inclusion criteria out of 2755 potentially eligible studies with 44 mitral valve surgery patients and 20 aortic valve surgery patients. In the entire population, the mean time from HTx to reintervention was 6.19 ± 5.22 years. After a mean follow-up of 2.78 ± 3.54 years and 1.53 ± 2.26 years from reintervention, 65.6% mitral and 86.7% aortic patients were reported as alive, respectively. As guidelines on cardiac surgery after HTx are currently lacking, left-sided valvular cardiac reinterventions can be considered a possible therapeutic approach in carefully selected patients. These interventions may not only improve the patient's functional status and survival, but may ultimately reduce the need for re-transplantation due to the chronic shortage of donor hearts. However, the support of more robust data is warranted.

Aortic Valve Replacement and Tricuspid Valve Repair Five Years After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation in an Adult Patient

In the current era of improved survival after orthotopic heart transplantation, post-transplant valve dysfunction is not an uncommon occurrence. The first treatment is medical management, but when it fails, surgery, possibly as retransplantation, may be needed. However, due to the scarcity of donor hearts, efforts are being made on the preservation of the cardiac allograft function by conventional operations in lieu of retransplantation. In this case report, we present a patient developing severe aortic valve insufficiency and moderate-to-severe functional tricuspid valve insufficiency five years after cardiac transplant, leading to progressive clinical deterioration and heart failure symptoms. The aortic valve was replaced with an Edwards Inspiris Resilia Nr. 23 biological prosthesis, and the tricuspid valve was repaired with a Medtronic Contour 3D Nr. 28 annuloplasty. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient remained well six months after her reintervention. In the literature, cases of patients undergoing valve operations following their heart transplants have already been described. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report describing a concomitant procedure of aortic valve replacement and tricuspid valve repair in an adult patient occurring five years after her cardiac transplant.

Indications, Complications, and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery After Heart Transplantation: Results From the Cash Study

Background

Allograft pathologies, such as valvular, coronary artery, or aortic disease, may occur early and late after cardiac transplantation. Cardiac surgery after heart transplantation (CASH) may be an option to improve quality of life and allograft function and prolong survival. Experience with CASH, however, has been limited to single-center reports.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of heart transplant recipients with CASH between January 1984 and December 2020. In this study, 60 high-volume cardiac transplant centers were invited to participate.

Results

Data were available from 19 centers in North America (n = 7), South America (n = 1), and Europe (n = 11), with a total of 110 patients. A median of 3 (IQR 2–8.5) operations was reported by each center; five centers included ≥ 10 patients. Indications for CASH were valvular disease (n = 62), coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 16), constrictive pericarditis (n = 17), aortic pathology (n = 13), and myxoma (n = 2). The median age at CASH was 57.7 (47.8–63.1) years, with a median time from transplant to CASH of 4.4 (1–9.6) years. Reoperation within the first year after transplantation was performed in 24.5%. In-hospital mortality was 9.1% (n = 10). 1-year survival was 86.2% and median follow-up was 8.2 (3.8–14.6) years. The most frequent perioperative complications were acute kidney injury and bleeding revision in 18 and 9.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

Cardiac surgery after heart transplantation has low in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in carefully selected patients. The incidence and type of CASH vary between international centers. Risk factors for the worse outcome are higher European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE II) and postoperative renal failure.

Cardiac Surgery After Heart Transplantation: Elective Operation or Last Exit Strategy?

Background

Because of improved long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx), late graft pathologies such as valvular disease or cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) might need surgical intervention to enhance longer survival and ensure quality of life. To this date, there exist no guidelines for indication of cardiac surgery other than retransplantation after HTx.

Methods

In this retrospective, single-center study, we evaluated patients who underwent cardiac surgery after HTx at our institution.

Results

Between March 1984 and October 2016, 17 (1.16%) of 1466 HTx patients underwent cardiac surgery other than retransplantation after HTx. Indication were valvular disease (n = 7), CAV (n = 6), and other (n = 4). Of these, 29.4% (n = 5) were emergency procedures and 70.6% were elective cases. Median age at time of surgery was 61 years (interquartile range, 52-66 years); 82.4% (n = 14) were male. Median time to surgery after HTx was 9.3 years (2.7-11.1 years). In-hospital, mortality was 11.8% (n = 2); later need of retransplantation was 11.8% (n = 2) due to progressing CAV 3 to 9 months after surgery. One-year survival was 82.35%; overall survival was 47.1% (n = 8) with a median follow-up of 1477 days (416-2135 days). Overall survival after emergency procedures was 209 days (36-1119.5 days) whereas, for elective procedures, it was 1583.5 days (901.5-4319 days).

Conclusions

Incidence of cardiac surgery after HTx in our cohort was low (1.16%) compared with that of other studies. In elective cases, long-term survival was good.

Heart Valve Operations in Solid Organ Recipients: An 18-Year Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of heart valve operations in solid organ recipients, who were referred for operation to our institution.

METHODS

Over an 18-year period, 23 heart (group 1) and 16 renal (group 2) transplant recipients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III and IV underwent valve operation. The mean interval from the time of transplantation to cardiac surgery was 77.9 months with a mean follow-up time of 34.6 months in group 1 and 87.2 months with a mean follow-up time of 39.2 months in group 2.

RESULTS

Group 1 underwent tricuspid valve replacement (n=12), tricuspid valve reconstruction (n=7), aortic valve replacement (AVR, n=3), and mitral valve replacement (MVR, n=1). In group 2, mechanical valve replacement was performed in 14 patients (9 AVR, 3 MVR, 2 AVR and MVR) and tricuspid or mitral valve reconstruction in two patients. There was no operative death. During hospitalization, multiorgan failure due to sepsis was the main cause of mortality (2 in both groups). In the mean follow-up period of 41.2 months, there were four late non-cardiac-related deaths in group 1. Currently 29 surviving transplant recipients (16 heart, 69.6% and 13 renal, 81.3%) are in NYHA classes I and II.

CONCLUSION

In heart and renal recipients, valve operations can be performed effectively and safely with acceptable mortality, low cardiac morbidity, and excellent clinical results, although infection is the most serious complication.