Lymphoid cell proliferation in renal transplants: biologic and diagnostic implications

Proliferation of CD8-positive T cells in blood vessels of rat renal allografts

It is still disputed in which anatomical compartments of allograft recipients T-cells proliferate. After experimental renal transplantation, host monocytes and lymphocytes accumulate in the lumina of graft blood vessels. In this study, we test the hypothesis that T lymphocytes proliferate in the vascular bed of the graft. Kidneys were transplanted in the Dark Agouti to Lewis rat strain combination, an established experimental model for acute rejection. Isogeneic transplantation was performed as a control. Cells in the S-phase of mitosis were detected in situ three days posttransplantation by pulse-labeling with BrdU and by immunohistochemical detection of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). More than 20% of all T-cells in the lumina of allograft blood vessels incorporated BrdU and approximately 30% of them expressed PCNA. In the blood vessels of isografts as well as in other organs of allograft recipients, only few BrdU(+) cells were detected. A majority of the BrdU(+) cells in graft blood vessels expressed CD8. In conclusion, we demonstrate that CD8(+) T lymphocytes proliferate in the lumina of the blood vessels of renal allografts during the onset of acute rejection.

Dynamic expression of Qa-2 during acute graft rejection

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G exhibits immunotolerogenicity and is related to allograft acceptance. Qa-2 is the murine homolog of HLA-G; it has structure and functions similar to those of HLA-G. We investigated the dynamic expression of Qa-2 in skin allografts by immunohistochemistry and on peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets by flow cytometry during the entire process of acute graft rejection (AGR) with a murine skin transplantation model to determine its relationship with the pathological changes of allografts and the influence of immunosuppressive therapy. In grafts without immunosuppressive treatment, Qa-2 did not exhibit obvious changes in syngeneic and allogeneic recipients. In contrast, with immunosuppressant-treated grafts, positive expression of Qa-2 was observed. It remained at high levels in the immunosuppressant-treated syngeneic group; however, it became weakly positive and even negative in infiltrating inflammatory cells as AGR advanced, but it remained strongly positive in other skin tissues throughout the AGR process. Qa-2 expression on CD4(+) and CD8(+) peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets remained stable at a normal level in the non-immunosuppressant-treated syngeneic group. Immunosuppressive treatment can also significantly upregulate Qa-2. In the allogeneic groups, decreased expression was observed when AGR was at histological grades 1 to 2 (well before gross rejection was observed). Qa-2 was upregulated again after the graft was rejected completely. The results suggest that the increase in Qa-2 may be attributed to the use of immunosuppressive treatments. Moreover, Qa-2 expression decreased significantly with AGR progression, suggesting that it may be a potential marker for predicting AGR, especially in the presence of immunosuppressive agents.