A pitfall in screening with decoy cells after simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation

BK nephropathy in the native kidneys of patients with organ transplants: Clinical spectrum of BK infection

Nephropathy secondary to BK virus, a member of the Papoviridae family of viruses, has been recognized for some time as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. In recent times, BK nephropathy (BKN) of the native kidneys has being increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic kidney disease in patients with solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplants and in patients with other clinical entities associated with immunosuppression. In such patients renal dysfunction is often attributed to other factors including nephrotoxicity of medications used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organs. Renal biopsy is required for the diagnosis of BKN. Quantitation of the BK viral load in blood and urine are surrogate diagnostic methods. The treatment of BKN is based on reduction of the immunosuppressive medications. Several compounds have shown antiviral activity, but have not consistently shown to have beneficial effects in BKN. In addition to BKN, BK viral infection can cause severe urinary bladder cystitis, ureteritis and urinary tract obstruction as well as manifestations in other organ systems including the central nervous system, the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal system and the hematopoietic system. BK viral infection has also been implicated in tumorigenesis. The spectrum of clinical manifestations from BK infection and infection from other members of the Papoviridae family is widening. Prevention and treatment of BK infection and infections from other Papovaviruses are subjects of intense research.

Decoy cells and malignant cells coexisting in the urine from a transplant recipient with BK virus nephropathy and bladder adenocarcinoma

The search for decoy cells (DC) in urine is widely used as screening for BK virus (BKV) reactivation in transplant recipients. BKV cytopathic effect of DC must not be confused with high-grade urothelial carcinoma. This report presents a case of coexistence of DC and malignant cells in the urine from a transplant recipient with BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVN) and bladder adenocarcinoma. A 38-year-old female with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease underwent a simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant. Four years post-transplantation, BK virus studies were performed for renal dysfunction. Isolated DC and DC in casts were identified in urine. Also, the tests for BKV DNA were positive in serum and renal allograft biopsy. BKVN was treatment-resistant and the patient returned to hemodialysis. A kidney transplant nephrectomy was performed 2 years later. The next urine cytology showed, in addition to DC, other distinct cells with nuclear atypia highly suggestive of malignancy. Some cells showed both, malignant and DC features. A bladder adenocarcinoma was diagnosed on biopsy and BKV proteins were demonstrated on tumor cells, supporting a possible role for BKV in the oncogenic pathway in this clinical setting. The presence of DC in the urine from a transplant recipient is the hallmark of BKV activation, but it does not exclude the existence of carcinoma. Furthermore, the presence of highly atypical cells should raise, not eliminate, the possibility of neoplastic transformation of the bladder.