Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers after renal transplantation

Urine Angiotensin II Signature Proteins as Markers of Fibrosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) is an important cause of kidney allograft loss; however, noninvasive markers to identify IFTA or guide antifibrotic therapy are lacking. Using angiotensin II (AngII) as the prototypical inducer of IFTA, we previously identified 83 AngII-regulated proteins in vitro. We developed mass spectrometry-based assays for quantification of 6 AngII signature proteins (bone marrow stromal cell antigen 1, glutamine synthetase [GLNA], laminin subunit beta-2, lysophospholipase I, ras homolog family member B, and thrombospondin-I [TSP1]) and hypothesized that their urine excretion will correlate with IFTA in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Urine excretion of 6 AngII-regulated proteins was quantified using selected reaction monitoring and normalized by urine creatinine. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess protein expression of TSP1 and GLNA in kidney biopsies.

RESULTS

The urine excretion rates of AngII-regulated proteins were found to be increased in 15 kidney transplant recipients with IFTA compared with 20 matched controls with no IFTA (mean log2[fmol/µmol of creatinine], bone marrow stromal cell antigen 1: 3.8 versus 3.0, P = 0.03; GLNA: 1.2 versus -0.4, P = 0.03; laminin subunit beta-2: 6.1 versus 5.4, P = 0.06; lysophospholipase I: 2.1 versus 0.6, P = 0.002; ras homolog family member B: 1.2 versus -0.1, P = 0.006; TSP1_GGV: 2.5 versus 1.9; P = 0.15; and TSP1_TIV: 2.0 versus 0.6, P = 0.0006). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve = 0.86 for the ability of urine AngII signature proteins to discriminate IFTA from controls. Urine excretion of AngII signature proteins correlated strongly with chronic IFTA and total inflammation. In a separate cohort of 19 kidney transplant recipients, the urine excretion of these 6 proteins was significantly lower following therapy with AngII inhibitors (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

AngII-regulated proteins may represent markers of IFTA and guide antifibrotic therapies.

Comprehensive Care of the Lung Transplant Patient

Lung transplantation has evolved into a life-saving treatment with improved quality of life for patients with end-stage respiratory failure unresponsive to other medical or surgical interventions. With improving survival rates, the number of lung transplant recipients with preexisting and posttransplant comorbidities that require attention continues to increase. A partnership between transplant and nontransplant care providers is necessary to deliver comprehensive and optimal care for transplant candidates and recipients. The goals of this partnership include timely referral and assistance with transplant evaluation, optimization of comorbidities and preparation for transplantation, management of common posttransplant medical comorbidities, immunization, screening for malignancy, and counseling for a healthy lifestyle to maximize the likelihood of a good outcome. We aim to provide an outline of the main aspects of the care of candidates for and recipients of lung transplants for nontransplant physicians and other care providers.

Ramipril versus placebo in kidney transplant patients with proteinuria: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of end-stage renal disease and death in non-transplant patients with proteinuria. We examined whether ramipril would have a similar beneficial effect on important clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with proteinuria.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial, conducted at 14 centres in Canada and New Zealand, we enrolled adult renal transplant recipients at least 3-months post-transplant with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 20 mL/min/1·73m(2) or greater and proteinuria 0·2 g per day or greater and randomly assigned them to receive either ramipril (5 mg orally twice daily) or placebo for up to 4 years. Patients completing the final 4-year study visit were invited to participate in a trial extension phase. Treatment was assigned by centrally generated randomisation with permuted variable blocks of 2 and 4, stratified by centre and estimated GFR (above or below 40 mL/min/1·73 m(2)). The primary outcome was a composite consisting of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death in the intention-to-treat population. The principal secondary outcome was the change in measured GFR. We ascertained whether any component of the primary outcome had occurred at each study visit (1 month and 6 months post-randomisation, then every 6 months thereafter). This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 78129473.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 23, 2006, and March 28, 2012, 213 patients were randomised. 109 were allocated to placebo and 104 were allocated to ramipril, of whom 109 patients in the placebo group and 103 patients in the ramipril group were analysed and the trial is now complete. The intention to treat population (placebo n=109, ramipril n=103) was used for the primary analysis and the trial extension phase analysis. The primary outcome occurred in 19 (17%) of 109 patients in the placebo group and 14 (14%) of 103 patients in the ramipril group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·38-1·51]; absolute risk difference -3·8% [95% CI -13·6 to 6·1]). With extended follow-up (mean 48 months), the primary outcome occurred in 27 patients (25%) in the placebo group and 25 (24%) patients in the ramipril group (HR 0·96 [95% CI 0·55-1·65]); absolute risk difference: -0·5% (95% CI -12·0 to 11·1). There was no significant difference in the rate of measured GFR decline between the two groups (mean difference per 6-month interval: -0·16 mL/min/1·73m(2) (SE 0·24); p=0·49). 14 (14%) of patients died in the ramipril group and 11 (10%) in the placebo group, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (HR 1·45 [95% CI 0·66 to 3·21]). Adverse events were more common in the ramipril group (39 [38%]) than in the placebo group (24 [22%]; p=0·02).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with ramipril compared with placebo did not lead to a significant reduction in doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death in kidney transplant recipients with proteinuria. These results do not support the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with the goal of improving clinical outcomes in this population.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

The risk factors of cardiovascular disease in patients with renal transplantation

Objective: This study aims to observe the risk factors of cardiovascular disease in patients after kidney transplantation.

Methods: Total 102 patients after renal transplantation (group A) and 96 clinic examination cases (group B) were recruited. Blood pressure, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr), blood glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I ( apoA-I ) of the subjects were tested. These indexes were tested 3 times in group A in the 1, 2, and 3 month after kidney transplantation surgery. Electrocardiogram examination was done in the third month after kidney transplantation surgery.

Results: There were significant differences in the incidence of hypertension, hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia between the two groups. After operation, the levels of BUN and Cr decreased significantly in 57 cases of group A without taking antihypertensive drugs (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the blood pressure regardless of the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) before and after operation. In group A, the abnormal rate of ECG was 65%, the incidence of ST-T changes, prolongation of QT interval, left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular high voltage increased significantly (P<0.01).

Conclusion: The incidence of coronary heart disease risk factors such as hypertension and hyperglycemia are high in patients after renal transplantation.

Modulating kidney transplant interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy: is the RAAS an important target?

In follow-up to a recently published randomized controlled clinical trial, Issa et al. provide evidence that systemic activity and physiological responsiveness of the renin aldosterone angiotensin system (RAAS) are well within normal limits in most kidney recipients during the first 5 years post-transplant. Implications of the results include the need to better understand intra-renal RAAS activity in transplanted kidneys and to identify patients in which the graft-protective effects of RAAS blockade are most relevant.

Posttransplant hypertension: multipathogenic disease process

Arterial hypertension is prevalent among kidney transplant recipients. The multifactorial pathogenesis involves the interaction of the donor and the recipient's genetic backgrounds with several environmental parameters that may precede or follow the transplant procedure (eg, the nature of the renal disease, the duration of the chronic kidney disease phase and maintenance dialytic therapy, the commonly associated cardiovascular disease with atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis, the renal mass at implantation, the immunosuppressive regimen used, life of the graft, and de novo medical and surgical complications that may occur after a transplant). Among calcineurin inhibitors, tacrolimus seems to have a better cardiovascular profile. Steroid-free protocols and calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens seem to be associated with better blood pressure control. Posttransplant hypertension is a major amplifier of the chronic kidney disease-cardiovascular disease continuum. Despite the adverse effects of hypertension on graft and patient survival, blood pressure control remains poor because of the high cardiovascular risk profile of the donor-recipient pair. Although the optimal blood pressure level remains unknown, it is recommended to maintain the blood pressure at < 130/80 mm Hg and < 125/75 mm Hg in the absence or presence of proteinuria.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension in elderly patients: focus on patient outcomes

Hypertension in the elderly is one of the main risk factors of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Knowledge regarding the mechanisms of hypertension and specific considerations in managing hypertensive elderly through pharmacological intervention(s) is fundamental to improving clinical outcomes. Recent clinical studies in the elderly have provided evidence that angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists can improve clinical outcomes to a similar or, in certain populations, an even greater extent than other classical arterial blood pressure-lowering agents. This newer class of antihypertensive agents presents several benefits, including potential for improved adherence, excellent tolerability profile with minimal first-dose hypotension, and a low incidence of adverse effects. Thus, AT(1) receptor antagonists represent an appropriate option for many elderly patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and/or left ventricular dysfunction.

Insertion/Deletion polymorphism of Angiotensin-converting enzyme as a risk factor for chronic allograft nephropathy

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy is widely used to treat chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), which suggests a possible role of the renin-angiotensin system in the pathologic mechanism of the disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the possible link between CAN and ACE. The ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism and the amount and activity of ACE were determined in cadaver kidney recipients with CAN (n = 38) or normal renal function (n = 34). The DD genotype was observed significantly more frequently in the CAN group compared with the group with normal renal function. Moreover, the DD genotype was associated with a higher serum ACE concentration and greater serum ACE activity, compared with II genotype homozygotes. The insertion/deletion polymorphism of ACE affects ACE expression and activity in serum, and, therefore, may have an important role in the pathogenesis of CAN. These findings suggest that determination of the ACE genotype may be useful in identifying patients at high risk. In particular, the DD genotype may be considered an indication for ACE inhibitor therapy.