Indications for combined liver and kidney transplantation: propositions after a 23-yr experience

Dialysis and Transplant Considerations in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the fourth leading cause of kidney replacement therapy. Unfortunately, the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation is a foreseeable outcome for many patients affected by ADPKD. We review some of the unique issues that should be considered in the management of patients with ADPKD who require dialysis or kidney transplantation. The choice of dialysis modality may be influenced by the enlarged kidneys and liver, but peritoneal dialysis should not be excluded as an option, as studies do not consistently show that there is an increased risk for technique failure or peritonitis. The optimal kidney replacement therapy option remains kidney transplantation; however, nephrectomy may be needed if there is insufficient space for the allograft. Living donor candidates from at-risk families need to be excluded from carrying the disease either by diagnostic imaging criteria or genetic testing. Other potential transplant issues, such as malignancy and cardiovascular and metabolic risks, should also be recognized. Despite these issues, patients with ADPKD requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation generally have more favorable outcomes as compared to those with other causes of chronic kidney disease. Further studies are still needed to personalize the therapeutic approach for those receiving kidney replacement therapy and eventually improve clinical outcomes.

Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) after liver transplantation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This increase in mortality can be offset by performing a kidney transplant at the time of the liver transplant in select cases. Accordingly, Margreiter and colleague; s performed the first simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant in 1983. The number of SLK transplants has increased by more than 300% since then. In 1990%, 1.7% of all liver transplants in the United States were SLK transplants which increased to 9.9% by 2016. This steep increase was likely due to the implementation of the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system in 2002, which is heavily weighted by serum creatinine.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation for rare diseases

Combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) is indicated in patients with failure of both organs, or for the treatment of end-stage chronic kidney disease (ESKD) caused by a genetic defect in the liver. The aim of the present review is to provide the most up-to-date overview of the rare conditions as indications for CLKT. They are major indications for CLKT in children. However, in some of them (e.g., atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome or primary hyperoxaluria), CLKT may be required in adults as well. Primary hyperoxaluria is divided into three types, of which type 1 and 2 lead to ESKD. CLKT has been proven effective in renal function replacement, at the same time preventing recurrence of the disease. Nephronophthisis is associated with liver fibrosis in 5% of cases and these patients are candidates for CLKT. In alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency, hereditary C3 deficiency, lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency and glycogen storage diseases, glomerular or tubulointerstitial disease can lead to chronic kidney disease. Liver transplantation as a part of CLKT corrects underlying genetic and consequent metabolic abnormality. In atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome caused by mutations in the genes for factor H, successful CLKT has been reported in a small number of patients. However, for this indication, CLKT has been largely replaced by eculizumab, an anti-C5 antibody. CLKT has been well established to provide immune protection of the transplanted kidney against donor-specific antibodies against class I HLA, facilitating transplantation in a highly sensitized recipient.

Combined liver and kidney transplantation: Our experience and review of literature

Increased awareness of organ donation has increased the availability of deceased donors, and it has boosted the opportunities for treating patients with multiple organ dysfunction. Simultaneously replacing two organs gives advantages of single surgery, lower immunosuppression dose and better survival than when one organ alone is transplanted. We present reports of management of three cases of combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) from deceased donors. Based on management of these cases we discuss the importance of CLKT and anaesthetic concerns during such complex procedures.

Left Lateral Sectionectomy of the Native Liver and Combined Living-Related Liver-Kidney Transplantation for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1

Primary hyperoxaluria type I (PH1), the most severe form of primary hyperoxalurias, is a liver disease of the metabolic defect in glyoxylate detoxification that can be corrected by liver transplantation. A 21-year-old man presented to our center after 4 months of regular hemodialysis for kidney failure caused by nephrolithiasis. A diagnosis of PH1 was confirmed by mutations of the AGXT gene. Left lateral sectionectomy of the native liver was performed; and auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) and kidney transplantation were carried out synchronously using a living donor. After transplantation, the patient's plasma oxalate and creatinine levels substantially decreased and the patient recovered well with good dual grafts function. APOLT and kidney transplantation can compensate the liver deficient in liver enzyme production and aid the renal elimination of oxalate, thus serving as an effective treatment option for patients with PH1. In conclusion, left lateral sectionectomy of the native liver and combined living-related liver-kidney transplantation can be a surgical option for PH1.

Excessive immunosuppression as a potential cause of poor survival in simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation for hepatitis C

Appropriate recipient selection of simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation (SLKT) remains controversial. In particular, data on liver graft survival in hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) SLKT recipients are lacking. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of HCV+ SLKT recipients (N = 25) in comparison with HCV- SLKT (N = 26) and HCV+ liver transplantation alone (LTA, N = 296). Despite backgrounds of HCV+ and HCV- SLKT being similar, HCV+ SLKT demonstrated significantly impaired 5-year liver graft survival of 35% (HCV- SLKT, 79%, P = 0.004). Compared with HCV+ LTA, induction immunosuppression was more frequently used in HCV+ SLKT. Five-year liver graft survival rate for HCV+ SLKT was significantly lower than that for LTA (35% vs. 74%, respectively, P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio of liver graft loss in HCV+ SLKT was 4.9 (95% confidence interval 2.0-12.1, P = 0.001). HCV+ SLKT recipients were more likely to succumb to recurrent HCV and sepsis compared with LTA (32% vs. 8.8%, P < 0.001 and 24% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.030, respectively). Ten HCV+ SLKT recipients underwent anti-HCV therapy for recurrent HCV; only 1 achieved sustained virological response. HCV+ SLKT is associated with significantly decreased long-term prognosis compared with HCV- SLKT and HCV+ LTA.

Predisposing factors of diminished survival in simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation

Since the adoption of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, simultaneous liver/kidney transplants (SLKT) have substantially increased. Recently, unfavorable outcomes have been reported yet contributing factors remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 74 consecutive adult SLKT performed at our center from 2000 to 2010 and compared with kidney transplant alone (KTA, N = 544). In SLKT, patient and death-censored kidney graft survival rates were 64 ± 6% and 81 ± 5% at 5 years, respectively (median follow-up, 47 months). Multivariable analyses revealed three independent risk factors affecting patient survival: hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+, hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-7.9), panel reactive antibody (PRA) > 20% (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.2) and female donor gender (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.9). For death-censored kidney graft survival, delayed graft function was the strongest negative predictor (HR 8.3, 95% CI 2.5-27.9), followed by HCV+ and PRA > 20%. The adjusted risk of death-censored kidney graft loss in HCV+ SLKT patients was 5.8 (95% CI 1.6-21.6) compared with HCV+ KTA (p = 0.008). Recurrent HCV within 1 year after SLKT correlated with early kidney graft failure (p = 0.004). Careful donor/recipient selection and innovative approaches for HCV+ SLKT patients are critical to further improve long-term outcomes.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation is preferable to liver transplant alone for cirrhotic patients with renal failure

BACKGROUND

The role of combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) for cirrhotic patients with renal failure (RF) is controversial. Since the model for end-stage liver disease era, there has been a rise in the number of CLKT. Using the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database, this study was undertaken to compare outcomes of cirrhotic patients with RF who received either liver transplant alone (LTA) or CLKT between 2002 and 2008.

METHODS

Analysis was limited to cirrhotic patients 18 years old or older, with serum creatinine level 2.5 mg/dL or higher at the time of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or who received dialysis at least twice during the week before OLT. Patients who received CLKT were categorized based on the cause of their underlying RF.

RESULTS

Overall liver allograft and patient survival rates of LTA patients were significantly lower compared with CLKT patients (P<0.001). CLKT patients with hepatorenal syndrome showed significantly higher patient and liver allograft survival rates. Liver allograft survival was superior among CLKT patients irrespective of whether they received dialysis. Prevalence of posttransplantation RF was higher for LTA patients at 6 months and 3 years of follow-up (P<0.001). LTA was a significant risk factor both for graft loss and mortality. Recipient hepatitis C virus seropositivity, donor age, donor cause of death, and life support at the time of OLT were also risk factors for graft loss and death.

CONCLUSIONS

Cirrhotic patients with RF, in particular with hepatorenal syndrome, CLKT is preferable to LTA because it improves liver allograft and patient survival.