Multivariate analysis of antibody induction therapy and their associated outcomes in live donor kidney transplantation in the recent era

Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients Who Received Steroid-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen

BACKGROUND

Although the clinical outcomes of pediatric renal transplantation (RT) in developed countries have improved significantly, the data on clinical outcomes in developing countries are wildly different.

METHODS

Children and adolescents who had undergone RT at Ramathibodi Hospital between March 2001 and August 2014 were included.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into 2 groups: living related donor (LRD) group (n = 13) and deceased donor (DD) group (n = 30). Prolonged cold ischemic time over 13 hours was significantly associated with delayed graft function (P = .029). The prevalence of infection was 90.7%, in which urinary tract infection (UTI) was the most common infection. Although almost none of the patients in the LRD group received induction therapy, the prevalence of rejection was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .817). The comparison of graft survivals between LRD and DD groups were 100% vs 100%, 92.3% vs 100%, and 85.7% vs 81.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (P = .938). Recurrent UTI and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection had a negative effect on graft function at 1-year follow-up (P < .05). Rejections, bladder dysfunction, and donors aged ≥50 years were associated with graft deterioration at 3 years after RT (P < .01). None of these patients died with functioning graft.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated good graft and patient survival in Thai pediatric RT recipients. Although recurrent UTI and CMV infection were related to graft dysfunction at 1-year follow-up, infections had no effect on graft and patient survival in long-term follow-up.

Induction Therapies in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation on Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate With or Without Steroid Maintenance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Induction therapy with IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) is recommended as a first line agent in living donor renal transplantation (LRT). However, use of IL2-RA remains controversial in LRT with tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) with or without steroids.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry was studied for patients receiving LRT from 2000 to 2012 maintained on TAC/MPA at discharge (n=36,153) to compare effectiveness of IL2-RA to other induction options. The cohort was initially divided into two groups based on use of maintenance steroid at time of hospital discharge: steroid (n=25,996) versus no-steroid (n=10,157). Each group was further stratified into three categories according to commonly used antibody induction approach: IL2-RA, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG), and no-induction in the steroid group versus IL2-RA, r-ATG and alemtuzumab in the no-steroid group. The main outcomes were the risk of acute rejection at 1 year and overall allograft failure (graft failure or death) post-transplantation through the end of follow-up. Propensity score-weighted regression analysis was used to minimize selection bias due to non-random assignment of induction therapies.

RESULTS

Multivariable logistic and Cox analysis adjusted for propensity score showed that outcomes in the steroid group were similar between no-induction (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.86 to 1.08 for acute rejection; and hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.08 for overall allograft failure) and IL2-RA categories. In the no-steroid group, odds of acute rejection with r-ATG (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.90) and alemtuzumab (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.67) were lower; however, overall allograft failure risk was higher with alemtuzumab (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.56) but not with r-ATG (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.45), compared with IL2-RA induction.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with no-induction therapy, IL2-RA induction was not associated with better outcomes when TAC/MPA/steroids were used in LRT recipients. r-ATG appears to be an acceptable and possibly the preferred induction alternative for IL2-RA in steroid-avoidance protocols.

Selection of induction therapy in kidney transplantation

Currently available immunosuppressive agents can be classified into three categories: induction agents, maintenance therapy, and treatment for rejection. This review article will focus on induction immunosuppression. There are three antibodies which are used for induction therapy: the lymphocyte-depleting agents - anti-thymocyte globulin and alemtuzumab, and basiliximab which is nondepleting. Historically, immunosuppressant selection was solely based on efficacy for prevention of rejection. In the current era of transplantation, it is now common practice in the transplant community to select induction therapy on the basis of risk-benefit considerations for each patient. This article will focus on the efficacy of available induction agents and the selection of induction agent based on donor and recipient risk factors.