Isolated intestinal transplants vs. liver-intestinal transplants in adult patients in the United States: 22 yr of OPTN data

Endoscopic ultrasound in the monitoring of the intestinal allograft

Objective

Chronic rejection (CR) of the small intestinal allograft includes mucosal fibrosis, bowel thickening and arteriopathy in the outer wall layers and the mesentery. CR lacks non-invasive markers and reliable diagnostic methods. We evaluated endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a novel approach for monitoring of the intestinal allograft with respect to CR.

Design

In intestinal graft recipients, EUS and enteroscopy with ileal mucosal biopsy were performed via the ileostomy. At EUS, the wall thickness of the intestinal graft was measured in standard mode, whereas the resistive index (RI) of the supplying artery was assessed in pulsed Doppler mode. At enteroscopy, the intestinal mucosa was assessed. Findings were compared with histopathology and clinical follow-up.

Results

EUS was successfully performed in all 11 patients (adequate clinical course (AC) n=9; CR n=2) after a median interval of 1537 days (range: 170–5204), post-transplantation. The total diameter of the wall (layer I–V) was comparable in all patients. Meanwhile, the diameter of the outermost part (layer IV–V; that is, muscularis propria–serosa) was among the two CR patients (range: 1.3–1.4 mm) in the upper end of measurements as compared with the nine AC patients (range: 0.5–1.4 mm). The RI was >0.9 in both CR patients, while the RI was ≤0.8 in all AC patients. Both CR patients had abnormal findings at enteroscopy and histopathology and deceased during follow-up.

Conclusion

EUS is a promising tool providing detailed information on the intestinal graft morphology and rheology, which may be used for assessment of potential CR in long-term follow-up of intestinal allograft recipients.

Intestinal failure-associated liver disease in adult patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to give up-to-date information on intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) and how its investigation and management has evolved. Despite advances in treatment for patients with intestinal failure, IFALD remains a significant cause of mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Liver biopsy remains as the gold standard for the diagnosis of IFALD, but its invasive nature has prompted assessment of noninvasive techniques. Risk factors for IFALD are both nonnutritional (e.g. sepsis) and nutritional. Strict protocols for the prevention of central venous catheter infections in patients with intestinal failure are well established, as is the optimization of the constituents of parenteral nutrition. Further research comparing the available lipid emulsions has become available. Novel approaches at maximizing intestinal absorption are discussed including glucagon-like peptide-2 analogues, as well as surgical approaches.

SUMMARY

Although there are data on the novel investigative and therapeutic strategies for managing IFALD, further study is required to identify a suitable noninvasive technique for earlier diagnosis and then monitoring of IFALD. Further data are also required on the impact of novel therapies aimed at improving absorption and reducing parenteral nutrition load on IFALD occurrence and progression.

Visceral transplantation in patients with intestinal-failure associated liver disease: Evolving indications, graft selection, and outcomes

Intestinal failure (IF)-associated liver disease (IFALD) is widely recognized as a lethal complication of long-term parenteral nutrition. The pathophysiology of IFALD is poorly understood but appears to be multifactorial and related to the inflammatory state in the patient with IF. Visceral transplant for IFALD includes variants of intestine, liver, or combined liver-intestine allografts. Graft selection for an individual patient depends on the etiology of IF, abdominal and vascular anatomy, severity of IFALD, and potential for intestinal rehabilitation. The past decade has witnessed dramatic improvement in the management of IFALD, principally due to improved lipid emulsion formulations and the multidisciplinary care of the patient with IF. As the recognition and treatment of IFALD continue to improve, the requirement of liver-inclusive visceral grafts appears to be decreasing, representing a paradigm shift in the care of the patient with IF. This review highlights the current indications, graft selection, and outcomes of visceral transplantation for IFALD.

The current therapeutic options for Crohn's disease: from medical therapy to intestinal transplantation

Crohn's disease (CD) has an annual incidence per 100.000 person-year of 20.2 in North America and 12.7 in Europe, and the purpose of this review is to evaluate its medical management, from diagnosis to transplant. Pharmacologic manipulation with nutritional care aims to achieve and maintain remission, but more than half of patients will undergo an intestinal resection, very often repeated over time. They could experience short bowel syndrome (SBS) requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Intestinal transplantation (ITx) represents an alternative in case of irreversible intestinal failure (IF) with life-threatening TPN complications. Patient survival after ITx is 79%, 53% and 43% at 1, 3 and 5 years respectively, with no differences among ITx for other disorders. Areas covered: The research discussed medical therapy with nutritional support, evaluating the role of endoscopy, surgery and transplant in CD. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed search engine up to May 31^th, 2017 without restriction of the language. The decision on paper's eligibility was reached by consensus between the 3 screening authors. Expert commentary: CD treatment is mainly medical, leaving endoscopy and surgery for a complex course. ITx represents a therapeutic option if TPN complications with IF arise.

Pre-emptive Intestinal Transplant: The Surgeon's Point of View

Pre-emptive transplantation is a well-established practice for certain types of end-organ failure such as in the use of kidney transplantation. For irreversible intestinal failure, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) remains the gold standard, due to the suboptimal long-term results of intestinal transplantation. As such, the only role for pre-emptive transplantation, if at all, will be for patients identified to be at high risk of complications and mortality while on definitive long-term TPN. In these patients, the timing of early listing and transplantation could become life-saving, taking into account that mortality on the waiting list is still the highest for intestinal candidates. The development of simulation models or pre-transplant scoring systems could help in selecting patients based on potential outcome on TPN or with transplantation, and recent reports from high-volume centers identify few underlying pathologic conditions and some TPN complications as at higher risk of increased morbidity and mortality. A pre-emptive transplant could be used as a rehabilitative procedure in a well-selected case-by-case scenario, among TPN patients at risk of liver failure, repeated central line infections, mesenteric infarction, short bowel syndrome (SBS) <50 cm or with end stoma, congenital mucosal disease, desmoid tumors: These conditions must be carefully evaluated, not to underestimate the clinical stage nor to over-estimate the impact of a temporary situation. At the present time, diseases with a variable and unpredictable course, such as intestinal dysmotility disorders, or quality of life and financial issues are still far from being considered as indications for a pre-emptive transplant.

European Society of Coloproctology consensus on the surgical management of intestinal failure in adults

Intestinal failure (IF) is a debilitating condition of inadequate nutrition due to an anatomical and/or physiological deficit of the intestine. Surgical management of patients with acute and chronic IF requires expertise to deal with technical challenges and make correct decisions. Dedicated IF units have expertise in patient selection, operative risk assessment and multidisciplinary support such as nutritional input and interventional radiology, which dramatically improve the morbidity and mortality of this complex condition and can beneficially affect the continuing dependence on parenteral nutritional support. Currently there is little guidance to bridge the gap between general surgeons and specialist IF surgeons. Fifteen European experts took part in a consensus process to develop guidance to support surgeons in the management of patients with IF. Based on a systematic literature review, statements were prepared for a modified Delphi process. The evidence for each statement was graded using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The current paper contains the statements reflecting the position and practice of leading European experts in IF encompassing the general definition of IF surgery and organization of an IF unit, strategies to prevent IF, management of acute IF, management of wound, fistula and stoma, rehabilitation, intestinal and abdominal reconstruction, criteria for referral to a specialist unit and intestinal transplantation.

Liver inclusion improves outcomes of intestinal retransplantation in adults. [Corrected]

BACKGROUND

Retransplantation is a viable treatment option for patients with primary intestinal graft loss.

METHODS

We analyzed outcomes of retransplantations (n = 23) in adults from May 2000 to May 2010 at our center and compared patients who received liver-free retransplantations (n = 13) with those who received liver-inclusive retransplantations (n = 10).

RESULTS

The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in retransplantations were 90.9%, 67.1%, and 59.7% (patient) and 82.2%, 58.6%, and 51.3% (graft), respectively, which were similar to the rates in primary transplants. The patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.7%, 55.6%, and 41.7%, respectively, in liver-free retransplantations, as compared to rates of 90.0%, 80.0%, and 80.0% in liver-inclusive retransplantations. The graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in liver-free retransplantations were 76.2%, 40.6%, and 27.1%, respectively, which were significantly worse than those in liver-inclusive retransplantations (P = 0.03). Within an average follow-up of 32.3 months, 8 of 13 (61.5%) of liver-free retransplantations underwent enterectomy because of severe acute cellular rejection (n = 3) or chronic rejection (n = 5). Six of 13 (46.2%) recipients succumbed to rejection-related complications. Compared to liver-free retransplantations, the rate and severity of acute rejection were markedly de creased in liver-inclusive retransplantations, and no chronic rejection was seen. Within an average follow-up of 44.5 months, two of 10 (20%) died due to graft-versus-host disease and infection, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A liver-inclusive retransplantation offers a better long-term patient and graft survival, suggesting that including the liver as part of an intestinal graft should be considered in adult recipients when retransplantation is necessary.

Developing trends in the intestinal transplant waitlist

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was examined for trends in the intestinal transplant (ITx) waitlist from 1993 to 2012, dividing into listings for isolated ITx versus liver-intestine transplant (L-ITx). Registrants added to the waitlist increased from 59/year in 1993 to 317/year in 2006, then declined to 124/year in 2012; Spline modeling showed a significant change in the trend in 2006, p < 0.001. The largest group of registrants, <1 year of age, determined the trend for the entire population; other pediatric age groups remained stable, adult registrants increased until 2012. The largest proportion of new registrants were for L-ITx, compared to isolated ITx; the change in the trend in 2006 for L-ITx was highly significant, p < 0.001, but not isolated ITx, p = 0.270. New registrants for L-ITx, <1 year of age, had the greatest increase and decrease. New registrants for isolated ITx remained constant in all pediatric age groups. Waitlist mortality increased to a peak around 2002, highest for L-ITx, in patients <1 year of age and adults. Deaths among all pediatric age groups awaiting L-ITx have decreased; adult L-ITx deaths have dropped less dramatically. Improved care of infants with intestinal failure has led to reduced referrals for L-ITx.

Outcome of intestinal transplants for patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiology of Crohn's disease (CD) is related to immune dysregulation making it unique among indications for intestinal transplants (ITx). We examined whether outcomes of ITx for CD are any worse than the overall ITx population.

METHODS

United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files were analyzed. Adult ITx recipients from 1987 to 2009 were included.

RESULTS

Of 86 primary ITx for CD, 61 (70%) had isolated ITx and 25 (30%) had liver-ITx (L-ITx). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival for isolated ITx was 85%, 67%, and 54%; for L-ITx, 63%, 47%, and 41% (P = .04). The graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 85%, 55%, and 45% for isolated ITx recipients and 63%, 47%, and 41% for L-ITx recipients (Wilcoxon's test, P = .04). Patient and graft survival was better in era 2 (January 2001 through August 2009) than in era 1 (October 1987 through December 2000). In the regression analysis of long-term outcome of adults undergoing ITx, recipient age > 40 years and hospitalization prior to transplantation were negative predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patient and graft survival for CD patients is not inferior to other indications for ITx.

Intestinal transplantation: a review

Parenteral nutrition is a life-saving therapy for patients with intestinal failure. Intestinal transplantation is now recognized as a treatment for patients who develop complications of parenteral nutrition and in whom attempts at intestinal rehabilitation have failed. Patients with parenteral nutrition related liver disease will require a liver graft typically part of a multivisceral transplant. Isolated intestinal transplants are more commonly performed in adults while multivisceral transplants are most commonly performed in infants. Isolated intestinal transplants have the best short-term outcome, with over 80 % survival at 1 year. Patients requiring multivisceral transplants have a high rate of attrition with a 1 year survival less than 70 %. Prognostic factors for a poor outcome include patient hospitalization at the time of transplant and donor age greater than 40 years while systemic sepsis and acute rejection are the major determinant of early postoperative outcome. For patients surviving the first year the outcome of transplantation of the liver in addition to intestine affords some survival advantage though long-term outcome does not yet match other abdominal organs. Outcomes for intestinal retransplantation are poor as a result of immunology and patient debility. Overall intestinal transplantation continues to develop and is a clear indication with cost and quality of life advantages in patients with intestinal failure that do not remain stable on parenteral nutrition.