MD-1 expression regulates direct and indirect allorecognition

Inhibition of myeloid differentiation 1 specifically in colon with antisense oligonucleotide exacerbates dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis

Myeloid differentiation 1 (MD-1), also known as lymphocyte antigen 86 (Ly86), is a soluble protein homologous to MD-2 and forms a complex with radioprotective 105 (RP105). RP105/MD-1 complex negatively regulates toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling and is involved in several immune disorders. However, the precise role of MD-1 in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remains poorly understood. To further investigate the involvement of MD-1 in IBD, we inhibited MD-1 in colon with antisense oligonucleotide (AS-ODN) and assessed the effect of MD-1 inhibition on dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis. We discovered that MD-1 protein expression was remarkably decreased in both patients with ulcerative colitis and mice with DSS-induced colitis. For the first time, we showed that oral administration of MD-1 AS-ODN to mice significantly suppressed the MD-1 protein levels in colon rather than systemic tissues. Subsequently, we found that MD-1 AS-ODN treated mice were more susceptible to DSS-induced colitis based on loss of body weight, colon length, histological scores, and disease activity index. MD-1 inhibition also significantly enhanced inflammatory cytokines production such as IL-6 and IL-1β in colons. Finally, mice treated with MD-1 AS-ODN exhibited increased messenger RNA levels of TLR4 and MyD88 after DSS exposure and showed enhanced nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation compared with the control. Taken together, specifically suppression of MD-1 in colon tissues with AS-ODN exacerbates DSS-induced experimental colitis in mice, which is possibly related to activation of TLR4/NF-κB signaling.

Novel Protective Role of Myeloid Differentiation 1 in Pathological Cardiac Remodelling

Myeloid differentiation 1 (MD-1), a secreted protein interacting with radioprotective 105 (RP105), plays an important role in Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signalling pathway. Previous studies showed that MD-1 may be restricted in the immune system. In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that MD-1 was highly expressed in both human and animal hearts. We also discovered that cardiac-specific overexpression of MD-1 significantly attenuated pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and dysfunction, whereas loss of MD-1 had the opposite effects. Similar results were observed for in vitro angiotensin II-induced neonatal rat cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. The antihypertrophic effects of MD-1 under hypertrophic stimuli were associated with the blockage of MEK-ERK 1/2 and NF-κB signalling. Blocking MEK-ERK 1/2 signalling with a pharmacological inhibitor (U0126) greatly attenuated the detrimental effects observed in MD-1 knockout cardiomyocytes exposed to angiotensin II stimuli. Similar results were observed by blocking NF-κB signalling with a pharmacological inhibitor (BAY11–7082). Our data indicate that MD-1 inhibits cardiac hypertrophy and suppresses cardiac dysfunction during the remodelling process, which is dependent on its modulation of the MEK-ERK 1/2 and NF-κB signalling pathways. Thus, MD-1 might be a novel target for the treatment of pathological cardiac hypertrophy.

MD1 expression regulates development of regulatory T cells

Intense interest has centered around the role of a subset of regulatory T cells, CD4+CD25+ Treg, in controlling the development of autoimmune disorders, allograft rejection, infection, malignancy, and allergy. We previously reported that MD1, a molecule known to be important in regulation of expression of RP105, also was important in regulating alloimmunity, and that blockade of expression of MD1 diminished graft rejection in vivo. One mechanism by which an MD1-RP105 complex exerts an effect on immune responses is through interference with an LPS-derived signal delivered through the CD14-MD-2-TLR4 complex. We show below that LPS signaling for Treg induction occurs at higher LPS thresholds that for effector T cell responses. In addition, blockade of MD1 functional activity in dendritic cells (using anti-MD1 mAbs, MD1 antisense deoxyoligonucleotides, or responder cells from mice with deletion of the MD1 gene), resulted in elevated Treg induction in response to allogeneic stimulation (in vivo or in vitro) in the presence of LPS. These data offer one mechanistic explanation for the augmented immunosuppression described following anti-MD1 treatment.

Is the CD200/CD200 receptor interaction more than just a myeloid cell inhibitory signal?

The membrane glycoprotein CD200, which has a widespread but defined distribution and a structurally similar receptor (CD200R) that transmits an inhibitory signal to cells of the hematopoetic lineage, especially myeloid cells, has been characterized. CD200R expression is restricted predominantly to cells of the myeloid lineage indicating that this ligand/receptor pair has a specific role in controlling myeloid cell function. In addition to CD200R, several related genes have been identified. Whether these gene products also regulate immune function is controversial. CD200R is also expressed by certain subsets of T cells and CD200 may be expressed by antigen-presenting cells, adding additional layers of complexity to the CD200/CD200R axis. Because monocytic myeloid cells provide a link between the innate and adaptive immune response, mechanisms to control their function through receptors such as CD200R will have therapeutic potential. Regulation of immune responses is accomplished by the concerted, but opposing, activity of kinases and phosphatases, fine control often being achieved through paired receptors. In this review, we will consider whether CD200R signaling functions within a framework of paired activating and inhibitory receptors and whether the inhibitory signal delivered has functional consequences beyond inhibition of myeloid cell proinflammatory activation.

Can an allograft become harmonious with its recipient by analogous mechanisms to the long-term survival of a parasite in its host? Transplantation is similar to parasitism and chronic parasite infection can prolong allograft survival

Organ transplantation is very similar to the parasitism, the immune responses to the allograft and parasite share some general characters in acute stage. But host-parasite interplay seems harmonious and clinically asymptomatic carriers act as long-term reservoirs for transmission even several decades. It is proposed that the allograft also can survive long-term like the parasite harmonious with the host if we exploit the mechanism of the parasitism. How can the parasite escape the immunologic cleaning? Recent research found that: (1) Almost all the parasites infection can break the balance of Th1/Th2 and induce the Th2 bias. The level of cytokine excreted by Th2 is increased. (2) Parasite infection can interfere in antigen presentation processing through cystatins and "dendritic cell paralysis". (3) Regulatory T cells were found surrounding the local site of parasite worms. (4) Parasite infections can switch of eicosanoid metabolism, and the anti-inflammatory mediator of the plasma is increasingly manifest in the chronic infection stage. And in animal model, chronic infection can prolong the allograft survival. If the hypotheses are correct, it will give another novel therapeutic option for patients with organ transplantation.