Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for pediatric kidney allograft recipients

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery on a gigantic primary retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Primary teratomas in the retroperitoneum are rare, incidentally identified in children, and resected using a laparoscopic approach. However, when it increases in size, the laparoscopic approach is technically demanding, leaving a large skin incision for tumor removal.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

The patient was a 20-year-old woman who presented with chronic left flank pain. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) revealed a 25-cm wide giant polycystic and solid retroperitoneal tumor containing calcification located in the upper portion of the left kidney, strongly compressing the pancreas and spleen. No other metastatic lesions were observed. Additionally, abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed that the polycystic tumor consisted of serous fluid and fatty components, and bone and tooth components were found in the tumor center. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with retroperitoneal mature teratoma and a hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery using bikini line skin incision was performed. The specimen was 27 × 25 cm in size, weighing 2512 g. Histology revealed that the tumor was a benign, mature teratoma without a malignant component. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 7. The patient remained healthy without any recurrence and the postoperative scar is barely visible under direct vision.

DISCUSSION

Primary retroperitoneal mature teratomas can enlarge without initially causing symptoms and can be incidentally identified using imaging studies.

CONCLUSION

A hand-assisted laparoscopic approach using a bikini line skin incision is safe, minimally invasive, and provides better cosmesis.

Comparison of outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic to open donor nephrectomy for pediatric recipients

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of pediatric recipients of kidneys procured using a hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALDN group) to an open technique (ODN group). Twenty-eight patients ≤18 yr old (HALDN group) were compared with 17 patients (ODN group). The serum creatinine for HALDN and ODN groups at discharge were 0.93 ± 0.48 and 0.94 ± 0.54 mg/dL (p = 0.917), respectively. The serum creatinine for HALDN and ODN groups at six and 12 months was 1.01 ± 0.44 and 1.11 ± 0.55, and 1.04 ± 0.52 and 1.14 ± 0.46 mg/dL (p = 0.516, p = 0.554), respectively. The eGFR for HALDN and ODN groups at discharge was 108.66 ± 37.23 and 106.1 ± 50.55 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.845), respectively. The eGFR for HALDN and ODN groups at six and 12 months was 97.77 ± 28.25 and 81.73 ± 27.46, and 94.56 ± 28.3 and 85.74 ± 30.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.085, p = 0.344), respectively. The patient and graft survival for both groups were 100% at 12 months post-transplant. In conclusion, the short-term outcome of recipients of kidneys procured via HALDN is comparable to that of kidneys procured via ODN in pediatric patients.

Is laparoscopic donation safe for paediatric recipients?--a study of 85 paediatric recipients comparing open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

The safety of adult laparoscopic donor nephrectomy remains controversial with respect to paediatric recipients with few data existing about its efficacy. Small studies have shown no difference in graft survival when compared with open techniques, but previous data from United Network for Organ Sharing suggests a higher incidence of rejection in laparoscopically procured kidneys.

METHODS

We examined the outcome in a total of 85 consecutive paediatric renal recipients, comparing 46 recipients of laparoscopically procured kidneys (performed over a 3-year period, 2004-07) to a historical control of 39 open donor recipients. Thirty-seven laparoscopic donors were by the hand-assisted technique.

RESULTS

Mean recipient age was 9.8 (SD 5.04) years in the laparoscopic group and 10.4 (SD 4.67) years in the open group (P = 0.617). Two patients had delayed graft function in the laparoscopic group (4.3%) and one (2.5%) in the open group (P = 0.562). At 1 year follow-up, there was 100% graft survival in the laparoscopic group compared to 92% (P = 0.093) in the open group. Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection within 1 year of transplant was 26% (16 episodes in 12 patients) in the laparoscopic group compared to 41% (29 episodes in 16 patients) in the open group (P = 0.219). There were no deaths in the laparoscopic group but there were three deaths (7.6%) in the open group (P = 0.093).

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience of laparoscopic kidney donation for paediatric recipients suggests excellent outcome with no difference in rejection rate or graft survival compared to open donation. Laparoscopic donation is the optimal method of kidney procurement for paediatric recipients.

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the pediatric recipient in a dual-site program

BACKGROUND

At our institution, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is done at a different hospital site than pediatric recipient transplantation, whereas open donor nephrectomy (OLDN) is done in the adjacent operating room. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of a dual-site renal transplantation program by comparing the outcomes of pediatric recipients of LLDN vs. OLDN.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of consecutive pediatric recipients (n = 10) of LLDN (June 2002 to June 2005) compared to the 10 most recent pediatric recipients of OLDN (March 2001 to June 2005). Renal function was assessed with calculated creatinine clearance using the Schwartz formula and the following outcomes were assessed: delayed graft function, ureteral complications, acute rejection and patient and graft survival. Results are expressed as median (IQR).

RESULTS

When comparing the laparoscopic vs. open group, there were no significant differences in recipient age, height, weight, preoperative calculated creatinine clearance and warm ischemia time. Twelve month postoperative creatinine clearance was 88 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (57-99) in the laparoscopic group (n = 8) and 66 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (60-86) in the open group (n = 9), p = 0.2. In the LLDN group vs. the OLDN group, delayed graft function was 0% vs. 10% (p = 1.0), ureteral complications were 20% vs. 30% (p = 1.0), and acute rejection was 20% vs. 40% (p = 0.6). In the laparoscopic group, one-yr patient and graft survival were both 100%, as compared to 100% and 89%, respectively, in the open group.

CONCLUSION

A dual-site laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program is not associated with adverse pediatric recipient outcomes when compared to a same-site open donor approach.