Ascites after orthotopic liver transplantation in children

Approach to persistent ascites after liver transplantation

Persistent ascites (PA) after liver transplantation (LT), commonly defined as ascites lasting more than 4 wk after LT, can be expected in up to 7% of patients. Despite being relatively rare, it is associated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher 1-year mortality. The cause of PA can be divided into vascular, hepatic, or extrahepatic. Vascular causes of PA include hepatic outflow and inflow obstructions, which are usually successfully treated. Regarding modifiable hepatic causes, recurrent hepatitis C and acute cellular rejection are the leading ones. Considering predictors for PA, the presence of ascites, refractory ascites, hepato-renal syndrome type 1, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, and prolonged ischemic time significantly influence the development of PA after LT. The initial approach to patients with PA should be to diagnose the treatable cause of PA. The stepwise approach in evaluating PA includes diagnostic paracentesis, ultrasound with Doppler, and an echocardiogram when a cardiac cause is suspected. Finally, a percutaneous or transjugular liver biopsy should be performed in cases where the diagnosis is unclear. PA of unknown cause should be treated with diuretics and paracentesis, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and splenic artery embolization are treatment methods in patients with refractory ascites after LT.

Determinants of large drain losses early after pediatric liver transplantation

The goal of this study was to evaluate postoperative ascites to correlate it with graft dysfunction and other complications. We therefore reviewed the files of patients transplanted between 2009 and 2014 to correlate drain losses with indication, patient and organ size, PELD, graft type, GRWR, NRBW, NGWD, cold ischemia time, histologically proven graft dysfunction, and surgical complications. Of 120 LTs in 104 patients, 48 (40%) were complicated by graft dysfunction, 43 (36%) by surgical complications, and 25 (21%) by cellular rejection. Large drain losses correlated with younger age (P=.05), graft dysfunction (P<.01), surgical complications (P<.01), chylous ascites (P=.05); there was no association with PELD, GRWR, NRBW, or NGWD. Graft dysfunction was predicted by >20 mL/kg/d of ascites at age 0-2 years (AUROC 0.671), and >10 mL/kg/d above 2 years (AUROC 0.710). The measurement of drain losses after pediatric LT could be used as a non-invasive marker of graft dysfunction. Younger recipients tend to develop larger amounts of ascites, and its persistence is associated with early complications.

Examinations of ascites from prophylactic drains can predict intra-abdominal infections after living donor liver transplantation

Studies suggest that prophylactic intra-abdominal drains are unnecessary for cadaveric liver transplantation using whole liver grafts because there is no benefit from drainage. However, no studies have investigated on the necessity of prophylactic drains after LDLT using split-liver grafts or reduced-liver grafts, which may present a high risk of post-transplant intra-abdominal infections. This retrospective study investigated whether the ascitic data on POD 5 after LDLT can predict intra-abdominal infections and on the post-transplant management of prophylactic drains. Between March 2008 and March 2013, 90 LDLTs were performed. We assessed the number of ascitic cells, biochemical examinations, and cultivation tests at POD1 and POD5. The incidence rates of post-transplant intra-abdominal infections were 24.4%. The multivariate analysis showed that left lobe and S2 monosegment grafts were a significant risk factor for intra-abdominal infections (p = 0.006). The patients with intra-abdominal infections had significantly higher acsitic LDH levels and the positive rate of ascitic culture at POD5 in comparison with patients without infections (p < 0.001 and p = 0.014, respectively). LDLT using left lobe and S2 monosegment grafts yields a high risk for post-transplant intra-abdominal infections, and ascitic LDH and cultivation tests at POD5 via prophylactic drains can predict intra-abdominal infections.

Combined heterotopic liver-pancreas transplantation as a curative treatment for liver cirrhosis and diabetes mellitus in cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited disease with a defect in epithelial chloride transport that results in a multisystem disease. Although pulmonary disease remains the primary cause of morbidity and mortality, focal biliary cirrhosis and portal hypertension may develop in up to 8% of these patients. Liver transplantation (TX) is an accepted therapy and shows good results. We report on a patient with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the most common CFTR mutation delta F 508 who received a combined heterotopic liver and pancreas transplantation at the age of 18 yr. He suffered from CFRD, which untypically required high doses of insulin. In addition, the patient had pulmonary complications, was chronically colonized with multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MBL) and had an allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). The patient remained in stable health for 54 months post-TX and was able to live a nearly normal life. With a follow-up of five yr, the function of the liver and pancreas allografts was excellent. However, and sadly, his pulmonary function continued to deteriorate from progression of his CF, and he died of respiratory failure due to a severe pneumonia and septicemia at the age of 23 yr and five months.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients: technical considerations and review of the literature

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an accepted therapeutic option for the treatment of complications of portal hypertension, such as refractory variceal bleeding, refractory ascites, refractory hepatic hydrothorax and Budd-Chiari syndrome, in cirrhotic livers. However, portal hypertension is uncommon after liver transplantation, and when it occurs, it has been related to hepatic vein outflow obstruction, small liver donor size, rejection, or recurrence of the original disease. There are few reports in the literature addressing TIPS experience in liver transplant patients. This review will address the published experience of TIPS procedures in liver transplant patients, including indications, technical issues, complications, and outcomes.

Management of intra-abdominal drain after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

There have been few reports on the management of intra-abdominal drains after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We retrospectively investigated changes in ascitic data related to management of an intra-abdominal drain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2008 and June 2009, we performed 28 LDLT. On the first and the fifth postoperative day (POD) after LDLT, we examined the number of ascites cells and cell fractions as well as performed biochemical examination and cultures.

RESULTS

The day of removal of the drain for massive ascites (10 mL/kg/d or more) was 14.2 ± 5.4 POD; for less than 10 mL/kg/d it was 8.7 ± 1.9 POD (P < .001). Nine patients were ascites culture positive; long-term placement of the drain caused an infection in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

When the amount of ascitic fluid on the fifth POD after LDLT was small, it was important to assess the properties of the ascitic fluid because of the possibility of a drain infection or of poor drainage. If the ascitic neutrophil count is less than 250/mm(3) or the examined ascites is normal, intra-abdominal drains should be removed.

Long-term follow-up of portal hypertension after liver transplantation in children

We aimed to describe the long-term changes in the imaging and clinical features of PHALT in children. A retrospective review was undertaken of consecutive children undergoing their first liver transplant between 1993 and 2003. Details of clinical progress and ultrasound imaging were recorded at one-yr post-transplantation and at last follow-up. Data were extracted on 83 children (median age at transplant 1.7 yr, range one month to 17.5 yr, 44 girls) who underwent 89 transplants. Four of these children died at a mean 5.6 yr (range 3.8-6.9 yr) after transplantation. Of the survivors, follow-up at one yr (n = 83) and at last follow-up (n = 71, median 4.3 yr post-transplant) revealed imaging evidence of splenomegaly in 46% and 44%, ascites in 6% and 4%, and portal systemic collaterals in 12% and 14%, respectively. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage associated with portal hypertension had occurred in no children at one yr and in four (6%) at latest follow-up. Features of portal hypertension on ultrasound scan are common in children before liver transplantation. An important minority of children will suffer clinically significant complications of PHALT during long-term follow-up, caused by both vascular and parenchymal disease.