Living-related liver transplantation with removal of inferior vena cava for unresectable hepatoblastoma

Non-standard hepatic venous reconstruction in the setting of absent inferior vena cava in partial graft pediatric liver transplantation-A matched retrospective cohort study

Recipient cava may be unavailable for outflow reconstruction in some children undergoing liver transplantation (PLT) due to caval agenesis, tumor, or fibrotic caval occlusion. Non-standard hepatic venous reconstruction (NHVR) with a direct veno-caval anastomosis or neo-cava reconstruction is necessary in such cases. Retrospective review of all PLT needing NHVR performed in our unit from January 2010 to September 2019 was performed. Outcomes of this group were compared to a 2:1 matched control group who underwent transplantation with standard piggyback technique. Fifteen children (4.9%) of 304 PLT recipients underwent NHVR. Caval agenesis in biliary atresia (n = 5, 33%) and hepatoblastoma infiltrating the cava (n = 4, 27%) were the commonest indications. Ten children had neo-cava reconstruction, while 5 had direct anastomosis to the supra-hepatic caval cuff or right atrium. One child had developed neo-cava thrombosis without graft venous outflow obstruction in the post-operative period. There was no significant difference in major morbidity, need for re-operation (20% vs 16.7%; P = 1.00), hospital stay (24 days, vs 21 days; P = .32), graft & patient survival among the study and control groups. Absent or inadequate recipient cava during PLT with a partial liver graft can be safely managed with technical modifications. Results equivalent to standard piggyback implantation can be achieved.

Inferior Vena Cava and Venous Outflow Reconstruction in Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Children: A Single-Center Retrospective Study and Literature Review

Background

In this report, we present technical problems and solutions used in the reconstruction of the inferior vena cava and graft venous outflow during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children.

Material/Methods

In 65 grafts out of 379 liver transplantations from living donors, reconstruction of multiple hepatic venous branches and/or IVC was necessary. In 4 cases, cryopreserved deceased donor venous grafts were used for the reconstruction of the IVC and/or HV.

Results

Follow-up ranged from 2 months to 17.8 years (median 7.2 years). In 4 children, liver re-transplantation was required for a reason not related to venous outflow (biliary complications in 3 patients, graft insufficiency caused by small-for-size syndrome). Two patients died: 1 due to tumor recurrence and 1 due to multi-organ failure. Fifty-nine patients are alive with good liver function. One patient (1.5%) after deceased donor venous graft reconstruction showed symptoms of venous outflow obstruction, which was successfully treated with endovascular balloon angioplasty and stent placement. The remaining 59 transplanted patients do not show any signs of venous outflow obstruction.

Conclusions

In most cases, the reconstruction of multiple hepatic veins of living donor allografts can successfully be done with local venoplasty, while using cold-stored vein grafts may be helpful in selected cases of LDLT.

Long-term physiologic and oncologic outcomes of inferior vena cava thrombosis in pediatric malignant abdominal tumors

BACKGROUND

The long-term physiologic and oncologic outcomes of treatment for inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis in children with malignant abdominal tumors are unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of children with malignant IVC tumor thrombosis treated at our institution between January 1996 and December 2011. Extent of tumor thrombus was classified using the Hinman system. Disease stage, management, and oncologic and physiologic outcomes and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 15 patients (median age, 4.7 years): 12 with Wilms tumor, 2 with hepatoblastoma, and 1 with adrenocortical carcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy changed Hinman levels in 2 (13%) patients. IVC thrombus resection was complete in 6 (40%) patients, partial in 7 (47%) patients, and not performed in 1 (6.7%) patient. On follow-up imaging, 8 (53%) patients' IVCs were patent, 6 (40%) had residual thrombus, and 1 (6.7%) was surgically interrupted. Three (20%) patients had perioperative complications, and 2 (13%) experienced transient effects related to IVC occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of tumor thrombus in the vena cava of children with solid abdominal tumors is challenging. Evidence on which to base strong treatment recommendations is lacking. Few long-term physiologic complications were observed.