Successful sirolimus rescue in tacrolimus-induced thrombotic microangiopathy after living-related liver transplantation

Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive medications play a crucial role in determining both organ and patient survival following liver transplantation (LT). Typically, immunosuppressive protocols for pediatric LT patients rely on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). While inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have demonstrated beneficial outcomes in adult recipients of liver allografts, such as improved renal function post-LT, their application in pediatric liver transplant recipients is a subject of debate due to uncertain efficacy and potential adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

This review evaluates the potential roles of mTOR inhibitors in the context of pediatric LT patients.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol for conduct and reporting. Databases until 31 August 2023 were searched using specific terms and keywords. All clinical studies focusing on mTOR inhibitors in pediatric LT were included.

RESULTS

Out of 888 identified articles, 30 studies, involving 386 children who had undergone liver transplantation and received mTOR-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens, met the inclusion criteria. The beneficial impacts of switching from a CNI to an mTOR inhibitor or adding an mTOR inhibitor to CNI-reduced immunosuppression in LT pediatric patients with impaired kidney function are controversial, and high-powered clinical studies are need. It appears that enhancing immunosuppression by adding an mTOR inhibitor to CNI is helpful for pediatric LT recipients who are experiencing refractory acute rejection or chronic rejection. mTOR-inhibitor-containing regimens failed to reduce the occurrence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) among children with LT that may be due to concomitant high CNI concentration among studied patients. The effectiveness of mTOR inhibitors in treating PTLD remains uncertain; however, in patients with PTLD who are at high risk of rejection, mTOR inhibitors may be administered. Conversion to or the addition of mTOR inhibitors to maintenance immunosuppression seems to be suitable for pediatric patients who received a transplant due to hepatic malignancies such as hepatoblastoma or hepatocellular carcinoma or for those with post-transplant primary or recurrent malignancies. Switching to an mTOR inhibitor may improve some CNI-related adverse effects such as gingival hyperplasia, neurotoxicity, nephropathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or thrombotic microangiopathy.

CONCLUSION

Although the exact role of mTOR inhibitors among pediatric patients who have received a liver transplant needs further study, two algorithms are presented in this review to guide conversion from CNIs to mTOR inhibitors or the addition of mTOR inhibitor to a CNI-minimization immunosuppressive regimen for pediatric patients who may benefit from this class of drugs. This review mainly consisted of retrospective studies with inadequate sample sizes and lacked a control group, which represents the main limitation of this study.

Beyond Immunosuppression: The Intricate Relationship Between Tacrolimus and Microangiopathy

Tacrolimus, widely known as Prograf, has become the preferred immunosuppressant for preventing graft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients, particularly in steroid-sparing regimens. Its efficacy and reduced risk of acute and chronic rejection compared to cyclosporine have made it the preferred treatment option for transplant patients. However, tacrolimus has drawbacks as it is associated with adverse effects, such as renal tubular necrosis, kidney failure, hypertension, metabolic acidosis, and new-onset diabetes mellitus. Among the less common but potentially severe complications is thrombotic microangiopathy linked to tacrolimus usage. Identifying and addressing this condition early on is crucial given its severity and potential complications. Manifestations of this microangiopathy can vary, encompassing renal, neurological, cardiac, and respiratory symptoms, and, in some cases, presenting as pancreatitis, intestinal ischemia, or skin abnormalities. Although conventional management often involves plasma exchange as the primary therapeutic option, recent insights into the pathophysiology have led to newer drugs, such as eculizumab and belatacept, offering promising outcomes. In this narrative review, we delve deeper into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of tacrolimus-induced thrombotic microangiopathy and aim to provide clinicians with valuable recommendations for efficient and timely treatment strategies. By understanding the complexities of this condition and staying abreast of the latest advancements in therapeutic options, healthcare providers can optimize patient outcomes and ensure safer tacrolimus administration in solid organ transplant recipients.

TMA in Kidney Transplantation

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a rare and devastating complication of kidney transplantation, which often leads to graft failure. Posttransplant TMA (PT-TMA) may occur either de novo or as a recurrence of the disease. De novo TMA can be triggered by immunosuppressant drugs, antibody-mediated rejection, viral infections, and ischemia/reperfusion injury in patients with no evidence of the disease before transplantation. Recurrent TMA may occur in the kidney grafts of patients with a history of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in the native kidneys. Studies have shown that some patients with aHUS carry genetic abnormalities that affect genes that code for complement regulators (CFH, MCP, CFI) and components (C3 and CFB), whereas in 10% of patients (mostly children), anti-FH autoantibodies have been reported. The incidence of aHUS recurrence is determined by the underlying genetic or acquired complement abnormality. Although treatment of the causative agents is usually the first line of treatment for de novo PT-TMA, this approach might be insufficient. Plasma exchange typically resolves hematologic abnormalities but does not improve kidney function. Targeted complement inhibition is an effective treatment for recurrent TMA and may be effective in de novo PT-TMA as well, but it is necessary to establish which patients can benefit from different therapeutic options and when and how these can be applied.

vWFpp/ADAMTS13 ratio is a useful marker of postliver transplantation thrombotic microangiopathy: A pediatric case report

vWFpp/ADAMTS13 ratio should be further studied as a useful marker for diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy postliver transplantation. Immunosuppressive regimen modification and plasma supplementation can lead to recovery.

Complement-mediated renal diseases after kidney transplantation - current diagnostic and therapeutic options in de novo and recurrent diseases

For decades, kidney diseases related to inappropriate complement activity, such as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy (a subtype of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis), have mostly been complicated by worsened prognoses and rapid progression to end-stage renal failure. Alternative complement pathway dysregulation, whether congenital or acquired, is well-recognized as the main driver of the disease process in these patients. The list of triggers include: surgery, infection, immunologic factors, pregnancy and medications. The advent of complement activation blockade, however, revolutionized the clinical course and outcome of these diseases, rendering transplantation a viable option for patients who were previously considered as non-transplantable cases. Several less-costly therapeutic lines and likely better efficacy and safety profiles are currently underway. In view of the challenging nature of diagnosing these diseases and the long-term cost implications, a multidisciplinary approach including the nephrologist, renal pathologist and the genetic laboratory is required to help improve overall care of these patients and draw the optimum therapeutic plan.

De novo thrombotic microangiopathy after kidney transplantation

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a serious complication of transplantation that adversely affects kidney transplant recipient and allograft survival. Post-transplant TMA is usually classified into two categories: 1) recurrent TMA and 2) de novo TMA. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) resulting from dysregulation and over-activation of the alternate complement pathway is a rare disease but the most common diagnosis associated with recurrence in the allografts. De novo TMA, on the other hand, represents an overwhelming majority of the cases of post-transplant TMA and is a substantially more heterogeneous entity than recurrent aHUS. Here, we review the etio-pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment options for de novo post-transplant TMA. It is usually in the setting of calcineurin inhibitor use, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use, or antibody mediated rejection; recently genetic mutations in complement regulatory genes for Factor H and Factor I similar to those described in aHUS have been reported in up to a third of these patients. Systemic signs of TMA are frequently absent, and a renal allograft biopsy is often needed to establish the diagnosis. Although withdrawal of the offending agents is usually the first line of treatment and resolution of laboratory abnormalities has been documented with this approach in several case reports and case series, available retrospective data demonstrate lack of benefit in long-term graft outcomes. Co-stimulation blockage with belatacept provides an effective alternate immunosuppressive strategy for these patients. Anti-complement therapy with eculizumab is effective in some cases; further work is required to define which patients with TMA (with and without concomitant antibody-mediated rejection) would benefit from receiving this treatment, and what biomarkers can be used to identify them.

Distinct deleterious effects of cyclosporine and tacrolimus and combined tacrolimus-sirolimus on endothelial cells: protective effect of defibrotide

Endothelial dysfunction seems to be a key factor in the development of several complications observed early after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The conditioning regimen and many other factors associated with the procedure are responsible for this endothelial damage. The effects of immunosuppressive agents on endothelial function have not been explored in detail. We evaluated the effects of 3 drugs commonly used in HSCT: 2 calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine A (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC), and an inhibitor of mTOR, sirolimus (SIR). We also evaluated the effect of the combination of TAC and SIR (TAC+SIR), which is used increasingly in clinical practice. Microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1) were exposed to these drugs to evaluate changes in (1) intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 expression on the cell surface, assessed by immunofluorescence labeling and expressed as the mean gray value (MGV); (2) reactivity of the extracellular matrix (ECM) toward platelets, upon exposure of the ECM to circulating blood; and (3) whole-blood clot formation, assessed by thromboelastometry. Studies were conducted in the absence and presence of defibrotide (DF) to assess its possible protective effect. The exposure of HMEC-1 to CSA and TAC+SIR significantly increased the expression of ICAM-1 (157.5 ± 11.6 and 153.4 ± 9.5 MGV, respectively, versus 105.7 ± 6.5 MGV in controls [both P < .05]). TAC applied alone increased ICAM-1 slightly (120.3 ± 8.2 MGV), and SIR had no effect (108.9 ± 7.4 MGV). ECM reactivity increased significantly only in response to CSA (surface covered by platelets of 41.2% ± 5.4% versus 30.1% ± 2.0%, P < .05). DF attenuated all these changes. No significant changes in the viscoelastic properties of clot formation were observed in any condition with blood samples incubated in vitro. In conclusion, CSA and TAC+SIR had a proinflammatory effect, but only CSA exhibited an additional prothrombotic effect. Interestingly, DF exerted clear protective anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic effects on the endothelium.

Lipid metabolism and oxidative stress in children after liver transplantation treated with sirolimus

Lipid disturbances are one of the most frequent side effects of SRL; however, clinical consequences are not known. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of AS in children after LTx treated with SRL. In 17 children with median age 13.2 yr (1.9-17.9) who received SRL on average for 4.1 yr (s.d. ± 2.9) we measured and compared with age-matched healthy control group (n = 45) lipid parameters and markers of AS: ADMA, oxyLDL, GSH, GPx, TC, TG, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, ApoAI, ApoB, ApoE, lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). We found no major differences in cholesterol, cholesterol in lipoprotein fractions and TG concentrations between patients receiving SRL and the control group. ApoE was markedly increased in the study group (19.1 g/L [±1.8]) when compared to controls (9.8 [±3.9]). ApoA1 was decreased in the study group: 1.30 g/L (±0.2) vs. 1.45 (±0.25), p = 0.04. ApoB and Lpa concentrations were similar in both groups. There were differences in oxidative stress markers: GSH 743 (±66.2) mol/mL vs. 780 (±48.2), p = 0.02 and GPx 32.8 (±5.5) U/gHb vs. 34.3(±2.6), p = 0.01. Markers of AS: ADMA did not differ between groups and oxidized LDLc was significantly lower in SRL group: 190 mU/mL (±113) vs. 237 (±107) in control, p < 0.05. SRL does not significantly disturb lipid metabolism and oxidative status in children after LTx.