Microbiological findings of culture-positive preservation fluid in liver transplantation

Effect of preservation fluid contamination and associated possible donor-derived infections on early postoperative prognosis in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The study aims to analyze the epidemiology of preservation fluid (PF) contamination and investigate the impact of PF contamination and possible donor-derived infections(p-DDI) on early postoperative prognosis in kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

METHODS

A total of 256 PF samples were collected for microbiological evaluation from all KT recipients who received deceased donor donations in our hospital from June 2018 to August 2022. Data on the baseline and clinical characteristics of these PF corresponding to recipients and donors were extracted from the electronic medical record. It mainly included the early postoperative complications and prognosis of KT recipients.

RESULTS

From June 2018 to August 2022, 597 kidney transplants were performed in our center, with 260 recipients receiving kidney transplantation from donation after citizens' death. A total of 256 samples of PF were collected, of which 64.5% (165/256) were culture positive, and 24.6% (63/165) of the culture-positive PF were polymicrobial contamination. A total of 238 strains were isolated, of which coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) had the highest proportion of 34.0% (81/238), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae with 20.6% (49/238) and Escherichia coli with 8.8% (21/238). Recipients with culture-positive PF had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative infection (55.8% vs. 20.9%, P < 0.001) and DGF (38.2% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.023). In addition, the incidence of p-DDI was 12.9% (33/256). CRKP was the most common pathogen causing p-DDI. The recipients who developed p-DDI had a higher rate of graft loss (9.1% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001), mortality (12.1% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.018), and longer postoperative hospital stay (30 days (19.5-73.5) vs. (22 days (18-32), P < 0.05) compared with recipients who did not develop p-DDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Culture-positive PF is potentially significant for KT recipients, and p-DDI may increase the risk of poor prognosis for recipients. Prophylactic anti-infective treatment should be actively performed for highly virulent or multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens (especially Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, CRKP) in PF to avoid the occurrence of p-DDI.

Substantial decline of organ preservation fluid contamination following adoption of ischemia-free liver transplantation: a post-hoc analysis

INTRODUCTION

Preservation fluid (PF) contaminations are common in conventional liver transplantation (CLT) and presumably originate from organ or PF exposures to the external environment in a non-strict sterile manner. Such exposures and PF contamination may be avoided in ischaemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) because of the strict sterile surgical procedures. In this study, the authors evaluated the impact of IFLT on organ PF contamination.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis using data from the first randomized controlled trial of IFLT was performed to compare the incidence, pathogenic spectrum of PF contamination, and incidence of early recipient infection between IFLT and CLT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore risk factors for PF contamination.

RESULTS

Of the 68 cases recruited in the trial, 64 were included in this post-hoc analysis. The incidence of culture-positive PF was 9.4% (3/32) in the IFLT group versus 78.1% (25/32) in the CLT group ( P <0.001). Three microorganisms were isolated from PF in the IFLT group, while 43 were isolated in the CLT group. The recipient infection rate within postoperative day 14 was 3.1% (1/32) in the IFLT group vs 15.6% (5/32) in the CLT group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.196). Multivariate analysis revealed that adopting IFLT is an independent protective factor for culture-positive PF.

CONCLUSION

PF contamination is substantially decreased in IFLT, and IFLT application is an independent protective factor for PF contamination. Using rigorous sterile measures and effective antibiotic therapy during IFLT may decrease PF contamination.

Utility of deceased donor cultures in solid organ transplantation in preventing donor-derived bacterial and fungal infectious diseases transmission

Deceased donor and organ perfusion fluid cultures are obtained in order to inform recipient antimicrobial management and therefore reduce the risk of donor-derived bacterial and fungal infections. However, important heterogeneity exists in laboratory practice across organ procurement organizations and clinical management of culture results across transplant centers. While not standardized, the clinical approach to donors with positive bacterial and/or fungal cultures should be informed by the risk of donor-derived infection (DDI) and the consequence of organ non-utilization and account for potential unintended effects of antimicrobial use in the recipient. In this review, we summarize the literature on bacterial and fungal DDIs, describe the significance of positive cultures by anatomic site, and summarize current guidance on the management of positive cultures from donors or preservation fluids.

Effects of preservative fluid associated possible donor-derived carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae infection on kidney transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND

Infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. This study aimed to investigate the preservation fluid (PF) samples from deceased donors and report the impacts of possible donor-derived carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (pdd-CRKP) infections on KT recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed that included all recipients who received kidney transplantation from deceased donors in our hospital between December 2018 and December 2020. A total of 212 patients received kidney transplantation from deceased donors, a total of 206 PF samples were collected, and 20 recipients had a CRKP-positive culture. Both donors and recipients with CRKP-positive PF cultures were divided into two groups, and continuous variables between the two groups were compared using independent-sample t tests and Mann-Whitney tests. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The significance level of p values was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 337 recipients underwent kidney transplantation, including 212 recipients of organs from deceased donors and 110 corresponding deceased donors. A total of 206 PF samples were collected, and 20 recipients had CRKP-positive PF cultures. The donors' length of ICU stay was a potential risk factor for CRKP positivity in the PF culture (P < 0.05). Fifteen recipients were infected with pdd-CRKP, and the incidence of pdd-CRKP infection was 7.3% (15/206). The use of antibiotics, including ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), was a potential protective factor against death and graft loss in recipients with a CRKP-positive PF culture (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the incidence of pdd-CRKP is high in our centre, recipients with pdd-CRKP infection can still achieve a good prognosis with the use of antimicrobial agents including CAZ-AVI.

Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in a liver transplant patient: A case report and review of the literature

The share of Klebsiella pneumoniae in infections has been recently increasing. Multidrug-resistant strains that produce more than one antibiotic resistance mechanism are also increasingly isolated. Contamination of the organs preservation fluid occurs quite often, but the isolated microorganisms are mainly saprophytic bacteria that are part of the skin microbiota (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium spp). The following case describes a K. pneumoniae blood infection in a patient after liver transplantation. Susceptibility of the strains to chosen antimicrobials was determined using the automated method. For strain isolated from blood, it was confirmed by loop-mediated isothermal amplification of genetic material.

Candida Contamination in Kidney and Liver Organ Preservation Solution: Does It Matter?

INTRODUCTION

Fungal infections remain a major challenge affecting outcomes after kidney (KT) and liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

In this retrospective single center study, the incidence of Candida contamination in renal and hepatic graft preservation solution (PS) was evaluated. In addition, Candida associated infections in recipients and related complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, the PS of 1248 hepatic and 1273 renal grafts were evaluated. The incidence of fungal contamination in the PS of hepatic and renal grafts was 1.2% and 0.86%, respectively. Additionally, the hepatic PS of one patient who underwent a combined liver-kidney transplant had Candida contamination. Candida albicans was the most common organism (70.4%) and 65.4% of the patients received antifungal treatment. Candida-associated complications in the recipients was 19%. Complications in LT patients included Candida peritonitis and Candida sepsis. Two KT recipients with contaminated PS developed a mycotic aneurysm at the anastomotic site resulting in severe bleeding. The 1-year mortality in patients with PS contamination for LT and KT recipients was 33% and 18%, respectively. Although the incidence of fungal contamination of PS was low, contaminated PS was associated with a high mortality.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study suggest that PS should be evaluated for fungal growth.

Culture of Transplant Perfusate Using BACTEC Technology and Antibiotic Prophylaxis Influences Wound Complications Within a Kidney Transplant and SPK Transplant Cohort

PURPOSE

Routine screening for microbial contamination in organ recovery perfusion transport solution (ORPTS) is by microbiological culture without broth enrichment. Our aim was to examine the clinical utility of broth enrichment of perfusion solution, through use of BACTEC (Becton Dickinson) blood culture media, in preventing wound complications for transplant recipients in comparison with culture without enrichment.

METHODS

We prospectively collected samples of ORPTS of 395 kidney (n = 250) or simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK, n = 145) donors over a 7-year period. Results of culture with and without broth enrichment (n = 285) using BACTEC blood culture media were examined to compare the sensitivity of BACTEC with non-BACTEC methods. We then conducted a paired analysis of 110 recipients with both BACTEC and non-BACTEC culture organ perfusion media. We examined the rates of wound infection and whether the use of targeted antimicrobials reduced infections in the BACTEC group and recipients with both types of cultures.

RESULTS

Of 395 patients with cultures of ORPTS, first, the results of 79 cultures performed using BACTEC media only were compared with 206 non-BACTEC cultures (n = 285). Second, 110 cultures were performed using both methods. For the first part of the study, BACTEC media detected significantly greater microbial growth than non-BACTEC methods (n = 79, 64.6% vs n = 206, 14.6%; P < .001). In the 110 patients with both BACTEC (52.3%) and non-BACTEC cultures (9.9%), there was significantly higher sensitivity of the BACTEC method (P < .001); 68.2% of these patients had antimicrobial cover in the days immediately following transplant sufficient to cover the cultured organism. In the patients with appropriate antimicrobial cover, the rate of recipient wound infection was significantly reduced (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine screening of ORPTS with BACTEC broth enrichment should always be employed. When paired with antimicrobial prophylaxis, it has the potential to significantly reduce the risk of recipient wound infection.

The Impact of Culturing the Organ Preservation Fluid on Solid Organ Transplantation: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

We analyzed the prevalence, etiology, and risk factors of culture-positive preservation fluid and their impact on the management of solid organ transplant recipients.

Methods

From July 2015 to March 2017, 622 episodes of adult solid organ transplants at 7 university hospitals in Spain were prospectively included in the study.

Results

The prevalence of culture-positive preservation fluid was 62.5% (389/622). Nevertheless, in only 25.2% (98/389) of the cases were the isolates considered "high risk" for pathogenicity. After applying a multivariate regression analysis, advanced donor age was the main associated factor for having culture-positive preservation fluid for high-risk microorganisms. Preemptive antibiotic therapy was given to 19.8% (77/389) of the cases. The incidence rate of preservation fluid-related infection was 1.3% (5 recipients); none of these patients had received preemptive therapy. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid receiving preemptive antibiotic therapy presented both a lower cumulative incidence of infection and a lower rate of acute rejection and graft loss compared with those who did not have high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid. After adjusting for age, sex, type of transplant, and prior graft rejection, preemptive antibiotic therapy remained a significant protective factor for 90-day infection.

Conclusions

The routine culture of preservation fluid may be considered a tool that provides information about the contamination of the transplanted organ. Preemptive therapy for SOT recipients with high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid may be useful to avoid preservation fluid-related infections and improve the outcomes of infection, graft loss, and graft rejection in transplant patients.

Infections in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation has become an important treatment modality for patients with end-stage liver disease/cirrhosis, acute liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens for liver transplantation have improved significantly over the past 20 years, infectious complications continue to contribute to the morbidity and mortality in this patient population. The use of standardized screening protocols for both donors and recipients, coupled with targeted prophylaxis against specific pathogens, has helped to mitigate the risk of infection in liver transplant recipients. Patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis have immunological deficits that place them at increased risk for infection while awaiting liver transplantation. The patient undergoing liver transplantation is prone to develop healthcare-acquired infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms that could potentially affect patient outcomes after transplantation. The complex nature of liver transplant surgery that involves multiple vascular and hepatobiliary anastomoses further increases the risk of infection after liver transplantation. During the early post-transplantation period, healthcare-acquired bacterial and fungal infections are the most common types of infection encountered in liver transplant recipients. The period of maximal immunosuppression that occurs at 1–6 months after transplantation can be complicated by opportunistic infections due to both primary infection and reactivation of latent infection. Severe community-acquired infections can complicate the course of liver transplantation beyond 12 months after transplant surgery. This chapter provides an overview of liver transplantation including indications, donor-recipient selection criteria, surgical procedures, and immunosuppressive therapies. A focus on infections in patients with chronic liver disease/cirrhosis and an overview of the specific infectious complications in liver transplant recipients are presented.

Donor-Derived Candida dubliniensis Resulting in Perigraft Abscesses in a Liver Transplant Recipient Proven by Whole Genome Sequencing: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

The transmission of fungi via transplant, although well-known, has not often been molecularly proven. We describe a case of donor-derived candidiasis verified by whole genome sequencing.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The multiorgan donor was a 42-year-old woman with subdural hemorrhage. Procurement of the thoracic organs was performed followed by the abdominal organs. Tissue from the left bronchus grew Candida dubliniensis. The liver recipient was a 63-year-old woman with cryptogenic liver cirrhosis. She was noted to have worsening leukocytosis on postoperative day (POD) 9. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis showed multiple rim-enhancing collections around the graft. Percutaneous drainage was performed. Fluid cultures grew C dubliniensis. C dubliniensis isolated from the donor's left bronchus and the liver recipient's abscesses were verified to be related by whole genome sequencing. We postulate that C dubliniensis colonizing the donor's transected trachea could have contaminated the inferior vena cava when the former was left open after explant of the donor's lungs. A portion of the donor's contaminated inferior vena cava was transplanted along with the liver graft, resulting in the infected collections in the recipient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case report highlights the importance of maintaining a sterile field during organ procurement, especially in a multiorgan donor whose organs are explanted in succession.

Molecular testing of Klebsiella pneumoniae contaminating tissue allografts recovered from deceased donors

Microbiological screening of tissue allografts is crucial to prevent the transmission of bacterial and fungal infections to transplant recipients. Klebsiella was the most prevalent and resistant contaminating microorganism observed in our setting in the Iranian Tissue Bank. This study was conducted to determine the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes, antimicrobial resistance patterns of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, and their clonal relationships in allograft materials. K. pneumoniae contaminating bone and other tissue allografts recovered from deceased donors were identified and ESBL isolates were detected using a phenotypic confirmatory method. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the disk diffusion method. Distribution of ESBL genes and molecular typing were performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Repetitive-element (rep-PCR) methods. Of 3828 donated tissues, 51 (1.3%) were found contaminated by K. pneumoniae isolates. Compared to tissue allografts from brain-dead, heart-beating tissue donors, allografts from donors with circulatory cessation were associated with a higher risk of K. pneumoniae contamination [odds ratio (OR), 1.2 (CI 95% 0.9-2.3) (P value < 0.001)]. Half of the isolates produced ESBL, and the rate of susceptibility to cephalosporins was 51%. Among isolates, 22 (43.1%) harbored CTX-M, 31 (60.8%) SHV, and 9 (17.6%) harbored TEM types. The rep-dendrogram indicated that clones having identical or related strains with a similar antibiotype were isolated in the same period. This study provides evidence that a single clone of K. pneumoniae contaminated tissue allografts recovered from many different donors. A single clone found on tissues from several donors suggests contamination of tissues from a single source such as the tissue recovery process and environment. Genomic DNA testing and clonality of contaminating bacteria using molecular methods can focus the epidemiologic investigation on the tissue allograft recovery process including a search for contamination of the tissue recovery room environment, recovery staff, recovery equipment, reagents, solutions and supplies.

Donor Leucocytosis Predicts Bacterial and Fungal Contamination of the Preservation Solution in Visceral Organ Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Contamination of the preservation solution may contribute to septic complications that can occur after transplantation and cause higher morbidity and mortality among recipients. The aim of this study was to determine potential donor-related predictors of positive microbiological findings in the preservation solution.

DESIGN

We retrospectively studied 16 donor parameters on data from our center for microbiological findings in the preservation solution used in solid-organ recovery. From January 2008 through December 2011, 976 solid organs were transplanted, and in 167, the solution was positive for contaminants.

RESULTS

The most frequently detected contaminant was coagulase-negative staphylococci. Only the donor leucocyte count (cutoff at 9.1 × 10⁹/L) predicted positive microbiological findings in the preservation solution ( P = .0024). Multivariable regression analysis found that donor age, donor sex, intensive care unit stay, total number of organs recovered, and leucocyte count differentiated various categories of potentially pathogenic bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Donor leucocyte count higher than 9.1 × 10⁹/L predicts contamination of preservation solution.

Clinical impact of culture-positive preservation fluid on solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Contamination of the preservation fluid (PF) used for donated organs is a potential source of post-transplant infection. However, the information on this issue is scarce. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of culture-positive PF and its impact on solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Seventeen studies were identified and included. The overall incidence of culture-positive PF was 37% (95% CI: 27% to 49%), and the incidence of PF-related infections among SOT recipients with PF cultures that grew pathogenic microorganisms was 10% (95% CI: 7% to 15%). There were differences in the rates of infections due to pathogenic microorganisms between SOT recipients who received pre-emptive treatment and those who did not, but without statistical significance. The mortality rate among SOT recipients with PF-related infection was 35% (95% CI: 21% to 53%). In conclusion, although contamination of the PF of donated organs is frequent, the incidence of PF-related infection is relatively low. A closely clinical and microbiologic monitoring of the SOT recipient in case of culture-positive PF, regardless of the type of microorganism isolated might be do in order to establish a prompt diagnosis of PF-related infection.

Donor-derived infections among Chinese donation after cardiac death liver recipients

AIM

To investigate blood cultures of deceased donors and report the confirmed transmission of bacterial infection from donors to liver recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the results of blood cultures among our donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors and calculated the donor-derived bacterial infection rates among liver recipients. Study participants underwent liver transplantation between January 1, 2010 and February 1, 2017. The study involved a total of 67 recipients of liver grafts from 67 DCD donors. We extracted the data of donors’ and patients’ characteristics, culture results and clinical outcomes, especially the post-transplant complications in liver recipients, from electronic medical records. We analyzed the characteristics of the donors and the corresponding liver recipients with emphasis put on donor-derived infections.

RESULTS

Head trauma was the most common origin of death among our 67 DCD donors (46.3%). Blood taken prior to the procurement operation was cultured for 53 of the donors, with 17 episodes of bloodstream infections developing from 13 donors. The predominant organism isolated from the blood of donors was Gram-positive bacteria (70.6%). Only three (4.5%) of 67 liver recipients developed confirmed donor-derived bacterial infections, with two isolates of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and one isolate of multidrug-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes. The liver recipients with donor-derived infections showed relation to higher crude mortality and graft loss rates (33.3% each) within 3 mo post transplantation, as compared to those without donor-derived infections (9.4% and 4.7%, respectively). All three liver recipients received appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

CONCLUSION

Liver recipients have high occurrence of donor-derived infections. The liver recipients with donor-derived multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections can have good outcome if appropriate antimicrobial therapy is given.

Continuous monitoring of the liver graft temperature: relationship between bacterial contamination of the perfusion fluid and early outcome

BACKGROUND

A potential mechanism of the infection would be an infected donor, contamination at the time of the infusion and/or packaging, back-table procedure, and finally during the transplantation, all are potential sources of infection. The aim of our study is to analyze the incidence and significance of infection in the preservation solution according with the graft temperature. The second aim was to analyze the impact graft temperature on the clinical infections and the ischemia reperfusion injury.

METHODS

Sixteen donors were prospectively included in this study, including 9 males and 7 females. The liver graft temperature monitoring shows variation in four different phases: at the harvesting beginning, before the graft packaging, at the beginning of the backtable, at the end of the backtable.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between the functionality of the graft and the temperature of the perfusion fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we did not found a correlation between graft temperature, culture of the preservation solution and early post-transplant follow up.

The Etiology, Incidence, and Impact of Preservation Fluid Contamination during Liver Transplantation

The role of contaminated preservation fluid in the development of infection after liver transplantation has not been fully elucidated. To assess the incidence and etiology of contaminated preservation fluid and determine its impact on the subsequent development of infection after liver transplantation, we prospectively studied 50 consecutive liver transplants, and cultured the following samples in each instance: preservation fluid (immediately before and at the end of the back-table procedure, and just before implantation), blood, and bile from the donor, and ascitic fluid from the recipient. When any culture was positive, blood cultures were obtained and targeted antimicrobial therapy was started. We found that the incidence of contaminated preservation fluid was 92% (46 of 50 cases of liver transplantation per year), but only 28% (14/50) were contaminated by recognized pathogens. Blood and bile cultures from the donor were positive in 28% and 6% respectively, whereas ascitic fluid was positive in 22%. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci. In nine cases, the microorganisms isolated from the preservation fluid concurred with those grown from the donor blood cultures, and in one case, the isolate matched with the one obtained from bile culture. No liver transplant recipient developed an infection due to the transmission of an organism isolated from the preservation fluid. Our findings indicate that contamination of the preservation fluid is frequent in liver transplantation, and it is mainly caused by saprophytic skin flora. Transmission of infection is low, particularly among those recipients given targeted antimicrobial treatment for organisms isolated in the preservation fluid.

Clinical Significance of Contamination of the Preservation Solution in Liver Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to describe the incidence and microbiological profiles of positive cultures obtained from preservation solution (PS) and correlate these findings with infectious complications detected in the liver transplant (LT) recipient.

PATIENTS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study between December 2010 and August 2014 among 178 LT. In all grafts, a PS culture was carried out. All the infections in the receipt until hospital discharge were collected. In patients with >1, infection was considered the most severe according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

PS culture was positive for bacterial or fungal agents in 79 of 178 LT recipients (44%). The most commonly cultured organisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (64%), Enterobacteriaceae (17%), and Staphylococcus aureus (4.7%). In the 79 patients with positive PS, 49 blood cultures were requested in the period after LT. Twenty-five postoperative infections (31.7%) were diagnosed. Only 4 of 79 patients (5%) with PS contamination had a postoperative infections related with isolated microorganism.

CONCLUSIONS

Contamination of PS appears in a high percentage of liver grafts before LT, although there is a poor correlation with postoperative infections in LT recipient. In these patients, a standardized process including fungal and bacterial cultures could be useful.

Fungal complications after Candida preservation fluid contamination in liver transplant recipients

Donor-derived fungal infections can be associated with severe complications in transplant recipients. Donor-derived candidiasis has been described in kidney transplant recipients where contamination of the preservation fluid (PF) was a commonly proposed source. In liver transplantation, these fungal infections have been less explored. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the incidence and clinical relevance of Candida contamination of preservation fluid in the context of liver transplantation. A 5-year (2008-2012) retrospective multicentre study involving six French liver transplantation centers was performed to determine the incidence of Candida PF contamination. Postoperative clinical features, outcomes in recipients, and risk factors for Candida-related complications of liver transplantation were studied. Candida sp. was isolated from 28 of 2107 preservation fluid samples (1.33%). Candida albicans was the most common yeast (n = 18, 64%). Twenty-two recipients (78.5%) received antifungal therapy (echinocandins in 68%) for 7-37 days. Eight patients developed yeast-related complications (28.6%) including hepatic artery aneurysms (n = 6) and Candida peritonitis (n = 2). The 1-year mortality rate among patients after a yeast-related complication was 62.5%. The incidence of Candida PF contamination was low, but was associated with dramatic postoperative complications and high mortality. Close radiological follow-up may enable early recognition of the arterial complications associated with PF contamination by Candida.

Selecting suitable solid organ transplant donors: Reducing the risk of donor-transmitted infections

Selection of the appropriate donor is essential to a successful allograft recipient outcome for solid organ transplantation. Multiple infectious diseases have been transmitted from the donor to the recipient via transplantation. Donor-transmitted infections cause increased morbidity and mortality to the recipient. In recent years, a series of high-profile transmissions of infections have occurred in organ recipients prompting increased attention on the process of improving the selection of an appropriate donor that balances the shortage of needed allografts with an approach that mitigates the risk of donor-transmitted infection to the recipient. Important advances focused on improving donor screening diagnostics, using previously excluded high-risk donors, and individualizing the selection of allografts to recipients based on their prior infection history are serving to increase the donor pool and improve outcomes after transplant. This article serves to review the relevant literature surrounding this topic and to provide a suggested approach to the selection of an appropriate solid organ transplant donor.

Update on donor-derived infections in liver transplantation

Advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppressive medications, and robust infectious disease prophylaxis have resulted in liver transplantation becoming the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage liver disease and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Nonetheless, organ transplantation is not without risk. Unexpected donor-derived disease transmission is a newly recognized risk that complicates approximately 0.2% of all organ transplants. We review the epidemiology of donor-derived infectious diseases and methods of risk mitigation with a focus on liver transplantation.

Hepatocyte transplantation for inherited metabolic diseases of the liver

Inherited metabolic diseases of the liver are characterized by deficiency of a hepatic enzyme or protein often resulting in life-threatening disease. The remaining liver function is usually normal. For most patients, treatment consists of supportive therapy, and the only curative option is liver transplantation. Hepatocyte transplantation is a promising therapy for patients with inherited metabolic liver diseases, which offers a less invasive and fully reversible approach. Procedure-related complications are rare. Here, we review the experience of hepatocyte transplantation for metabolic liver diseases and discuss the major obstacles that need to be overcome to establish hepatocyte transplantation as a reliable treatment option in the clinic.

Donor-derived fungal infections in organ transplant recipients: guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation, infectious diseases community of practice

Donor-derived fungal infections can be associated with serious complications in transplant recipients. Most cases of donor-derived candidiasis have occurred in kidney transplant recipients in whom contaminated preservation fluid is a commonly proposed source. Donors with cryptococcal disease, including those with unrecognized cryptococcal meningoencephalitis may transmit the infection with the allograft. Active histoplasmosis or undiagnosed and presumably asymptomatic infection in the donor that had not resolved by the time of death can result in donor-derived histoplasmosis in the recipient. Potential donors from an endemic area with either active or occult infection can also transmit coccidioidomycosis. Rare instances of aspergillosis and other mycoses, including agents of mucormycosis may also be transmitted from infected donors. Appropriate diagnostic evaluation and prompt initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy are warranted if donor-derived fungal infections are a consideration. This document discusses the characteristics, evaluation and approach to the management of donor-derived fungal infections in organ transplant recipients.

Risk factors for infection after liver transplantation

Infection is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. Risk factors relate to transplantation factors, donor and recipient factors. Transplant factors include ischaemia-reperfusion damage, amount of intra-operative blood transfusion, level and type of immunosuppression, rejection, and complications, prolonged intensive care stay with dialysis or ventilation, type of biliary drainage, repeat operations, re-transplantation, antibiotics, antiviral regimen, and environment. Donor risk factors include infection, prolonged intensive care stay, quality of the donor liver (e.g. steatosis), and viral status. For the recipient the most important are MELD score >30, malnutrition, renal failure, acute liver failure, presence of infection or colonisation, and immune status for viruses like cytomegalovirus. In recent years it has become clear that genetic polymorphisms in innate immunity, especially the lectin pathway of complement activation and in Toll-like receptors importantly contribute to the infection risk after liver transplantation. Therefore, the risk for infections after liver transplantation is a multifactorial problem and all factors need attention to reduce this risk.