ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation of an 8-yr-old girl with donor/recipient-constellation A1B/B

Early relapse of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome following ABO-incompatible living-related pediatric kidney re-transplant successfully treated with eculizumab

BACKGROUND

A 3-year-old girl with clinical features of atypical HUS (complement Factor I mutation inherited from an asymptomatic mother and Factor H autoantibodies) was treated with plasma exchange, progressed to kidney failure (KF) aged 4 years, and received an en bloc kidney DCD transplant aged 8 years with primary graft non-function necessitating transplant nephrectomy at the time of transplantation. She subsequently underwent re-transplantation from her father. This is a retrospective study of electronic patient records and medical notes.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

A 9-year-old girl received an ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living-related kidney transplant from her father with recipient and donor blood groups of O and A, respectively, with baseline recipient anti-A titers 1:128 reducing to 1:4 at the time of transplant with B lymphocyte depletion with rituximab and four sessions of immunoadsorption. Six hours post-transplant, she had recurrence of aHUS and received the first dose of eculizumab. She continues on monthly home eculizumab infusions with stable kidney allograft function and negative anti-A titers 7 years post-kidney transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of a pediatric high-risk ABOi living-related kidney transplantation in whom early relapse of aHUS was successfully treated with eculizumab with good long-term patient and allograft outcome.

Bleeding complications in pediatric ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible renal transplantation (ABOi-RTx) following preconditioning with immunoadsorption (IA) and rituximab is a promising approach to facilitate living-related RTx. However, clinical experience is limited in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Three patients underwent living-related ABOi-RTx in our center. Preoperative IA was performed six, ten and 11 times in patient one, two and three, respectively, to achieve isoagglutinin titers of ≤1:8 on the day of transplantation; rituximab was administered once. The immunosuppressive regimen further comprised tacrolimus, mycophenolate, methylprednisolone and basiliximab; immunoglobulin G (IgG) was infused on the day of ABOi-RTx.

RESULTS

All three patients achieved normal renal function within 2-6 days post-RTx. Major postoperative bleeding occurred in two patients, with one requiring repeated blood transfusions and the other a surgical revision 4 h after RTx, despite local citrate anticoagulation use during the preoperative IA procedures in the latter patient. A pyelonephritis-associated increase of the isoagglutinin IgG/IgM titers to 1:64/1:128 led to a biopsy-proven acute humoral rejection in the third patient, which was treated successfully with plasma exchange and methylprednisolone pulses. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 18, 8 and 23 months post-RTx was 96, 52 and 74 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ABOi-RTx can successfully be performed in pediatric patients after preconditioning with quadruple immunosuppression, rituximab and IA. Caution is required regarding bleeding complications, which are most likely due to the unspecific binding of coagulation factors during repeated IA.

Phenotypic evaluation of B-cell subsets after rituximab for treatment of acute renal allograft rejection in pediatric recipients

BACKGROUND

Recently published pediatric trial of Rituximab for the treatment of CD20+ acute renal allograft rejection (AR) demonstrated transient depletion of circulating/intragraft B cells (Zarkhin et al., Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 2607). In this study, we have evaluated phenotypic definition of circulating B-cell subsets before and after standard of care and B-cell depletional AR therapies.

METHODS

We assessed peripheral B cells by flow cytometry at the time of AR and after AR treatment in 35 pediatric renal transplant recipients: 17 patients with AR who received Rituximab (R-AR; n=11) or steroid pulsing (S-AR; n=6), 18 stable patients with stable graft function with (iSTA; n=10) or without interval infection (hSTA; n=8), and 3 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Infections increased memory (P=0.02) and CD19+/CD27⁻/IgD⁻ double negative (DN) B cells (P=0.02) and decreased naive B cells (P=0.01) in iSTA group compared to hSTA patients. Decrease in naive/memory B cells ratio at AR was observed compared with hSTA patients (P=0.01). One year after AR treatment, S-AR patients had persistently lower naive/memory B-cell ratio (P=0.01) and higher DN B cells (P=0.0001) than hSTA patients, whereas after R-AR treatment naive/memory B-cell ratio (P=0.6) and DN B cells (P=0.13) recovered to levels of hSTA patients. R-AR patients with sustained AR resolution (n=8) had trend toward better graft survival (P=0.06) and higher naive B cells (P=0.004) than R-AR relapsers (n=3).

CONCLUSIONS

Increase in circulating memory B cells was seen in pediatric patients at AR. B cells persist as memory after S-AR treatment, whereas Rituximab resulted in repopulation of mostly naive B cells. The heterogeneity in B-cells reconstitution after rejection therapies deserves further investigation as a possible means to follow the clinical and immunologic outcomes of graft rejection.

Increase of infectious complications in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients--a single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Due to the shortage of deceased donors ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living kidney transplantation has become a popular alternative to deceased kidney transplantation. In recent years, recipient desensitization with a combination of anti-CD20 treatment (rituximab), antigen-specific immunoadsorptions (IA) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), led to promising short-term and intermediate-term results. However, little is known about the impact of this intensified desensitization protocol on the risk of surgical and infectious complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 21 consecutive recipients who underwent ABOi renal transplantation. Pre-transplant desensitization included administration of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus and prednisolone 4 weeks prior of scheduled transplantation as well as IA and IVIG. Forty-seven patients who underwent ABO-compatible (ABOc) renal transplantation served as the control group. Medical records and electronic databases were reviewed for patient and graft survival, renal function, rate of rejections, viral and bacterial infections as well as for surgical complications (SCs) post-transplantation.

RESULTS

All patients showed an immediate graft function. During a mean follow-up of 15.7 ± 8.3 months (interquartile range 11.9) patient survival was 95 and 98% in the ABOi and ABOc group, respectively. Allograft survival and function, as assessed by serum creatinine levels and calculated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, did not differ between ABOi and ABOc recipients. Furthermore, the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejections was comparable between the two groups. However, there was a trend towards more SCs within the ABOi group (29 versus 11%, non-significant). In addition, the rate of viral infections including cytomegalovirus, Herpes simplex virus, Varicella zoster virus and polyoma virus was significantly increased among the ABOi recipients (50 versus 21%; P = 0.038) despite comparable tacrolimus trough levels and MMF and steroid doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results, in line with the extended experience of other groups, demonstrate favourable short-term allograft survival and function after ABOi renal transplantation after desensitization with antigen-specific IA, IVIG and rituximab. However, the intensified desensitization was associated with an increased risk of infectious complications. This observation prompted us to briefly escalate the desensitization protocol in ABOi kidney recipients in our centre.

Rituximab-associated infections

After more than 10 years of use, rituximab has proven to be remarkably safe. However, accumulated evidence now suggests that under some circumstances it may significantly increase the risk of infections. This risk is difficult to quantify because of confounding factors (namely, concomitant use of immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic agents and underlying conditions), as well as under-reporting. Increased number of infections has been documented in patients treated with maintenance rituximab for low-grade lymphoma and in patients with concomitant severe immunodeficiency, whether caused by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or immunosuppressive agents like fludarabine. From the practical standpoint, the most important infection is hepatitis B reactivation, which may be delayed and result in fulminant liver failure and death. Special care should be placed on screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and preemptive antiviral treatment. Some investigators have reported an increase in Pneumocystis pneumonia. Finally, there is increasing evidence of a possible association with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a lethal encephalitis caused by the polyomavirus JC. This review enumerates the described infectious complications, summarizes the possible underlying mechanisms of the increased risk, and makes recommendations regarding prevention, diagnosis and management.

A randomized, prospective trial of rituximab for acute rejection in pediatric renal transplantation

We report 1-year outcomes of a randomized study of Rituximab versus standard-of-care immunosuppression (Thymoglobulin and/or pulse steroids) for treatment of biopsy confirmed, acute transplant rejection with B-cell infiltrates, in 20 consecutive recipients (2-23 years). Graft biopsies, with Banff and CADI scores, CD20 and C4d stains, were performed at rejection and 1 and 6 months later. Peripheral blood CMV, EBV and BK viral loads, graft function, DSA, immunoglobulins, serum humanized antichimeric antibody (HACA) and Rituximab, and lymphocyte counts were monitored until 1 year posttreatment. Rituximab infusions were given with a high index of safety without HACA development and increased infections complications. Rituximab therapy resulted in complete tissue B-cell depletion and rapid peripheral B-cell depletion. Peripheral CD19 cells recovered at a mean time of approximately 12 months. There were some benefits for the recovery of graft function (p = 0.026) and improvement of biopsy rejection scores at both the 1- (p = 0.0003) and 6-month (p < 0.0001) follow-up biopsies. Reappearance of C4d deposition was not seen on follow-up biopsies after Rituximab therapy, but was seen in 30% of control patients. There was no change in DSA in either group, independent of rejection resolution. This study reports safety and suggests further investigation of Rituximab as an adjunctive treatment for B-cell-mediated graft rejection.

Renal transplantation today

BACKGROUND

The first successful renal transplant was carried out more than five decades ago between identical twins. At these early days, acute rejection was the limiting factor.

DISCUSSION

Due to tremendous progress in immunosuppressive therapy and surgical technique, today, renal transplantation is the gold standard therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. In fact, in comparison with chronic hemodialysis, renal transplantation offers an increase in quality of life while reducing comorbidities associated with dialysis treatment.

RESULTS

Despite numerous beneficial achievements, no further improvement regarding patient outcome can be observed over the last two decades. Graft survival rates remain unchanged. The leading causes for graft loss are chronic allograft nephropathy and death with functioning graft. This might be related to a constant increase of the proportion of donors presenting extended donor criteria as well as a more liberal acceptance of candidates for a renal transplant.

CONCLUSION

In the near future, one has to focus more closely on the posttransplant patient care to minimize factors associated with chronic allograft damage. These include post-transplant diabetes, hyperlipidemia, high blood pressure, cytomegalovirus infection, etc.

Preemptive postoperative antigen-specific immunoadsorption in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: necessary or not?

Several standard protocols for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation use scheduled preemptive antigen-specific immunoadsorption during the postoperative period. Our center has developed a different approach. Our patients undergo antigen-specific immunoadsorption postoperatively only if their isoagglutinine titers (immunoglobulin G anti-A/B) exceed 1:8 in the first postoperative week and 1:16 in the second postoperative week. Using this strategy, 22 ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations have been performed at our center since 2004. Only 32% of these patients (7 of 22) needed to undergo postoperative immunoadsorption (mean 4.1 immunoadsorption sessions per patient). The renal outcome in patients receiving postoperative immunoadsorption treatment versus the outcome in patients without postoperative immunoadsorption remained equal at a mean follow-up of 17 months. We identified a shorter pretransplant time on dialysis, a blood type constellation of donor A1/recipient O, and high initial starting titers as predictors for the need for postoperative immunoadsorption treatment. A more detailed version of this study, with modified tables and figures, has been accepted for publication in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation.

ABO incompatible kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although ABO incompatible kidney transplantation is increasingly recognized as effective, the procedure is still evolving. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent advances in this area.

RECENT FINDINGS

Short to intermediate-term outcome appears good, although long-term results are still preliminary. Pretransplant risk stratification based on antidonor antibody titer may be of limited value. Splenectomy, previously reported to be an important component of ABO incompatible transplantation, appears to be avoidable under many circumstances. The wider implementation of A2 blood group incompatible transplantation shortens waiting time for deceased donor transplantation of blood group B recipients without significantly disadvantaging others. The diagnosis of acute humoral rejection has become clearer following the recognition that C4d deposition commonly occurs in well functioning ABO incompatible allografts. The long-term implications of acute humoral rejection appear substantial even following successful acute therapy, with a significant percentage of patients developing chronic humoral rejection manifested as transplant glomerulopathy. Finally, although ABO incompatible transplantation entails increased expense, when compared with maintenance dialysis and taking into account the health related quality of life benefits of a successful transplant, it is clearly cost effective.

SUMMARY

ABO incompatible kidney transplantation is an effective therapy, and will become more widely implemented in the future.