Post-operative analgesia by high thoracic epidural versus intramuscular nicomorphine after thoracotomy. Part III. The effects of per- and post-operative analgesia on morbidity

Management of Pain in the Critically Ill

Analgesia for critically ill patients can be provided most effectively by the use of modern techniques. Under standing of the anatomical pathways for nociceptive sig nal transmission allows the use of techniques that mod ulate or block nociceptive information at several levels (periphery, spinal cord, and systemic). A comprehen sive discussion of analgesic techniques at each level is presented. Formulation of a treatment plan is discussed. Several examples are presented to show the decision- making process for the use of modern analgesic tech niques in critically ill patients.

Distribution of contrast medium epidurally injected at thoracic and lumbar vertebral segments

The epidural distribution of iohexol (0.2 ml/kg) administered at thoracic vertebrae (Thoracic group) and lumbar vertebrae (Lumbar group) was compared by computed tomographic (CT) epidurography in dogs. The total spread of iohexol was similar between the 2 groups upon reaching a similar cranial level. The maximal CT values were higher at the C7/T1 and T4/T5 levels in Thoracic group, but they were higher at the T13/L1 and L4/L5 levels in Lumbar group (P<0.05). This result suggests that the distribution pattern of the drug administered epidurally at thoracic vertebrae and lumbar vertebrae is different in dogs.

Postthoracotomy pain management problems

Pain after thoracotomy is very severe, probably the most severe pain experienced after surgery. Thoracic epidural analgesia has greatly improved the pain experience and its consequences and has been considered the standard for pain management after thoracotomy. This view has been challenged recently by the use of paravertebral nerve blocks. Nevertheless, severe ipsilateral shoulder pain and the prevention of the postthoracotomy pain syndrome remain the most important challenges for management of postthoracotomy pain.

Incidence of epidural haematoma and neurological injury in cardiovascular patients with epidural analgesia/anaesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Epidural anaesthesia is used extensively for cardiothoracic and vascular surgery in some centres, but not in others, with argument over the safety of the technique in patients who are usually extensively anticoagulated before, during, and after surgery. The principle concern is bleeding in the epidural space, leading to transient or persistent neurological problems.

Methods

We performed an extensive systematic review to find published cohorts of use of epidural catheters during vascular, cardiac, and thoracic surgery, using electronic searching, hand searching, and reference lists of retrieved articles.

Results

Twelve studies included 14,105 patients, of whom 5,026 (36%) had vascular surgery, 4,971 (35%) cardiac surgery, and 4,108 (29%) thoracic surgery. There were no cases of epidural haematoma, giving maximum risks following epidural anaesthesia in cardiac, thoracic, and vascular surgery of 1 in 1,700, 1 in 1,400 and 1 in 1,700 respectively. In all these surgery types combined the maximum expected rate would be 1 in 4,700. In all these patients combined there were eight cases of transient neurological injury, a rate of 1 in 1,700 (95% confidence interval 1 in 3,300 to 1 in 850). There were no cases of persistent neurological injury (maximum expected rate 1 in 4,600).

Conclusion

These estimates for cardiothoracic epidural anaesthesia should be the worst case. Limitations are inadequate denominators for different types of surgery in anticoagulated cardiothoracic or vascular patients more at risk of bleeding.

Thoracic epidural infusions for post-thoracotomy pain: a comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine mixtures vs. fentanyl alone

A randomised double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 106 patients scheduled for pulmonary resection. Patients received an epidural infusion containing 0.1%, 0.2% bupivacaine or saline in combination with fentanyl 10 microgram.ml -1. Adequacy of analgesia was assessed at rest and during movement over 24 h. Analgesic efficacy was assessed using visual analogue scores and an observer/verbal ranking scale. Pain scores were higher in the fentanyl-only group at the 2 h assessment (p < 0.05). Otherwise, there were no between-group differences in pain scores or in the total amounts of epidural solution used. All patients received continuous haemodynamic monitoring. There were no between-group differences in the number of episodes of hypotension or in the number of interventions for hypotension. However, the use of intra-operative vasopressor and the incidence of temporary neurological complications was higher in the 0.2% bupivacaine group (p < 0.05). We conclude that, in the early postoperative period, the addition of bupivacaine 0.1% improves fentanyl epidural analgesia in patients undergoing lung resection and is not associated with the disadvantages seen with the addition of bupivacaine 0.2%.

The effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on intraoperative visceral perfusion and metabolism

After institutional approval and informed consent, we studied the effect of epidural bupivacaine 0.5% on visceral perfusion and metabolism by using gastric mucosal tonometry in 30 patients in a placebo-controlled fashion. The maximal intramucosal pH (pHi) decrease was significantly (P < 0.001) greater in the control group (0.16 +/- 0.04) than in the thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) group (0.07 +/- 0.05). There were 10 patients in the control group and 2 patients in the TEA group who had evidence of gastric mucosal ischemia (pHi <7.32) at the end of the study (P< 0.01). The differences in pHi and intramucosal CO2 (PiCO2) became statistically significant between the groups after 180 and 240 min. The study data show that TEA prevents the decrease of pHi during major abdominal surgery, perhaps as an effect of stable visceral perfusion. We conclude that TEA may be a valuable method for intra- and postoperative treatment of surgical stress.

IMPLICATIONS

The present study shows that thoracic epidural anesthesia prevents a decrease of intramucosal pH during major abdominal surgery, which suggests that thoracic epidural anesthesia may be a valuable tool for the treatment of surgical stress.

The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials

We performed meta-analyses of randomized, control trials to assess the effects of seven analgesic therapies on postoperative pulmonary function after a variety of procedures: epidural opioid, epidural local anesthetic, epidural opioid with local anesthetic, thoracic versus lumbar epidural opioid, intercostal nerve block, wound infiltration with local anesthetic, and intrapleural local anesthetic. Measures of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), vital capacity (VC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), PaO2, and incidence of atelectasis, pulmonary infection, and pulmonary complications overall were analyzed. Compared with systemic opioids, epidural opioids decreased the incidence of atelectasis (risk ratio [RR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.85) and had a weak tendency to reduce the incidence of pulmonary infections (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.18-1.53) and pulmonary complications overall (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.20-1.33). Epidural local anesthetics increased PaO2 (difference 4.56 mm Hg, 95% CI 0.058-9.075) and decreased the incidence of pulmonary infections (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21-0.65) and pulmonary complications overall (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.80) compared with systemic opioids. Intercostal nerve blockade tends to improve pulmonary outcome measures (incidence of atelectasis: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.57, incidence of pulmonary complications overall: RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.18-1.22), but these differences did not achieve statistical significance. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in the surrogate measures of pulmonary function (FEV1, FVC, and PEFR). These analyses support the utility of epidural analgesia for reducing postoperative pulmonary morbidity but do not support the use of surrogate measures of pulmonary outcome as predictors or determinants of pulmonary morbidity in postoperative patients.

IMPLICATIONS

When individual trials are unable to produce significant results, it is often because of insufficient patient numbers. It may be impossible for a single institution to study enough patients. Meta-analysis is a useful tool for combining the data from multiple trials to increase the patient numbers. These meta-analyses confirm that postoperative epidural pain control can significantly decrease the incidence of pulmonary morbidity.

The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials

We performed meta-analyses of randomized, control trials to assess the effects of seven analgesic therapies on postoperative pulmonary function after a variety of procedures: epidural opioid, epidural local anesthetic, epidural opioid with local anesthetic, thoracic versus lumbar epidural opioid, intercostal nerve block, wound infiltration with local anesthetic, and intrapleural local anesthetic. Measures of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), vital capacity (VC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), PaO2, and incidence of atelectasis, pulmonary infection, and pulmonary complications overall were analyzed. Compared with systemic opioids, epidural opioids decreased the incidence of atelectasis (risk ratio [RR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.85) and had a weak tendency to reduce the incidence of pulmonary infections (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.18-1.53) and pulmonary complications overall (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.20-1.33). Epidural local anesthetics increased PaO2 (difference 4.56 mm Hg, 95% CI 0.058-9.075) and decreased the incidence of pulmonary infections (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21-0.65) and pulmonary complications overall (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.80) compared with systemic opioids. Intercostal nerve blockade tends to improve pulmonary outcome measures (incidence of atelectasis: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.57, incidence of pulmonary complications overall: RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.18-1.22), but these differences did not achieve statistical significance. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in the surrogate measures of pulmonary function (FEV1, FVC, and PEFR). These analyses support the utility of epidural analgesia for reducing postoperative pulmonary morbidity but do not support the use of surrogate measures of pulmonary outcome as predictors or determinants of pulmonary morbidity in postoperative patients.

IMPLICATIONS

When individual trials are unable to produce significant results, it is often because of insufficient patient numbers. It may be impossible for a single institution to study enough patients. Meta-analysis is a useful tool for combining the data from multiple trials to increase the patient numbers. These meta-analyses confirm that postoperative epidural pain control can significantly decrease the incidence of pulmonary morbidity.

Postthoracotomy pain management using continuous epidural analgesia in 1,324 patients

Continuous epidural analgesia consisting of an opioid with or without a local anesthetic agent is a commonly employed technique for pain relief after thoracotomy. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the use of continuous epidural analgesia in 1,324 patients undergoing elective thoracotomy between 1987 and 1993. Epidural pain management was continued for 1 to 3 postoperative days. Patients experienced excellent pain relief, with mean visual analog pain scores of 2.4, 1.7, and 1.4 on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Side effects occurred most frequently in the first 24 hours postoperatively; the incidence of pruritus was 14.1%; nausea, 11.2%; hypotension, 4.3%; sedation, 3.3%; and numbness, 1.1%. Respiratory depression (< 8 breaths per minute) occurred in 1 patient who received 16 mg of supplemental morphine sulfate over a 2-hour period. The incidence of inadequate analgesia (a visual analog pain score of 7 or more persisting for 1 to 2 hours after an epidurally administered bolus) was 3.8%. The results from this study support the use of standard protocols for dosing guidelines, the treatment of inadequate analgesia, and the management of side effects. Daily evaluation by a team member of the postoperative analgesia services section of the Department of Anesthesiology enhances patient care and minimizes adverse effects.

Complications related to thoracic epidural analgesia: a prospective study in 1071 surgical patients

In a prospective study, the complications of 1071 patients scheduled for thoracic epidural catheterization for postoperative analgesia (TEA) were studied. All catheters were inserted preoperatively between segment Th 2/3 and Th 11/12 under local anesthesia. Balanced anesthesia with endotracheal intubation and TEA were combined. Postoperatively 389 patients (36.9%) were monitored on a normal surgical ward. Buprenorphine, 0.15 to 0.3 mg, and if needed bupivacaine 0.375% 3-5 ml h-1 were given epidurally. Primary perforation of the dura occurred in 13 patients (1.23%). Radicular pain syndromes were observed in six patients (0.56%). In one patient (0.09%) respiratory depression was seen in close connection with the epidural administration of 0.3 mg buprenorphine. Although 116 patients (10.83%) showed one abnormal clotting parameter but no clinical signs of hemorrhage, there was no complication related to this group. No persisting neurological sequelae caused by the thoracic epidural catheters were found. In conclusion, continuous TEA with buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief after major abdominal surgery is a safe method without too high a risk of catheter-related or drug-induced complications, even on a normal surgical ward and when one clotting parameter is abnormal.

Epidural bupivacaine, sufentanil or the combination for post-thoracotomy pain

Analgesia with epidural bupivacaine, sufentanil or the combination was studied in 50 patients who had undergone thoracotomy. During operation all patients received an initial dose of bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 5 micrograms.ml-1 (5-10 ml) by thoracic epidural catheter. One hour later the patients were divided into three groups: the bupivacaine group (bupivacaine 0.125%), the sufentanil group (50 micrograms sufentanil in 60 ml normal saline) and the combination group (50 micrograms sufentanil in 60 ml bupivacaine 0.125%). Analgesia in the three groups was provided by a continuous epidural infusion (5-10 ml.h-1) for 3 days. The mean dose of bupivacaine was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in the bupivacaine group (12.07 mg.h-1 (s.e.mean 0.97 mg.h-1)), compared with the combination group (9.82 mg.h-1 (s.e.mean 0.43 mg.h-1)). The mean dose of sufentanil in the sufentanil group was similar to the combination group (6.37 micrograms.h-1 (s.e.mean 0.23 micrograms.h-1) and 6.52 micrograms.h-1 (s.e.mean 0.28 micrograms.h-1), respectively. The pain scores on the inverse visual analogue scale of most patients in the bupivacaine group were unacceptably low. The sufentanil group had much better pain scores, but on exercise these patients experienced more pain than the combination group. The combination group had, overall, better pain scores. In the combination group, there were better respiratory results.

Pharmacokinetics of nicomorphine and its metabolites in man after epidural administration

In ten patients who received an epidural injection of 15 mg of nicomorphine, the compound was relatively slowly released from the epidural space and was found in plasma for approximately 1.5 h. Nicomorphine is relatively slowly metabolized into 6-nicotinoylmorphine and morphine. The rate of release is patient-dependent. The relative AUC values are 15.3% for nicomorphine, 23.9% for 6-nicotinoylmorphine and 60.8% for morphine. The mean clinical effect lasts for 18.2 +/- 10.1 h.

Perioperative functional residual capacity

The literature dealing with the magnitude, mechanism and effects of reduced FRC in the perioperative period is reviewed. During general anaesthesia FRC is reduced by approximately 20%. The reduction is greater in the obese and in patients with COPD. The most likely mechanism is the loss of inspiratory muscle tone of the muscles acting on the rib cage. Gas trapping is an additional mechanism. Lung compliance decreases and airways resistance increases, in large part, due to decreased FRC. The larynx is displaced anteriorly and elongated, making laryngoscopy and intubation more difficult. The change in FRC creates or increases intrapulmonary shunt and areas of low ventilation to perfusion. This is due to the occurrence of compression atelectasis, and to regional changes in mechanics and airway closure which tend to reduce ventilation to dependent lung zones which are still well perfused. Abdominal and thoracic operations tend to increase shunting further. Large tidal volume but not PEEP will improve oxygenation, although both increase FRC. Both FRC and vital capacity are reduced following abdominal and thoracic surgery in a predictable pattern. The mechanism is the combined effect of incisional pain and reflex dysfunction of the diaphragm. Additional effects of thoracic surgery include pleural effusion, cooling of the phrenic nerve and mediastinal widening. Postoperative hypoxaemia is a function of reduced FRC and airway closure. There is no real difference among the various methods of active lung expansion in terms of the speed of restoration of lung function, or in preventing postoperative atelectasis/pneumonia. Epidural analgesia does not influence the rate of recovery of lung function, nor does it prevent atelectasis/pneumonia.