Impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients: abnormal body weight gives unreliable cardiac output measurements

Difference in cardiovascular response during orthostatic stress in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy

Although orthostatic hypotension is more prominent in multiple system atrophy (MSA) than in Parkinson's disease (PD), there is no study comparing the degree of decrease in total peripheral resistance and cardiac response during orthostatic stress between both diseases. In this study, we examined whether there is a difference in cardiovascular response between MSA and PD. We examined the results of the head-up tilt test in 68 patients with MSA, 28 patients with cardiac non-denervated PD, and 70 patients with cardiac denervated PD whose total peripheral resistance after 60° tilting was lower than the value at 0°. Differences in cardiac output and blood pressure changes were compared against the decrease in total peripheral resistance. There was no difference in the degree of decrease in total peripheral resistance among the three groups. However, the slope of the regression line revealed that the increase in cardiac output against the change in total peripheral resistance was significantly lower in the MSA group than in the cardiac non-denervated and denervated PD groups, and that the decrease in systolic blood pressure against the change in total peripheral resistance was significantly greater in the MSA group than in the cardiac non-denervated and denervated PD groups. In MSA, the cardiac response during orthostatic stress is lower than that in PD, possibly underlying the fact that orthostatic hypotension is more prominent in MSA than in PD.

Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in children with repaired coarctation of the aorta using electrical cardiometry compared to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the equivalence of the ICON^® electrical cardiometry (EC) haemodynamic monitor to measure cardiac output (CO) relative to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) in paediatric patients with repaired coarctation of the aorta (CoA).

APPROACH

A group of n  =  28 CoA patients and n  =  27 matched controls were enrolled. EC and TTE were performed synchronously on each participant and CO measurements compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. The CoA group was further subdivided into two groups, with n  =  10 and without n  =  18 increased left ventricular outflow tract velocity (iLVOTv) for comparison.

MAIN RESULTS

CO measurements from EC and TTE in controls showed a strong correlation (R  =  0.80, p  <  0.001) and an acceptable percentage error (PE) of 28.1%. However, combining CoA and control groups revealed a moderate correlation (R  =  0.57, p  <  0.001) and a poor PE (44.2%). We suspected that the CO in a subset of CoA participants with iLVOTv was overestimated by TTE. Excluding the iLVOTv CoA participants improved the correlation (R  =  0.77, p  <  0.001) and resulted in an acceptable PE of 31.2%.

SIGNIFICANCE

CO measurements in paediatric CoA patients in the absence of iLVOTv are clinically equivalent between EC and TTE. The presence of iLVOTv may impact the accuracy of CO measurement by TTE, but not EC.

Impact of Obesity on Noninvasive Cardiac Hemodynamic Measurement by Electrical Cardiometry in Adults With Aortic Stenosis

OBJECTIVES

There are substantial potential benefits to noninvasive cardiac monitoring methods, such as electrical cardiometry (EC), over more invasive methods, including significantly reduced risk of complications, lower up-front and operational costs, ease of use, and continuous monitoring. To take advantage of these technologies, clinical equivalence to currently established methods must be determined. The authors sought to determine if the noninvasive measurement of cardiac index (CI) by EC was clinically equivalent to thermodilution (TD) in adult patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study comparing measurement devices in a single patient group.

SETTING

Single-center, university teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 52 adult patients with aortic stenosis undergoing right heart catheterization.

INTERVENTIONS

Cardiac output (CO) was measured concurrently using EC with an ICON device and TD in 52 participants with AS. CI values were to determine the accuracy and precision of EC in reference to TD. Percentage error (PE) was used to assess their clinical equivalence. The participants were divided further into groups (normal and overweight/obese) based on body mass index and the analysis was repeated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

CO measurement made by EC in adult patients with obesity or overweight was reduced significantly relative to TD. This was not observed in normal-weight adult AS patients. EC provided clinically equivalent measurements to TD for measuring CI in normal-weight adult AS patients (PE = 25.0%), but not for those adult AS patients with overweight or obesity (PE = 42.3%).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the ICON device produced lower CO and index measurements relative to TD in adult patients with AS. Overweight and obesity also significantly affected the relative precision and accuracy of the ICON electrical cardiometric device to measure CI in these patients.

Accuracy, Precision, and Trending Ability of Electrical Cardiometry Cardiac Index versus Continuous Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Method: A Prospective, Observational Study

Introduction

Evaluation of accuracy, precision, and trending ability of cardiac index (CI) measurements using the Aesculon™ bioimpedance electrical cardiometry (Aesc) compared to the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter (PAC) technique before, during, and after cardiac surgery.

Methods

A prospective observational study with fifty patients with ASA 3-4. At six time points (T), measurements of CI simultaneously by continuous cardiac output pulmonary thermodilution and thoracic bioimpedance and standard hemodynamics were performed. Analysis was performed using Bland-Altman, four-quadrant plot, and polar plot methodology.

Results

CI obtained with pulmonary artery thermodilution and thoracic bioimpedance ranged from 1.00 to 6.75 L min⁻¹ and 0.93 to 7.25 L min⁻¹, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias between CI_BIO and CI_PAC of 0.52 liters min⁻¹ m⁻², with LOA of [−2.2; 1.1] liters min⁻¹ m⁻². Percentage error between the two techniques was above 30% at every time point. Polar plot methodology and 4-quadrant analysis showed poor trending ability. Skin incision had no effect on the results.

Conclusion

CI obtained by continuous PAC and CI obtained by Aesculon bioimpedance are not interchangeable in cardiac surgical patients. No effects of skin incision were found. International clinical trial registration number is ISRCTN26732484.

Does obesity affect the non-invasive measurement of cardiac output performed by electrical cardiometry in children and adolescents?

Electrical cardiometry (EC) is a non-invasive and inexpensive method for hemodynamic assessment and monitoring. However, its feasibility for widespread clinical use, especially for the obese population, has yet to be determined. In this study, we evaluated the agreement and reliability of EC compared to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) in normal, overweight, and obese children and adolescents. We measured stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) of 131 participants using EC and TTE simultaneously. We further divided these participants according to BMI percentiles for subanalyses: <85% normal weight (n = 41), between 85 and 95% overweight (n = 7), and >95% obese (n = 83). Due to small sample size of the overweight group, we combined overweight and obese groups (OW+OB) with no significant change in results (SV and CO) before and after combining groups. There were strong correlations between EC and TTE measurements of SV (r = 0.869 and r = 0.846; p < 0.0001) and CO (r = 0.831 and r = 0.815; p < 0.0001) in normal and OW+OB groups, respectively. Bias and percentage error for CO measurements were 0.240 and 29.7%, and 0.042 and 29.5% in the normal and OW+OB groups, respectively. Indexed values for SV were lower in the OW+OB group than in the normal weight group when measured by EC (p < 0.0001) but no differences were seen when measured by TTE (p = 0.096). In all weight groups, there were strong correlations and good agreement between EC and TTE. However, EC may underestimate hemodynamic measurements in obese participants due to fat tissue.

Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in obese children and adolescents: comparison of electrical cardiometry and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography

The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of electrical cardiometry (EC) for the noninvasive determination of cardiac output (CO) in obese children and adolescents. We compared these results with those obtained by transthoracic echocardiography. Sixty-four participants underwent simultaneous measurement of CO. Cardiac output was measured by EC using the ICON(®) device. Simultaneously CO was determined by using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography from parasternal long-axis and apical view. The median age was 12.52 years (range 7.9-17.6 years) and 36 (56 %) were female. A strongly significant correlation was found between the COEC and COEcho measurements (p < 0.0001, r = 0.91). Significant correlations were also found between CO and age (r = 0.37, p = 0.002), weight (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001), height (0.60, p < 0.0001) and BMI (r = 0.42, p = 0.001). The mean difference between the two methods (COEC - COEcho) was 0.015 l min(-1). According to the Bland and Altman method, the upper and lower limits of agreement, defined as mean difference ±2 SD, were +1.21 and -0.91 l min(-1), respectively. Compared to the transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, Electrical Cardiometry provides accurate and reliable CO measurements in obese children and adolescents.

Lack of agreement between thermodilution and electrical velocimetry cardiac output measurements

OBJECTIVE

The modified algorithm for the non-invasive determination of cardiac output (CO) by electrical bioimpedance-electrical velocimetry (EV)-has been reported to give reliable results in comparison with echocardiography and pulmonary arterial thermodilution (PA-TD) in patients either before or after cardiac surgery. The present study was designed to determine whether EV-CO measurements reflect intraindividual changes in CO during cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-nine patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

CO was determined simultaneously by PA-TD and EV after induction of anesthesia (t1) and 4.9+/-3.5 h after ICU admission (t2).

RESULTS

TD-CO was 3.9+/-1.4 and 5.4+/-1.1 l/min at t1 and t2 (p < 0.0001). EV-CO was 4.3+/-1.1 and 4.9+/-1.5 l/min at t1 and t2 (p = 0.013). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of -0.4 l/min and 0.4 l/min and a precision of 3.2 and 3.6 l/min (34.3% and 67.4%) at t1 and t2, respectively. Analysis of the individual pre- to postoperative changes in CO with both methods revealed bidirectional changes in n = 12 patients and unidirectional changes with a difference greater than 50% and less than 50% in n = 9 and n = 8 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The disagreement between PA-TD and EV-CO measurements after anesthesia induction and after ICU admission, as well as the fact that thoracic bioimpedance did not adequately reflect pre- to postoperative changes in CO, questions the reliability of EV-CO measurements in cardiac surgery patients and contrasts sharply with previous studies.

Comparative overview of cardiac output measurement methods: has impedance cardiography come of age?

Cardiac output, usually expressed as liters of blood ejected by the left ventricle per minute, is a fundamental measure of the adequacy of myocardial function to meet the perfusion needs of tissue at any time. Decreases in cardiac output over time (when cardiac output is measured under similar conditions) may signal myocardial functional deterioration and the onset or progression of heart failure. Conversely, improvements in cardiac output may indicate a positive response to medical therapy. However, most methods for evaluating cardiac output are technically demanding, require specialized training and specialized environments for measurement, and are costly. Therefore, most measurement techniques are impractical for routine evaluation of disease progression and/or response to treatment in the prevention and/or management of heart failure. This paper provides a comparative overview of commonly employed cardiac output measurement strategies with emphasis on developments in impedance cardiography which suggest that impedance cardiography has the potential to make routine assessment and trending of cardiac output a viable alternative to assist in the management of both chronically and acutely ill patients, including those with heart failure. (c)2000 by CHF, Inc.

Non-invasive cardiac output determination: state of the art

This review deals with recent developments in non-invasive cardiac output measurement. In the past few years significant progress has been made with semi-invasive transoesophageal echocardiography; the method now provides advanced facilities to measure cardiac output and other important characteristics of cardiac function. The method is, however, operator-dependent and the equipment used is expensive, which means that large-scale use on intensive care patients is not feasible. Whole-body impedance cardiography has recently shown good accuracy and flexibility in use, and seems to be the most promising method for the non-invasive measurement of cardiac output.