Postoperative epidural infusion of morphine and bupivacaine is safe on surgical wards. Organisation of the treatment, effects and side-effects in 2000 consecutive patients

Infectious complications following regional anesthesia: a narrative review and contemporary estimates of risk

INTRODUCTION

Infectious complications following regional anesthesia (RA) while rare, can be devastating. The objective of this review was to estimate the risk of infectious complications following central neuraxial blocks (CNB) such as epidural anesthesia (EA), spinal anesthesia (SA) and combined spinal epidural (CSE), and peripheral nerve blocks (PNB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify reference studies reporting infectious complications in the context of RA subtypes. Both prospective and retrospective studies providing incidence of infectious complications were included for review to provide pooled estimates (with 95% CI). Additionally, we explored incidences specifically associated with spinal anesthesia, incidences of central nervous system (CNS) infections and, the incidences of overall and CNS infections following CNB in obstetric population.

RESULTS

The pooled estimate of overall infectious complications following all CNB was 9/100 000 (95% CI: 5, 13/100 000). CNS infections following all CNB was estimated to be 2/100 000 (95% CI: 1, 3/100 000) and even rarer following SA (1/100 000 (95% CI: 1, 2/100 000)). Obstetric population had a lower rate of overall (1/100 000 (95% CI: 1, 3/100 000)) and CNS infections (4 per million (95% CI: 0.3, 1/100 000)) following all CNB. For PNB catheters, the reported rate of infectious complications was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.2, 2.5/100).

DISCUSSION

Our review suggests that the risk of overall infectious complications following neuraxial anesthesia is very rare and the rate of CNS infections is even rarer. The infectious complications following PNB catheters seems significantly higher compared with CNB. Standardizing nomenclature and better reporting methodologies are needed for the better estimation of the infectious complications.

Managing epidural catheters in critical care beds: An observation analysis in the Republic of Ireland

In certain hospitals, epidural analgesia is restricted to critical care beds. Due to critical care bed strain, it is likely that many patients are unable to avail of epidural analgesia. The aims of the study were to retrospectively review the number of patients admitted to critical care beds for epidural analgesia over a two-year period 2015–16, to determine the duration of epidural analgesia, to identify the average critical care bed occupancy during this period, to get updated information on the implementation of acute pain service in the Republic of Ireland and the availability of ward-based epidural analgesia. One hundred and sixty patients had a midline laparotomy, 40 of which had an epidural (25%). Forty-two patients were admitted to a critical care bed for epidural analgesia. Aside from epidural analgesia, 12% had other indications for ICU admission. Median duration epidural analgesia was 1.64 days (IQR 0.98–2.14 days). ICU bed occupancy rates were 88.7% in 2015 and 85.1% in 2016. Acute pain service and ward-based epidural analgesia were available in 46 and 42% of hospitals, respectively. Restricting epidural use to a critical care setting is likely to result in reduced access to epidural analgesia. The implementation of acute pain service and availability of ward-based epidural analgesia in the Republic of Ireland are suboptimal.

Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Friend or A Foe?

Escalating costs and change in the profile of patients presenting for cardiac surgery requires modification of perioperative management strategies. Regional anesthesia has played an integral part of many fast-track anesthesia protocols across North America and Europe. This review suggests that for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the risk-to-benefit ratio is in favor of epidural and spinal anesthesia, provided there are no specific contraindications and the guidelines for the use of regional techniques in cardiac surgery are followed. Patients managed with regional techniques seem to benefit from superior postoperative analgesia, shorter postoperative ventilation, reduced incidence of supraventricular arrhythmia, and lower rates of perioperative myocardial infarction. The results of this analysis suggest that for each episode of neurologic complication, 20 myocardial infarctions and 76 episodes of atrial fibrillation would be prevented, thus, we would consider the regional anesthesia and analgesia to be an effective strategy that improves perioperative morbidity. However, other treatment modalities such as the addition of calcium channel blockers, aspirin, and beating heart surgery, are also suggested to be beneficial in cardiac surgical patients and may impose less risk than the use of regional techniques. We believe that the results presented in this review are encouraging enough to permit continued investigation. A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial needs to be adequately powered to answer important clinical questions and allow for a long-term follow-up.

Pain Management After Vascular Surgery

Patients presenting for vascular surgery usually have concomitant disease processes that may increase the likelihood of adverse outcomes after major surgery. Because of the advanced nature of the underlying medical condition, it is important to optimize postopera tive pain control to adequately control postoperative discomfort, stress response, hypercoagulability, myocar dial ischemia, and graft failure. This article discusses methods of pain control after vascular surgery and their effects on physiology and outcome.

Epidural Hematoma and Abscess Related to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia: A Single-Center Study of 2,907 Patients Who Underwent Lung Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To report the major complications (epidural hematoma and abscess) of postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia in patients who underwent lung surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, monocentric study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

All lung surgical patients who received postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia between November 2007 and November 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

Thoracic epidural analgesia for patients who underwent lung surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During the study period, data for 2,907 patients were recorded. The following 3 major complications were encountered: 1 case of epidural hematoma (0.34 case/1,000; 95% confidence interval 0.061-1.946), for which surgery was performed, and 2 cases of epidural abscesses (0.68 case/1,000; 95% confidence interval 0.189-2.505), which were treated medically.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk range of serious complications was moderate; only the patient who experienced an epidural hematoma also experienced permanent sequelae.

Cardiorespiratory complications of neuraxial opioids in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review

We sought to determine the rate of cardiorespiratory complications following neuraxial opioid administration in the setting of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This systematic review of the leading biomedical databases originated from a university-affiliated, tertiary-care teaching hospital. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts Database (1970 - September 2011) was undertaken. Cardiorespiratory complications were stratified into minor and major based on existing OSA literature. Five studies, including a total of 121 patients, were selected for analysis. All studies comprised low-quality evidence. Six major cardiorespiratory complications were reported among 5 (4.1%) patients and included three deaths, one cardiorespiratory arrest, and two episodes of severe respiratory depression. Five of these complications occurred during continuous fentanyl-containing epidural infusions and without concurrent positive airway pressure treatment. The rate of cardiorespiratory complications following the administration of neuraxial opioids to surgical patients with OSA is difficult to determine.

A controlled comparison between single doses of intravenous and intramuscular morphine with respect to analgesic effects and patient safety

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF INVESTIGATION: Intramuscular (IM) administration has been considered to be safer than intravenous (IV) for opioids on wards, but a comparative knowledge of patient safety and analgesic potency following a single dose of IV and IM administration is lacking. This study was carried out to compare patient safety and analgesic efficacy of a single and high dose of morphine given IM or IV for post-operative pain management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with post-operative pain following hip replacement surgery were given IM or IV morphine 10 mg at a specified pain level. The study was randomized and double blinded. Time to onset of analgesic effect (11-point numeric rating scale), respiratory function (p(a)CO2, p(a)O2, and respiratory rate), level of sedation (5-point verbal rating scale), and hemodynamic function were recorded.

RESULTS

In the IV group there was a slight but significant increase in p(a)CO2 after 5, 10, and 15 min compared with the IM group (5.2 vs. 4.8, 5.4, vs. 5.0 and 5.5 vs. 5.1 kPa, respectively). The IV group had a significantly faster onset of analgesic effect than the IM group (5 vs. 20 min). Between 5 and 25 min after morphine administration, pain status in the IV group was significantly improved compared with the IM group. Patients in the IV group were slightly more sedated than the IM group 5 and 10 min after morphine.

CONCLUSION

A 10 mg bolus dose of IV morphine given to patients with moderate pain after surgery does not cause severe respiratory depression, but provides more rapid and better initial analgesia than 10 mg given IM. IV morphine even at a dose as high as 10 mg IV is well tolerated if there is a certain level of pain at its administration. The safety of IV morphine on the general ward needs to be further explored in adequately controlled studies.

The safety of concurrent administration of opioids via epidural and intravenous routes for postoperative pain in pediatric oncology patients

Supplementation of epidural opioid analgesia with intravenous opioids is usually avoided because of concern about respiratory depression. However, the choice of adjunct analgesic agents for pediatric oncology patients is limited. Antipyretic drugs may mask fever in neutropenic patients, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents may exert antiplatelet effects and interact with chemotherapeutic agents. We examined the safety of concurrent use of epidural and intravenous opioids in a consecutive series of 117 epidural infusions in pediatric patients and compared our findings to those reported by other investigators. We observed a 0.85% rate of clinically significant respiratory complications. The single adverse event was associated with an error in dosage. In our experience, the supplementation of epidural opioid analgesia with intravenous opioids has been a safe method of postoperative pain control for pediatric patients with cancer.

Development and verification of saphenous, tibial and common peroneal nerve block techniques for analgesia below the thigh in the nonchondrodystrophoid dog

OBJECTIVE

To document simple and reliable local, infiltrating nerve blocks for the saphenous, tibial and common peroneal nerves in the dog.

STUDY DESIGN

Laboratory technique development; in vivo blind, controlled, prospective study.

ANIMALS

Twenty canine cadavers and 18 clinically normal, client-owned dogs.

METHODS

A peripheral nerve blockade technique of the tibial, common peroneal, and saphenous nerves was perfected through anatomic dissection. Injections were planned in the caudal thigh for the tibial and common peroneal nerves, and in the medial thigh for the saphenous nerve. Cadaver limbs were injected with methylene blue dye and subsequently dissected to confirm successful dye placement. Clinically normal dogs undergoing general anesthesia for unrelated, elective procedures were randomly assigned to treatment (bupivacaine; n = 8) or control (saline; n = 8) nerve blocks of the nerves under study. Upon recovery from general anesthesia, skin sensation in selected dermatomes was evaluated for 24 hours.

RESULTS

Cadaver tibial, common peroneal, and saphenous perineural infiltrations were successful in nonchondrodystrophoid dogs (100, 100, and 97%, respectively.) Intraneural injection was rare (1%; 1/105; tibial nerve) in cadaver dogs. In the treatment group of normal dogs, duration of loss of cutaneous sensation in some dermatomes (saphenous, superficial and deep peroneal nerve) was significantly different than control dogs; the range of desensitization occurred for 1-20 hours. No clinical morbidity was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique for local blockade of the tibial, common peroneal, and saphenous nerves just proximal to the stifle is easy to perform, requires minimal supplies and results in significant desensitization of the associated dermatomes in clinically normal, nonchondrodystrophoid dogs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This technique may be an effective tool for post-operative analgesia to the femoro-tibial joint and distal pelvic limb. Other applications, using sustained-release drugs or methods, may include anesthesia/analgesia in high-risk patients or as a treatment for chronic pelvic limb pain or self-mutilation.

Epidural abscesses

Until recently epidural abscess was considered a rare, almost theoretical, complication of central nerve block, but anecdotal reports suggest that this is no longer the case. Thus a review of the risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical features and outcome of this condition is appropriate, the primary aim being to make recommendations on best anaesthetic practice to minimize the risk of this serious complication. A search of EMBASE(c), PUBMED(c) and MEDLINE(c) databases from 1966 to September 2004 was performed using several strategies, supplemented by reference list screening. Spontaneous epidural abscess is rare, accounting for 0.2-1.2 cases per 10,000 hospital admissions per year. Estimates of the incidence after central nerve block vary from 1:1,000 to 1:100,000. Risk factors (compromised immunity, spinal column disruption, source of infection) are present in the majority of patients, whether the condition is spontaneous or associated with central nerve block. Presentation is vague, fever and back pain usually preceding neurological deficit. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion and modern imaging techniques. Treatment involves early surgical drainage to prevent permanent deficit and high dose parenteral antibiotics chosen with bacteriological advice. Primary prevention depends on proper use of full aseptic precautions. Epidural abscess can be a catastrophic consequence of central nerve block. Early diagnosis will minimize permanent damage, but primary prevention should be the aim. There is a need for a large survey to indicate the true incidence to better inform the risk-benefit ratio for central nerve block.

The frequency and timing of respiratory depression in 1524 postoperative patients treated with systemic or neuraxial morphine

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency and timing of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) or neuraxial morphine-induced postoperative respiratory depression.

DESIGN

Audit of data captured by routine quality assurance of the acute pain protocols that were implemented by nurses performing routine postoperative care.

SETTING

The surgical wards of a university-affiliated, 700-bed, tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

In real time, the data of all patients enrolled into our Acute Pain Service (APS) were entered and stored in the APS database. Thereafter, patients who had received IV morphine via a PCA device or neuraxial morphine between January 1999 and December 2002 were isolated. From this subset, all patients in whom a respiratory rate (RR) less than 10 breaths per minute was recorded were retrieved.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

From a total of 4500 patients, IV or neuraxial morphine was administered to 1524 patients. Eighteen (1.2%) cases of an RR less than 10 breaths per minute were recorded (13 patients, 4 patients, and 1 patient in the IV-PCA, daily epidural morphine, and single-dose intrathecal morphine groups, respectively). A direct correlation between intraoperative fentanyl administration and postoperative respiratory depression was demonstrated between the IV-PCA (P = 0.03) and epidural groups (P = 0.05). The time from IV-PCA initiation or last neuraxial morphine administration until the diagnosis of respiratory depression ranged between 2 hours and 31.26 hours and 2 hours and 12.15 hours, respectively. Ten (55.6%) patients received naloxone.

CONCLUSION

Morphine-induced respiratory depression may occur at any time during the APS admission. However, the optimal frequency of intermittent RR monitoring is unknown. Furthermore, because multiple variables (age, sex, prior opioid administration, site of operation) may affect morphine-induced respiratory depression, further investigation must be performed to determine the ideal monitoring protocol.

Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain

Epidural analgesia provides superior analgesia compared with other postoperative analgesic techniques. Additionally, perioperative epidural analgesia confers physiologic benefits, which may potentially decrease perioperative complications and improve postoperative outcome. However, there are many variables (eg, choice of analgesics, catheter-incision congruency, and duration of analgesia) that may influence the efficacy of epidural analgesia. In addition, the use of epidural analgesia should be evaluated on an individual basis because there are risks associated with this technique.

Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery

Surgical injury can be followed by pain, nausea, vomiting and ileus, stress-induced catabolism, impaired pulmonary function, increased cardiac demands, and risk of thromboembolism. These problems can lead to complications, need for treatment in hospital, postoperative fatigue, and delayed convalescence. Development of safe and short-acting anaesthetics, improved pain relief by early intervention with multimodal analgesia, and stress reduction by regional anaesthetic techniques, beta-blockade, or glucocorticoids have provided important possibilities for enhanced recovery. When these techniques are combined with a change in perioperative care a pronounced enhancement of recovery and decrease in hospital stay can be achieved, even in major operations. The anaesthetist has an important role in facilitating early postoperative recovery by provision of minimally-invasive anaesthesia and pain relief, and by collaborating with surgeons, surgical nurses, and physiotherapists to reduce risk and pain.

Pain relief and safety after major surgery. A prospective study of epidural and intravenous analgesia in 2696 patients

BACKGROUND

Adverse effects may still limit the use of continuous epidural and intravenous analgesia in surgical wards. This study postulated that postoperative epidural analgesia was more efficient, and had fewer side-effects than intravenous morphine. The aim was to investigate efficacy, adverse effects and safety of the treatments in a large patient population.

METHODS

During a five-year period 2696 patients undergoing major surgery, received either epidural or intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain relief. The patients were prospectively monitored in surgical wards. Pain was evaluated with a numeric rating scale (0-10) at rest/mobilization. Treatment duration, respiratory depression, sedation/hallucinations/nightmares/confusion, nausea/vomiting, pruritus, orthostatism/leg weakness, and insufficient pain relief were registered. Pain relief for all patients aimed at a pain scoring of less than 4 at rest.

RESULTS

Epidural analgesia was used in 1670 patients, and intravenous morphine in 1026 patients. Patients with epidural analgesia experienced less pain both at rest and during mobilization. Insufficient treatment effects such as dose adjustments, orthostatism/leg weakness, and pruritus were more common in the epidural group. Respiratory depression and sedation/hallucinations/nightmares/confusion occurred more often in the intravenous group. Thoracic epidural catheters caused a lower incidence of motor blockade compared to lumbar catheter placements.

CONCLUSION

In a large patient population the use of epidural and intravenous postoperative analgesia was considered safe in surgical wards, and the incidence of adverse effects was low. Patients with epidural analgesia experienced overall less pain, while opioid related side-effects were more common with intravenous morphine analgesia.

Provision of postoperative epidural services in NHS hospitals

To describe facilities for postoperative epidurals in UK National Health Service Hospitals, a questionnaire was sent to each hospital performing surgery below the head and neck. Of 271 hospitals, 256 replied (95%). While almost all offer postoperative epidurals, only 78 (30%) offer them to all surgical disciplines. Most hospitals rely on acute pain nurses for troubleshooting during the day, and on trainee anaesthetists after hours. Administration is most commonly by continuous infusion. There was no restriction on the use of epidural opioids in 67% of hospitals. Most (96%) hospitals have a protocol for epidural care, although the specified level of monitoring varies widely. There is no consensus of practice on removal of epidural catheters relative to anticoagulation. Levels of training in epidural care also vary widely. Two hundred and thirty-six hospitals (92%) have an acute pain team. Despite the expansion in acute pain services, facilities for postoperative epidurals are deficient in many NHS hospitals.

Pain relief after esophagectomy: Thoracic epidural analgesia is better than parenteral opioids

OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative pain relief and pulmonary function in patients after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy treated by continuing perioperative thoracic epidural anesthesia or changing to parenteral opioids.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-three patients undergoing thoracoabdominal esophagectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

General anesthesia was combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia during surgery. The patients either continued with thoracic epidural analgesia (n = 18) or were switched to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine (n = 15) for 5 postoperative days. Pain scores were estimated twice daily, at rest and after mobilization. Peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume, and vital capacity were measured the day before surgery, postoperative day 2, and postoperative day 6. Adverse events and complications were recorded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At rest, there were no differences in pain relief between the groups. Pain scores at mobilization showed a significantly lower value in the epidural group (p < 0.027). No intergroup differences were found regarding pulmonary function, which decreased on postoperative day 2, but was improved on postoperative day 6.

CONCLUSION

Continuation of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia for 5 postoperative days provides better pain relief at mobilization compared with a switch to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine. There was no intergroup difference in the impact on measures of pulmonary function.

Thoracic epidural anaesthesia and analgesia: United Kingdom practice

BACKGROUND

Thoracic epidural analgesia has become increasingly practised in recent years. Complications are rare but potentially serious and, consequently, careful evaluation is required before undertaking this technique. The practice surrounding this procedure varies widely amongst anaesthetists.

METHODS

A postal survey to examine the practice of thoracic epidural analgesia was sent to all Royal College of Anaesthetists tutors in the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 240 tutors, representing a return rate of 83%. When obtaining consent for thoracic epidural cannulation, 42% of respondents mentioned risk of a dural tap complication and 11% mentioned neurological damage. Fifty percent of respondents performed epidural cannulation following induction of general anaesthesia. The practice of epidural insertion in patients with abnormal coagulation varied, although over 80% of respondents did not consider concurrent treatment with either aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs a contraindication. Sterile precautions for epidural insertion also varied between anaesthetists. Postoperatively, 95% of respondents used an opioid-based bupivacaine solution for epidural infusions, and these were most commonly nursed on general surgical wards (63%). Seventy-eight percent of hospitals provided an acute pain team to review epidural analgesia.

CONCLUSION

In the United Kingdom, there is little consensus in the practice of thoracic epidural analgesia relating to the issues of informed consent, epidural cannulation in patients with deranged clotting and the sterile precautions taken prior to performing epidural insertion. Most respondents use an opioid-based bupivacaine solution to provide postoperative epidural analgesia. Most hospitals in the UK now provide an acute pain service for thoracic epidural follow-up.

Postoperative pain control by epidural analgesia after transabdominal surgery. Efficacy and problems encountered in daily routine

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of postoperative epidural pain treatment has been well documented in controlled studies. However, the literature concerning results of daily routine use of this method often only emphasises certain aspects of it.

METHODS

A prospective study of 168 patients scheduled for major surgery with transabdominal access was performed in order to evaluate efficacy, side effects, complications and rate of acceptance of postoperative epidural pain treatment. The epidural catheter was placed before surgery and the patients received epidural analgesia by a bupivacaine/morphine mixture for 3 days postoperatively, continued by another 3 days with bolus injections of morphine only.

RESULTS

Only few complications followed the insertion of the epidural catheter, but in about 16% of the patients the epidural catheter or the drugs administered by it made reinsertion or change in the type of analgesia necessary during the first 3 post-operative days. Despite the possibility for individualising the treatment and p.r.n. analgesics, pain relief when coughing and moving during day 1-3 was insufficient in 30-50% of the patients. Serious side effects were rare, but pruritus was frequent, as were the symptoms of nausea and vomiting. The patients were generally satisfied with the treatment; however, a small group had unacceptable pain when the epidural catheter was inserted.

CONCLUSION

Analgesia was insufficient when coughing and moving in an unacceptably large number of the patients. Also the number of epidural catheter related problems was high. In order to make early intervention possible, the patients and epidural catheters should be observed daily and systematically by members of the staff competent to detect possible problems.

Balanced analgesia: what is it and what are its advantages in postoperative pain?

The concept of balanced analgesia was introduced to improve analgesic efficacy and reduce adverse effects. A large amount of clinical data has documented improved analgesia by combining different analgesics, but data on reducing adverse effects are inconclusive. Balanced analgesia should be used whenever possible, and future studies should be directed to define optimal combination regimens in individual surgical procedures.

[Benefit-risk and monitoring modalities of different techniques and methods of postoperative analgesia]

This review aimed to determine the benefits-risks ratio of postoperative analgesia. The various agents usually used for intravenous postoperative analgesia (paracetamol, NSAID's, opioids), and the techniques for postoperative analgesia (PCA, epidural, perinervous block) are analysed. The rules proposed for the monitoring of postoperative analgesia are considered.

[How is the management of postoperative pain in organized in surgical wards?]

Many studies have demonstrated that the management of pain after surgery was unsatisfactory. New pain management techniques have been developed in recent years (patient-controlled analgesia, epidural analgesia). To extend the number of patients who may benefit from these recent techniques and/or to obtain the best efficacy from existing methods of pain relief, re-organisation should take place on surgical wards. For example, protocols describing pain management strategies should be written. Surveys and audits should be carried out regularly to check their efficacy. Moreover, patients should be fully informed of the range of treatments available and their adverse effects. Finally, all staff involved in providing acute pain relief should undergo training.