Epidural fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine as adjuvants to local anaesthetics for surgical analgesia: meta-analyses of analgesia and side-effects

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018

BACKGROUND

This is the fourth updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and providing graded recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol.

METHODS

A wide database search on English literature publications was performed. Studies on each item within the protocol were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts and examined, reviewed and graded according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

All recommendations on ERAS® protocol items are based on best available evidence; good-quality trials; meta-analyses of good-quality trials; or large cohort studies. The level of evidence for the use of each item is presented accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence base and recommendation for items within the multimodal perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS® Society in this comprehensive consensus review.

Opioid administration via epidural catheter is a risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting in total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) may lead to extended hospital stay due to severe discomfort and restriction of patient activity. We retrospectively studied PONV incidence following total hip arthroplasty (THA) to evaluate the effect of opioid administration via epidural catheter.

METHODS

Our study included 155 affected joints in 136 patients who underwent a first THA from 2011 to 2016. For postoperative analgesia, an epidural catheter was preoperatively placed and used for continuous analgesic delivery into the epidural space up to 2 days after surgery. We analyzed patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), opioid use via epidural catheter, amount of opioid used intraoperatively, amount of opioid used immediately before the end of the operation, anesthesia duration, and amount of opioid used postoperatively.

RESULTS

PONV was reported for 51 affected joints. Opioid was infused via epidural catheter in 114 affected joints, but not in 41 affected joints. Logistic regression analysis for PONV occurrence revealed a significant difference according to sex (P < 0.05), BMI (P < 0.01), and opioid use via epidural catheter (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis evaluating the occurrence of PONV and BMI using the χ² test demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of PONV in the subgroup of patients with a BMI ≤20 kg/m² (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that without using opioid or other action should be considered when epidural catheter is used in female patients with a BMI ≤20 kg/m².

Operative anesthesia and pain control

A comprehensive understanding of operative anesthesia and postoperative pain control is essential to the practicing colon and rectal surgeon. Most of the operations performed-particularly in the perineum-cause significant patient discomfort and often result in a lengthy recovery period. A variety of factors, including patient positioning in the operating room and patient expectations, influence the choice of operative anesthesia. Postoperatively numerous modalities and agents exist for pain control. With this variety of options at hand, surgeons should be educated and decisions should be individualized, with the ultimate goals of improving the patient experience and facilitating recovery.

Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine: effects of small-or large-volume regimen of infusion

BACKGROUND

The question of whether the dose, concentration or volume of a local anesthetic solution is the relevant determinant of the spread and quality of post-operative epidural analgesia is still open. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the effects of a large volume-low concentration with a small-volume-high-concentration lumbar epidural infusion of levobupivacaine.

METHODS

Seventy patients scheduled for total hip replacement were enrolled. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous epidural infusion of levobupivacaine (10.5 mg/h) using either 0.125% levobupivacaine infused at 8.4 ml/h (low concentration group, n=35) or 0.75% levobupivacaine infused at 1.4 ml/h (high concentration group, n=35). We blindly recorded the degree of pain relief at rest and during movement every 8 h for the first two post-operative days, as well as hip flexion, motor block, rescue analgesic consumption and adverse events.

RESULTS

No difference in pain relief was observed between groups as estimated with the areas under the curve of the verbal Numerical Rating Scale for pain over time, both at rest and during movement. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in hip flexion degree, motor blockade and hemodynamic stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.75% levobupivacaine was as effective as continuous lumbar epidural infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine, when administered at the same hourly dose of 10.5 mg, in achieving adequate analgesia both at rest and during movement, without differences in the incidence of hypotension and motor blockade.

Current interventions and approaches to postoperative pain management

Some degree of pain accompanies all surgical procedures. Current evidence informs us that patients will experience significant physiological and psychological effects if this pain is not adequately treated. These effects can cause serious harm, delay recovery from surgery, and in some cases lead to persistent post-surgical chronic pain. This article briefly discusses the importance of assessing patients preoperatively and highlights how some patients will have risk factors which may lead them to experience severe postoperative pain. Approaches to postoperative pain control are focused on ways to address the inter-patient differences in response to pain and treatments and avoid periods of ineffective pain relief. A review of the commonly used analgesics, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids and local anaesthetics, and methods of administration, is included. The final section provides a short review of emerging trends in acute pain therapy and the implications for improving patient care.

Dose-response study of intrathecal fentanyl added to bupivacaine in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic surgery

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal (IT) adjuncts often are used to enhance the duration of spinal bupivacaine. Fentanyl is a spinal analgesic that could be a useful adjunct, and enhances the duration and quality of sensory block in adult surgical and obstetric population. However, no data exist to assess the dose-response characteristics of IT fentanyl when added to bupivacaine in infants.

METHODS

Fifty-eight infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic procedures were randomized into four groups to receive plain 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine F0 (<5 kg = 0.5 mg.kg(-1); 5-10 kg = 0.4 mg.kg(-1)). Groups F0.25, F0.5, and F1 groups received bupivacaine added with 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mug.kg(-1) of fentanyl, respectively. Duration of spinal anesthesia (SA) as assessed by the recovery of hip flexion in the postoperative period was the primary variable analyzed. In addition, the duration of analgesia in the postoperative period, rescue postoperative analgesic requirements and hemodynamic changes were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-six infants were studied. The four groups were similar for age, weight, duration of surgery, onset of sensory, motor block, and the highest level of analgesia attained. The addition of 1 mug.kg(-1) fentanyl (F1) significantly increased the duration of SA (74.27 +/- 6.1 min) compared to the control group (51.21 +/- 5.2 min) (P = 0.001). Postoperative pain-free interval was prolonged (P = 0.004) and significantly less rescue analgesics were required after 1 mug.kg(-1) IT fentanyl (P = 0.032). These parameters did not show any significant difference among groups F0, F0.25, and F0.5.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of 1 mug.kg(-1) IT fentanyl to spinal bupivacaine prolonged the duration of spinal block in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic procedures.

Modern concepts of acute and chronic pain management

Both, acute and chronic pain should be treated using appropriate pain management as they may cause several negative reactions and jeopardise the health or at least the quality of life of the patients. Nowadays there are many analgesics and treatment tools available to provide sufficient pain relief for almost all patients. Unfortunately there are still patients suffering from pain due to inadequate or/and inconsequent pain therapy.

Anesthesia and analgesia during and after surgery in neonates

BACKGROUND

Historically, the use of anesthetics and analgesics in neonates and infants has been based on extrapolations from studies performed in adults and older children. Over the past 20 years, there has been a growing body of research on the clinical pharmacology and clinical outcomes of these agents in neonates and infants.

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes clinical pharmacology and clinical outcomes studies of opioids, opioid antagonists, sedative-hypnotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, and local anesthetics in neonates and infants to highlight gaps in the available knowledge, review some concerns about study design, and identify drugs that should receive high priority for future study.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through a search of MEDLINE and a review of textbooks, conference proceedings, and abstracts. The available literature was subjected to expert committee-based review.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a growing body of information on analgesic and anesthetic pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical outcomes in neonates and infants, permitting safe and effective use in some clinical settings. Major gaps in knowledge persist, however. Future research may involve a combination of clinical trials and preclinical studies in suitable infant animal surrogate models.

Intrathecal clonidine in the treatment of intractable pain: a phase I/II study

OBJECTIVE

Epidural clonidine has been proven effective in relieving intractable cancer pain, especially neuropathic. This phase I/II study was performed to investigate if intrathecal clonidine is well tolerated and effective for long-term treatment of intractable chronic pain.

DESIGN

Thirty-one patients, previously implanted with programmable pumps and unable to obtain adequate pain relief with opioids and adjuvant oral medications, were enrolled. Clonidine monotherapy was initiated at 1 mcg/hr and escalated to a maximum of 40 mcg/hr (960 mcg/day). Efficacy measurements included Verbal Digital Pain Ratings, and side effects were determined by physical exam and patient reports.

RESULTS

Patients achieving 50% or greater reduction in pain intensity scores in the dose-titration phase continued for long-term follow-up. Twenty-two patients (71%) entered long-term follow-up with intrathecal clonidine; nine patients (29%) did not obtain adequate pain control in the dose-titration phase. Thirteen patients were considered long-term successes with a mean follow-up of 16.7 months (range = 6.3 to 44 months). Nine patients failed to achieve adequate pain relief due to side effects or lack of efficacy. Fifty-nine percent of the patients successful in the dose-titration stage (42% of all patients considered) were considered long-term successes. Patients in the long-term phase maintained adequate pain control with minimal dose escalation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the tolerability and effectiveness of intrathecal clonidine in the treatment of chronic pain. The physician using clonidine for long-term intrathecal infusion should be cognizant of the risk that severe rebound systemic hypertension can occur with abrupt cessation of the intrathecal infusion of clonidine.

Lumbar epidural fentanyl: segmental spread and effect on temporal summation and muscle pain

BACKGROUND

Despite extensive use, different aspects of the pharmacological action of epidural fentanyl have not been clarified. We applied a multi-modal sensory test procedure to investigate the effect of epidural fentanyl on segmental spread, temporal summation (as a measure for short-lasting central hyperexcitability) and muscle pain.

METHODS

Thirty patients received either placebo, 50 or 100 micro g single dose of fentanyl epidurally (L2-3), in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Heat pain tolerance thresholds at eight dermatomes from S1 to fifth cranial nerve (assessment of segmental spread), pain threshold to transcutaneous repeated electrical stimulation of the sural nerve (assessment of temporal summation) and pain intensity after injection of hypertonic saline into the tibialis anterior muscle (assessment of muscle pain) were recorded.

RESULTS

Fentanyl 100 micro g, but not 50 micro g, produced analgesia to heat stimulation only at L2. Surprisingly, no effect at S1 was detected. Both fentanyl doses significantly increased temporal summation threshold and decreased muscle pain intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that a single lumbar epidural dose of fentanyl should be injected at the spinal interspace corresponding to the dermatomal site of pain. Increased effect on L2 compared with S1 suggests that drug effect on spinal nerve roots and binding to opioid receptors on the dorsal root ganglia may be more important than traditionally believed for the segmental effect of epidurally injected fentanyl. Epidural fentanyl increases temporal summation threshold and could therefore contribute to prevention and treatment of central hypersensitivity states. I.M. injection of hypertonic saline is a sensitive technique for detecting the analgesic action of epidural opioids.

Examining the evidence in anesthesia literature: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews

Systematic reviews are structured reviews that use scientific strategies to reduce bias in the collection, appraisal, and interpretation of relevant studies. We undertook a systematic review of published systematic reviews in perioperative medicine to summarize the areas currently covered by this type of literature, to evaluate the quality of systematic reviews in this field, and to assess some of the methodologic and reporting issues that are unique to systematic reviews. Computerized bibliographic databases, citation review, and hand searches were performed to identify eligible articles. Quality was assessed using the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. Eight-two systematic reviews were found. Reviews in perioperative medicine tended to evaluate prophylactic or therapeutic interventions. No differences were seen in quality between reviews published in anesthesia and nonanesthesia journals. Nearly half of all systematic reviews had only minor or minimal flaws; however, methods can be improved with expanded search strategies, use of least two reviewers to assess each study, use of validated methods to evaluate quality, and assessment of potential sources of bias.

IMPLICATIONS

The quality of systematic reviews relating to perioperative medicine was examined systematically and found to be similar in quality to those in other specialties. Adoption of recently published criteria on writing and methods could further improve this type of literature.

Balanced analgesia: what is it and what are its advantages in postoperative pain?

The concept of balanced analgesia was introduced to improve analgesic efficacy and reduce adverse effects. A large amount of clinical data has documented improved analgesia by combining different analgesics, but data on reducing adverse effects are inconclusive. Balanced analgesia should be used whenever possible, and future studies should be directed to define optimal combination regimens in individual surgical procedures.