Propofol, more than halothane, depresses electroencephalographic activation resulting from electrical stimulation in reticular formation

The effect of different anesthetics on neurovascular coupling

To date, the majority of neurovascular coupling studies focused on the thalamic afferents' activity in layer IV and the corresponding large spiking activity as responsible for functional hyperemia. This paper highlights the role of the secondary and late cortico-cortical transmission in neurovascular coupling. Simultaneous scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and diffuse optical imaging (DOI) measurements were obtained during multiple conditions of event-related electrical forepaw stimulation in 33 male Sprague-Dawley rats divided into 6 groups depending on the maintaining anesthetic - alpha-chloralose, pentobarbital, ketamine-xylazine, fentanyl-droperidol, isoflurane, or propofol. The somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were decomposed into four components and the question of which best predicts the hemodynamic responses was investigated. Results of the linear regression analysis show that the hemodynamic response is best correlated with the secondary and late cortico-cortical transmissions and not with the initial thalamic input activity in layer IV. Baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF) interacts with neural activity and influences the evoked hemodynamic responses. Finally, neurovascular coupling appears to be the same across all anesthetics used.

Propofol produces immobility via action in the ventral horn of the spinal cord by a GABAergic mechanism

BACKGROUND

We investigated the actions of propofol and isoflurane on nociceptive responses of neurons in the spinal cord.

METHODS

We determined nociceptive responses of lumbar neurons in the dorsal horn (<1200 microm) and ventral horn (>1200 microm) of decerebrate rats before and during propofol (1 effective dose, ED(50)) or isoflurane (1 minimum alveolar concentration) anesthesia. During recording of ventral horn neurons, we administered picrotoxin by infusion to determine whether isoflurane and propofol differed in their effects at the gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) Type A receptors. We also determined whether decerebration altered propofol requirements to produce immobility.

RESULTS

Decerebration did not affect propofol requirements. The ED(50) for propofol was 497 +/- 58 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) in intact rats and 420 +/- 65 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) in decerebrated rats (P > 0.05), with corresponding propofol blood concentrations of 8.1 +/- 1.1 microg/mL and 7.3 +/- 1.1 microg/mL, respectively (P > 0.05). Propofol did not significantly depress dorsal horn neurons, but isoflurane depressed the responses to 56% of control (P < 0.05). Propofol depressed ventral horn neurons to 47% of control, whereas isoflurane depressed ventral horn neurons to 20% of control. Picrotoxin significantly reversed the depressant effect of propofol on ventral horn neuronal responses (79% of control, not significantly different from control). Pic- rotoxin, however, had no effect on isoflurane's depression of ventral horn neuronal responses (26% of control).

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol acts in the spinal cord to produce immobility. This depressive effect occurs in the ventral horn and is mediated mainly by GABA(A) receptors. Isoflurane also depresses neurons in the ventral horn; however, isoflurane actions at the GABA(A) receptor are either weak or overridden by other effects in the ventral horn.