Norepinephrine in low to moderate doses may not increase luminal concentrations of L-lactate in the gut in patients with septic shock

Consecutive Daily Measurements of Luminal Concentrations of Lactate in the Rectum in Septic Shock Patients

In a recent study we found no difference in the concentrations of luminal lactate in the rectum between nonsurvivors and survivors in early septic shock (<24 h). This study was initiated to investigate if there are any changes in the concentrations of luminal lactate in the rectum during the first 3 days of septic shock and possible differences between nonsurvivors and survivors. Methods. We studied 22 patients with septic shock in this observational study. Six to 24 h after the onset of septic shock the concentration of lactate in the rectal lumen was estimated by 4 h equilibrium dialysis (day 1). The rectal dialysis was repeated on day 2 and day 3. Results. The concentration of lactate in the rectal lumen did not change over the 3 days in neither nonsurvivors nor survivors. Rectal luminal and arterial lactate concentrations were not different. Conclusion. There was no change in the concentration of lactate in the rectal lumen over time in patients with septic shock. Also, there was no difference between nonsurvivors and survivors.

Norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and reduces preload dependency assessed by passive leg raising in septic shock patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of norepinephrine on cardiac preload, cardiac index, and preload dependency during septic shock.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional study.

SETTING

Medical Intensive Care Unit.

PATIENTS

We included 25 septic shock patients (62 ± 13 yrs old, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II 53 ± 12, lactate 3.5 ± 2.1 mmol/L, all receiving norepinephrine at baseline at 0.24 [25%-75% interquartile range: 0.12-0.48] μg/kg/min) with a positive passive leg raising test (defined by an increase in cardiac index ≥ 10%) and a diastolic arterial pressure ≤ 40 mm Hg.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed a passive leg raising test (during 1 min) at baseline. Immediately after, we increased the dose of norepinephrine (to 0.48 [0.36-0.71] μg/kg/min) and, when the hemodynamic status was stabilized, we performed a second passive leg raising test (during 1 min). We finally infused 500 mL saline.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Increasing the dose of norepinephrine significantly increased central venous pressure (+23% ± 12%), left ventricular end-diastolic area (+9% ± 6%), E mitral wave (+19% ± 23%), and global end-diastolic volume (+9% ± 6%). Simultaneously, cardiac index significantly increased by 11% ± 7%, suggesting that norepinephrine had recruited some cardiac preload reserve. The second passive leg raising test increased cardiac index to a lesser extent than the baseline test (13% ± 8% vs. + 19% ± 6%, p < .05), suggesting that norepinephrine had decreased the degree of preload dependency. Volume infusion significantly increased cardiac index by 26% ± 15%. However, cardiac index increased by <15% in four patients (fluid unresponsive patients) while the baseline passive leg raising test was positive in these patients. In three of these four patients, the second passive leg raising test was also negative, i.e., the second passive leg raising test (after norepinephrine increase) predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 95 [76-99]% and a specificity of 100 [30-100]%.

CONCLUSIONS

In septic patients with a positive passive leg raising test at baseline suggesting the presence of preload dependency, norepinephrine increased cardiac preload and cardiac index and reduced the degree of preload dependency.

Lactate concentrations in the rectal lumen in patients in early septic shock

BACKGROUND

Previously, we observed that rectal luminal lactate was higher in non-survivors compared with survivors of severe sepsis or septic shock persisting >24 h. The present study was initiated to further investigate this tentative association between rectal luminal lactate and mortality in a larger population of patients in early septic shock.

METHODS

A prospective observational multicentre study of 130 patients with septic shock at six general ICU's of university hospitals. Six to 24 h after the onset of septic shock, the concentration of lactate in the rectal lumen was estimated by a 4-h equilibrium dialysis. Dialysate concentrations of lactate were determined using an auto-analyser.

RESULTS

The overall 30-day mortality was 32%, with age and Simplified acute physiology scores II and sequential organ failure assessment scores being significantly higher in non-survivors. In contrast, there were no differences in concentrations of lactate in the rectal lumen [2.2 (1.4-4.1) and 2.8 (1.6-5.1) mmol/l (P=0.34)] (medians and 25th-75th percentiles) or arterial blood [2.1 (1.4-4.2) and 2.0 (1.3-3.2) mmol/l (P=0.15)] between non-survivors and survivors. The rectal-arterial difference of the lactate concentration was higher in survivors. There were no differences in blood pressure, noradrenaline dose or central venous oxygen saturation between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective, observational study of unselected patients with early septic shock, there was no difference in the concentration of lactate in the rectal lumen between non-survivors and survivors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (no: NCT00197938).

Review article: inotrope and vasopressor use in the emergency department

Shock is a common presentation to the ED, with the incidence of septic shock increasing in Australasia over the last decade. The choice of inotropic agent is likely dependent on previous experience and local practices of the emergency and other critical care departments. The relatively short duration of stay in the ED before transfer leaves little room for evaluating the appropriateness of and response to the agent chosen. Delays in transfer to inpatient facilities means that patients receive advanced critical care within the ED for longer, requiring initiation and titration of vasoactive agents in the ED. This article discusses the general concepts of shock and the indicators for inotrope and vasopressor use, revises the various agents available and reviews the current evidence for their use.