Intubation of an infant with Pierre Robin sequence under dexmedetomidine sedation using the Shikani Optical Stylet

Comparative evaluation of lignocaine nebulization with and without dexmedetomidine for flexible videoendoscopic guided awake nasal intubation for general anaesthesia

Background and Aims

Awake fibreoptic intubation is considered a safe approach in airway management of a patient with difficult airway. Awake fibreoptic endoscopy needs appropriate anaesthesia of airway to suppress airway reflexes and prevent discomfort. We planned this study to evaluate effect of adding dexmedetomidine to lignocaine nebulization on conditions for awake videoendoscopic intubation.

Material and Methods

In this prospective randomized double blind controlled study, ninety six ASA grade I, II patients of either gender, aged 18-65 years, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia, were randomly allocated into two groups, Group D and L to receive nebulization with 4% Lignocaine 5 ml + Dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/kg and 4% Lignocaine alone respectively, 20 min before procedure. Time taken to intubate the patient, ease of intubation assessed by cough severity score, patient comfort score, post-intubation patient satisfaction and hemodynamic changes were recorded and compared.

Results

Group D and L had comparable intubation time (196.8 ± 61.2 s) and (205.8 ± 52.2 s) (p = 0.437). Cough severity, patient comfort and quality of procedure with post intubation patient satisfaction score were significantly better in Group D. Haemodynamics parameters were better post nebulization in group D as compared to group L.

Conclusion

Addition of Dexmedetomidine 2 mcg/kg with 4% Lignocaine during nebulization improves intubating conditions during awake flexible videoendoscopy in terms of ease of intubation, cough severity, patients comfort and satisfaction along with providing stable Haemodynamics profile.

Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for sedation during awake intubation using a Shikani optical stylet: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for sedation during awake intubation using a Shikani optical stylet (SOS).

Methods

Sixty-eight patients with cervical trauma or severe cervical spondylosis undergoing cervical spinal surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. They were randomly assigned to receive dexmedetomidine (Group D) or remifentanil (Group R). In Group D, the patients received an intravenous loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg · kg⁻¹ over 10 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.7 μg · kg⁻¹ · h⁻¹. In Group R, a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil was administered to achieve a plasma concentration of 2.5 ng · ml⁻¹, increased to 3 ng · ml⁻¹ 10 min later. An endotracheal tube was inserted using a SOS under dexmedetomidine or remifentanil sedation after topical anesthesia to the airway. Midazolam was given as rescue sedation. We recorded the first attempt intubation success rate, the dose of midazolam, duration of intubation, Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score, tracheal tube tolerance score, duration of drug infusion, adverse events and patient satisfaction score.

Results

The RSS score was significantly higher in Group D than in Group R. First attempt success rate, rescue midazolam dose and the duration of intubation did not differ between the groups. Patients in Group R were significantly more tolerant of the tracheal tube. The incidence of hypoxia was significantly higher in Group R than Group D, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of other adverse events between the groups. The hemodynamic responses of the two groups were similar, but more patients in Group R were able to recall airway instrumentation.

Conclusions

Both dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are effective sedatives for awake intubation using an SOS. Although the first attempt success rates were similar, patients sedated with remifentanil tolerated the tracheal tube better after intubation with moderately increased risk of desaturation.

Trial registration

www.chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR-TRC-13003052 (February 4th, 2013).

The effectiveness of dexmedetomidine infusion for sedating oral cancer patients undergoing awake fibreoptic nasal intubation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Dexmedetomidine is characterized with effects of sedation, analgesia, amnesia and lack of respiratory depression. Hence, it should be suitable for awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI).

METHODS

We enrolled 30 oral cancer patients with limited mouth openings who were undergoing AFOI for elective surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups; the Dex group (n = 16) that received dexmedetomidine (1.0 microg kg(-1)) infusion and the Control group (n = 14) that received fentanyl (1.0 microg kg(-1)) infusion. Main outcomes were evaluated by grading scores presenting conditions for nasal intubation and postintubation. Other analysed parameters included airway obstruction, haemodynamic changes, consumption time for intubation, amnesia level and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Intubation score (1-5) representing condition for nasal intubation was significantly better in the Dex group [2(1-3)] than in the Control group [3(2-5)] (P = 0.001). Postintubation score (1-3) representing tolerance to intubation also showed more favourable results in the Dex group [1(1-3)] than in the Control group [2(2-3)] (P = 0.002). The Dex group showed significantly reduced haemodynamic response to intubation than the Control group. Incidence requiring temporary haemodynamic support was higher in the Dex group but not of significance. Both levels of amnesia and satisfaction score were significant in the Dex group. Other analysed parameters such as consumption time for intubation, airway obstruction score and postoperative adverse events did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Combination of dexmedetomidine loading with topical anaesthesia provides significant benefit for AFOI in intubation condition, patient tolerance, haemodynamic response, amnesia and satisfaction. Dexmedetomidine is effective for AFOI in anticipated difficult airway with only minor and temporary haemodynamic adverse effects.