Isoflurane attenuates dynorphin-induced cytotoxicity and downregulation of Bcl-2 expression in differentiated neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells

Involvement of the Opioid Peptide Family in Cancer Progression

Peptides mediate cancer progression favoring the mitogenesis, migration, and invasion of tumor cells, promoting metastasis and anti-apoptotic mechanisms, and facilitating angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis. Tumor cells overexpress peptide receptors, crucial targets for developing specific treatments against cancer cells using peptide receptor antagonists and promoting apoptosis in tumor cells. Opioids exert an antitumoral effect, whereas others promote tumor growth and metastasis. This review updates the findings regarding the involvement of opioid peptides (enkephalins, endorphins, and dynorphins) in cancer development. Anticancer therapeutic strategies targeting the opioid peptidergic system and the main research lines to be developed regarding the topic reviewed are suggested. There is much to investigate about opioid peptides and cancer: basic information is scarce, incomplete, or absent in many tumors. This knowledge is crucial since promising anticancer strategies could be developed alone or in combination therapies with chemotherapy/radiotherapy.

Effect of Different General Anesthesia Methods on the Prognosis of Patients with Breast Cancer after Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

The effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anesthesia (IA) on the prognosis of breast cancer patients has been controversial. The study is aimed at exploring the effects of different anesthesia methods on the postoperative prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Methods

Literature retrieval was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. The literature topic was to compare the effects of TIVA and IA on the prognosis of patients undergoing breast cancer resection. Two researchers extracted data from the literature independently. This study included randomized controlled trials that evaluated for risk of bias according to the “Risk assessment Tool for Bias in Randomized Trials” in the Cochrane Manual. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias in observational studies. The chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. If heterogeneity existed between literature, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding low-quality and different-effect models. Data were statistically analyzed using the Cochrane software RevMan 5.3. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for statistical description.

Results

Seven literatures were selected for meta-analysis. There were 9781 patients, 3736 (38.20%) receiving TIVA and 6045 (61.80%) receiving inhalation anesthesia. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between TIVA and IA breast cancer patients (HR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.91, 1.22), Z = 0.70, P = 0.49). There was no difference in the literature (χ² = 6.82, P = 0.34, I² = 12%), and there was no obvious publication bias. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between TIVA and IA patients (HR = 0.95, 95% CI (0.79, 1.13), Z = 0.61, P = 0.54). There was no heterogeneity in the literature (χ² = 5.23, P = 0.52, I² = 0%), and there was no significant publication bias.

Conclusion

There is no significant difference in OS and RFS between TIVA and IA patients during breast cancer resection. The prognostic effects of TIVA and IA were similar.

Novel Imidazole Phenoxyacetic Acids as Inhibitors of USP30 for Neuroprotection Implication via the Ubiquitin-Rho-110 Fluorometric Assay: Design, Synthesis, and In Silico and Biochemical Assays

USP30, a deubiquitinating enzyme family, forfeits the ubiquitination of E3 ligase and Parkin on the surface of mitochondria. Inhibition of USP30 results in mitophagy and cellular clearance. Herein, by understanding structural requirements, we discovered potential USP30 inhibitors from an imidazole series of ligands via a validated ubiquitin-rhodamine-110 fluorometric assay. A novel catalytic use of the Zn(l-proline)₂ complex for the synthesis of tetrasubstituted imidazoles was identified. Among all compounds investigated, 3g and 3f inhibited USP30 at IC₅₀ of 5.12 and 8.43 μM, respectively. The binding mode of compounds at the USP30 binding site was understood by a docking study and interactions with the key amino acids were identified. Compound 3g proved its neuroprotective efficacy by inhibiting apoptosis on SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells against dynorphin A (10 μM) treatment. Hence, the present study provides a new protocol to design and develop ligands against USP30, thereby offering a therapeutic strategy under conditions like kidney damage and neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson's disease.

Impact of anesthetics on oncogenic signaling network: a review on propofol and isoflurane

Propofol as an intravenous anesthetic and isoflurane as an inhalational/volatile anesthetic continue to be an important part of surgical anesthetic interventions worldwide. The impact of these anesthetics on tumor progression, immune modulation, and survival rates of cancer patients has been widely investigated. Although most of the preclinical studies have provided a beneficial effect of propofol over isoflurane or other volatile anesthetics, several investigations have shown contradictory results, which warrant more preclinical and clinical studies. Propofol mostly exhibits antitumor properties, whereas isoflurane being a cost-effective anesthetic is frequently used. However, isoflurane has been also reported with protumorigenic activity. This review provides an overall perspective on the network of signaling pathways that may modulate several steps of tumor progression from inflammation, immunomodulation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and cancer stemness and extracellular vesicles along with chemotherapeutic applications and clinical status of these anesthetics. A clear understanding of the mechanistic viewpoints of these anesthetics may pave the way for more prospective clinical trials with the ultimate goal of obtaining a safe and optimal anesthetic intervention that would prevent cancer recurrence and may influence better postoperative survival.

The Protective Effects of Ropivacaine Against High Glucose-induced Brain Microvascular Endothelial Injury by Reducing MMPs and Alleviating Oxidative Stress

Diabetes is undoubtedly affecting global health. Considerable attention has been directed to brain complications caused by diabetes, which are reported to be related to the injury on brain microvascular endothelial cells. Oxidative stress and degradation of vascular basement membrane contribute to the injury of vascular endothelia by diabetes. The present study aims to investigate the effects of ropivacaine on high glucose-induced brain microvascular endothelial injury, as well as the underlying mechanism. Cell viability was determined by (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was evaluated by 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining. Quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used to determine the expression levels of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The production of nitric oxide (NO) was detected by DAF-FM DA staining. The expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was evaluated by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Western blot was used to determine the expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1).The cell viability of bEnd.3 brain endothelial cells was inhibited by high glucose, which was rescued by ropivacaine. The elevated production of ROS and MDA by high glucose was reversed by ropivacaine. Ropivacaine suppressed the expression of up-regulated iNOS, NO, MMP-2, MMP-9, ICAM-1, and VEGF induced by high glucose incubation. The expression of Nrf-2 and HO-1 by high glucose incubation was significantly inhibited by ropivacaine treatment.Ropivacaine might alleviate high glucose-induced brain microvascular endothelial injury by suppressing oxidative stress and down-regulating MMPs.

Propofol, but not ketamine or midazolam, exerts neuroprotection after ischaemic injury by inhibition of Toll-like receptor 4 and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cell signalling: A combined in vitro and animal study

BACKGROUND

Propofol, midazolam and ketamine are widely used in today's anaesthesia practice. Both neuroprotective and neurotoxic effects have been attributed to all three agents.

OBJECTIVE

To establish whether propofol, midazolam and ketamine in the same neuronal injury model exert neuroprotective effects on injured neurones in vitro and in vivo by modulation of the Toll-like receptor 4-nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (TLR-4-NF-κB) pathway.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cell-based laboratory (n = 6 repetitions per experiment) and animal (n = 6 per group) studies using a neuronal cell line (SH-SY5Y cells) and adult Sprague-Dawley rats.

INTERVENTIONS

Cells were exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation before or after treatment using escalating, clinically relevant doses of propofol, midazolam and ketamine. In animals, retinal ischaemia (60 min) was induced followed by reperfusion and randomised treatment with saline or propofol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Neuronal cell death was determined using flow-cytometry (mitochondrial membrane potential) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. Nuclear factor NF-κB and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α-activity were analysed by DNA-binding ELISA, expression of NF-κB-dependent genes and TLR-4 by luciferase-assay and flow-cytometry, respectively. In animals, retinal ganglion cell density, caspase-3 activation and gene expression (TLR-4, NF-κB) were used to determine in vivo effects of propofol. Results were compared using ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) and t test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Post-treatment with clinically relevant concentrations of propofol (1 to 10 μg ml) preserved the mitochondrial membrane potential in oxygen-glucose deprivation-injured cells by 54% and reduced LDH release by 21%. Propofol diminished TLR-4 surface expression and preserved the DNA-binding activity of the protective hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α transcription factor. DNA-binding and transcriptional NF-κB-activity were inhibited by propofol. Neuronal protection and inhibition of TLR-4-NF-κB signalling were not consistently seen with midazolam or ketamine. In vivo, propofol treatment preserved rat retinal ganglion cell densities (cells mm, saline 1504 ± 251 vs propofol 2088 ± 144, P = 0.0001), which was accompanied by reduced neuronal caspase-3, TLR-4 and NF-κB expression.

CONCLUSION

Propofol, but neither midazolam nor ketamine, provides neuroprotection to injured neuronal cells via inhibition of TLR-4-NF-κB-dependent signalling.

In vivo effects of different anesthetic agents on apoptosis

Background

This study was designed to measure in vivo effects of propofol, isoflurane and sevoflurane on apoptosis by measuring caspase-3 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) blood level as apoptotic markers.

Methods

After obtaining ethical committee approval and informed written consents, sixty adult patients ASA I scheduled for open cholecystectomy participated in this study. They were randomally allocated into one of three equal groups to receive propofol infusion, low-flow isoflurane or sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia. Venous blood samples were collected preoperatively, immediately postoperative and after 24 hours to measure hemoglobin, hematocrit, creatinine, liver enzymes, serum TRAIL and caspase-3 levels.

Results

There was no significant difference in hematological markers and serum creatinine. Liver enzymes showed significant postoperative rise (P < 0.05). In Propofol group, TRAIL and caspase-3 levels were significantly elevated immediately postoperative then decreased significantly after 24-hours (P < 0.05). In Isoflurane group, immediate postoperative level of TRAIL was significantly higher than 24 hours reading and significantly lower than its level in Propofol group at the same timing meanwhile caspase-3 levels were comparable at different timings. In Sevoflurane group, TRAIL and caspase-3 levels increased significantly in both postoperative samples than preoperative level and than those of Isoflurane and Propofol groups after 24 hours concerning TRAIL (P & 0.05).

Conclusions

This study concluded that isoflurane is superior and sevoflurane is the least effective among the three anesthetics in protection against apoptosis. This study neither proved nor excluded propofol-induced apoptosis. Further studies are required during lengthy procedure and in compromised patients.

Effects of propofol on proliferation and anti-apoptosis of neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line: new insights into neuroprotection

Recently, it has been suggested that anesthetic agents may have neuroprotective potency. The notion that anesthetic agents can offer neuroprotection remains controversial. Propofol, which is a short-acting intravenous anesthetic agent, may have potential as a neuroprotective agent. In this study, we tried to determine whether propofol affected the viability of human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells by using the MTT assay. Surprisingly, our results showed that propofol at a dose of 1-10 μM could improve cell proliferation. However, at higher doses (200 μM), propofol appears to be cytotoxic. On the other hand, propofol could up-regulate the expression of key proteins involved in neuroprotection including B-cell lymphoma 2 at a dose range of 1-10 μM, activation of phospho-serine/threonine protein kinase at a dose range of 0.5-10 μM, and activation of phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinases at a dose range of 5-10 μM. Similarly, we demonstrate that propofol (10 μM) could elevate protein levels of heat shock protein 90 and heat shock protein 70. Therefore, we choose to utilize a 10 μM concentration of propofol to assess neuroprotective activities in our studies. In the following experiments, we used dynorphin A to generate cytotoxic effects on SH-SY5Y cells. Our data indicate that propofol (10 μM) could inhibit the cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells induced by dynorphin A. Furthermore, propofol (10 μM) could decrease the expression of the p-P38 protein as well. These data together suggest that propofol may have the potential to act as a neuroprotective agent against various neurologic diseases. However, further delineation of the precise neuroprotective effects of propofol will need to be examined.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2009

This paper is the 32nd consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2009 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).