Significance of pre-storage leucoreduction for autologous blood

Randomized double-blinded clinical trial on acute transfusion reactions in dogs receiving leukoreduced versus nonleukoreduced packed red blood cells

Background

Leukoreduction of blood products is commonly performed in human medicine, but its effect on outcome or incidence of transfusion reactions (TRs) in dogs is unknown.

Objectives

To prospectively evaluate the incidence of acute TRs in, and the outcome of, dogs receiving either leukoreduced (LR) or nonleukoreduced (N‐LR) packed red blood cells (PRBC).

Animals

Dogs (n = 194) administered PRBC between August 2017 and June 2020.

Methods

Prospective randomized double‐blinded clinical trial. Dogs were randomized to receive either LR or N‐LR PRBC and clinicians, nurses and investigators were blinded to the group allocations. The incidence of TRs, change in PCV, hospitalization duration, and survival to discharge were recorded.

Results

Out of the 194 dogs, 96 received LR and 98 received N‐LR PRBCs. The mean 12‐hour change in PCV value was +9.22% (SD 5.27%) for dogs that received N‐LR and +10.69% (SD 6.44%) for dogs that received LR PRBC (effect size 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.02 to 0.55), which was not significantly different (P = .08). TRs were documented in 16/194 (8.24%) dogs, with 1/194 (0.51%) being a mild allergic reaction, while 15/194 (7.73%) had suspected febrile nonhemolytic TRs (FNHTRs). FNHTR incidence was not significantly different between the LR (6/96, 6.25%, 95% CI 2.8‐13.56) and N‐LR (9/98, 9.18%, 95% CI 4.92‐17.11) groups (P = .81). Of the 156 dogs that survived to discharge, 80/156 received N‐LR PRBC and 76/156 received LR PRBC which was not significantly different (P = .66).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

A clinical advantage of using LR over N‐LR PRBC in terms of TRs and increase in PCV after transfusion was not detected.

Pre-operative autologous blood donation and transfusion-related adverse reactions: A 14-year experience at a university hospital

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the rate of adverse reactions to pre-operative autologous blood donation (PAD) transfusion in a single institution over a 14-year period.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Between January 2003 and December 2016, we investigated adverse reactions to PAD transfusion and compared them with those to allogeneic blood transfusion in Juntendo University Hospital. Adverse reactions were categorized according to the definition proposed by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Haemovigilance.

RESULTS

A total of 178,014 blood components were transfused during the study period, of which PAD transfusions were 13,653 (8%), whereas allogeneic blood transfusions were 164,361 (92%). The number and rate of adverse reactions to PAD transfusion were 16 and 0.1%, whereas those of allogeneic blood transfusion were 1075 and 0.7%, respectively. The rate of adverse reactions to allogeneic blood transfusions excluding platelet transfusion was 0.3%, being significant (p < 0.01) against PAD transfusion. Among 16 adverse reactions to PAD transfusion, the most common was febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reaction (FNHTR) at 12 (75%), followed by allergic reaction at 4 (25%). The severity of adverse reactions to PAD transfusion was Grade 1 (non-severe) in all cases. With regard to blood component types, 16 adverse reactions involved: 12 cases of whole blood PAD, 2 of frozen PAD, and 2 of autologous fresh-frozen plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-severe adverse reactions were observed on PAD transfusion at a rate of 0.1% at our institution.

Impact of prestorage leucoreduction of autologous whole blood on length of hospital stay with a subgroup analysis in bilateral hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although prestorage leucoreduction (LR) of blood components for transfusion has gained favour around the world, evidence of its beneficial clinical effects is ambiguous.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To reveal whether leucocytes and/or platelets in transfused blood are related to transfusion-related adverse effects, a prospective randomized crossover study was performed on patients who donated autologous blood prior to elective surgery. Among 1487 primary enrolees, a total of 192 patients undergoing two-stage, bilateral total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive autologous blood that was either prestorage leucoreduced, or not, for the first procedure. For the second procedure, each patient was crossed over to receive alternatively processed autologous blood. Length of hospital stay served as a primary end-point, with perioperative infectious/thrombotic complications, pre- and postoperative laboratory values, and body temperature serving as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

No significant differences emerged between prestorage LR and non-LR cohorts in length of hospital stay, as well as perioperative infectious/thrombotic complications, postoperative body temperature and duration of fever. Postoperative laboratory values including white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels had no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

This study could not prove any superiority of prestorage LR over non-LR for autologous whole blood among patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty.

The effect of pre-storage whole-blood leukocyte reduction on cytokines/chemokines levels in autologous CPDA-1 whole blood

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of pre-storage leukocyte filtration of autologous blood (AB), especially focusing on the cytokines/chemokines accumulation on blood products.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After approval of the ethics committee of the University of Tokyo, a total of 26 orthopedic patients, who donated AB prior to surgery after informed consent, were enrolled. The effects of filtration on blood cell counts were analyzed, and the accumulation of cytokines and chemokines were measured on pre- and post-leukoreduced (LR) samples, using the Luminex system. The time-dependent changes of the cytokines/chemokines and the effect of the filtration on their concentration were analyzed, and compared with the normal plasma levels reported in the literature.

RESULTS

LR effectively reduced the number of leukocytes and platelets, without affecting that of red cells. The concentration of most of the cytokines/chemokines analyzed, except the EGF, sCD40-L and sFas-L, decreased time-dependently of storage or did not change in pre-LR samples. However, EGF, sCD40L and sFas-L were significantly reduced by LR. Some, such as IL-8 and RANTES, were also importantly decreased by LR, and others, such as IL-1β and TNF-α, were not significantly affected by LR.

CONCLUSIONS

Leukocyte filtration effectively removes platelets and leukocytes from AB, thus preventing the accumulation of cytokines/chemokines. Since adverse effects due to AB transfusion, although rare, are observed, there is need to consider the implementation of pre-storage leukocyte reduction (PSLR) for AB.

A policy case study of blood in Australia

In 2008 the Australian government decided to remove white blood cells from all blood products. This policy of universal leucodepletion was a change to the existing policy of supplying leucodepleted products to high risk patients only. The decision was made without strong information about the cost-effectiveness of universal leucodepletion. The aims for this policy analysis are to generate cost-effectiveness data about universal leucodepletion, and to add to our understanding of the role of evidence and the political reality of healthcare decision-making in Australia. The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed universal leucodepletion costs $398,943 to save one year of life. This exceeds the normal maximum threshold for Australia. We discuss this result within the context of how policy decisions are made about blood, and how it relates to the theory and process of policy making. We conclude that the absence of a strong voice for cost-effectiveness was an important omission in this decision.