Association of poly(A) and poly(U) polymerases with cytoplasmic ribosomes

Gradual processing of the ITS1 from the nucleolus to the cytoplasm during synthesis of the human 18S rRNA

Defects in ribosome biogenesis trigger stress response pathways, which perturb cell proliferation and differentiation in several genetic diseases. In Diamond–Blackfan anemia (DBA), a congenital erythroblastopenia, mutations in ribosomal protein genes often interfere with the processing of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), the mechanism of which remains elusive in human cells. Using loss-of-function experiments and extensive RNA analysis, we have defined the precise position of the endonucleolytic cleavage E in the ITS1, which generates the 18S-E intermediate, the last precursor to the 18S rRNA. Unexpectedly, this cleavage is followed by 3′–5′ exonucleolytic trimming of the 18S-E precursor during nuclear export of the pre-40S particle, which sets a new mechanism for 18S rRNA formation clearly different from that established in yeast. In addition, cleavage at site E is also followed by 5′–3′ exonucleolytic trimming of the ITS1 by exonuclease XRN2. Perturbation of this step on knockdown of the large subunit ribosomal protein RPL26, which was recently associated to DBA, reveals the putative role of a highly conserved cis-acting sequence in ITS1 processing. These data cast new light on the original mechanism of ITS1 elimination in human cells and provide a mechanistic framework to further study the interplay of DBA-linked ribosomal proteins in this process.

The Cid1 poly(U) polymerase

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe cytoplasmic protein Cid1 acts as a poly(U) polymerase (PUP). Polyadenylated actin mRNA, a target of this activity, is uridylated upon arrest in S phase and is likely to be one of many such Cid1 targets. This RNA uridylation pathway appears to be conserved, as Cid1 orthologs in Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans and humans display PUP activity either in vitro or in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Here, we review the literature on Cid1, other PUPs and uridylation, a conserved and previously under-appreciated mechanism of RNA regulation.

Specific and non-specific mammalian RNA terminal uridylyl transferases

Uridylylation of various types of RNA molecules is a wide-spread phenomenon in molecular biology and is catalyzed by enzymes mediating the transfer of UMP residues to the 3'-ends of preexisting RNA. In most cases, however, the biological significance of these modifications remains elusive. As an exception, the RNA terminal uridylyl transferases (TUTases) of the mRNA editing complex within mitochondria of Trypanosomatidae have been characterized in great detail. Current knowledge on those editing enzymes has been summarized recently by R. Aphasizhev [Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62 (2005) 2194-203] and, therefore, will not be included here. Rather, this review will focus on cellular non-editing TUTases, characterized by distinct modes of catalytic activity and substrate specificity. Putative biological functions of this rapidly growing number of RNA modifying enzymes are discussed.

Trypanosome mitochondrial 3' terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase): the key enzyme in U-insertion/deletion RNA editing

A 3' terminal RNA uridylyltransferase was purified from mitochondria of Leishmania tarentolae and the gene cloned and expressed from this species and from Trypanosoma brucei. The enzyme is specific for 3' U-addition in the presence of Mg(2+). TUTase is present in vivo in at least two stable configurations: one contains a approximately 500 kDa TUTase oligomer and the other a approximately 700 kDa TUTase complex. Anti-TUTase antiserum specifically coprecipitates a small portion of the p45 and p50 RNA ligases and approximately 40% of the guide RNAs. Inhibition of TUTase expression in procyclic T. brucei by RNAi downregulates RNA editing and appears to affect parasite viability.

Sensitive detection of morbillivirus cell-free transcription in a direct RNase protection assay

Cell-free measurement of viral transcription is necessary to determine if alterations of in situ levels of viral mRNA represent altered mRNA production or stability. Conditions for cell-free genomic transcription have been developed for the morbilliviruses canine distemper virus (CDV) and measles virus (MV), although the means for detecting nascent transcripts in these assays are insensitive in some cell systems. This work describes a technique in which CDV cell-free transcription reactions are modified so that non-radiolabeled transcripts are produced, precluding the need for limiting nucleotide concentrations in the reaction mixtures and allowing nucleotide concentrations which support optimal polymerase activities. Cell-free transcripts are then detected using anti-sense gene-specific riboprobes in an RNase protection assay (RPA). This approach is more sensitive than conventional slot blot analyses in detecting radiolabeled nascent transcripts and is efficacious in cell systems supporting inherently low levels of virus gene expression. Preformed viral RNA is distinguished from RNA synthesized during the course of the cell-free reactions by using a direct RPA (i.e., hybridization of target RNA prior to phenol/chloroform extraction). The use of this approach will expand the range of virus-host systems in which determinants of morbillivirus transcription can be characterized.

RNA end-labeling and RNA ligase activities can produce a circular rRNA in whole cell extracts from trypanosomes

We have found two enzymatic activities in whole cell extracts from Trypanosoma brucei; an end-labeling reaction involving a single uridine at the 3' end of ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and an RNA ligase activity joining 5' monophosphates to 3' hydroxyl groups. The RNA ligase acts upon one of the small rRNAs (180 nucleotides) from the trypanosome ribosomal repeat unit, forming a circular RNA. The specific circularization of this small rRNA is probably dependent on the secondary structure of the molecule and is not detectable in vivo.

Characterization of West Nile virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and cellular terminal adenylyl and uridylyl transferases in cell-free extracts

To facilitate further studies of flavivirus transcription, cell extraction methods and in vitro reaction conditions which increased West Nile virus (WNV) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity were determined. Subcellular fractions from WNV-infected BHK-21/W12 cells were characterized with regard to their protein and RNA content and in vitro polymerase activity. In both a cytoplasmic fraction, designated S1, and a fraction enriched for outer nuclear membranes, designated S2, seven virus-specific proteins, NS5 (96 kilodaltons [kDa]), NS3 (67 kDa), E (48 kDa), NS1 (47 kDa), ns4a (26 kDa), ns2a (17 kDa), and ns2b (14.5 kDa), were detected. The fractions also contained virus-specific RNA and cellular rRNA and mRNA. Polymerase activity in S1 and S2 fractions from WNV-infected cells was concentrated by pelleting and consisted of two types of enzyme activities: the WNV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and terminal transferases of cellular origin. Enhanced levels of WNV polymerase activity were obtained from these cell fractions by altering several of the in vitro reaction conditions. Although Mg2+ was the divalent cation preferred by WNV polymerase, virus-specific in vitro transcription was detected at reduced levels when Mn2+ (0.05 or 0.5 mM) was present as the sole divalent cation. Product analysis revealed that the viral polymerase incorporated radiolabeled ribonucleotides into three distinct RNA species. Free single-stranded genome-sized RNA which was LiCl insoluble and RNase sensitive was found by fingerprint analysis to have an oligonucleotide pattern similar to that of WNV genomic RNA. RNA molecules which comigrated as a broad band near the top of the gel were separable into LiCl-insoluble, partially RNase-sensitive replicative-intermediate RNA and LiCl-soluble, RNase-resistant replicative-form RNA. The cellular transferases added UMP or AMP residues to the 3'-termini of cellular mRNA, tRNA, and 18S and 28S rRNA. Although a cellular terminal transferase has been reported to function in initiation of poliovirus transcription, no labeling of the WNV RNA by either of these cellular enzymes was detected. Therefore, they appear to play no specific role in flavivirus RNA synthesis.

Purification of a terminal uridylyltransferase that acts as host factor in the in vitro poliovirus replicase reaction

Poliovirus RNA polymerase requires a host factor to initiate RNA synthesis in vitro. The host factor was previously purified to near homogeneity from HeLa cells but was not assigned an enzymatic activity. This report describes the purification of a terminal uridylyltransferase that can act as host factor. By all criteria examined it is identical to the factor purified previously. It has the same molecular weight (68,000), chromatographic properties, and cellular localization. We present evidence that terminal uridylyltransferase can add uridine residues to the 3' poly(A) end of virion RNA and that these anneal back to the poly(A) and form a hairpin primer for polymerase.

Isolation of active transcription complexes from animal cell nuclei by nitrocellulose binding

A method for the rapid isolation of active transcription complexes from animal cell nuclei is described. The method is based on the observation that, after lysis of nuclei with the detergents Sarkosyl and Triton X-100, transcription complexes are selectively bound to nitrocellulose. The nitrocellulose filters retain 80-90% o the RNA labelled briefly in vitro and about 10% of the nuclear DNA. The bulk of the retained DNA is in the size range of 20 kb. Transcription complexes involving both RNA polymerase I and II are retained by nitrocellulose. The nitrocellulose-bound transcription complexes preserve almost all of their RNA polymerase activity. The size distribution of the RNA product shows that bound transcription complexes retain also most of their growing RNA chains. The possibility to use selective retention by nitrocellulose in the analysis of transcriptionally active genes is discussed.

Terminal uridylyl transferase of Vigna unguiculata: purification and characterization of an enzyme catalyzing the addition of a single UMP residue to the 3'-end of an RNA primer

An enzyme which catalyzes the addition of a single UMP residue from UTP to the 3'-end of an RNA primer and which is referred to as terminal uridylyl transferase (TUT) has been extensively purified from the membrane fraction of vigna unguiculata leaves. The purification procedure involved (i) solubilization by cation depletion (ii) DEAE-Sepharose CL-6B column chromatography (iii) affinity chromatography of poly(U)-Sepharose 4B and (iv) glycerol gradient centrifugation. The molecular weight of the native enzyme was approximately 50,000 as determined by velocity sedimentation. Under conditions that were optimal for UMP-incorporation (5 mM Mg2+, low salt, 30 degrees C) TUT displayed a marked specificity for UTP as substrate, was unable to incorporate deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates and required a single-stranded oligo- or polyribonucleotide as primer. When oligoA20, tRNAasp of E. coli or alfalfa mosaic virus RNA 4 were used as primers at various substrate to primer ratio's, the vast majority of the product appeared to consist of primer molecules elongated with a single UMP residue as shown by polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis and nearest neighbour analysis. We believe TUT to be a novel enzyme which has not been reported before and which may be a feasible tool in RNA sequencing as it enables the specific 3'-terminal labeling of RNA molecules.

Primer specificity of ribosome-associated poly(A) polymerase from Ehrlich ascites tumour cells

The reaction product of the ribosomal poly(A) polymerase [ATP(UTP):RNA nucleotidyltransferase] is analyzed. Two systems are used in vitro: (a) isolated polyribosomes with endogenous enzyme and RNA primer and (b) purified enzyme with total polyribosomal RNA as primer. In the polyribosome system about 50% of the [3H]AMP label is in poly(A)-containing mRNA. This RNA displays a heterogeneous size ditribution in the range of 8--30 S with a maximum at about 14 S. Upon denaturation the maximum is shifted towards the 10-S zone. The poly(A) polymerase catalyzes the addition of 12--18 adenylate residues to pre-existing mRNA poly(A) sequences of 40--160 residues. The [3H]AMP incorporated into poly(A)-lacking RNA is mainly in a fraction with an electrophoretic mobility corresponding to 4-S RNA. In the purified enzyme system, specificity towards poly(A)-containing mRNA is lost to a considerable extent. Only 10% of the [3H]AMP label is retained by oligo(dT)-cellulose. The bulk of the product is in 18-S rRNA and heterogeneous small molecular weight RNA. We conclude that the ribosome-associated poly(A) polymerase is most likely the enzyme responsible for the cytoplasmic polyadenylation of poly(A)-containing mRNA in vivo.

Two distinct poly(A) polymerases isolated from the cytoplasm of Ehrlich ascites tumour cells

The poly(A) polymerases from the cytosol and ribosomal fractions of Ehrlich ascites tumour cells are isolated and partially purified by DEAE-cellulose and phosphocellulose column chromatography. Two distinct enzymes are identified: (a) a cytosol Mn2+-dependent poly(A) polymerase (ATP:RNA adenylyltransferase) and (b) a ribosome-associated enzyme defined tentatively as ATP(UTP): RNA nucleotidyltransferase. The cytosol poly(A) polymerase is strictly Mn2+-dependent (optimum at 1 mM Mn2+) and uses only ATP as substrate, poly(A) is a better primer than ribosomal RNA. The purified enzyme is free of poly(A) hydrolase activity, but degradation of [3H]poly(A) takes place in the presence of inorganic pyrophosphate. Most likely this enzyme is of nuclear origin. The ribosomal enzyme is associated with the ribosomes but it is found also in free state in the cytosol. The purified enzyme uses both ATP and UTP as substrates. The substrate specificity varies depending on ionic conditions: the optimal enzyme activity with ATP as substrate is at 1 mM Mn2+, while that with UTP as substrate is at 10--20 mM Mg2+. The enzymes uses both ribosomal RNA and poly(A) [but not poly(U)] as primers. The purified enzyme is free of poly(A) hydrolase activity.