Expression of the rat growth-hormone gene is under the influence of a cell-type-specific silencer element

Characterization of the human α9 integrin subunit gene: Promoter analysis and transcriptional regulation in ocular cells

α9β1 is the most recent addition to the integrin family of membrane receptors and consequently remains the one that is the least characterized. To better understand how transcription of the human gene encoding the α9 subunit is regulated, we cloned the α9 promoter and characterized the regulatory elements that are required to ensure its transcription. Transfection of α9 promoter/CAT plasmids in primary cultured human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs) and uveal melanoma cell lines demonstrated the presence of both negative and positive regulatory elements along the α9 promoter and positioned the basal α9 promoter to within 118 bp from the α9 mRNA start site. In vitro DNaseI footprinting and in vivo ChIP analyses demonstrated the binding of the transcription factors Sp1, c-Myb and NFI to the most upstream α9 negative regulatory element. The transcription factors Sp1 and NFI were found to bind the basal α9 promoter individually but Sp1 binding clearly predominates when both transcription factors are present in the same extract. Suppression of Sp1 expression through RNAi also caused a dramatic reduction in the expression of the α9 gene. Most of all, addition of tenascin-C (TNC), the ligand of α9β1, to the tissue culture plates prior to seeding HCECs increased α9 transcription whereas it simultaneously decreased expression of the α5 integrin subunit gene. This dual regulatory action of TNC on the transcription of the α9 and α5 genes suggests that both these integrins must work together to appropriately regulate cell adhesion, migration and differentiation that are hallmarks of tissue wound healing.

A binary mechanism for the selective action of a pancreatic beta -cell transcriptional silencer

The pancreatic elastase I gene (ELA1) is selectively transcribed to high levels in pancreatic acinar cells. Pancreatic specificity is imparted by a 100-base pair enhancer that activates transcription in beta-cells of the islets of Langerhans as well as in acinar cells. Adjacent to the enhancer is a silencer that renders transcription specific to acinar cells by selectively suppressing the inherent beta-cell activity of the enhancer. We show that the selective repression of beta-cell transcription is due neither to a beta-cell specific activity of the silencer nor to selective interference with beta-cell-specific transcriptional activators acting on the enhancer. Rather, the silencer is effective in both pancreatic endocrine and acinar cell types against all low and moderate strength enhancers and promoters tested. The silencer appears to act in a binary manner by reducing the probability that a promoter will be active without affecting the rate of transcription from active promoters. We propose that the ELA1 silencer is a weak off switch capable of inactivating enhancer/promoter combinations whose strength is below a threshold level but ineffective against stronger enhancer/promoters. The apparent cell-specific effects on the ELA1 enhancer appear due to the ability of the silencer to inactivate the weak beta-cell activity of the enhancer but not the stronger acinar cell activity.

Pituitary and extrapituitary growth hormone: Pit-1 dependence?

Growth hormone (GH) is primarily produced in pituitary somatotrophs. The synthesis of this hormone is thought to be dependent upon a pituitary-specific transcription factor (Pit-1). However, many extrapituitary tissues are now known to express GH genes. The extrapituitary production of GH may therefore indicate an extrapituitary distribution of the Pit-1 gene. The extrapituitary production of GH may, alternatively, indicate that GH expression occurs independently of Pit-1 in extrapituitary tissues. These possibilities are considered in this brief review.Key words: growth hormone, pituitary, pituitary transcription factor 1.

Nuclear factor 1 regulates the distal silencer of the human PIT1/GHF1 gene

Here we report the characterization of 12 kb genomic DNA upstream of the human PIT1/GHF1 promoter. Different regions involved in the modulation of human PIT1/GHF1 gene expression were defined by transient transfection studies. Two regions, one proximal (-7.1/-2. 3) and one distal (-11.8/-10.9), presented an enhancer activity in pituitary cells when placed upstream of the SV40 promoter. The 0.9 kb distal region was analysed further and found to decrease the basal transcriptional activity of the human PIT1/GHF1 minimal promoter, indicating that this region behaves as a silencer for its own promoter. Three Pit-1/GHF-1-binding sites and two ubiquitous nuclear factor 1 (NF-1)-binding sites were identified by DNase I footprinting in the distal regulatory region. Deletion analysis indicated that NF-1 or NF-1-related protein(s) participate in the down-regulation of human PIT1/GHF1 gene expression by interacting with an NF-1-binding site within the distal regulatory region.

The rat growth hormone and human cellular retinol binding protein 1 genes share homologous NF1-like binding sites that exert either positive or negative influences on gene expression in vitro

High levels of expression for the rat growth hormone (rGH) gene are restricted to the somatotroph cells of the anterior pituitary. Previously, we have shown that rGH cell-specific repression results in part from the recognition of negatively acting silencers by a number of nuclear proteins that repress basal promoter activity. Examination of these silencers revealed the presence of binding sites for proteins that belong to the NF1 family of transcription factors. Indeed, proteins from this family were shown to bind the rGH proximal silencer (designated silencer-1) in in vitro assays. Furthermore, this silencer site is capable of repressing chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene expression driven by an heterologous promoter (that of the mouse p12 gene), even in pituitary cells. Recently, we identified in the 5' untranslated region of the gene encoding human cellular retinol binding protein 1 (hCRBP1) a negative regulatory element (Fp1) that also bears an NF1 binding site very similar to that of rGH silencer-1. However, although deletion of Fp1 in the hCRBP1 gene yielded increased CAT activity, pointing toward a negative regulatory function exerted by this element, its insertion upstream of the p12 basal promoter results in an impressive positive stimulation of CAT gene expression. By exploiting NaDodSO4 gel protein fractionation and renaturation, we identified a 40-kD nuclear protein (designated Bp1) present in GH4C1 cells that binds very strongly to rGH silencer-1 but only weakly to hCRBP1 Fp1. Similarly, we also detected a 29-kD nuclear factor (designated Bp2) that recognizes exclusively the Fp1 element as its target site, therefore suggesting that different, but likely related, proteins bind these homologous elements to either activate or repress gene transcription. Although they bind DNA through the recognition of the NF1-like target sequence contained on these elements, competition and supershift experiments in electrophoretic mobility shift assays provided evidence that neither of these proteins belong to the NF1 family.

Identification of promoter elements involved in cell-specific regulation of rat smooth muscle myosin heavy chain gene transcription

In order to identify cis-acting regulatory elements involved in smooth muscle cell-specific gene regulation, we have cloned a 4. 7-kilobase pair fragment of the promoter for the rat smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, a protein expressed in differentiated smooth muscle cells. Sequence analysis of a 1.7-kilobase pair portion of this clone reveals potential binding sites for known transcription factors. A comparison of the primary sequence between the rat and rabbit smooth muscle myosin heavy chain promoters reveals numerous conserved consensus binding sites. Transient transfection analysis of promoter deletion constructs in rat aorta and tracheal smooth muscle cells, L8 myoblast cells, and rat pulmonary aorta endothelial cells suggests that a region of the promoter located between -1,249 and -1,317 base pairs is important for the restriction of gene expression to smooth muscle cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of a highly conserved region located between -1,317 and -1, 085 base pairs reveals specific DNA-protein complexes formed in smooth muscle cell extracts, which can be competed with an oligonucleotide containing a nuclear factor 1 binding site.

Control of growth hormone synthesis

A large body of research, primarily in the rodent and human species, has elucidated many of the details regarding the control of GH synthesis and release. Cell type-specific transcriptional control has been identified as the main mechanism of the somatotroph-specific expression of GH. The recent detailed analysis in rodents and humans of a highly specific transcriptional activator protein, PIT-1, has opened several new areas of study. This is especially true for research in the farm animal species, where PIT-1 has been cloned and its binding elements on the GH gene are being investigated in a number of economically important species. Genetic and biochemical analyses of PIT-1 and other GH regulators have shown the central role of PIT-1 not only in the cell-autonomous stimulation of GH gene transcription, but also in the participation of PIT-1 in the response at the GH gene to exogenous hormones such as RA and TH. PIT-1 has been implicated in the proliferative development of the pituitary itself, in the maintenance of anterior pituitary cell types once cell types are defined, and in the mechanism by which the hypothalamic signal for GH release is transduced. However, PIT-1 by itself does not activate the GH gene, so that additional unknown factors exist that need to be identified to fully understand the cell type-specific activation of the GH gene. In addition, GH gene regulatory elements acting through well-characterized systems such as TH have seemingly different effects; the specific context of the regulatory elements relative to the promoter elements appear to be crucial. These contextual details of GH gene regulation are not well understood for any species and need to be further studied to be able to make predictions for particular elements and regulatory mechanisms across species. The regulation of the pulsatile secretion of GH by GHRH and SRIH is reasonably well understood after the cloning and analysis of the two releasing factors and their receptors. Modification or manipulation of the pathways involved in the regulation of GH secretion is a potential means of enhancing the lean tissue growth of meat animals. However, further understanding of the systems controlling the in vivo release of GH is needed before such manipulations are likely to be productive. Several other research questions regarding the control of GH expression and release remain to be answered. What is the biochemical connection between exogenous signal transduction (i.e., GRH/GHRH-R, TR, ER, RAR) and PIT-1 at the GH gene? Are there additional coactivators or repressors of GH that respond to cAMP levels? Do ubiquitous regulatory factors such as GHF-3 and Zn-15, identified thus far only in the rat, exist in humans or livestock? Zn-15 is expected to be found in many mammalian species, because its recognition sequence between the PIT-1 binding sites is highly conserved across mammals (Figure 2). What is the mechanism causing GH levels to drop during aging? Does PIT-1 expression decrease during the lifespan of animals? Is it possible to increase GH gene expression within target tissues by directing the expression of PIT-1 to these tissues via transgenesis, or are other factors limiting in peripheral tissues so that the lack of PIT-1 expression is not the deciding factor? Finally, is there genetic variation in the expression of GHRH and/or SRIH or in their respective receptors? These questions are relevant to and could be investigated in several of the livestock species.

Silencing is golden: negative regulation in the control of neuronal gene transcription

Recent work has identified negative-acting DNA regulatory elements that function to prevent the expression of neuronal genes in non-neuronal cell types or in inappropriate neuronal subtypes. In some cases, the protein factors that interact with these silencer elements have been isolated and characterized. For example, the recently cloned silencer-binding factor NRSF/REST is a novel zinc-finger protein that interacts with silencer elements in a number of neuron-specific genes. These data suggest that negative regulation plays a major role in determining the diverse patterns of gene expression within the nervous system.

The rat growth hormone proximal silencer contains a novel DNA-binding site for multiple nuclear proteins that represses basal promoter activity

Cell-type-specific expression of the rat growth hormone (rGH) gene is determined by the interaction of both positive as well as negative regulatory proteins with cis-acting elements located upstream of the rGH mRNA start site. We have recently shown that the rat liver transcription factor NF1-L binds to the proximal rGH silencer (called silencer-1) to repress its transcriptional activity. However, this single factor proved to be insufficient by itself to confer cell-specific gene repression. We therefore attempted to identify other regulatory proteins interacting with silencer 1, which might be needed to achieve full cell-specific repression of that gene. A common recognition site for three yet uncharacterized nuclear proteins (designated as SBP1, SBP2 and SBP3) which bind a DNA sequence adjacent to the NF1-L-binding site in the rGH silencer-1 element were identified. UV crosslinking of DNA/protein complexes and nuclear protein fractionation/renaturation from SDS/polyacrylamide gels further indicated that the molecular masses for SBP1-3 are 41, 26 and 17 kDa respectively, the major species being the 26-kDa protein (SBP2) which account for 83% of the shifted SBP double-stranded oligonucleotide in gel mobility-shift assays. For this reason, most of this study focussed on the characterization of SBP2. We demonstrated that binding of NF1-L and SBP2 to their respective recognition sequence is a mutually exclusive event. Although an SBP-binding activity has been found in every non-pituitary tissue or cell line tested, no such activity could be detected in either rat pituitaries or rat pituitary GH4C1 cells. Insertion of the SBP element upstream of the basal promoter of the mouse p12 heterologous gene resulted in a consistent decrease in chloramphenicol acetyl transferase reporter gene expression following transient transfections in non-pituitary cells only, suggesting that the related SBP1-3 proteins might be involved in generally repressing gene transcription in a cell-specific manner.

A regulatory element within the uteroferrin gene 5'-flanking region binds a pregnancy-associated uterine endometrial protein

DNA-protein interactions within two putative regulatory regions distal from the transcription initiation site of the porcine uteroferrin (UF) gene were characterized. These regions, termed XB (-1,600 to -1,129 bp) and AB (-1,128 to -893 bp) exhibited transcriptional enhancer activities within the context of the heterologous SV40 promoter, that were specific to endometrial cells. DNase I and gel-shift assays demonstrated that both fragments contain a heptamer motif TGCTAGA that binds a nuclear protein present in crude and DEAE-fractionated nuclear extracts from porcine endometrium of pregnancy. This heptad sequence, designated as endometrial-associated sequence (EAS), is different from previously described nuclear protein-binding consensus sequences. Mutations in the heptamer motif abolished binding to the nuclear factor, as detected by gel-shift assays. The endometrial nuclear protein that interacts with the heptamer was characterized by Southwestern and UV cross-linking analysis. The protein has an approximate M(r) of 80 kD, is basic (pI 7.7-8.6) and is present in pig endometrium throughout pregnancy. The functional relevance of this DNA-binding protein in the control of UF gene transcription in the endometrium is discussed.

The 30-kDa rat liver transcription factor nuclear factor 1 binds the rat growth-hormone proximal silencer

Transcription of the gene encoding rat growth hormone is under the influence of cis-acting negative regulatory elements termed silencers. We showed previously that one such element, designated the rat growth hormone proximal silencer-1 site, binds a nuclear protein, the nuclear-factor-1-like protein that is probably a member of the CAAT transcription factor/nuclear-factor-1 (CTF/NF-I) family of transcription factors. This nuclear protein possesses DNA-binding activity as well as biochemical properties similar to those reported for the 30-kDa rat liver form of nuclear factor 1 (NF1-L). Results from both gel mobility supershift assays and Western-blot analyses, performed in combination with a polyclonal antibody directed against the DNA-binding domain of NF1-L, indicated that rat liver nuclear factor 1 might indeed correspond to one of the transcription factors interacting with the rat growth-hormone proximal silencer element. Further experiments using gel mobility shift assays also indicated that, as for NF1-L, multiple proteins among the 52-66-kDa CTF/NF-I isoforms from human HeLa cells also possess the ability to bind the rat growth-hormone silencer.